& cplSiteName &

AT&T Holders Cry Foul Over Exec Pay

Raymond McConville
News Analysis
Raymond McConville
4/27/2007
50%
50%

AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) announced this morning at its shareholders meeting that Edward Whitacre would be stepping down as chairman and chief executive. (See AT&T's Whitacre Cedes Throne.) But that's not all that was on the docket today.

Stockholder Proposal D during today's meeting called for the adoption of a policy that would give the shareholders advisory voting powers in the approval of executive pay. "We believe current rules governing senior executive compensation do not give shareholders sufficient influence over pay practices - nor do they give the Board adequate feedback from the owners of the company," says the shareholder proposal.

Not surprisingly, AT&T's board of directors recommended the rejection of this proposal, which later happened by a vote of 56.2 percent to 43.8 percent.

Whitacre's compensation was cited as Exhibit A in demonstrating how AT&T execs were excessively compensated. Disgruntled shareholders pointed to a study conducted by the Corporate Library that cited AT&T as being one of 11 large corporations where the disconnect between pay and performance is severe.

"The study notes that over the five fiscal years through 2005, CEO Edward Whitacre received $85.2 million in compensation, while total shareholder return was negative 40.3%. The Corporate Library accordingly gave AT&T's Board a 'D' for overall effectiveness," argued the shareholders.

All of this came on the same day it was reported that Whitacre would be receiving a massive $158 million retirement package. The announcement has sparked yet another round of discussions over the huge compensations that executives in corporate America have been receiving as of late.

AT&T could not be reached for comment on this story

— Raymond McConville, Reporter, Light Reading

(8)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First        ADD A COMMENT
Scott Raynovich
50%
50%
Scott Raynovich,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 3:09:22 PM
re: AT&T Holders Cry Foul Over Exec Pay
The result was posted in the orginal story. There is no way you can "overhype" a $158M retirement package.

56% to 44% vote is an extremely close vote for a corproate proxy vote, when you consider the advantages the board of directors has in lining up all their lackeys and gathering insider votes.

If anything, to me, this 44% indicates there was serious shareholder outcry on this.
Pete Baldwin
50%
50%
Pete Baldwin,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 3:09:23 PM
re: AT&T Holders Cry Foul Over Exec Pay
?? - Not sure what you mean, lap_work. We've got the result of the vote right there in the story.
lap_work
50%
50%
lap_work,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 3:09:23 PM
re: AT&T Holders Cry Foul Over Exec Pay
So..., the measure failed - 56% against, 44% for.
So, T execs will continue to get $100M plus paydays,
but LR doesn't report the results.

Typical Light Reading -- all hype -- few facts
wrt what actually happened.
thierryh
50%
50%
thierryh,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 3:09:29 PM
re: AT&T Holders Cry Foul Over Exec Pay
it's interesting to note that just now in France, similar stories of highly paid (but "only" between Gé¼5M and Gé¼10M) retiring top execs gets to the news' highlights and many politicians are expressing their views on that matter...

and for a 10-times more "offending" retiring package of Whitacre, the news hardly reach the top of business news and do not seem to make politicians react much...
DarkWriting
50%
50%
DarkWriting,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 3:09:31 PM
re: AT&T Holders Cry Foul Over Exec Pay
DEATH TO CAPITALISM!!!!


BTW, it's could've or could have NOT could of, SHEESH! Also it's their, there or they're, you all can figure out which is the right one for your sentence!
paolo.franzoi
50%
50%
paolo.franzoi,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 3:09:31 PM
re: AT&T Holders Cry Foul Over Exec Pay

Actually AT&T Park in San Francisco was built by the SF Giants. AT&T just has the naming rights that it picked up through Pac Bell.

I am just confused why an executive gets a "package". When I retire, I get a handshake and a good luck. As a shareholder, I want Ed Whitacre to get $0 and no benefits - just like any other employee.

seven
rjmcmahon
50%
50%
rjmcmahon,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 3:09:31 PM
re: AT&T Holders Cry Foul Over Exec Pay
if i owned T, i'd by hopping mad right now.

Yeah. I'm hopping mad too. They're shoving this cost saving U-verse crap down our throats while Whitacre walks away with the cash that could of laid down the lines for 150,000 or so. I guess our superheros need their rewards and, unfortunately, *these* superheros really don't give a shit about anybody else.

Hey, let's go raid the electric fund to build another stadium!! That's what the public wants, right? Doesn't matter, they'll buy it.
chips_ahoy
50%
50%
chips_ahoy,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 3:09:32 PM
re: AT&T Holders Cry Foul Over Exec Pay
the whole stock options blow up is chump change compared to this. when are we going to realize that chairman and ceo have conflicting interests and therefore these roles that should not be executed by the same individual.

if i owned T, i'd by hopping mad right now.
Featured Video
Upcoming Live Events
September 17-19, 2019, Dallas, Texas
October 1-2, 2019, New Orleans, Louisiana
October 10, 2019, New York, New York
October 22, 2019, Los Angeles, CA
November 5, 2019, London, England
November 7, 2019, London, UK
November 14, 2019, Maritim Hotel, Berlin
December 3-5, 2019, Vienna, Austria
December 3, 2019, New York, New York
March 16-18, 2020, Embassy Suites, Denver, Colorado
May 18-20, 2020, Irving Convention Center, Dallas, TX
All Upcoming Live Events