AT&T Maven: 'Clean Up Your Networks'

NEW YORK -- Today’s metro networks are a mess.
That was the conclusion drawn by Robert Doverspike, of AT&T Corp. (NYSE: T), in a keynote speech presented at Light Reading's "Future of Sonet" conference at the W Hotel in Manhattan today. Pointing to a network topology slide of Gordian complexity, Doverspike, who is Division Manager for AT&T's Transport Network Evolution Research Group, told the audience: "My co-workers told me that I shouldn't share this slide with a Light Reading audience, but that's the whole point: The network we have today is a mess."
The problem is caused by having too many transport elements handling TDM muxing and demuxing and inefficient TDM-channeled handoffs to packet switches and routers, Doverspike told a packed audience of nearly 200 service providers and carriers.
“That’s what's inefficient in this network,” he said. "You have to do too many up and down transports, like a roller coaster."
Doverspike pointed to new packet-aware transport networks as a possible solution. "Let’s do this once, let’s not do all up and down two, three, and four times,” he added to nods and generally appreciative murmurings from a receptive crowd.
Packet-aware transport networks will transport legacy and emerging packet services from a metro network into the core via a unified infrastructure, according to Doverspike. These networks will incorporate Ethernet switching into metro transport platforms and use so-called "pseudo-wires" to multiplex packet traffic into Sonet virtual pipes.
Doverspike said transporting packet and TDM services over this sort of converged infrastructure, so the muxing and demuxing only have to be done once, could clean up the mess. He pointed to PWE3 (pseudo-wire emulation edge-to-edge) and Gigabit Ethernet-driven MSE (multiservice edge) boxes as keys to the desired convergence.
Today, PWE3 is used to emulate Frame Relay and Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) over a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) network. Doverspike's suggestion that they be used to clean up the transport layer is new, according to Heavy Reading chief analyst Scott Clavenna, the conference moderator. “That’s the first time I heard a big carrier go out and talk about using pseudo-wire in relationship to a transport network,” he said. "Wow!"
Along with using pseudo-wires to create virtual circuits and MSEs, other packet-aware transport network technologies could include Resilient Packet Ring Technology and idle packet suppression (IPS).
Doverspike’s keynote hinted that AT&T will move to Gigabit Ethernet using RPR where possible, for price reasons. "Everybody tells us this trend [Ethernet being cheaper than Sonet] will change, but we don’t see it. As the price of Sonet comes down, the price of GigE comes down with it.”
Clavenna estimated that service providers won’t be deploying packet-aware transport networks before 2005, but Doverspike points out that they already run successfully in AT&T labs.
"The biggest problem is the lack of capital,” Doverspike said. “If we were in a growth period, people would just put this in. But the biggest driver of this is Ethernet, because of price. It’s going to start mostly with point-to-point Ethernet virtual circuits.”
— Dave Raffo, Senior Editor, Byte and Switch
That was the conclusion drawn by Robert Doverspike, of AT&T Corp. (NYSE: T), in a keynote speech presented at Light Reading's "Future of Sonet" conference at the W Hotel in Manhattan today. Pointing to a network topology slide of Gordian complexity, Doverspike, who is Division Manager for AT&T's Transport Network Evolution Research Group, told the audience: "My co-workers told me that I shouldn't share this slide with a Light Reading audience, but that's the whole point: The network we have today is a mess."
The problem is caused by having too many transport elements handling TDM muxing and demuxing and inefficient TDM-channeled handoffs to packet switches and routers, Doverspike told a packed audience of nearly 200 service providers and carriers.
“That’s what's inefficient in this network,” he said. "You have to do too many up and down transports, like a roller coaster."
Doverspike pointed to new packet-aware transport networks as a possible solution. "Let’s do this once, let’s not do all up and down two, three, and four times,” he added to nods and generally appreciative murmurings from a receptive crowd.
Packet-aware transport networks will transport legacy and emerging packet services from a metro network into the core via a unified infrastructure, according to Doverspike. These networks will incorporate Ethernet switching into metro transport platforms and use so-called "pseudo-wires" to multiplex packet traffic into Sonet virtual pipes.
Doverspike said transporting packet and TDM services over this sort of converged infrastructure, so the muxing and demuxing only have to be done once, could clean up the mess. He pointed to PWE3 (pseudo-wire emulation edge-to-edge) and Gigabit Ethernet-driven MSE (multiservice edge) boxes as keys to the desired convergence.
Today, PWE3 is used to emulate Frame Relay and Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) over a Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) network. Doverspike's suggestion that they be used to clean up the transport layer is new, according to Heavy Reading chief analyst Scott Clavenna, the conference moderator. “That’s the first time I heard a big carrier go out and talk about using pseudo-wire in relationship to a transport network,” he said. "Wow!"
Along with using pseudo-wires to create virtual circuits and MSEs, other packet-aware transport network technologies could include Resilient Packet Ring Technology and idle packet suppression (IPS).
Doverspike’s keynote hinted that AT&T will move to Gigabit Ethernet using RPR where possible, for price reasons. "Everybody tells us this trend [Ethernet being cheaper than Sonet] will change, but we don’t see it. As the price of Sonet comes down, the price of GigE comes down with it.”
Clavenna estimated that service providers won’t be deploying packet-aware transport networks before 2005, but Doverspike points out that they already run successfully in AT&T labs.
"The biggest problem is the lack of capital,” Doverspike said. “If we were in a growth period, people would just put this in. But the biggest driver of this is Ethernet, because of price. It’s going to start mostly with point-to-point Ethernet virtual circuits.”
— Dave Raffo, Senior Editor, Byte and Switch
EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES


FEATURED VIDEO
UPCOMING LIVE EVENTS
April 6-4, 2023, Virtual Event
April 25-27, 2023, Virtual Event
May 10, 2023, Virtual Event
May 15-17, 2023, Austin, TX
May 23, 2023, Digital Symposium
June 6-8, 2023, Digital Symposium
June 21, 2023, Digital Symposium
December 6-7, 2023, New York City
UPCOMING WEBINARS
March 29, 2023
Will Your Open RAN Deployment Meet User Expectations?
March 29, 2023
Are Your Cable/Fixed/FTTX Customers Impacted by Outages?
March 30, 2023
Taking the next step with Wi-Fi 6E
April 4, 2023
RAN Evolution Digital Symposium - Day 1
April 6, 2023
RAN Evolution Digital Symposium - Day 2
April 12, 2023
B2B 5G: Lessons learned from Huawei’s path to monetization
April 12, 2023
Harnessing the Power of Location Data
April 20, 2023
SCTE® LiveLearning for Professionals Webinar™ Series: Getting A Fix on Fixed Wireless
April 20, 2023
13 Million DDoS Attacks – What You Need to Know
April 24, 2023
APAC Digital Symposium - Day One
Webinar Archive
PARTNER PERSPECTIVES - content from our sponsors
Embrace F5.5G and stride to Green 10Gbps
By Kerry Doyle
How Carriers can Boost B2B Services Growth
By Kerry Doyle
WBBA Director General: Creating a Roadmap for Broadband Advocacy
By Pedro Pereira
All Partner Perspectives