& cplSiteName &

G.fast Could Use a Boost

Iain Morris

Second generation
Amendment 2 will usher in techniques such as higher bit loading and increasing the transit power to bring about further improvements. But the real prize is expected to come with Amendment 3 in 2017. Besides doubling the frequency range, from 106MHz to 212MHz, this iteration of the technology will also bolster vectoring, which cuts out crosstalk interference, and support the introduction of distribution point units featuring many more "ports" than today's models.

"At the moment we are stuck at 16-port vectoring," says Joyce. "That is fine for distribution points but with cabinets it's not really enough -- we want to be going into 48- and 96-port vectoring solutions for cabinet deployments."

The Road Ahead
Eric Joyce, a systems engineer at Adtran, thinks G.fast is set for a radical change over the next 12 months.
Eric Joyce, a systems engineer at Adtran, thinks G.fast is set for a radical change over the next 12 months.

While vendors seem confident they can support Amendment 2 using existing first-generation silicon, Amendment 3 will definitely require a new set of second-generation G.fast chips from Broadcom Corp. (Nasdaq: BRCM) and Sckipio Technologies , the market's two leading G.fast chip vendors. These second-generation chips seem likely to become available next year, but it remains unclear exactly when. "They are right around the corner in telco time," says Michael Weissman, Sckipio's vice president of marketing. "That doesn't mean next week but it doesn't mean in 2018, either."

BT will obviously be very keen to get delivery of technology based on those chips to pursue a more widespread cabinet-based deployment of G.fast technology. In the meantime, its current G.fast rollout plans, which involves connecting up to 140,000 premises by the end of March 2017, will rely on enhanced first-generation chips that support Amendment 2 of the G.fast standard, with new higher-power line drivers. For this stage of its access network upgrade, BT recently announced supplier deals with Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. and Nokia Corp. (NYSE: NOK) for G.fast equipment. (See Huawei, Nokia Land Initial G.fast Deals at BT's Openreach.)

The rollout of gigabit broadband access networks is spreading. Find out what's happening where in our dedicated Gigabit Cities content channel here on Light Reading.

Broadband equipment vendors may also be keen to weigh up the differences between Broadcom and Sckipio once second-generation chips become available. Sckipio has long been regarded as the real G.fast pioneer, but there is a perception that Broadcom has been closing that gap during the past year.

Currently, the headline difference between the two silicon vendors is that Sckipio does not support fallback to VDSL, an older copper-based broadband technology, while Broadcom does. Sckipio insists this is not an issue, and that it supports "co-existence" with VDSL, but it also acknowledges that some operators have seen the lack of VDSL fallback as a potential problem. Nevertheless, it denies this has driven BT towards Huawei and Nokia, which are using Broadcom chips, and away from Adtran, which has worked closely with Sckipio during BT trials. (Both Adtran and Sckipio are still involved in those trials, it should be noted.)

With second-generation silicon, Broadcom has a dual-chip strategy, according to Adtran's Joyce, whereby a second chip handles vectoring needs when more than 24 ports are in use. Sckipio, by contrast, does not rely on this dedicated "vectoring engine" but can instead link chips together to provide so-called "distributed vectoring." There is a possibility that Broadcom's dual-chip approach drives up space requirements and costs. Joyce reckons this is unlikely because larger "pizza box" units would, in any case, be used to support 96-port deployments. But until physical chips materialize, Adtran cannot verify any of the differences between Broadcom and Sckipio.

Next page: Regulatory and competitive heat

(3)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
User Rank: Light Beer
10/19/2016 | 5:03:14 AM
Would it be viable though
Even in South Africa Telkom is phasing out ADSL and VDSL in favour of fibre with packages up to 1Gbps. With the UK being 5 times smaller than SA, wouldn't it be more cost-effective and future-proof to lay fibre instead of doing an interim G.fast upgrade?
[email protected],
User Rank: Blogger
10/13/2016 | 12:37:25 PM
Re: What speeds?
that's a great discussion for Broadband World Forum...
User Rank: Blogger
10/13/2016 | 10:30:39 AM
What speeds?
A big question is obviously how much bandwidth G.fast will deliver in commercial settings. The 300Mbit/s figure bandied about by BT sounds terrific, and more than enough for years to come, but is it at all realistic? If the actual connection speeds are somewhat lower then G.fast starts to look far less attractive as a "future-proof" option.
Featured Video
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
September 17-19, 2019, Dallas, Texas
October 1-2, 2019, New Orleans, Louisiana
October 10, 2019, New York, New York
October 22, 2019, Los Angeles, CA
November 5, 2019, London, England
November 7, 2019, London, UK
December 3, 2019, New York, New York
December 3-5, 2019, Vienna, Austria
March 16-18, 2020, Embassy Suites, Denver, Colorado
May 18-20, 2020, Irving Convention Center, Dallas, TX
All Upcoming Live Events