Sour Grapes of Roth

Isn’t the customer always right? It appears that at least one top telecom exec has forgotten that old adage.

Last Friday, John Roth, chief executive officer for Nortel Networks Corp. (NYSE/Toronto: NT), pointed his finger directly at customers to justify why his company will report a $19.2 billion loss this quarter (see Nortel's Nuclear Winter).

Less than a week later, Joseph Nacchio, CEO and chairman of Qwest Communications International Corp. (NYSE: Q), gave the finger right back to Roth (see Qwest Gives Market a Boost).

During a conference call with analysts, Roth contended Internet traffic had fallen off considerably this quarter, into the single digits, due to Internet service providers that had gone out of business. He implied that, as a consequence, Nortel product sales declined.

“We’ve seen a reduction in traffic as a number of companies declaring chapter 11 have gone away,” said Roth. “Those loads haven’t been replaced, as people haven’t been reconnected.”

His comments set off a firestorm among carriers and prompted Nacchio to take a public stand. In a conference call on Tuesday, Nacchio blasted equipment providers for blaming their woes on a slump in Internet traffic. Though Nacchio didn’t name Roth or Nortel outright, it was clear to whom he was referring.

“I was particularly annoyed that some of the equipment manufacturers are claiming negative growth in Internet traffic,” he ranted. “I’m not sure what they’re talking about because our Internet traffic is up 46 percent quarter over quarter, and when we look at our private peering arrangements, which we have with all the other big carriers, we see their traffic is up also.”

Nacchio went on to say that Qwest has actually lit more optical capacity for revenue in the second quarter of this year than it had for the entire year in 1998, emphasizing that it only lights new fibers when traffic demands warrant it. In his statements, Nacchio urged equipment providers to look in their mirrors to find the answers to their financial woes.

“The problem the equipment folks have is an industry structural condition coupled with some economic slowdown,” he said on the call. “It is not that there are U.S. networks operating at 3 to 5 percent of capacity. So I think the utilization, the capacity question, the blunt issue is dramatically overplayed.”

Roth’s comments didn’t go over too well with analysts either, who say that Nortel has no one else to blame but itself for its failings. These analysts point to a number of issues all within Nortel’s control.

The company has tried to build out its new optical networking and wireless businesses through a series of expensive acquisitions that have cost the company about $12.3 billion in charges, according to figures presented on the conference call. The company is also still relying heavily on its legacy circuit switch business, which has seen a stark downturn over the last few quarters.

And then there is the issue of vendor financing, a practice that has also caused financial problems for Nortel’s archrival, Lucent Technologies Inc. (NYSE: LU). As competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs) have gone out of business, they’ve defaulted on payments, using Nortel’s balance sheet to sop up the mess and costing the company some $200 million in writeoffs.

“It’s classic Big Company syndrome,” says one analyst who didn’t want to be named. “They’re just looking for a scapegoat. Blame the customers -- or the customers’ customers, as the case may be. It’s a joke.”

The real issue is not that Internet traffic has declined or that there is a glut of capacity in the network. It's that carriers are being more careful with their cash and, consequently, are making more efficient use of their current gear, say analysts.

“If there’s a glut of anything, there’s a glut of dark fiber,” says Rick Schafer, an analyst with CIBC World Markets. But carriers are being more careful in how they spend the money to light that fiber, he adds. “The pendulum has shifted, and carriers are trying to reduce their upfront costs by scaling back deployments of new systems.”

Roth acknowledged this phenomenon on the call as yet another cause for Nortel’s big losses this quarter. He said that the slowing economy has forced many carriers to use existing equipment more efficiently than they have in the past. This means that they are redeploying gear in different parts of the network and reconfiguring old equipment to squeeze as much revenue out of it as possible.

“When the name of the game moves from capital investment for pursuing revenues, to one that focuses on return on capital, it’s a huge paradigm shift,” said Roth. “Unfortunately for us, our customers' engineers are getting very good at this, and they’re finding opportunities everyday for avoiding ways to spend capital.”

- Marguerite Reardon, Senior Editor, Light Reading

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
kephill 12/4/2012 | 8:11:50 PM
re: Sour Grapes of Roth It is very inaccurate and unfair to describe Roth's comments as sniveling or whining. He was merely stating a fact that internet data had declined because some ISP's had gone bankrupt. He was not blaming the customer. He was not even disagreeing with Nachio. QWest may have increasing traffic while Nortel's other customers have declining traffic. The whole tone of the article is negative. I see nothing wrong with Roth speaking out on the reasons for a business decline. This publication seems to enjoy being negative about NT and Roth.
Milano 12/4/2012 | 8:11:50 PM
re: Sour Grapes of Roth Time for John to go. The case:

1- Buying Xros for $3B;
2- Blame the Canadian media and threaten to move to the U.S.
3- Get your internet growth numbers wrong.
4- Piss your customers off.

fiber_r_us 12/4/2012 | 8:11:47 PM
re: Sour Grapes of Roth I have talked with several of the tier 1 Internet providers. None of them have reported a decrease in traffic. Most said traffic growth has been as strong as last year. Seems that the successful content providers have more than made up for the dot.com failures.
Lopez 12/4/2012 | 8:11:39 PM
re: Sour Grapes of Roth kephill,

You must be the last keeper of the faith. Roth has really shown his lack of character in these last few trying months. He has whined and complained about the media, pointed blame everywhere but himself, and utterly destroyed what used to be one of Canada's best companies and a fun place to work. And best of all, when the going gets tough, he turns tail and runs.

He deserves every bit of bad press he gets.
LightCycle 12/4/2012 | 8:11:39 PM
re: Sour Grapes of Roth Personally, I think Roth made a slight boo-boo.

Instead of saying that the _Growth_ of Internet traffic has slowed down, he said Internet traffic _itself_ has slowed down.

The other possibility ofcourse (as seemed to be implied by this article) is that Roth meant that Service Providers filing for Ch.11 have caused major _churn_ in Internet traffic and not all of them have come back online (hence the reduced traffic).

In either case, IMHO, Roth should keep his mouth shut (to the public/media) in the near term till he at least gets moral at the company back up!!
Belzebutt 12/4/2012 | 8:11:38 PM
re: Sour Grapes of Roth It's worth pointing out that Roth spoke of the carriers who are going bankrupt, not carriers like QWest. LR's tagline "isnGÇÖt the customer always right" is misleading because Roth never actually argued with Naccio, Naccio is the one who ponced on Roth. Afterwards, NT issued a "no comment".
T-bone 12/4/2012 | 8:11:38 PM
re: Sour Grapes of Roth Saying that Internet data has declined is fundamentally different than saying the *GROWTH RATE* has declined (and therefore buildouts have slowed...not stopped). We're comparing negative growth rates to positive (double-digit) growth rates.

Why care? Wall Street and VCs further sour on making service provider investments, SPs have access to even less capital to purchase equipment, and the valuation of the *entire* equipment industry gets whacked...again.

As I posted in another thread, if Roth had any credibility left with the analysts, his pre-announcement comments would have created a much larger industry correction on the market...no thanks.

Nacchio's, and all other Tier 1 CEO's, phones must have been ringing off the hook after that comment. I'm sure that comment made Scott Kriens' day too.

If he truly meant to imply negative growth rates, I'd call it sniveling and whining. Either way, he's a lousy spokesman.
braddillman 12/4/2012 | 8:11:27 PM
re: Sour Grapes of Roth "During a conference call with analysts, Roth contended Internet traffic had fallen off considerably this quarter, into the single digits, due to Internet service providers that had gone out of business."

Internet traffic has fallen to the single digits? Is that single digit subscribers, or single digit Mbs?

Wow ;-)
kcufde 12/4/2012 | 8:11:24 PM
re: Sour Grapes of Roth nortel is in single digit, and roth is mentioning that the internet is down this quarter,but if he had made right moves last year in acquiring right companies , NT would not have fallen to single digit
why is it necessary for a optical company to acquire a software company like clarify ??

comments are welcome on this,
Belzebutt 12/4/2012 | 8:11:12 PM
re: Sour Grapes of Roth "roth is mentioning that the internet is down this quarter"

If the internet is down this quarter, how are you posting messages on this web site?

It's hear-say crap like this that blew this story out of proportion, the LR article quote is also very vague. Saying "single digits" without saying what these digits refer to is like telling the temperature but not telling whether it's C or F.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Sign In