In both cases, Alcatel has built Ethernet-only versions of existing multiservice edge products, with a view to bringing down the cost of using Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) to provide virtual private line and virtual private LAN Ethernet services.
The idea is that the cost reduction will encourage carriers to extend the use of MPLS-based equipment in their networks, towards customers. This is at the expense of using pure Ethernet switches, which are less expensive than MPLS-based edge devices but don't have such a strong story in terms of scaleability, resilience, and support for service-level guarantees.
Alcatel 7450 Ethernet Service Switch
This is an Ethernet-only version of the TiMetra box, the Alcatel 7750 Service Router. In other words, it uses MPLS signaling to set up Ethernet point-to-point and multipoint virtual networks, but it doesn't do any routing and thus doesn't support Layer 3 IP VPNs or IP multicasts, as the TiMetra box does. Neither does it support the delivery of Frame Relay and ATM services.
Alcatel says that for a typical Ethernet-only application, the 7450 will be "up to 30 percent" less expensive than the 7750.
Lindsay Newell, director of product marketing for Alcatel's IP division, characterizes the 7450 as a "service aggregation" box and the 7750 as a "core edge" device and says they'll often work together in the same network.

These benefits really come into play when MPLS can be extended end-to-end, and Alcatel's 7450 won't go that far in the majority of cases. So far, there are two models:
- The 7450 ESS-7, an eight-rack-unit (14-inch-high) chassis with two switch fabric slots, 10 interface half slots, and a switching capacity of up to 200 Gbit/s
- The 7450 ESS-1, a 1.5-RU (2.625-inch-high) integrated box with two interface half slots and a switching capacity of 20 Gbit/s
At least two other vendors already have Ethernet-over-MPLS products that could be used as CLE according to Geoff Bennett, chief technologist for Heavy Reading, who happens to have recently surveyed equipment in this space. They are the Cisco 3750 from Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO) and the RS1000 and RS1100 from Riverstone Networks Inc. (OTC: RSTN.PK).
Bennett points out that extending MPLS from the edge of the core to the service aggregation level, as Alcatel has done, brings some benefits anyhow, because it avoids having to backhaul packet-based traffic in order to switch it.
Until carriers can reap the benefits of end-to-end MPLS, a lot of them are probably going to stick with providing Ethernet services using next-generation Sonet/SDH, rather than MPLS, Bennett adds. "As Alcatel already has a strong position in the SDH market, its account managers will have to be careful to pitch the right strategy to the right customer."
Alcatel says TeliaSonera International Carrier (TIC), a major Scandinavian service provider, is already trialing the 7450. It's being used to offer managed Ethernet services to business users and to aggregate Ethernet traffic from DSLAM-based broadband consumer services. General availability is planned by "the end of Q3," according to Newell.
Alcatel 1662 Packet Ring Switch
This product targets non-North American markets only, as it's for carriers with SDH, as opposed to Sonet, infrastructure. It enables them to offer MPLS-based Ethernet services that run over Resilient Packet Ring Technology, which in turn runs over existing STM-4 (622 Mbit/s) rings. It also enables carriers to offer Ethernet services in areas where they don't already have SDH infrastructure.

Stefano Schiavoni, VP of product strategy for Alcatel's optical networks division, says it's the next step in the evolution from circuit to packet telecom networks. Carriers started with TDM-only add/drop multiplexers. Then they introduced platforms like the OMSN that could furnish circuit- and packet-based services. Now they want to reduce costs and complete the transition with packet-only platforms.
The 1662 is available now, and has already been deployed by some customers, according to Vinay Rathore, Alcatel's director of strategic marketing for fixed communications. It's managed by Alcatel's 1350 system, the same one used to manage OMSN products.
— Peter Heywood, Founding Editor, Light Reading
You are right if you look at RPR layer 2, but all services are Layer 3 based and they will work without force-fitting them using Layer 2 tunnels.
Besides, isn't Alcatel's strategy locking customers in their network management solution with L2 over MPLS as they did with their SDH networks?
xbar