& cplSiteName &

2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends

Light Reading
News Analysis
Light Reading
12/27/2002

Picking the hot technologies this year was a very different exercise than in past years. Few things actually counted as hot, and none were really new. But finding ten to talk about wasn’t so hard.

This was a year of refreshing pragmatism, so we’re looking more at important progress here, rather than newness. That said, this was also a year of coming of age. Many of the selections on our list have had a rough adolescence, starting out rosy and full of enthusiastic promise - only to be slapped down, laughed off the playground, and not allowed to join in any reindeer games. But now they’re back, well-muscled and mature.

Here's our picks:

10. Network Processors Come of Age

We had to find something positive to say about something in the components market in 2002, and this is the best we could do.

System vendors are beginning to take network processors seriously at last - partly because they actually exist now (making a nice change from the hype of a couple of years ago) and partly because OEMs are under pressure themselves to buy in components rather than developing their own.

Having said that, the future is not exactly rosy for companies in this space, because there's way too many of them - about 30, according to Linley Gwennap, president of The Linley Group, a consultancy specializing in network processors. A shakeout appears inevitable.

Notable articles on network processors this year:

  • News Analysis: Net Processors Brace for Shakeout
  • News Analysis: Net Processors Aim for Access
  • Report: Traffic Manager Chips
  • News Analysis: Intel Moves on Security
  • News Analysis: Network Processors: Easy Come, Easy Go
  • Report: Network Processors
  • News Analysis: Vitesse Drops Some Packets
  • News Analysis: EZchip Sallies Fourth
  • News Analysis: Bay Joins the Big Leagues
  • News Analysis: Power X Powers Down
  • News Analysis: Intel: The Prince of Processors?
  • News Analysis: Why Intel Loves Teja
  • News Analysis: 10-Gig Processors Shape Up

    9. Security Becomes a Hot Topic

    Between hackers and terrorists, it’s a miracle anyone turns on their computer in the morning, but we all do - typing in credit card info, logging onto corporate VPNs, and running Websites. Networks are insecure and equipment is vulnerable, so security must continually evolve with the ways in which networks are used.

    The ongoing process of migrating many network services from traditional circuit or Layer 2 networks to IP networks requires new forms of security, keeping this topic a hot one year after year. 2002 was no exception.

    This year the government got involved, putting money into network security to shore up its own defenses. Startups began repositioning around security to take advantage of the interest, and NetScreen pulled off an IPO when no one else could.

    Many large enterprises started distributing data center resources to new locations, so no one event could bring down the whole network, while carriers rolled out “managed security” services for customers unable or unwilling to trust their own.

    Notable articles on security this year:

  • Webinar: Security: Big Issues, Big Advances
  • Tests: Carrier-Class IPSec: the Bigger the Better
  • News Analysis: Report: Security Spending Soars
  • News Analysis: Vendors Add Security to MIPS Chips
  • News Analysis: VPN Security: A Soft Spot?
  • News Analysis: Optical Oracle: Firewalls of the Future
  • News Analysis: Intel Moves on Security
  • Byte and Switch: Hifn Snaps Up NetOctave
  • News Analysis: Cisco's Security on a Switch
  • News Analysis: NetScreen Acquires OneSecure
  • News Analysis: Quantum Cipher Sent by Fiber
  • News Analysis: IPolicy Chips In
  • News Analysis: Quarry, NetScreen Ace the Test
  • Byte and Switch: SNIA Tackles Security
  • News Analysis: CoSine's Fear Factor
  • News Analysis: Guarding the Gigabits
  • Byte and Switch: SAN Security: Who Needs It?
  • News Analysis: NetScreen Goes Carrier-Grade
  • News Analysis: Cisco Locks Down Security Strategy
  • News Analysis: Internet Security Scare
  • News Analysis: NetScreen's Screaming IPO

    8: Video on Demand Comes Back into Vogue

    This has been on top ten lists for a decade now, but this year we think it’s actually earned it. Video may not save the industry, but consumers appear ready pay for choices in their programming, and the technology around on-demand delivery of video has matured to the point that it doesn’t cost an armchair and a leg. Encoders have gotten cheaper and easier to use, Gigabit Ethernet has shown up as an interface on video servers, and now set-top boxes are available for under $300, making this service palatable to even the most parsimonious MSOs.

    What’s behind VOD in 2002 that wasn’t there before:

    • MSOs have significant digital subscribers in place. They added 5 million in 2002 alone, for a total of 19.5 million in the U.S. Having digital communications with the subscriber is tantamount to offering any advanced service. So, whereas in the past you had to bring a whole new infrastructure to a subscriber to offer VOD, today it’s merely an incremental step.

    • Gear is cheaper, plain and simple, and it was the cost of infrastructure that made VOD services unprofitable in the past. Not so today.

    • More variants. It’s not just movies on demand, but subscription VOD, which lets you watch past episodes of the Sopranos for a fee. Very popular, it turns out.

    • Cable Television Laboratories Inc. (CableLabs), the technical specifications arm of the industry, adopted the first set of specs for standardized VOD infrastructure in March of this year. These specs are meant to tie set-top boxes, program-guide software, and billing systems with VOD equipment, hopefully creating a plug-and-play infrastructure for MSOs wanting to offer VOD.

    So video on demand started to look real this year, and people were actually paying for it. Nearly 4 million customers have video-on-demand service available to them today, and the number is expected to increase dramatically over the next five years. And why not? People love their entertainment centers, hate late fees, and want a broader selection than is often available at video stores. If MSOs can get the pricing right and the content deals worked out with Hollywood, this could turn out to be a huge success story by 2004.

    Notable articles on VOD this year:

  • News Analysis: IP Video Uptake by 2004?
  • News Analysis: Lucent Touts Video-Over-DSL
  • News Analysis: Cable MSOs Set to Win?

    7: MPLS Gathers Momentum

    Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) had to be on this list because many of the big vendor sales centered on it, suggesting that the technology is establishing itself as a key part of carriers' core network infrastructure.

    This was also the year that the term “Martini Draft Compliant” began to really mean something. Startups like Laurel Networks Inc. made hay by producing a fully Martini-compliant box, and others are following suit. The Martini Draft outlines how Ethernet and various Layer 2 protocols can be transported over an IP/MPLS core simply and easily, making the integration of Ethernet metro networks and carrier IP core networks a reality in 2002.

    Fast Reroute also appeared this year, offering a bandwidth-protection scheme positioned as a cost-effective alternative to Sonet/SDH protection.

    Notable articles on MPLS this year:

  • News Analysis: Juniper Sells T- Router in China
  • Tests: Metro Edge Router Test
  • Tests: Multiservice Switch Test
  • News Analysis: MPLS Vendors Demo Fast Reroute
  • News Analysis: MPLS Fast Reroute Gains Momentum
  • News Analysis: Juniper's Good News Fails to Impress
  • News Analysis: Juniper/Cisco Duke It Out Over MPLS
  • News Analysis: MPLS vs ATM? Vendors Weigh In
  • Report: Virtual Private Networks
  • News Analysis: MPLS: King for a Day?
  • News Analysis: Cisco Beefs Up MPLS VPN Offering

    6: IP Reliability Becomes a Must-Have

    This was the year when router vendors launched major efforts to improve the resilience of IP networks, with the goal of attaining the magic "five 9s" (99.999 percent) availability often cited by telecom operators.

    These efforts go beyond having fault-tolerant hardware. They focus on avoiding data loss and minimizing delays when router networks reconfigure themselves around line or equipment failures, or suffer "flapping" caused by router processor problems. Terms such as "graceful restart" and "stateful failover" have become the order of the day.

    Notable articles on IP reliability this year:

  • News Analysis: Alcatel Bids for IP Core
  • News Analysis: Cisco Intros Globally Resilient IP
  • News Analysis: Alcatel Unveils New Routing Technology

    For more on IP reliability, register for Light Reading's Webinar on the topic, scheduled for January 23, 2003.

    5: GFP Packs Up Next-Generation Sonet/SDH

    Generic Framing Procedure (GFP) went from being an acronym nobody knew (save some zealots at
    Lucent Technologies Inc. [NYSE: LU] and Nortel Networks Corp. [NYSE/Toronto: NT]) to a top priority for the multiservice edge of the transport network at most ILECs.

    GFP, plain and simple, is just a very elegant way of putting Layer 2 traffic onto Sonet (Synchronous Optical NETwork) and SDH (Synchronous Digital Hierarchy) networks. It encompasses other hot developments such as virtual concatenation, which creates fine-grained connections in a Sonet/SDH network; LCAS (Link capacity adjustment scheme), which dynamically resizes those channels based on operator requests or traffic fluctuations; and RPR, which squeezes the most out of a ring-based network carrying predominantly packet traffic.

    GFP also has a bonus feature, called "transparent mode," which supports oddball protocols such as those for storage networking or data center interconnect.

    That said, GFP represents something of a missing link in the carrier’s search for the multiservice network: a universal method of framing. Whereas "God boxes" of the past simply put every type of interface possible into a metro box, then added a bunch of switch fabrics to support them, GFP packages up everything nicely and sends it on its way, with true point-and-click operation. And best of all, it’s standardized by the International Telecommunication Union, Standardization Sector (ITU-T), so carriers actually give it the time of day. GFP is hot in 2002, but look for real buildup in 2003, when boxes start shipping en masse.

    Notable articles on GFP and next-gen Sonet/SDH this year:

  • Report: Next-Gen Sonet
  • Report: Next-Gen Sonet Silicon
  • Report: Metro Multiservices Evolution
  • News Analysis: Next Gen Sonet: What About SDH?
  • News Analysis: Vitesse Joins Next-Gen Sonet Party
  • News Analysis: Comm Chips Flip Out

    4: The "Multiservice Edge" is Redefined and Reinvigorated

    The term "multiservice edge" has been around for ages, but this year it's taken on a new meaning - and new marketing momentum. The old meaning typically refers to transport equipment - notably Sonet boxes capable of handling multiple protocols. In other words, it's more multiprotocol than multiservice.

    The new meaning, where most of the activity has been this year, refers to the packet layer, not the transport layer. In this case, multiservice means what it says - multiple services over a packet-based infrastructure.

    So what counts as "new" multiservice? Well, Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) always has, so companies like WaveSmith Networks Inc. made our Light Reading's Top Ten Private Companies because they are proving the life left in ATM as a solution for carrying services like Frame Relay and IP-over-ATM.

    There’s also the next-gen BRAS (broadband remote access server), which supports multiple services over DSL or cable modems, and which was put out by the likes of Juniper Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: JNPR), Network Equipment Technologies Inc. (net.com) (NYSE: NWK), and others.

    Finally, there are a host of edge switch/router vendors that are laying the groundwork for a whole new class of multiservice MPLS systems, using well-heeled draft specs from the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) to put any number of Layer 2 services on an MPLS-based packet network.

    Multiservice will always be a hard concept to define with clarity, but what we saw happening in 2002 was a continued willingness on the operators' part to look at their legacy infrastructure (from Sonet to DSL to ATM) and figure out how to wring the most service revenue out of it. There are just too many new services out there to build a distinct network layer for each, so multiservice, even though it often gets a bruising from claiming it can be all things to all carriers, is here to stay.

    Notable articles on the "new" multiservice edge this year:

  • Tests: Metro Edge Router Test
  • Tests: Multiservice Switch Test
  • Reports: Multiservice Switches
  • Reports: Taking Routing to the Edge
  • News Analysis: Cisco, Sycamore Circling Lucent's ATM
  • Column: Multiservice Cisco
  • News Analysis: Cisco's Fine Young Cannibal
  • News Analysis: The New Legacy Network
  • News Analysis: What to Expect From 'Junisphere'
  • News Analysis: WaveSmith's Multiservice Surprise
  • News Analysis: Vivace Livens Up the Edge
  • News Analysis: AFC Goes Multiservice

    3: DSL Proliferates and Evolves

    Digital subscriber line (or DSL) technology, though seeming to slow down in the U.S. this year, is huge: a true worldwide phenomenon. Though this began well before 2002, this year is the one in which DSL reached over 30 million subscribers globally.

    Every major carrier worldwide has a DSL plan in place with ambitious goals. France Telecom recently said it would wire every town of 5,000 or more. South Korea has wired just about dwelling imaginable, and in the U.S., where ILECs whine about UNE-P (unbundled network elements platform - see RBOCs Get Long Distance Go-Ahead) and whatever else ails them, DSL continues to be a major new source of revenue, if not profit.

    The next big step for DSL is business. Already, many small businesses worldwide are using ADSL to connect to the Internet, but this year new classes of DSL technology were rolled out that promise true business-class connectivity. There is ADSL Annex J in Europe, which supports 3-Mbit/s symmetric service, G.SHDSL, which does about the same, various flavors of VDSL that offer speeds up to 50 Mbit/s depending on loop length, and a number of DSL varieties that support the bonding of multiple pairs together to create true full-rate Ethernet connections in the access network.

    This is an interesting one: Ethernet over DSL may in some cases spell the demise of DSL as a service and instead relegate it to little more than a “bit pump.” Under this model, carriers would no longer sell DSL services, but rather Ethernet access, which has much more sex appeal.

    DSL is also behind one of the other hot trends of 2002, the "Triple Play": a trifecta of voice, video, and data over a single access connection. The independent LECs in the U.S. are interested, as are a number of operators in Europe and Asia. Using VDSL, connections of 20 Mbit/s and beyond can be provisioned to a home, with ample room for three simultaneous cable TV sessions, symmetric data, and voice, all on one supercharged telephone line. The Triple Play has long been sought by telcos facing ambitious MSOs in their backyards, and already there are signs that DSL is paving the way.

    Notable articles on DSL this year:

  • News Analysis: Covad Bundles Voice and Data
  • News Analysis: DSL Passes 30M Lines Worldwide
  • News Analysis: Broadcom Chips Away at Voice
  • News Analysis: Ericsson Launches Ethernet DSL Push
  • News Analysis: 'First Mile' Ethernet Hits Snags
  • News Analysis: Spediant Spies Copper Opportunity
  • News Analysis: Report: DSL Is Profitable
  • News Analysis: Ikanos Integrates DSL Chips
  • News Analysis: Alcatel Adds to DSL Dominance
  • News Analysis: First-Mile Ethernet Camps Dig In
  • News Analysis: SBC's Beck Is Big on Broadband
  • Newswire: In-Stat: Broadband's Not Dead
  • News Analysis: FCC Focuses on DSL Classification
  • News Analysis: Access Market Sings the Blues
  • News Analysis: Optical Oracle: Access is Gold
  • News Analysis: Lucent Touts Video-Over-DSL
  • News Analysis: Ka-Ching for Catena Networks

    2: 802.11 Wireless Technology Moves to Mass Deployment

    IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN technology has been around for a while, but this was the year that everyone actually bought it. WiFi hubs are under $200 and showing up in coffee shops, hotels, airports, and lots of homes and apartments. Enterprise customers get to choose from 802.11b or the higher-speed 802.11a and have embraced it happily.

    This raises the question: Where does 3G telephony fit in a world where low-cost WiFi hotspots are popping up on every street corner? Perhaps they'll reach different markets - consumers with 3G, and business users with WiFi.

    Notable articles on 802.11 this year:

  • Unstrung: Rainbow Unveiled
  • Interview: On the Job – With Mumford & Pals
  • Unstrung: Poll: WLAN Has Limited Life
  • News Analysis: Chambers Fires Up Market
  • Reports: NGN Notes
  • Unstrung: Trio Takes WLAN to Carriers
  • Unstrung: Microsoft's Wireless Home
  • Unstrung: Intel Preps WLAN Blast
  • Unstrung: Report: Multimode –The Way to Go?
  • Column: Cutting the Cord

    1: Ethernet Gains Ground in Access Networks

    This was a big year for Ethernet standardization, and the feeling around Ethernet can’t be more enthusiastic. The inevitability of Ethernet as the universal interface to the network of the future is now etched in granite, and standards are the chisel. This year we saw standards for 10-Gigabit Ethernet ratified by the IEEE as the 802.3ae standard in June. We also saw the beginnings of 802.3af, which will define how to send power over Ethernet networks. We also saw significant progress in the 802.3ah standard, which defines various physical layers for Ethernet in the First Mile, including fiber and copper.

    We also saw the ratification of the RPR (resilient packet ring) standard (IEEE 802.17), which promises to play an important role between Ethernet access networks and Sonet/SDH core telecom infrastructure.

    Beyond the official standards, the industry moved forward with multisource agreements (MSAs) for 10-GigE transceivers – with the goal of making 10-GigE interfaces easy to create and plug into a printed circuit board. The only problem is that there are too many MSAs. The first one, XENPAK, now faces competition from XPAK and X2, and an MSA for a serial 10-GigE transceiver – XFP – is also in the works.

    The Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) did its part to help push Ethernet into the service provider network by moving sixteen technical documents to MEF Draft status or beyond in the following four areas: Services, Protocol and Transport, Management, and Architecture. This process is critical in bringing carriers to the necessary comfort level to start rolling out more advanced Ethernet–based services.

    Notable articles on Ethernet this year:

    Ethernet Standards

  • Report: Metro Ethernet
  • News Analysis: Metro Ethernet Forum Pipes Up
  • Column: Ethernet Frame Relay
  • Column: Ethernet Over Copper: Now You’re Talking
  • Newswire: IEEE Ready to Draft EFM Standard
  • News Analysis: First-Mile Ethernet Camps Dig In
  • News Analysis: 'First Mile' Ethernet Hits Snags

    RPR

  • News Analysis: Who Knew? Big Carriers Like RPR
  • Report: Resilient Packet Ring Technology
  • Report: Metro Multiservices Evolution
  • Newswire: RPR Alliance Reaches Working Ballot
  • News Analysis: RPR Gurus Set Fall Deadline

    10-Gig Ethernet Transceivers

  • News Analysis The X-Wars: Agilent Strikes First
  • Market Stats: 10-Gig Transceiver Market Set to Soar
  • Report: 10-Gig Ethernet Transponders
  • News Analysis: Is Xenpak Past It?

    — Scott Clavenna, Director of Research, and Peter Heywood, Founding Editor, Light Reading
    (19)  | 
    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
  • Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
    Page 1 / 2   >   >>
    bsd_devil
    bsd_devil
    12/4/2012 | 9:06:58 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends
    For the past some time LR has been publishing articles which are making it worth taking seriously. This article is a good example of LR's attempts at shedding it tabloid-ness.

    I like the analysis, but I seriously doubt any carrier would spend even a penny to buy any equipment from any vendor. Sorry for being so dark the reality of the situtation is that the carriers are in such bad situation that they are paying to maintain customers. We haven't hit the bottom yet! The web is almost but dead. Companies are not necessarily doing business on the web. People are making more phone calls than sending emails.

    Yes, in our geeky worlds, no one makes a phone call. People send instant video messages to each other wirelessly. The reality is that this is in our geeky worlds. And these geeky worlds do not exist. What exists is common folks who still find the computer intimidating. What exists is common folks who are sick and tired of promises of high speed connections that were never delivered. What exists are companies that were told that the web would fundamentally transform business as we know it. These companies invested millions because the freaks (who were geeks) cajoled and coaxed these companies into believing them but these freaks never delivered. These companies have no reason to believe that this technology can revolutionize business.

    Today the web has no content. There's nothing worth reading on the web. The only thing most people use the web are to get directions, and (1 in million) to pay bills. People have gone back to their TV sets for news and entertainment. Students have gone back to their books and CDs for learning . Our geeky irrational exuberance has brought our false worlds on the brink of extinction. And if these false worlds woulndn't exist, people would not even venture close to these fallen worlds. ANd then the carriers would not even invest in new technologies. So why waste your time, effort and money into developing solutions for problems that don't exist.

    MPLS, martini-draft-compliance, GFP, DSL! These technologies are not deployed and they are inherently so henious that they cannot be deployed. You cannot get dsl if you (practically) don't live within the CO! GFP is a great concept, but frankly, who would consider over-hauling his network right now when there is no reason to do so? And MPLS! Lets not even get there!

    Overall, a real nice article. But, just shows off how we waste our time inventing solutions for problems that don't exist. And then we hope somebody would accept our solution so that it would create a new problem that we can solve and introduce a new problem and ...

    Lets break this vicious cycle.
    BobbyMax
    BobbyMax
    12/4/2012 | 9:06:47 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends
    In the last 10-12 years, we mostly have seen rtehash of old ideas. For example, most of the concepts pertaining to the router technology have essentially come from the PSTN. On the positive side. I think that VPN and DSL technologies have brought real benefit to the world. Another emerging technology that may some beneficial impact is broadband wireless.
    gea
    gea
    12/4/2012 | 9:06:46 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends
    LR "villiage idiot" Booby Max wrote...

    "In the last 10-12 years, we mostly have seen rtehash of old ideas."

    Yes, Internet and world wide web have been around for centuries. Only corrupt VCs and others were able to fool everyone on earth into believing it was new technology.

    Likewise, DWDM, BGP4,OC-48 and OC-192 have also been around for at least 150 years, but still many companies would be working on these technologies even though there would be no need for them ever.

    Even now there are over 5,000 companies building core routers even though packet technologie and routers have been proven not to work.

    willywilson
    willywilson
    12/4/2012 | 9:06:46 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends
    Another emerging technology that may some beneficial impact is broadband wireless.

    -------

    If it ever works, that is.
    gea
    gea
    12/4/2012 | 9:06:44 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends
    Whoever wrote this post seems to know absolutely nothing about the current state of affairs in commercial telecom. Let's start with...


    "The web is almost but dead. Companies are not necessarily doing business on the web. People are making more phone calls than sending emails."

    Are you on the pipe? Data passed voice as the number one form of traffic a couple of years ago, and that trend will continue. "The web is almost dead?" That's just about the stupident thing I've seen posted on these boards, and that includes posting by Booby Max.


    "What exists are companies that were told that the web would fundamentally transform business as we know it. These companies invested millions because the freaks (who were geeks) cajoled and coaxed these companies into believing them but these freaks never delivered. These companies have no reason to believe that this technology can revolutionize business."

    Again I suspect you are either 1)living in the old Unabomber's shack, or 2) smoking crack, or 3) live in Afghanistan. The web is slowly and surely radically changing how businesses do business. Hell it already has changed it. There's just little hype associated with the fact because its Microsoft and Cisco who are making all the money assoicated with this change.


    "Today the web has no content."

    Aside from Porno (which for some is that ONLY content they're interested in, and a multi-billion-$$$ industry on line), have you ever heard of P2P, such as Gnutella, Kazaa, or the now-defunct napster? Log on to Kazaa and see how many users are on line at the same time. It will be millions or tens of millions.

    "There's nothing worth reading on the web. The only thing most people use the web are to get directions, and (1 in million) to pay bills. People have gone back to their TV sets for news and entertainment. Students have gone back to their books and CDs for learning ."

    All wrong. GO look at the statistics. People have been leaving their TVs in droves and not coming back. Back to their CDs? Again you must have been stranded on a desert Island somewhere the last few years. Do you even know what iPOD is? Ever heard of an 'mp3'? Do you know where they are geting these from? And you think the trend is AWAY from mp3 downloads TO CD? Are you on the pipe?



    "Our geeky irrational exuberance has brought our false worlds on the brink of extinction. And if these false worlds woulndn't exist, people would not even venture close to these fallen worlds."

    Incomprehensible gibberish. Are you Booby Max's son or something?


    "MPLS, martini-draft-compliance, GFP, DSL! These technologies are not deployed and they are inherently so henious that they cannot be deployed."

    The fact that you say DSL is not and can not be deployed proves you know absolutely nothing about telecom. DSL has been rolled out by the millions over the last year, and it works just fine (as long as your copper is even half-way decent).

    "GFP is a great concept, but frankly, who would consider over-hauling his network right now when there is no reason to do so?"

    Needless to say, you misunderstand. GFP is a generic framing procedure that takes the place of PPP-mapped HDLC (as used, for instance, in Packet over SONET). It will work just fine over SONET, so no "overhaul" of any networks will be needed. New access gear that utilize GFP will be completely interoperable with legacy SONET networks. Hell, even with virtual concatenation and LCAS at the edges, the edge gear will STILL be completely interoperable with legacy SONET networks.

    All in all, you seemed to know so little about telecom that I wonder why you bothered posting.


    road__runner
    road__runner
    12/4/2012 | 9:06:31 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends
    gea

    Your posts are usually knowledgeable and it
    bothers me to see you spending what must be
    valuable time on responding to BobbyMax posts.

    "BobbyMax" is no real person but just
    one or more of the LR staff playing games.

    RR
    Tim Ber
    Tim Ber
    12/4/2012 | 9:06:30 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends
    WOW!

    Hey Gea. You must have hit a nerve.
    hey_tedd
    hey_tedd
    12/4/2012 | 9:06:25 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends
    Thanks for your reply. I think the guy is just mad because he lost his money in the crash. You have to learn and keep going!

    Maybe the next big thing is a PDA/Virtual Game boy/4D Web browser/multilingual personal communicator/personal healing machine/and a very intelligent organize your life bot all rolled into one. It will bring everyone closer and provide Internet security all in one small box, it will also read books and write books as well, but it will require huge amounts of bandwidth! So new networks will have to be built that provide huge amounts of bandwidth for this new device, both fiber networks and wireless, and very secure! With intelligence in the network to get the mean young and old hackers out!
    PresterJohn
    PresterJohn
    12/4/2012 | 9:06:22 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends
    gea,

    I think that I speak for a number of readers when I say that your knee jerk, ad hominum attacks on Bobby Max and his postings, as bad as you think they might be, are tiresome.

    Have you nothing better to do than to search for his posts and flame him? Reading between the careless spelling and frequent grammar mistakes, there is often a nugget or two of wisdom. Give him a break!

    PJ

    PresterJohn
    PresterJohn
    12/4/2012 | 9:06:22 PM
    re: 2002 Top Ten: Technology Trends
    gea,

    I think that I speak for a number of readers when I say that your knee jerk, ad hominum attacks on Bobby Max and his postings, as bad as you think they might be, are tiresome.

    Have you nothing better to do than to seach for his posts and flame him? Reading between the careless spelling and freq

    Page 1 / 2   >   >>
    Featured Video
    Upcoming Live Events
    October 22, 2019, Los Angeles, CA
    November 5, 2019, London, England
    November 7, 2019, London, UK
    November 14, 2019, Maritim Hotel, Berlin
    December 3-5, 2019, Vienna, Austria
    December 3, 2019, New York, New York
    March 16-18, 2020, Embassy Suites, Denver, Colorado
    May 18-20, 2020, Irving Convention Center, Dallas, TX
    All Upcoming Live Events