& cplSiteName &

Densification & Next-Gen C-RAN

Gabriel Brown
3/13/2018
50%
50%

Invariably, discussion of advanced radio access networks (RANs) is dominated by one thing: performance and how to maximize capacity in a service area using available spectrum. As the industry moves to 5G, the need to support reliability, low-latency, high-speed mobility, extreme density and user-level radio resource control adds several new dimensions to the discussion.

In areas of high demand, operators need ultra-dense networks based on a layered architecture containing macro and small cells radiating in multiple different frequency bands. The challenge is how to coordinate the use of these radios to minimize interference and to ensure the user is served by the "best" access cells. This is driving the development of new Centralized RAN (C-RAN) architectures -- also sometimes described as vRAN, Elastic RAN, Cloud RAN, and so on -- that can coordinate radio resource management across the service area.

An enormous amount of work is, rightly, being put into developing these new RAN operating models to ensure 5G networks can meet a wide variety of service types with diverse performance requirements. At the same time, the move to Centralized RAN also has a major impact on performance monitoring and service assurance. And with the emergence of so-called "open RAN" initiatives by groups such as the Open RAN Alliance at this year's MWC, the importance of being able to monitor and assure performance over standard interfaces is now even greater. One area that needs attention, and which has potential to improve service experience, is the fiber plant needed to connect centralized baseband processing to remote radio units. These "fronthaul" links can use passive or active optical transport. Some of the key aspects of this new C-RAN monitoring environment are:

  • Centralized RAN requires new fiber deployment and/or new optical technologies to light deployed fiber. Testing the quality of fiber is critical to ensure the link can transport digital RF (over the common public radio interface or CPRI) when the optics are deployed.

  • Classic fiber test methodologies to observe network health & performance might not be sufficient, however. Test tools and methodologies need to operate in active mode communication with the network to capture service issues and take timely action. Analyzing CPRI frames, for example, can help determine the performance experienced by end users.

  • New fronthaul interfaces such as evolved CPRI (eCPRI) and proprietary RF over Ethernet transports are emerging. Packet transport offers greater flexibility, but introduces new performance monitoring criteria. This is also influenced by the "functional split" between radio, baseband and controller functions.

There are several variations on the C-RAN model, each with different fronthaul transport requirements and performance trade-offs. 5G, for example, introduces the Centralized Units or CUs and Distributed Units or DUs with different functional splits. This makes deploying and operating C-RAN challenging in some respects. The extent to which operators, and their vendors, can make progress, the better their chances of making a successful transition to a new RAN operating model that has the cost profile and performance needed to support a new innovation s-curve.

— Gabriel Brown, Principal Analyst, Heavy Reading

This blog is sponsored by EXFO.

(0)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
More Blogs from Heavy Lifting Analyst Notes
Next-generation networks need innovation in the radio access network and Open RAN developments are set to disrupt the market – in a good way.
The optical line system is undergoing a revolution. Web-scale providers are bringing the concept of disaggregation to optical networking in the form of the open line system (OLS). But are operators buying it?
The Linux Foundation's Acumos AI Project has issued its initial release on schedule but its 'app store' is still rather bare.
Operators need an accurate, up-to-date network and service topology view in order to determine the 'Eulerian path' of service configuration and implementation.
Most communications service providers (CSPs) surveyed for this month's Thought Leadership Council (TLC) report feel they are on track with network security planning, but more than 80% of respondents worry about future technology being used to launch complex attack vectors.
Featured Video
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
March 12-14, 2019, Denver, Colorado
April 2, 2019, New York, New York
April 8, 2019, Las Vegas, Nevada
May 6, 2019, Denver, Colorado
May 6-8, 2019, Denver, Colorado
May 21, 2019, Nice, France
October 1, 2019, New Orleans, Louisiana
December 5-3, 2019, Viena, Austria
All Upcoming Live Events