Big Brother Gets Bigger

10:30 AM -- Today's New York Times reports on a "dramatic restructuring of surveillance law":

    After more than a year of wrangling, the Senate handed the White House a major victory on Tuesday by voting to broaden the government’s spy powers and to give legal protection to phone companies that cooperated in President Bush’s program of eavesdropping without warrants.

    One by one, the Senate rejected amendments that would have imposed greater civil liberties checks on the government’s surveillance powers.
I like that "wrangling." It apparently means, in this context, "spineless crumbling." The vote wasn't close: 68 to 29.

    Among the presidential contenders, Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, voted in favor of the final measure, while the two Democrats, Senator Barack Obama of Illinois and Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, did not vote. Mr. Obama did oppose immunity on a key earlier motion to end debate. Mrs. Clinton, campaigning in Texas, issued a statement saying she would have voted to oppose the final measure.
She woulda. O'Bama probably woulda, too. If only... if only... what? They gave a damn?

    Democratic opponents, led by Senators Russ Feingold of Wisconsin and Christopher J. Dodd of Connecticut, argued that the plan effectively rewarded phone companies by providing them with legal insulation for actions that violated longstanding law and their own privacy obligations to their customers. But immunity supporters said the phone carriers acted out of patriotism after the Sept. 11 attacks in complying with what they believed in good faith was a legally binding order from the president.
Yes. Just so long as your motives are patriotic... well, do what you will.

    “This, I believe, is the right way to go for the security of the nation,” said Senator John D. Rockefeller, the West Virginia Democrat who leads the intelligence committee. His support for the plan, after intense negotiations with the White House and his Republican colleagues, was considered critical to its passage but drew criticism from civil liberties groups because of $42,000 in contributions that Mr. Rockefeller received last year from AT&T and Verizon executives
Now, there's a shocker. It'll appear on your bill as a "surcharge."

Fortunately for me, I've got Time Warner Cable phone service, so if they try to eavesdrop on me they're unlikely to hear anything.

— Larry, Attack Monkey, Light Reading

Be the first to post a comment regarding this story.
Sign In