& cplSiteName &

Downgrades Flow From LaFountain

Light Reading
News Analysis
Light Reading
11/16/2001

Needham & Company analyst A.A. (Tad) LaFountain III is sticking to his guns, or his price targets, as the case may be.

In two separate research notes released this morning, LaFountain downgraded Juniper Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: JNPR) to a Buy from a Strong Buy, and he downgraded Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO) to a Hold from a Buy rating.

In afternoon trading today Juniper rose 0.11 (0.44%) to 25.23. Cisco sank 0.33 (1.64%) to 19.81.

Most analysts in the industry already had Cisco rated as a Buy. By contrast, Juniper’s ratings stretch the gamut from a Strong Buy (Paul Johnson of Robertson Stephens) to a Hold (Nikos Theodosopoulos of UBS Warburg).

LaFountain says that his reason for downgrading these stocks is simple. While neither company experienced fundamental change in its business, Juniper's stock price was reaching his target too quickly, and Cisco had already surpassed his target.

"On the first day of business school, I paid attention to that whole 'buy low, sell high' thing,” LaFountain spouts.

In the case of Juniper, the stock was trading at $25.12 when the note was issued today. LaFountain has the price target set for $29 a share. But since he raised the rating on the stock on November 5, when the stock was at $19.48, the share price has increased 29 percent.

“The potential gain to our target has dropped to 14 percent, below the 20 percent necessary to justify the Strong Buy rating,” he writes in his note. “Consequently, we are downgrading our rating from Strong Buy to Buy.”

In Cisco’s case, the stock was trading at $20.14 when the note was issued, with a price target of $16. Its shares have increased from $12.04 (67 percent) since LaFountain upgraded it on September 24. He had downgraded it to a Buy on October 12, 2001, when it was trading at $16.95. In essence, it has gone up 20 percent above his target, which he says forces him to downgrade the stock.

Overall, LaFountain believes that the long-term outlook for both companies is positive, but he sees some short-term strains on Juniper. He notes the loss of marketshare that Juniper experienced this quarter to Cisco. According to a recent study published by market research firm Dell'Oro Group, Cisco increased its share to 65 percent in Q3 from 60 percent in Q2. As a result, Juniper’s marketshare dropped to 32 percent in Q3 from 35 percent in Q2. In his note, LaFountain explains that Juniper is suffering the short-term effects of a down product cycle. He says that customers looking to upgrade their networks are awaiting follow-on products to Juniper’s M40 and M160 core routers. Cisco, on the other hand, is just beginning to roll out its latest generation of GSR 12000 routers, which has put pressure on Juniper sales.

“We believe these market share trends are somewhat transient in nature,” he writes, “and do not view them as significant in terms of our long-term growth and valuation metrics.”

At midday, Juniper was up 0.17 (0.68%) to 25.29, and Cisco was down 0.25 (1.24%) to 19.89.

— Marguerite Reardon, Senior Editor, Light Reading
http://www.lightreading.com

(2)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
go_packet
go_packet
12/4/2012 | 7:33:20 PM
re: Downgrades Flow From LaFountain
Mudslinger,

You really suck because of your
- poor grasp of the technology and the market
- poor finance related knowledge
- poor logic
- poor english, both on the grammar and
spelling fronts.

go_packet

HarveyMudd
HarveyMudd
12/4/2012 | 7:33:20 PM
re: Downgrades Flow From LaFountain
Downgrading of Cisco and Juniper is quite appropriate and logical. Boith companies have been attempting to upgradfe their stocks. Juniper tried to pull a big stunt by buying a Broadband Cable company. This acquisition is not a significant action on the part of Juniper.

AS is well known that many companies in the Silicon Valley Area resort to various accounting methologies to artificiialy boost up their prices. One technique/trick that is commonly used is: not to report sales realized in the previous quarter and report in the current quarter. Using this trick can report a higher ewrning rate from the previous quarter and use this false statistics to boost up the stock prices.
Featured Video
Upcoming Live Events
October 22, 2019, Los Angeles, CA
November 5, 2019, London, England
November 7, 2019, London, UK
November 14, 2019, Maritim Hotel, Berlin
December 3-5, 2019, Vienna, Austria
December 3, 2019, New York, New York
March 16-18, 2020, Embassy Suites, Denver, Colorado
May 18-20, 2020, Irving Convention Center, Dallas, TX
All Upcoming Live Events