2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends

Picking the hot technologies this year was a very different exercise than in past years. Few things actually counted as hot, and none were really new. But finding ten to talk about wasn’t so hard.

This was a year of refreshing pragmatism, so we’re looking more at important progress here, rather than newness. That said, this was also a year of coming of age. Many of the selections on our list have had a rough adolescence, starting out rosy and full of enthusiastic promise - only to be slapped down, laughed off the playground, and not allowed to join in any reindeer games. But now they’re back, well-muscled and mature.

Here's our picks:

10. Network Processors Come of Age

We had to find something positive to say about something in the components market in 2002, and this is the best we could do.

System vendors are beginning to take network processors seriously at last - partly because they actually exist now (making a nice change from the hype of a couple of years ago) and partly because OEMs are under pressure themselves to buy in components rather than developing their own.

Having said that, the future is not exactly rosy for companies in this space, because there's way too many of them - about 30, according to Linley Gwennap, president of The Linley Group, a consultancy specializing in network processors. A shakeout appears inevitable.

Notable articles on network processors this year:

  • News Analysis: Net Processors Brace for Shakeout
  • News Analysis: Net Processors Aim for Access
  • Report: Traffic Manager Chips
  • News Analysis: Intel Moves on Security
  • News Analysis: Network Processors: Easy Come, Easy Go
  • Report: Network Processors
  • News Analysis: Vitesse Drops Some Packets
  • News Analysis: EZchip Sallies Fourth
  • News Analysis: Bay Joins the Big Leagues
  • News Analysis: Power X Powers Down
  • News Analysis: Intel: The Prince of Processors?
  • News Analysis: Why Intel Loves Teja
  • News Analysis: 10-Gig Processors Shape Up

    9. Security Becomes a Hot Topic

    Between hackers and terrorists, it’s a miracle anyone turns on their computer in the morning, but we all do - typing in credit card info, logging onto corporate VPNs, and running Websites. Networks are insecure and equipment is vulnerable, so security must continually evolve with the ways in which networks are used.

    The ongoing process of migrating many network services from traditional circuit or Layer 2 networks to IP networks requires new forms of security, keeping this topic a hot one year after year. 2002 was no exception.

    This year the government got involved, putting money into network security to shore up its own defenses. Startups began repositioning around security to take advantage of the interest, and NetScreen pulled off an IPO when no one else could.

    Many large enterprises started distributing data center resources to new locations, so no one event could bring down the whole network, while carriers rolled out “managed security” services for customers unable or unwilling to trust their own.

    Notable articles on security this year:

  • Webinar: Security: Big Issues, Big Advances
  • Tests: Carrier-Class IPSec: the Bigger the Better
  • News Analysis: Report: Security Spending Soars
  • News Analysis: Vendors Add Security to MIPS Chips
  • News Analysis: VPN Security: A Soft Spot?
  • News Analysis: Optical Oracle: Firewalls of the Future
  • News Analysis: Intel Moves on Security
  • Byte and Switch: Hifn Snaps Up NetOctave
  • News Analysis: Cisco's Security on a Switch
  • News Analysis: NetScreen Acquires OneSecure
  • News Analysis: Quantum Cipher Sent by Fiber
  • News Analysis: IPolicy Chips In
  • News Analysis: Quarry, NetScreen Ace the Test
  • Byte and Switch: SNIA Tackles Security
  • News Analysis: CoSine's Fear Factor
  • News Analysis: Guarding the Gigabits
  • Byte and Switch: SAN Security: Who Needs It?
  • News Analysis: NetScreen Goes Carrier-Grade
  • News Analysis: Cisco Locks Down Security Strategy
  • News Analysis: Internet Security Scare
  • News Analysis: NetScreen's Screaming IPO

    8: Video on Demand Comes Back into Vogue

    This has been on top ten lists for a decade now, but this year we think it’s actually earned it. Video may not save the industry, but consumers appear ready pay for choices in their programming, and the technology around on-demand delivery of video has matured to the point that it doesn’t cost an armchair and a leg. Encoders have gotten cheaper and easier to use, Gigabit Ethernet has shown up as an interface on video servers, and now set-top boxes are available for under $300, making this service palatable to even the most parsimonious MSOs.

    What’s behind VOD in 2002 that wasn’t there before:

    • MSOs have significant digital subscribers in place. They added 5 million in 2002 alone, for a total of 19.5 million in the U.S. Having digital communications with the subscriber is tantamount to offering any advanced service. So, whereas in the past you had to bring a whole new infrastructure to a subscriber to offer VOD, today it’s merely an incremental step.

    • Gear is cheaper, plain and simple, and it was the cost of infrastructure that made VOD services unprofitable in the past. Not so today.

    • More variants. It’s not just movies on demand, but subscription VOD, which lets you watch past episodes of the Sopranos for a fee. Very popular, it turns out.

    • Cable Television Laboratories Inc. (CableLabs), the technical specifications arm of the industry, adopted the first set of specs for standardized VOD infrastructure in March of this year. These specs are meant to tie set-top boxes, program-guide software, and billing systems with VOD equipment, hopefully creating a plug-and-play infrastructure for MSOs wanting to offer VOD.

    So video on demand started to look real this year, and people were actually paying for it. Nearly 4 million customers have video-on-demand service available to them today, and the number is expected to increase dramatically over the next five years. And why not? People love their entertainment centers, hate late fees, and want a broader selection than is often available at video stores. If MSOs can get the pricing right and the content deals worked out with Hollywood, this could turn out to be a huge success story by 2004.

    Notable articles on VOD this year:

  • News Analysis: IP Video Uptake by 2004?
  • News Analysis: Lucent Touts Video-Over-DSL
  • News Analysis: Cable MSOs Set to Win?

    7: MPLS Gathers Momentum

    Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) had to be on this list because many of the big vendor sales centered on it, suggesting that the technology is establishing itself as a key part of carriers' core network infrastructure.

    This was also the year that the term “Martini Draft Compliant” began to really mean something. Startups like Laurel Networks Inc. made hay by producing a fully Martini-compliant box, and others are following suit. The Martini Draft outlines how Ethernet and various Layer 2 protocols can be transported over an IP/MPLS core simply and easily, making the integration of Ethernet metro networks and carrier IP core networks a reality in 2002.

    Fast Reroute also appeared this year, offering a bandwidth-protection scheme positioned as a cost-effective alternative to Sonet/SDH protection.

    Notable articles on MPLS this year:

  • News Analysis: Juniper Sells T- Router in China
  • Tests: Metro Edge Router Test
  • Tests: Multiservice Switch Test
  • News Analysis: MPLS Vendors Demo Fast Reroute
  • News Analysis: MPLS Fast Reroute Gains Momentum
  • News Analysis: Juniper's Good News Fails to Impress
  • News Analysis: Juniper/Cisco Duke It Out Over MPLS
  • News Analysis: MPLS vs ATM? Vendors Weigh In
  • Report: Virtual Private Networks
  • News Analysis: MPLS: King for a Day?
  • News Analysis: Cisco Beefs Up MPLS VPN Offering

    6: IP Reliability Becomes a Must-Have

    This was the year when router vendors launched major efforts to improve the resilience of IP networks, with the goal of attaining the magic "five 9s" (99.999 percent) availability often cited by telecom operators.

    These efforts go beyond having fault-tolerant hardware. They focus on avoiding data loss and minimizing delays when router networks reconfigure themselves around line or equipment failures, or suffer "flapping" caused by router processor problems. Terms such as "graceful restart" and "stateful failover" have become the order of the day.

    Notable articles on IP reliability this year:

  • News Analysis: Alcatel Bids for IP Core
  • News Analysis: Cisco Intros Globally Resilient IP
  • News Analysis: Alcatel Unveils New Routing Technology

    For more on IP reliability, register for Light Reading's Webinar on the topic, scheduled for January 23, 2003.

    5: GFP Packs Up Next-Generation Sonet/SDH

    Generic Framing Procedure (GFP) went from being an acronym nobody knew (save some zealots at
    Lucent Technologies Inc. [NYSE: LU] and Nortel Networks Corp. [NYSE/Toronto: NT]) to a top priority for the multiservice edge of the transport network at most ILECs.

    GFP, plain and simple, is just a very elegant way of putting Layer 2 traffic onto Sonet (Synchronous Optical NETwork) and SDH (Synchronous Digital Hierarchy) networks. It encompasses other hot developments such as virtual concatenation, which creates fine-grained connections in a Sonet/SDH network; LCAS (Link capacity adjustment scheme), which dynamically resizes those channels based on operator requests or traffic fluctuations; and RPR, which squeezes the most out of a ring-based network carrying predominantly packet traffic.

    GFP also has a bonus feature, called "transparent mode," which supports oddball protocols such as those for storage networking or data center interconnect.

    That said, GFP represents something of a missing link in the carrier’s search for the multiservice network: a universal method of framing. Whereas "God boxes" of the past simply put every type of interface possible into a metro box, then added a bunch of switch fabrics to support them, GFP packages up everything nicely and sends it on its way, with true point-and-click operation. And best of all, it’s standardized by the International Telecommunication Union, Standardization Sector (ITU-T), so carriers actually give it the time of day. GFP is hot in 2002, but look for real buildup in 2003, when boxes start shipping en masse.

    Notable articles on GFP and next-gen Sonet/SDH this year:

  • Report: Next-Gen Sonet
  • Report: Next-Gen Sonet Silicon
  • Report: Metro Multiservices Evolution
  • News Analysis: Next Gen Sonet: What About SDH?
  • News Analysis: Vitesse Joins Next-Gen Sonet Party
  • News Analysis: Comm Chips Flip Out

    4: The "Multiservice Edge" is Redefined and Reinvigorated

    The term "multiservice edge" has been around for ages, but this year it's taken on a new meaning - and new marketing momentum. The old meaning typically refers to transport equipment - notably Sonet boxes capable of handling multiple protocols. In other words, it's more multiprotocol than multiservice.

    The new meaning, where most of the activity has been this year, refers to the packet layer, not the transport layer. In this case, multiservice means what it says - multiple services over a packet-based infrastructure.

    So what counts as "new" multiservice? Well, Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) always has, so companies like WaveSmith Networks Inc. made our Light Reading's Top Ten Private Companies because they are proving the life left in ATM as a solution for carrying services like Frame Relay and IP-over-ATM.

    There’s also the next-gen BRAS (broadband remote access server), which supports multiple services over DSL or cable modems, and which was put out by the likes of Juniper Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: JNPR), Network Equipment Technologies Inc. (net.com) (NYSE: NWK), and others.

    Finally, there are a host of edge switch/router vendors that are laying the groundwork for a whole new class of multiservice MPLS systems, using well-heeled draft specs from the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) to put any number of Layer 2 services on an MPLS-based packet network.

    Multiservice will always be a hard concept to define with clarity, but what we saw happening in 2002 was a continued willingness on the operators' part to look at their legacy infrastructure (from Sonet to DSL to ATM) and figure out how to wring the most service revenue out of it. There are just too many new services out there to build a distinct network layer for each, so multiservice, even though it often gets a bruising from claiming it can be all things to all carriers, is here to stay.

    Notable articles on the "new" multiservice edge this year:

  • Tests: Metro Edge Router Test
  • Tests: Multiservice Switch Test
  • Reports: Multiservice Switches
  • Reports: Taking Routing to the Edge
  • News Analysis: Cisco, Sycamore Circling Lucent's ATM
  • Column: Multiservice Cisco
  • News Analysis: Cisco's Fine Young Cannibal
  • News Analysis: The New Legacy Network
  • News Analysis: What to Expect From 'Junisphere'
  • News Analysis: WaveSmith's Multiservice Surprise
  • News Analysis: Vivace Livens Up the Edge
  • News Analysis: AFC Goes Multiservice

    3: DSL Proliferates and Evolves

    Digital subscriber line (or DSL) technology, though seeming to slow down in the U.S. this year, is huge: a true worldwide phenomenon. Though this began well before 2002, this year is the one in which DSL reached over 30 million subscribers globally.

    Every major carrier worldwide has a DSL plan in place with ambitious goals. France Telecom recently said it would wire every town of 5,000 or more. South Korea has wired just about dwelling imaginable, and in the U.S., where ILECs whine about UNE-P (unbundled network elements platform - see RBOCs Get Long Distance Go-Ahead) and whatever else ails them, DSL continues to be a major new source of revenue, if not profit.

    The next big step for DSL is business. Already, many small businesses worldwide are using ADSL to connect to the Internet, but this year new classes of DSL technology were rolled out that promise true business-class connectivity. There is ADSL Annex J in Europe, which supports 3-Mbit/s symmetric service, G.SHDSL, which does about the same, various flavors of VDSL that offer speeds up to 50 Mbit/s depending on loop length, and a number of DSL varieties that support the bonding of multiple pairs together to create true full-rate Ethernet connections in the access network.

    This is an interesting one: Ethernet over DSL may in some cases spell the demise of DSL as a service and instead relegate it to little more than a “bit pump.” Under this model, carriers would no longer sell DSL services, but rather Ethernet access, which has much more sex appeal.

    DSL is also behind one of the other hot trends of 2002, the "Triple Play": a trifecta of voice, video, and data over a single access connection. The independent LECs in the U.S. are interested, as are a number of operators in Europe and Asia. Using VDSL, connections of 20 Mbit/s and beyond can be provisioned to a home, with ample room for three simultaneous cable TV sessions, symmetric data, and voice, all on one supercharged telephone line. The Triple Play has long been sought by telcos facing ambitious MSOs in their backyards, and already there are signs that DSL is paving the way.

    Notable articles on DSL this year:

  • News Analysis: Covad Bundles Voice and Data
  • News Analysis: DSL Passes 30M Lines Worldwide
  • News Analysis: Broadcom Chips Away at Voice
  • News Analysis: Ericsson Launches Ethernet DSL Push
  • News Analysis: 'First Mile' Ethernet Hits Snags
  • News Analysis: Spediant Spies Copper Opportunity
  • News Analysis: Report: DSL Is Profitable
  • News Analysis: Ikanos Integrates DSL Chips
  • News Analysis: Alcatel Adds to DSL Dominance
  • News Analysis: First-Mile Ethernet Camps Dig In
  • News Analysis: SBC's Beck Is Big on Broadband
  • Newswire: In-Stat: Broadband's Not Dead
  • News Analysis: FCC Focuses on DSL Classification
  • News Analysis: Access Market Sings the Blues
  • News Analysis: Optical Oracle: Access is Gold
  • News Analysis: Lucent Touts Video-Over-DSL
  • News Analysis: Ka-Ching for Catena Networks

    2: 802.11 Wireless Technology Moves to Mass Deployment

    IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN technology has been around for a while, but this was the year that everyone actually bought it. WiFi hubs are under $200 and showing up in coffee shops, hotels, airports, and lots of homes and apartments. Enterprise customers get to choose from 802.11b or the higher-speed 802.11a and have embraced it happily.

    This raises the question: Where does 3G telephony fit in a world where low-cost WiFi hotspots are popping up on every street corner? Perhaps they'll reach different markets - consumers with 3G, and business users with WiFi.

    Notable articles on 802.11 this year:

  • Unstrung: Rainbow Unveiled
  • Interview: On the Job – With Mumford & Pals
  • Unstrung: Poll: WLAN Has Limited Life
  • News Analysis: Chambers Fires Up Market
  • Reports: NGN Notes
  • Unstrung: Trio Takes WLAN to Carriers
  • Unstrung: Microsoft's Wireless Home
  • Unstrung: Intel Preps WLAN Blast
  • Unstrung: Report: Multimode –The Way to Go?
  • Column: Cutting the Cord

    1: Ethernet Gains Ground in Access Networks

    This was a big year for Ethernet standardization, and the feeling around Ethernet can’t be more enthusiastic. The inevitability of Ethernet as the universal interface to the network of the future is now etched in granite, and standards are the chisel. This year we saw standards for 10-Gigabit Ethernet ratified by the IEEE as the 802.3ae standard in June. We also saw the beginnings of 802.3af, which will define how to send power over Ethernet networks. We also saw significant progress in the 802.3ah standard, which defines various physical layers for Ethernet in the First Mile, including fiber and copper.

    We also saw the ratification of the RPR (resilient packet ring) standard (IEEE 802.17), which promises to play an important role between Ethernet access networks and Sonet/SDH core telecom infrastructure.

    Beyond the official standards, the industry moved forward with multisource agreements (MSAs) for 10-GigE transceivers – with the goal of making 10-GigE interfaces easy to create and plug into a printed circuit board. The only problem is that there are too many MSAs. The first one, XENPAK, now faces competition from XPAK and X2, and an MSA for a serial 10-GigE transceiver – XFP – is also in the works.

    The Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) did its part to help push Ethernet into the service provider network by moving sixteen technical documents to MEF Draft status or beyond in the following four areas: Services, Protocol and Transport, Management, and Architecture. This process is critical in bringing carriers to the necessary comfort level to start rolling out more advanced Ethernet–based services.

    Notable articles on Ethernet this year:

    Ethernet Standards

  • Report: Metro Ethernet
  • News Analysis: Metro Ethernet Forum Pipes Up
  • Column: Ethernet Frame Relay
  • Column: Ethernet Over Copper: Now You’re Talking
  • Newswire: IEEE Ready to Draft EFM Standard
  • News Analysis: First-Mile Ethernet Camps Dig In
  • News Analysis: 'First Mile' Ethernet Hits Snags


  • News Analysis: Who Knew? Big Carriers Like RPR
  • Report: Resilient Packet Ring Technology
  • Report: Metro Multiservices Evolution
  • Newswire: RPR Alliance Reaches Working Ballot
  • News Analysis: RPR Gurus Set Fall Deadline

    10-Gig Ethernet Transceivers

  • News Analysis The X-Wars: Agilent Strikes First
  • Market Stats: 10-Gig Transceiver Market Set to Soar
  • Report: 10-Gig Ethernet Transponders
  • News Analysis: Is Xenpak Past It?

    — Scott Clavenna, Director of Research, and Peter Heywood, Founding Editor, Light Reading
  • <<   <   Page 2 / 2
    gea 12/4/2012 | 9:06:21 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends Yo Prester John!

    Even if my "attacks" are tiring, you'll have to admit his response was hilarious, and well-worth any tedium you may have had to slog through.

    As for Booby's "nuggets of wisdom", I'd point out that my butt has nuggets of equal, if not superior quality.

    Sorry, but for the last several years I have seen Booby rip into pretty much every company, every technology, and every exec mentioned, literally accusing them all of crimes against humanity. And when you confront him on the specifics (eg, "where did you get your numbers? How can you say the technology doesn't work when it has already been deployed in x millions), he NEVER replies or supports his accusations.

    In fact, the only time I've ever seen him reply is to me, and once in a while to AAL5 (God bless his heart).

    Don't get me wrong. I believe there's TONS of corruption around and that the "fat cats" have cost the jobs and livlihood of 100s of thousands of workers. I'm mad as hell about it, too. But Booby's accusations and "whistleblowing" cloud the waters and make those of us who speak out look like idiots-by-association.

    I'm tired of Booby's hit-and-runs, and as long as he continues I will call him on his nonsense if I can think of something even reasonably amusing to say. If that tires you, hit the "ignore poster" button.
    dave77777 12/4/2012 | 9:06:14 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends Couple a DWIM interface with a 10GHZ processor (I'm assuming the MIPS scale proportionately), broadband connection, and possibly add networked computing power, and you end up with something similar to Asimov's old Multivac stories but with the capability to perform useful, labor-saving tasks as well as answer questions. For instance, you could tell it "Give the weather for the next week, tell me the capital of Austria in 1814 and the atomic weight of praesodymium, calculate the net present value of my remaining mortgage payments, order me the new Madden NFL 2007, and buy me two tickets to the latest Schwarzenegger movie at the nearest theater. Oh, and pay my telephone and electric bills tomorrow." This also follows the firmly established trend of companies making it easier and easier for consumers to spend money; if you're an exec at a retail company, you have to be drooling over the idea people could just say to their computer "Buy that for me" without having to type in CC#, address, personal data such as clothing sizes, etc. And of course that would create some more bandwidth usage as well. Probably happen in the next 5-7 years.

    Makes me think of a couple lines from the Hitchhiker's Trilogy where people are listening to a video, and one of them warns the others "Whatever you do, don't nod," because the sales technology is so advanced that's all they have to do to buy something. Douglas Adams turned out to have some correct predictions about the results of melding human nature and corporate attitudes with advanced technology.

    opticalweenie 12/4/2012 | 9:06:13 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends I am probably inviting several ranting invectives
    from the both of you, but what the hey.

    You two sound like you didn't get what you wanted
    for christmas! Stop it.

    AAL5 12/4/2012 | 9:06:11 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends
    Keep up the good work Gea, you are doing people a service by exposing Booby's true character. If people cannot see the humor in your posts I suggest they should ignore them, personally I can't wait for the next episode of 'Booby speaks'.

    How is the community college application coming along any way GǣDr GeaGǥ ? ;)


    gea 12/4/2012 | 9:06:08 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends Hey LR:

    Way too bad you removed Booby's last couple of posts. They were fever-pitched and absolutely hilarious, chock-full of nonsequiturs and half-baked insults. I really don't mind at all if you keep them up there.

    And don't forget, I had a couple of pretty classic rebuttals...calling Booby the "Thelonius Monk of Telco Nonsequiturs" is a stroke of sub-genius if I do say so myself.

    In only wonder if he had yet a couple more 'rebuttals' I missed while on the bus back home. Ah well.
    PresterJohn 12/4/2012 | 9:06:03 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends gea,

    I enjoy reading your posts very much. You always have well considered and knowledgeable responses on many subjects. I just think you drop your standards too much in your BM flames, and aside from the impersonations (great job, BTW!), they've become fairly predictable. I will continue to read your posts, and skip over the flames.

    I guess I'd have to say that I am a *partial* BM sympathizer with regard to the $6 trillion dollar (with a 't') fleecing we've gone through the past 4 or 5 years. Products that shouldn't have survived the science-project stage, commanded billions in IPOs and acquisitions from a spooked market filled with panic-investing baby boomers, and dim-witted CEOs/BODs who were terrified of being eclipsed by a "disruptive technology". VCs and their client (client hell, EMPLOYEE) CEOs knew exactly what was going down. The money they made in this environment had practically nothing to do with the innovative production of goods and services by visionary entrepreneurs in a free market economy, and everything to do with a transfer of wealth not unlike an insider bank robbery. Sorry to get started on this, I diverge...

    Besides, consider that BM/HM could, as others here have suggested, be a shill, in which case you've publicly taken the bait.

    Best Regards,

    BobbyMax 12/4/2012 | 9:06:00 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends Dear "Dr."Gea:

    You have launched deliberate hate campaigns aginst me. I kept quiet in the hope that you will mend ways and become civilized member of Light Reading. If you have not received a claim to fame, I have nothing to do with this. You and "Dr." AAL5 launched a vigrous hate campign agaist me. All of a sudden you became a cat from a mouse. You have used uncivic language in your postings to continue your hate campaigns. I have no time to become a tutor. You and brother-in-law "Dr.AAL5" working in concert with each other launched a vigorous hateful campaign against me.

    The posts that Light Reading removed simply shows your disgrunled behavior. These posts should not have been removed as they show how hollow you are. The english speaking countries form less than 15% of the poulation (probably less).

    Since you appear not to be familiar with very important and everlasting contributions by our scientists like Professor John von Neuman and Albert Einstein whose native tounge was not English. "Dr." Gea if you happen to visit Princeton University, you can look at some ofthe unpublished work of Einstein and you will see the flavor of the English language. The contributions of Russian scientists in all areas of basic sciences is as pround as ours and in many cases it exceeds. Our country does not even come close to making the same level of contributions.
    netskeptic 12/4/2012 | 9:05:59 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends > I guess I'd have to say that I am a *partial*
    > BM sympathizer with regard to the $6 trillion
    > dollar (with a 't') fleecing we've gone through
    > the past 4 or 5 years. Products that shouldn't
    > have survived the science-project stage,
    > commanded billions in IPOs and acquisitions
    > from a spooked market filled with panic-
    > investing baby boomers, and dim-witted
    > CEOs/BODs who were terrified of being eclipsed
    > by a "disruptive technology". VCs and their
    > client (client hell, EMPLOYEE) CEOs knew
    > exactly what was going down. The money they
    > made in this environment had practically
    > nothing to do with the innovative production of
    > goods and services by visionary entrepreneurs
    > in a free market economy, and everything to do
    > with a transfer of wealth not unlike an insider
    > bank robbery.

    It was all Bush's fault.


    gea 12/4/2012 | 9:05:57 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends "Since you appear not to be familiar with very important and everlasting contributions by our scientists like Professor John von Neuman and Albert Einstein whose native tounge was not English. "Dr." Gea if you happen to visit Princeton University, you can look at some ofthe unpublished work of Einstein and you will see the flavor of the English language. The contributions of Russian scientists in all areas of basic sciences is as pround as ours and in many cases it exceeds. Our country does not even come close to making the same level of contributions."

    Uh...earth to Booby! Earth to Booby! What does this have to do with anything I posted?

    Oh yes, perhaps the comment was that I felt your problems communicating had little to do with your poor english, and more to do with that mass of putty between your ears euphemistically called your "brain".

    As for the previous posts, I would now formally like to request that Lightreading re-post both yours and mine. After you take your meds, you might want to re-read your hysterical ramblings, and my reasoned (and humorous!) Aikido-like retorts.

    All I can do is quote 'Dr Wu' by Steely Dan:

    "Can you hear me, Dr Wu?
    Are you really just a shadow of the man that I once knew?
    Are you crazy, are you high?
    Or just an ordinary guy?
    Have you done all you can do?
    Can you hear me, Doctor?"
    <<   <   Page 2 / 2
    Sign In