x
New IP

Cable Opens Up to Open Source

The cable industry relied on closed, proprietary systems for decades.

With content and the user interface experience locked up in a draconian system of conditional access technologies tied to custom hardware, the cable industry couldn't get out of its own way until the Internet forced innovation in its face.

But now things are changing. Comcast Corp. (Nasdaq: CMCSA, CMCSK) has been running its X1 video service on an OpenStack cloud for more than two years. Last year, RGB Networks, before its acquisition by Imagine Communications , open-sourced its video transcoding solution, and the company's customer base -- which migrated with it to Imagine -- included a number of major cable companies, notably Comcast. (See RGB Opens Up Transcoding Market.)

Early in September, Concurrent Computer Corp. (Nasdaq: CCUR) announced an open source content delivery network solution. Even more recently, the company open-sourced its transparent caching technology -- a way to help operators support over-the-top video delivery alongside content delivered over their own managed networks. (See Concurrent Announces Open-Source Transparent Caching Solution.)

The primary reason Concurrent decided to take the open source route? CEO Derek Elder told Light Reading it's because Tier 1 cable companies are "moving toward a really open source model." And where Tier 1 customers go, vendors are bound to follow.

"[It's] about innovation velocity, and not being locked in," Elder said, citing the reasons operators are bullish on open source. The advantages are that it crowd-sources development, brings more solution providers into the mix and can speed up product releases and improvements in an increasingly software-driven industry.

The open source approach doesn't mean vendors are giving everything away for free. Instead, it's pushing technology providers toward more of a services business model rather than a product-based one.

Concurrent, for instance, is now selling support services on top of its open source transparent caching solution. For a fee, Concurrent will not only install the solution in an operator's network, it will also manage the ongoing signature analysis necessary to make sure content is being cached efficiently. The service is something large cable companies can handle on their own, but smaller ones often don't have the resources to manage. Concurrent wants to make open source technologies accessible to those smaller operators.


For more on cable technology trends, visit the cable channel here at Light Reading.


Ericsson AB (Nasdaq: ERIC)'s Simon Frost, head of media marketing and communications, however, cautioned in another interview that open source is "not a panacea." Even where there's a desire to open source cable technology, it's not always practical.

On a similar note, nScreenMedia Chief Analyst Colin Dixon, speaking recently about Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO)'s acquisition of 1 Mainstream, explained why that startup's proprietary solution for turning video services into OTT apps isn't a negative for the industry. "There is no open standard for the delivery of apps on devices," noted Dixon. He added that "the problem is that there are just so many different platforms. Any solution that can reach many with a simple approach like this is probably going to be welcomed by most people."

In other words, a near-term solution in this case that brings control to the chaos of OTT video delivery still trumps the longer-term benefits of an open, community-driven approach.

The move toward open source is also a big cultural change for the insular cable industry. Working together doesn't come naturally, but vendors are finding ways to collaborate when pushed to do so. Witness the latest open source effort around broadband CPE. Arris Group Inc. (Nasdaq: ARRS) and Cisco, two major rivals in the cable space, have both contributed code to the RDK-B software stack and are both actively involved in bringing the open standard to market. (See RDK-B Could Revolutionize Home Network.)

It helps that Comcast has become a vocal advocate for open source technology. It also helps that there is new and significant competitive pressure from companies like Amazon.com Inc. (Nasdaq: AMZN), Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL) and Netflix Inc. (Nasdaq: NFLX).

Not everything in the cable industry will go open source, and not everything that does will transition quickly. But open source solutions are going to play a greater and greater role over the next several years… whether cable is ready or not.

— Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, Light Reading

brooks7 11/3/2015 | 12:39:06 PM
Re: Closed Cable Systems  

One of the most productive (in terms of money made over the long term) was software developed on top of MS-DOS/Windows....open interfaces to closed systems right?

seven

 
gregw33 11/3/2015 | 8:12:06 AM
Closed Cable Systems years ago, many years ago, an executive at General Instruments told me their strategy is "open interfaces to a closed system" 

Interesting concept...  hard to tell if it's apropo now or not.

Greg W.
danielcawrey 11/2/2015 | 10:25:23 PM
Re: future of TV and cable Over the long run, it simply costs less to go with open source. And the cable companies now realize that.

It doesn't make sense to tailor proprietary software as often now that there are alternatives. What's great about this is we as customers will eventually pay less as operational costs go down. 
Ariella 11/2/2015 | 12:56:29 PM
Re: future of TV and cable But exactly where does the future of TV lie? I saw today that CBS will be offering a new Star Trek show, it will only be accessible in the US on CBS All Access, the streaming video platform introduced last year for $5.99 per month.
nasimson 11/2/2015 | 11:42:24 AM
future of TV and cable It's good to see that open source is getting to less welcoming industries like cable. If the future of TV is apps, as Apple insist, then open source will take us to that future faster.
HOME
Sign In
SEARCH
CLOSE
MORE
CLOSE