& cplSiteName &

Qwest Rallies on Death of Utopia

Light Reading
News Analysis
Light Reading
4/15/2004
50%
50%

Qwest Communications International Inc. (NYSE: Q) won a big victory in Salt Lake City this week, but that town's residents may have been shorted a chance at choice.

After the Salt Lake City Council voted Tuesday against funding construction of a municipally owned fiber optic network called Utopia, Utah’s largest incumbent carrier solidified plans to make DSL service available to 90 percent of Salt Lake City residents by year’s end.

Qwest had said that if Utopia won the city council’s support, the company would slow its rollout of DSL in the city since demand for the service would likely have been impaired (see Grass Roots Fiber Booms). Now, with no looming city-financed rival, Qwest will proceed with the rollout at full speed.

“We have said we are going to deploy DSL to more than 200 new areas in Utah this year,” says Vince Hancock, a spokesman for Qwest. “We had to look at the best places to deploy it based on where we thought we would get the best results.”

The city council’s vote was a philosophical victory for Qwest, which as a general policy is opposed to municipally owned telecommunications networks. “We don’t think government should be in the telecom business,” Hancock says. “We don’t think they should be competing in an industry they regulate.”

The Utopia project proposes to build an open service provider network funded by, and providing service to, 18 Utah cities. The network would deliver Internet access, cable television, and phone service over one infrastructure. So far, 11 cities have committed funds to the project. Utopia’s administrators have asked participants to establish cash reserves to pay off debts in case the project fails. The Salt Lake City Council voted against setting aside the needed $4.1 million in taxpayers’ money per year for 17 years.

As a result, Utopia’s organizers will now reformulate the project’s financial plan and present it to the 11 participating cities by early May. Roger Black, COO of Utopia, says Utopia will live on, even if Salt Lake City doesn't want it. He points out that each city is only asked to carry its own costs, so Salt Lake City's departure won't necessarily dampen the rest of the lot.

Black says the city council’s vote was a disappointment, but he holds out hope that Utopia may eventually build in Salt Lake City after it has developed enough cash flow to finance the project without requiring a large reserve of taxpayers’ funds. In the meantime, Black is not overly concerned about competition from Qwest.

"It will be fun to see the competitive situation unfold when residents of West Valley City, Utah, have three and four choices of video providers over the fiber network, four or five choices of local telephone providers, and a choice of ISPs,” Black says.

“All of that will be available over Utopia, and residents of Salt Lake City will have one cable TV choice, one telephone choice, and ISPs limited to DSL speeds.”

— Justin Hibbard, Senior Editor, Light Reading

(5)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First        ADD A COMMENT
truelight
50%
50%
truelight,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 2:01:19 AM
re: Qwest Rallies on Death of Utopia
QWEST sucks/lies/bribes/...bring back USWEST of old.
bullet257
50%
50%
bullet257,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 2:01:27 AM
re: Qwest Rallies on Death of Utopia
"Qwest, which as a general policy is opposed to municipally owned telecommunications networks. G«£We donG«÷t think government should be in the telecom business,G«• Hancock says. G«£We donG«÷t think they should be competing in an industry they regulate.G«•"

HERE IS WHAT THE TRUTH IS ON THIS:

It should be noted that local governments do not regulate telecommunications providers. That is done by the federal government and the states. Internet access providers are generally not regulated by any level of government. Local governments do manage public rights of way, but this is subject to federal and state non-discrimination and competitive neutrality requirements. Besides, incumbent cable and telephone companies are already in the public rights of way, so they can hardly claim to be adversely affected by local right-of-way management practices. Local governments do typically regulate cable service providers, but this is done through cable franchises that implement well-defined federal policies and standards.

Comunity Braodband, Seperating Fact from Fiction, APPA January 2004
firstmiler
50%
50%
firstmiler,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 2:01:44 AM
re: Qwest Rallies on Death of Utopia
"Althought Qwest is the dog of all incumbent telcos, in no circumstance should a regulating government entiry own their public telecommunications netwok (sic)"

Most Wanted, just what we need... more handouts to keep the status quo alive. This will surely make the US more competitive as a country while others invest strategically in high-speed infrastructures. ComQwest will no-doubt be rolling out fiber to broad swathes of their footprint and enabling competing providers to offer innovative services across this capital investment real soon.... not! Without treating the communications network as a utility, the country risks falling behind in the global market place.

But if we want to continue to subsidize the "dog of all incumbent telcos" and their MSO counterparts so be it. But this cheap way out will leave a legacy we may regret.
technonerd
50%
50%
technonerd,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 2:01:45 AM
re: Qwest Rallies on Death of Utopia
Doesn't Salt Lake have a cable company? You'd think it would be interested in running cable modem service there. As for Qworst, I hope someone in Salt Lake asked what the DSL speeds were going to be. Qworst's DSL to my Seattle neigborhood runs at a max of 256 Kb/s.
rbkoontz
50%
50%
rbkoontz,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 2:01:48 AM
re: Qwest Rallies on Death of Utopia
Finally, a sense of rationalism in this industry. Althought Qwest is the dog of all incumbent telcos, in no circumstance should a regulating government entiry own their public telecommunications netwok. Take those millions of dollars of future losses and and put them towards tax incentives to get service providers to invest in their local networks!
Featured Video
Upcoming Live Events
September 17-19, 2019, Dallas, Texas
October 1-2, 2019, New Orleans, Louisiana
October 10, 2019, New York, New York
October 22, 2019, Los Angeles, CA
November 5, 2019, London, England
November 7, 2019, London, UK
November 14, 2019, Maritim Hotel, Berlin
December 3-5, 2019, Vienna, Austria
December 3, 2019, New York, New York
March 16-18, 2020, Embassy Suites, Denver, Colorado
May 18-20, 2020, Irving Convention Center, Dallas, TX
All Upcoming Live Events