& cplSiteName &

How the Courts Came Up With Verizon's $2.74 FiOS TV Tax

Jeff Baumgartner
8/29/2012

8:00 AM -- A couple of numbers stick out of the appeals court ruling late last week that upheld the millions in damages Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) is due to pay ActiveVideo (See Verizon Avoids FiOS TV Injunction and ActiveVideo: Verizon Owes Us $260M.)

There's the combined $260 million that Verizon owes ActiveVideo so far when all damages, including interest, are factored in, according to the vendor's calculations. That also includes another number -- the court-determined $2.74 per month, per video subscriber royalty payment that Verizon has to fork over ... at least until we know if its patent work-around works.

In court documents Verizon claims that ActiveVideo's marquee customer Cablevision Systems Corp. (NYSE: CVC) only pays $0.17 (before costs) per sub. The $2.74 royalty the court ordered is lower than the $3.40 that ActiveVideo sought, but you'd be hard-pressed to find anyone who thinks the court gave Verizon some sort of a screaming deal here.

The district court that set the monthly sunset royalty payment obviously didn't just split the difference, but it did explain how it arrived at $2.74.

First, it got there post-verdict, concluding that ActiveVideo would be in a much better bargaining position with Verizon than the vendor was three-plus years ago when it was sweating out its original Cablevision deal. The court also accepted ActiveVideo's testimony that Verizon received an incremental profit of $6.86 per FiOS TV subscriber, finding it "reasonable" that Verizon would receive 60 percent of the profits, with ActiveVideo receiving the balance –- hence, $2.74 per month.

But the district court did do a reality check, acknowledging that it was unlikely that Verizon would have agreed to $2.74 prior to the litigation. But there it is. We'll have to see how long it lasts. The district court's now tasked with taking a closer look at the Verizon's work-around to determine if it's good enough to put it outside the attack radius of ActiveVideo's intellectual property.

But Verizon apparently had plenty of chances to make a deal before the lawsuits started flying. ActiveVideo CEO Jeff Miller testified that his company had tried to get Verizon on board as a customer since 2004.

So, hindsight being 20/20 and all that, Verizon probably would've been a lot better off negotiating a license. But I'm guessing Verizon would've laughed at the suggestion that it might come out on the short end of this thing.

ActiveVideo (formerly ICTV), after all, would not seem to stand much of a chance against a behemouth like Verizon. But this is the crazy world of patent litigation, where the potency of one's power isn't always obvious.

Plus, as we've documented, ActiveVideo may appear small, but it's been a resilient little sucker during its 20-plus year history. From my experience, the only thing capable of taking down its execs -- and that for a short spell -- is some bad grub on the Vegas strip. (See It... Lives! , ActiveVideo Meets Its Match and ActiveVideo's Year of Reckoning .)

— Jeff Baumgartner, Site Editor, Light Reading Cable



(1)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Related Stories
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
AESerm
AESerm
12/5/2012 | 5:22:30 PM
re: How the Courts Came Up With Verizon's $2.74 FiOS TV Tax


It used to be said that the program guide was the most valuable property on a channel lineup. Granted, in this case, it's more of a navigational tool/guide supplement. If it's the case that Active Vid drove $6.86 in incremental rev (wonder how that number was derived) it would be even more valuable than ESPN. But at 40%, only about half has pricey as sports. 

More Blogs from The Bauminator
Google is going 'All in on a Gig' and exclusively selling uncapped, symmetrical 1Gbit/s service starting at $70 a month, the same price as it's been since 2012.
Light Reading's Jeff Baumgartner and Alan Breznick discuss the key themes from Cable Congress and Cable Next-Gen Europe in Berlin, finding there's a renewed focus on 1-Gig speeds and the fixed mobile network.
Disney says there's 'no indication of a security breach on Disney+,' as it appears that some accounts have been compromised when consumers use the same credentials and passwords across multiple online accounts.
Programmer looking at direct-to-consumer streaming service that would aggregate Discovery's programming and target US consumers who don't subscribe to pay-TV.
The hemorrhaging of the US pay-TV industry isn't just bad. It's scary bad. Happy Halloween, everyone!
Featured Video
Upcoming Live Events
March 16-18, 2020, Embassy Suites, Denver, Colorado
May 18-20, 2020, Irving Convention Center, Dallas, TX
All Upcoming Live Events