& cplSiteName &

Cablevision, Verizon Brace for Court Collision

Light Reading
LR Cable News Analysis
Light Reading
1/12/2011
50%
50%



Setting the stage for a courtroom showdown later this month, a judge at the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) denied Cablevision Systems Corp. (NYSE: CVC)'s requests for a ruling that the MSO is not infringing on Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) patents related to digital set-tops and interactive program guides.

Seeking to block Cablevision from importing three advanced set-tops manufactured by Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO), Verizon filed a complaint against Cablevision at the ITC last March. In denying Cablevision's motion for a summary judgment that it hasn't infringed on Verizon’s patents, ITC administrative law judge E. James Gildea ruled that his staff of investigators have found "four material issues that are still in dispute." (See It's On: Verizon-Cablevision Patent Spat Heats Up.)

"Good cause does not exist to grant the motion in lieu of a trial of all issues on the merits," Gildea wrote in a ruling that he made on Dec. 22 but was not released publicly until last Friday. The ITC is scheduled to kick off a six-day hearing of the case Jan. 24, and issue a final decision by August.

Five motions for summary judgment have been filed in the case -- four from Cablevision, and one from Verizon, a source said. Gildea has denied three of Cablevision's motions, and on Tuesday (Jan. 11), granted Verizon a motion for summary judgment stating that it has a substantial domestic industry at stake in its dispute with Cablevision, the source said. A fifth motion for summary judgment from Cablevision is pending.

The stakes in the case are huge for Verizon and Cablevision, which are both relying on the rollout of advanced interactive TV products to lure and retain subscribers.

While Verizon's FiOS TV offers subscribers a high-tech interactive program guide and interactive TV widgets and applications such as Facebook , Cablevision has looked to differentiate itself with an IPG that contains mosaic channels that display multiple networks from the same genre on a single screen such as iO Kids and iO Sports. It also offers several interactive TV channels such as MSG Varsity and Optimum Autos and has had some early success with interactive advertising campaigns. (See Cablevision Adds ActiveVideo Apps, Cablevision Eyes T-Commerce Launch in 2010 and Cablevision Gets Interactive.)

Verizon claims that several of Cablevision's advanced products violate its patents. Exhibits Verizon has submitted in the case include documents related to Optimum Autos, Optimum Homes, MSG Varsity and the "Quick View" function on Cablevision’s IPG.

Interpretation will be key
The ITC case will hinge on the interpretation of Verizon's IPG patents. In Cablevision's motion for summary judgment, the MSO argued that it doesn't violate one of Verizon's IPG patents since the patent refers to allowing viewers to surf directly from TV shows in the same program category using a single click of a remote control, while Cablevision requires subscribers to click "several different buttons before the television tuner switches between channels broadcasting the same type of programs."

Verizon's exhibits and witness lists include several technology vendors of Cablevision, including interactive TV software firms ActiveVideo and Zodiac Interactive , and set-top suppliers Cisco and Samsung Corp.

ActiveVideo built Cablevision's Quick View channels and also supplies technology for MSG Varsity and other interactive TV channels, while Zodiac supplies Cablevision with technology for its coming remote-storage DVR and interactive TV applications. (See ActiveVideo Suit Targets Verizon and Cablevision Powers Up for ITV.)

Dozens of executives from Cablevision, Verizon, and cable technology firms have been deposed in the case, including current and former employees of Time Warner Cable Inc. (NYSE: TWC), Cisco and what used to be its Scientific Atlanta unit (Cisco bought SA in 2006), Cable Television Laboratories Inc. (CableLabs) and ActiveVideo.

Verizon attorneys may also be raising questions about Cablevision's plans to deploy tru2way-based boxes from Samsung. Its exhibits include the user guide, photos, and e-mails related to Samsung's SMT-C5320 set-top. (See Samsung Boxes Break In at Cablevision .)

Cablevision officials insist that the MSO hasn't violated Verizon's intellectual property. "We believe these claims are without merit, and we are defending against them vigorously," spokesman Jim Maiella said in a statement.

Verizon officials declined to comment on the ITC litigation.

Seeds of the Full Service Network
Cablevision's exhibits indicate that it will attempt to show that it hasn't infringed on Verizon's patents since it relies in part on technology that Scientific-Atlanta (now part of Cisco) developed for Time Warner Cable's Full Service Network (FSN), a digital TV experiment conducted in the mid-1990s that tested video on demand, home shopping and other interactive TV services in Orlando, Fla.

Time Warner Cable Executive VP of Advanced Engineering Mike Hayashi is included on Cablevision’s witness list, along with veteran TW Cable engineer Louis Williamson. Cablevision's witness list also includes Cisco executives Greg Durden, Kinney Bacon, Carla Cravalho, David Hansen and David Lett, and ActiveVideo VP Greg Brown.

Cablevision has also deposed several Verizon executives, including VP of Consumer Strategy and Planning Shawn Strickland; Director of Consumer Product Development Joe Ambeault; Director of Network Engineering Frank Boersma; and Senior VP of Consumer Product Management Eric Bruno.

Cablevision also lists several of its own employees as witnesses, including SVP of Strategic Product Development Patrick Donoghue; VP of Direct Marketing Kathy Filosa; Director of Product Development Adam Labelson; SVP of Software Technology Richard Neill; and Director of Advanced Technology Development Kenneth Silver.

According to a schedule set by the ITC, Gildea is expected to make an initial determination in April. A final determination, which will be voted on by all six ITC commissioners, is scheduled to be issued by August.

However, Cablevision could reach a settlement with Verizon before a final determination has been issued.

— Steve Donohue, Special to Light Reading Cable

(11)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Jeff Baumgartner
50%
50%
Jeff Baumgartner,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 5:15:32 PM
re: Cablevision, Verizon Brace for Court Collision


Seeing the FSN come up in this story was like jumping in the Waybackmachine for a moment. After seeing a demo at a cable conference in Orlando, the FSN is probably the reason I became interested in cable tech in the first place. People like to call it a failed project because it eventually got shut down, but they fail to recognize that it was an experiment/trial that actually ended up planting the seeds of what became Pegasus, TWC's digital bedrock for digital cable, IPGs, and VoD and its evolution to Start Over and other digital cable services.


The FSN set-top was a sight to behold... it was bigger than a breadbox and legend has it that it cost about $6K per unit  (anyone have a photo of it we could share?) and i think you might've been able to fry an egg on it if the idea so moved you... obviously not the kind of economics or platform any MSO would use for a mass market deployment. But it proved the concept.  Thanks for your time. Yours truly,  Cliff Claven

iTV Doctor
50%
50%
iTV Doctor,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:15:31 PM
re: Cablevision, Verizon Brace for Court Collision


Rumor has it that AMC will create another terrific NY-based character drama based on the Cablevision/Verizon Court battle

SteveDonohue
50%
50%
SteveDonohue,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:15:31 PM
re: Cablevision, Verizon Brace for Court Collision


I had the same kind of reaction when I saw all of the mentions of the Full Service Network. The FSN was generating a lot of attention when I started covering the industry in 1996, and knowing that a cable operator was able to do t-commerce and interactive TV back then is probably one of the reasons I keep asking operators about when they are going to finally deploy ITV products. 


Here are a few of the mentions about the FSN and Pegasus in Cablevision's exhibits in the ITC case:


-- "Memo from [former Time Warner Cable president Joseph] Collins to Staff re: Full Service Network Announcement."


-- "Time Warner Cable Introduces World's First Full Service Network in Orlando" (press release). 


-- "Pegasus Program Plan Overview."


-- "Pegasus User Interface Specification for Resident Applications Version 0.8 (Beta)."


-- "Development and Purchase Agreement Pegasus Set-top b/w Time Warner Cable and Pioneer New Media."


-- "Memo from J. Callahan to B. Cooper re: Permission to use TWC BBA's Body of Work for Pegasus RA Development."


 


 

Jeff Baumgartner
50%
50%
Jeff Baumgartner,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 5:15:29 PM
re: Cablevision, Verizon Brace for Court Collision


A sure-fire ratings leader! Any ideas on a title?  Madder Men? JB

SteveDonohue
50%
50%
SteveDonohue,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:15:28 PM
re: Cablevision, Verizon Brace for Court Collision


Word is the soundtrack for that new show is being composed by JD and The Straight Shot. 

SteveDonohue
50%
50%
SteveDonohue,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:15:27 PM
re: Cablevision, Verizon Brace for Court Collision


Quick update on the scorecard: Cablevision’s fourth motion for summary determination related to two of Verizon’s patents was denied by ITC administrative law judge Gildea on Wednesday. These rulings on the summary motions are not that significant - it would've been surprising if the judge had ruled that the Verizon patents were invalid before the hearing, which begins Jan. 24. 

comtech3
50%
50%
comtech3,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 5:15:26 PM
re: Cablevision, Verizon Brace for Court Collision


Here's my two cents on this aburd lawsuit.What if all the cable companies should sue Verizon for using any set-top boxes.After all, the now named Cablelabs is funded by the cable companies,and almost all CATV set-top boxes are certified by Cablelabs, isn't that so? This madness must stop.It is in the news that Microsoft is taking Apple to court for using "Apps" as a trademark.It is time for some of these companies to stop behaving like a bunch of kindergarten spoiled brats! Verizon needs to spend some more time and money getting their billing system right because their customers are returning to tradition cable companies after receiving bills for as high as $500.00! Further more, Verizon need to tell their technicians to stop lying to customers that they showed up to their house when they did not do so.

Jeff Baumgartner
50%
50%
Jeff Baumgartner,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 5:15:24 PM
re: Cablevision, Verizon Brace for Court Collision


I don't think CableLabs has to certify all set-tops, but it does have to certify tru2way devices offered at retail, and does qualify CableCARD modules. There's also a CableLabs project that lets CE manufacturers self-verify gear that uses CableCARDs.


But do agree that if successful, this case will set a significant, far-reaching precedent. JB


 


 

SteveDonohue
50%
50%
SteveDonohue,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:15:23 PM
re: Cablevision, Verizon Brace for Court Collision


Vonage generated more than $200 million in revenue during the third quarter -- I think the company is doing OK, even after a legal tangle with Verizon. It's also worth noting that Verizon has reached settlements with big cable MSOs Charter and Cox involving VoIP patent disputes. These patent infringement lawsuits aren't unusual. Technology companies invest a lot of money in research and development, and buying inventions. 


 

comtech3
50%
50%
comtech3,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 5:15:23 PM
re: Cablevision, Verizon Brace for Court Collision


Yes, it is realy ridiculous the Verizon is using dirty tricks to compete in the industry.Not so long ago they sued poor Vonage for some stupid so called infringement.For the life of me, if two software, or more precisely in the case, middleware, has the same outcome that are slightly different,how the hell should there be a lawsuite? That being the case,then Microsoft should be suing Firefox for using a browser to access the Internet.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Featured Video
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
September 17-19, 2019, Dallas, Texas
October 1-2, 2019, New Orleans, Louisiana
October 10, 2019, New York, New York
October 22, 2019, Los Angeles, CA
November 5, 2019, London, England
November 7, 2019, London, UK
December 3, 2019, New York, New York
December 3-5, 2019, Vienna, Austria
March 16-18, 2020, Embassy Suites, Denver, Colorado
May 18-20, 2020, Irving Convention Center, Dallas, TX
All Upcoming Live Events