Cloud Native/NFV

SlideshowHPE Blasting Spaceborne Supercomputer Into Space

SpaceX Dragon
(Source: SpaceX)
SpaceX Dragon
(Source: SpaceX)

kq4ym 8/26/2017 | 12:12:59 PM
Re: time I had not given thought to how computing was handled at the ISS. It does make lots of sense though that a long term Mars mission will be much more efficient if there's an onboard computing system. I would have thought though that someone must have thought about testing super computing on space craft before now. Would this be the first test ever?
Ariella 8/16/2017 | 8:53:58 AM
Re: time @Scott true, especially when critical life support systems are in danger.
Scott_Ferguson 8/16/2017 | 7:02:53 AM
Re: time @Ariella: I also think of it as a safety issues. If there was a mission to Mars, would you want to wait 40 minutes for critical information to go back and forth across space? I think you'd want as littel lag time as possible.

Susan Fourtané 8/14/2017 | 7:43:59 AM
From Earth to Mars Ariella — Two decades ago the ISS didn’t exist. I don’t think a 40-minute delay in data transmission is too much for a 34 million miles data travel to or from Mars. At least for now, you can’t have instant computing in such distance, not even with a supercomputer. The next generation of exascale supercomputers may solve the problem, though. You just have to wait three more years —perhaps a little less— for the first exascale supercomputer to be launched to the ISS and Mars.
Ariella 8/11/2017 | 1:23:46 PM
time MRight now, most computing is done on Earth and transmitted either to a space shuttle or the ISS. That works well in low-orbit situation, but Mars is nearly 34 million miles from Earth, which means sending and receive information from standard computer systems could take up to 40 minutes, according to HPE.> You know, a decade or two back a 40 minute delay wouldn't have sounded unreasonable. But today we've gotten accustomed to instant computing.
Sign In