There are no doubt a number of variables that make the comparisons slightly uneven -- particularly the breadth of portfolios (Huawei has made a big push in the enterprise technology and mobile devices sectors in the past year) and the impact of currency exchange rates. But at a basic level, and using the U.S. dollar as the unifying global currency, the Chinese vendor is now bigger than Ericsson AB (Nasdaq: ERIC).
While, at current exchange rates, Huawei's reported revenues for the first six months of 2012 total US$16.1 billion, Ericsson's come in at $15.25 billion (106.3 billion Swedish kronor). (See Ericsson Sets Q2 Benchmark.)
Nokia Networks , with first-half revenues of $8 billion (€6.59 billion) is some way off the pace, and Alcatel-Lucent (NYSE: ALU) and ZTE Corp. (Shenzhen: 000063; Hong Kong: 0763), which haven't yet reported their second-quarter sales, will not be troubling the leading duo. (See Restructuring Costs Hit NSN's Q2.)
Table 1: Vendor Ranking by H1 2012 Revenues (in US$)
Ranking by H1 2012 revenues | Vendor | H1 revenues in US$ |
1 | Huawei | 16.1 billion |
2 | Ericsson | 15.25 billion |
3 | Alcatel-Lucent | 8.13 billion (estimate) |
4 | Nokia Siemens Networks | 8 billion |
5 | ZTE | More than 5.8 billion |
AlcaLu reported first-quarter revenues of €3.2 billion ($3.9 billion) and is expected to report sales of around €3.5 billion ($4.23 billion) for the second quarter when it reports its latest earnings on July 26. (See AlcaLu Issues Full-Year Profit Warning and Bad Start to 2012 for AlcaLu.)
ZTE stated recently that its revenues for the first six months of 2012 will be greater than the RMB 37 billion ($5.8 billion) it recorded a year ago.
— Ray Le Maistre, International Managing Editor, Light Reading
Brookseven, yeah you are right.
I would say that most chinese are too sensitive when you say any bad thing about china, or question any small details about a chinese company, they respond very aggressively. On the other hand there is a paranoia around Huawei in the USA.
One feed the other.
The only thing that really bothers me in the whole debacle about Huawei, is regarding being copycats. Huawei really has an imense R&D facility, and really develops new and innovative products. The whole Cisco x Huawei problem that happened years ago really damaged their image until today in the industry...
Speaking of optical networking (which was the primary topic in this site in the old days), I really do not see Huawei copying anybody, and more than that, always delivering really good technology.
Other than that, I do agree that normally it is difficult to believe finance reports from private companies. There were so many cases of frauds in the past that it is normal to be skeptical. Actually even in public companies there were huge frauds over the years.