& cplSiteName &

Nokia Nabs Amber for $421M

Light Reading
News Analysis
Light Reading
7/25/2001

Nokia Corp. (NYSE: NOK) today announced after the markets closed that it is acquiring startup Amber Networks Inc. in a stock-for-stock swap set at $421 million (see Nokia Buying Amber). The price is payable in newly issued Nokia shares and partly as Nokia stock options for all outstanding securities of Amber.

The deal looks to be a good one for Amber, especially in these challenging economic times. Startup companies face a funding crisis and are more likely to complete development with a deep-pocketed partner. According to the recent report, "Valuation Deflation," published by Light Reading's subscription research service, Optical Oracle, Amber's valuaion was pegged somewhere in the range of $300 million after its last round of funding. Research firm Venture Economics says Amber Network's recent valuation was $540 million.

Amber started off with a splash, announcing in August 2000 that it had raised $90 million in its third round of funding. Since then, it added big-name board members like Mory Ejabat, chairman and CEO of Zhone Technologies and former CEO of Ascend Communications Inc. (see Amber Suiting Up for IPO?). But times have changed and so have market conditions. In May, the company reduced its workforce by 12 percent in an effort to cut costs (see Amber Networks Cuts Staff).

"It's a very good outcome for Amber," says Peter Wagner, a partner with Accel Partners, a firm that has invested in Amber. "It's also an important step in the development of the mobile IP network."

Amber's product is unique in that it is the first fault-tolerant router that allows one routing card to take over in the event of another's failure. The company has positioned itself at the metropolitan edge -- a good place to be, considering that most carriers are cutting back spending in the core of the Internet. But Amber’s competition is tough. In the long term, the 235-person startup was looking at a battle with big companies like Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO), Juniper Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: JNPR), and Unisphere Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: UNSP) for a place in carrier networks. And despite having carriers like Williams Communications Group (NYSE: WCG) and Enron Corp. (NYSE: ENE) as investors, the company hasn’t announced one customer yet.

In a conference call with press and analysts, many of the questions for Nokia executives focused on whether the Amber product would be used to build wireless or wireline networks.

Nokia officials said the product will be used as an edge router to support the construction of all-IP networks targeting wireless applications. But Nokia officials did not rule out selling the box for more conventional wireline networks.

"The product itself is about technology and platform and a platform that can be used for both wireless and wireline applications," said J.T. Bergqvist, Senior Vice President of Nokia Networks. Bergqvist said the platform will likely require more software development for wireless applications.

Other questions focused on Nokia's partnership with Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO) to resell Cisco routers. Nokia officials said it sees Cisco as the supplier of core routing technology, while Amber will provide routing equipment for the edge of the network.

“In terms with the Cisco relationship, this doesn’t effect our relationship with Cisco at all," said Bergqvist. "We are adding to our intelligent edge routing, while Cisco will remain an important component for IP backbone routing."

A Nokia spokesman said that the size of the acquisition, and the fact that it is a pre-revenue company, means the acquisition "is likely to have an immaterial effect on earnings."

- Marguerite Reardon, Senior Editor, Light Reading
http://www.lightreading.com



Editor's Note: Light Reading is not affiliated with Oracle Corporation.

(43)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Related Stories
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 5   >   >>
optical_1
optical_1
12/4/2012 | 8:02:42 PM
re: Nokia Nabs Amber for $421M
eom
Lopez
Lopez
12/4/2012 | 8:02:41 PM
re: Nokia Nabs Amber for $421M
The article says Amber's box is an edge router. So, does it support BGP?

Maintaining all the TCP state across multiple cards would be a big challenge, but if they've done it, that's cool.



pork
pork
12/4/2012 | 8:02:40 PM
re: Nokia Nabs Amber for $421M
Yep, supports stateful BGP, as well as LDP and other TCP-based "applications". No one else supprots this today, and they really need to!
Belzebutt
Belzebutt
12/4/2012 | 8:02:38 PM
re: Nokia Nabs Amber for $421M
How is this different from Juniper supporting a backup Routing Engine and redundancy across multiple interface cards and fabric cards?
LightCycle
LightCycle
12/4/2012 | 8:02:36 PM
re: Nokia Nabs Amber for $421M
Another Ipsilon Networks in the making?
Lopez
Lopez
12/4/2012 | 8:02:35 PM
re: Nokia Nabs Amber for $421M
Yep, supports stateful BGP, as well as LDP and other TCP-based "applications". No one else supprots this today, and they really need to!

Cool... I have always thought that a router which required no central intelligence would be nice. Totally distributed. Sounds like Amber is a step in this direction.
pork
pork
12/4/2012 | 8:02:35 PM
re: Nokia Nabs Amber for $421M
Juniper's is warm standby, meaning routing sessions must be reestablished with peers (i.e., the TCP session is dropped). Amber support stateful failover (i.e., the switch is transparent to the TCP session and higher-layer application).

In short, the difference is a 10 minute typical outage of BGP with lots of convergence and oscillation issues in the network -- v. Amber's <50ms forwarding plane hit that's transperent to pretty everyone but packets unfortunately transiting the backplane at that instance.

There are a few good white papers on Amber's web site that detail this much better than I have.
LeCastor71
LeCastor71
12/4/2012 | 8:02:34 PM
re: Nokia Nabs Amber for $421M
Does anyone have a handle on what happened with the 12% they got rid of? Will they still have options of value, are they part of the success in getting the group sold or already considered yesterday's news?

p.s: loved the comment on Ipsilon!! What ever became of RFC1953 and 1954 (IFMP)?
your_mama
your_mama
12/4/2012 | 8:02:33 PM
re: Nokia Nabs Amber for $421M
IPSILON Part II...let's see if they can keep the
west-coast inductees happy.....not a great track
record there....
hitechguy
hitechguy
12/4/2012 | 8:02:31 PM
re: Nokia Nabs Amber for $421M
Disclosure: I am not an Amber employee,
investor, or potential customer.

There is a big difference between Amber and
Ipsilon. Ipsilon was a stupid idea, and that
should have been apparent to anyone who looked
at it (Ipsilon's solution scaled very poorly).

Amber's product fits into a well known and
accepted category (edge router). In addition,
Amber's claimed strengths in availability are
important to voice folks who cannot tolerate
the instability most routers are known for.

Now the Amber guys have a chance to make some
money, which will make them happy. Not the
multi-billion offers that were available
during the bubble, but good money for times
liks this.

What will keep most of them happy are four things.

1. Nokia not smothering them.
2. The ability to create interesting next-gen
products.
3. Seeing their products sell.
4. The ability to continue making some good
money.

For most engineers, it's really that simple.

hitechguy
Page 1 / 5   >   >>
Featured Video
Upcoming Live Events
March 16-18, 2020, Embassy Suites, Denver, Colorado
May 18-20, 2020, Irving Convention Center, Dallas, TX
All Upcoming Live Events
Upcoming Webinars
Webinar Archive