Optical Oracle: Core Incompetence?

Capital spending is down, prices for bandwidth are declining, and the telecom carriers are announcing historic losses. At the same time, 13 players have gathered in the core IP routing market for the final showdown. In the end, only two or three will be left standing.
That's the grim reality painted in the latest Optical Oracle, Light Reading’s paid research service.
This month’s edition of the Optical Oracle concludes that there isn’t enough room for all the players trying to grab market share from Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO) and Juniper Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: JNPR), the two main players in the market. According to the report, Cisco, with its current 72 percent of the market, and Juniper, which has approximately the remaining 28 percent, are probably the only two companies that will still be making competitive core routers when the meltdown is over.
The report says the other companies proposing next-generation IP core routers don’t necessarily have bad products, but the equipment is costly, and there is a good chance that the ranks will be quickly thinned -- whether it be through shutdowns or acquisitions. The vendors covered in the report, in addition to Cisco and Juniper, are:
Of course, this consolidation process has already begun. Only yesterday, Juniper announced that it will be acquiring Unisphere from its parent, Siemens AG (NYSE: SI; Frankfurt: SIE) (see Juniper Nabs Unisphere for $740M).
The main problem today is that the equipment vendors’ customers, the service providers, continue to struggle with huge debt loads, and many have already tumbled into bankruptcy (see Optical Oracle: More Carrier Cutbacks ). Another problem is that supply and demand of bandwidth are still out of balance, which has resulted in the prices for bandwidth plummeting. The main challenge is therefore to create equipment that can deliver more capacity at a lower price as well as create new revenue, the report says.
Traditionally, service providers have had to upgrade their networks with newer and better equipment every two or three years. In the current market, few want to keep up that pace of upgrades. That means cutting-edge startup equipment is not likely to be welcomed unless it introduces revolutionary cost savings. This is where major players like Cisco and Juniper have an advantage over the many startups trying to make it in this space.
Another thing that will separate the winners from the losers in this race is density, the report says, pointing out that just because a company claims to have the densest router doesn’t mean it actually does. The report, which examines the densities of the leading next-generation router products, concludes that they're not always all they're cracked up to be. In addition to density, the winning routers need to fill the provider’s requirements, fit into standard-sized racks, and meet weight and power consumption requirements. Having software stability is also a must, if the equipment vendor wants its core router to survive.
Feeding the core from the edge might actually be a safer bet than standing square in the center. Bulkey says that near-term, the edge router market is a better place to be. Building an edge router “require[s] less pure hardware muscle and more software finesse,” Bulkey writes in the report.
The report also provides analysis of public companies playing in the general IP market, including edge routing and switching players. These companies are:
— Eugénie Larson, Reporter, Light Reading
http://www.lightreading.com The current Optical Oracle, "The Core IP Report," profiles 10 public companies and seven private companies, including detailed product and financial analysis for each. For more information or to subscribe, go to www.opticaloracle.com. Editor's Note: Light Reading is not affiliated with Oracle Corporation.
That's the grim reality painted in the latest Optical Oracle, Light Reading’s paid research service.
This month’s edition of the Optical Oracle concludes that there isn’t enough room for all the players trying to grab market share from Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO) and Juniper Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: JNPR), the two main players in the market. According to the report, Cisco, with its current 72 percent of the market, and Juniper, which has approximately the remaining 28 percent, are probably the only two companies that will still be making competitive core routers when the meltdown is over.
The report says the other companies proposing next-generation IP core routers don’t necessarily have bad products, but the equipment is costly, and there is a good chance that the ranks will be quickly thinned -- whether it be through shutdowns or acquisitions. The vendors covered in the report, in addition to Cisco and Juniper, are:
- Alcatel SA (NYSE: ALA; Paris: CGEP:PA),
Avici Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: AVCI; Frankfurt: BVC7),
Caspian Networks ,
Charlotte’s Networks Ltd.,
Chiaro Networks,
Foundry Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: FDRY),
Hyperchip Inc.,
Lucent Technologies Inc. (NYSE: LU),
Marconi PLC (Nasdaq/London: MONI),
Pluris Inc., and
Procket Networks Inc.
Of course, this consolidation process has already begun. Only yesterday, Juniper announced that it will be acquiring Unisphere from its parent, Siemens AG (NYSE: SI; Frankfurt: SIE) (see Juniper Nabs Unisphere for $740M).
The main problem today is that the equipment vendors’ customers, the service providers, continue to struggle with huge debt loads, and many have already tumbled into bankruptcy (see Optical Oracle: More Carrier Cutbacks ). Another problem is that supply and demand of bandwidth are still out of balance, which has resulted in the prices for bandwidth plummeting. The main challenge is therefore to create equipment that can deliver more capacity at a lower price as well as create new revenue, the report says.
Traditionally, service providers have had to upgrade their networks with newer and better equipment every two or three years. In the current market, few want to keep up that pace of upgrades. That means cutting-edge startup equipment is not likely to be welcomed unless it introduces revolutionary cost savings. This is where major players like Cisco and Juniper have an advantage over the many startups trying to make it in this space.
Another thing that will separate the winners from the losers in this race is density, the report says, pointing out that just because a company claims to have the densest router doesn’t mean it actually does. The report, which examines the densities of the leading next-generation router products, concludes that they're not always all they're cracked up to be. In addition to density, the winning routers need to fill the provider’s requirements, fit into standard-sized racks, and meet weight and power consumption requirements. Having software stability is also a must, if the equipment vendor wants its core router to survive.
Feeding the core from the edge might actually be a safer bet than standing square in the center. Bulkey says that near-term, the edge router market is a better place to be. Building an edge router “require[s] less pure hardware muscle and more software finesse,” Bulkey writes in the report.
The report also provides analysis of public companies playing in the general IP market, including edge routing and switching players. These companies are:
- Avici Systems,
Cisco,
Extreme Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: EXTR),
Foundry,
Juniper,
Redback Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: RBAK),
Riverstone Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: RSTN), and
Unisphere Networks Inc.
— Eugénie Larson, Reporter, Light Reading
http://www.lightreading.com The current Optical Oracle, "The Core IP Report," profiles 10 public companies and seven private companies, including detailed product and financial analysis for each. For more information or to subscribe, go to www.opticaloracle.com. Editor's Note: Light Reading is not affiliated with Oracle Corporation.
EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES


FEATURED VIDEO
UPCOMING LIVE EVENTS
April 6-4, 2023, Virtual Event
April 25-27, 2023, Virtual Event
May 10, 2023, Virtual Event
May 15-17, 2023, Austin, TX
May 23, 2023, Digital Symposium
June 6-8, 2023, Digital Symposium
June 21, 2023, Digital Symposium
December 6-7, 2023, New York City
UPCOMING WEBINARS
April 4, 2023
RAN Evolution Digital Symposium - Day 1
April 6, 2023
RAN Evolution Digital Symposium - Day 2
April 12, 2023
B2B 5G: Lessons learned from Huawei’s path to monetization
April 12, 2023
Harnessing the Power of Location Data
April 19, 2023
Finding the right path to Automation
April 20, 2023
SCTE® LiveLearning for Professionals Webinar™ Series: Getting A Fix on Fixed Wireless
April 20, 2023
13 Million DDoS Attacks – What You Need to Know
April 24, 2023
APAC Digital Symposium - Day One
April 26, 2023
Developing achievable SLAs for 5G Private Networks
April 26, 2023
APAC Digital Symposium - Day Two
Webinar Archive
PARTNER PERSPECTIVES - content from our sponsors
Embrace F5.5G and stride to Green 10Gbps
By Kerry Doyle
How Carriers can Boost B2B Services Growth
By Kerry Doyle
WBBA Director General: Creating a Roadmap for Broadband Advocacy
By Pedro Pereira
All Partner Perspectives