Light Reading Mobile – Telecom News, Analysis, Events, and Research

News Wire Feed  

Keynote Reports on VOIP

September 15, 2006 |

SAN MATEO, Calif. -- Keynote Systems, Inc. (Nasdaq:KEYN - News):

  • VoIP providers still lag behind PSTN in important areas, including audio delay; 12 leading VoIP providers studied and ranked in new competitive intelligence study
  • Among VoIP providers, VoIP digital phone service ranks first for reliability and audio clarity
  • VoIP service providers show overall improvement over the last year's results in key performance indicators such as service availability and audio clarity
  • Competing VoIP providers in New York and San Francisco markets, including digital cable, VoIP phone and PC-based software phone, included in study - all benchmarked against PSTN
  • Keynote study is first to include last-mile - including media and VoIP adapters - to provide true consumer perspective
  • Voice service quality trend analysis included in study to help VoIP providers understand impact of infrastructure changes over past six months

New insights into the performance of leading VoIP providers was released today by Keynote Systems (Nasdaq:KEYN - News), the global leader in Internet and mobile test and measurement services. Keynote's third VoIP competitive intelligence study revealed that overall VoIP quality has improved across the board since Keynote's last study in December 2005 and that the leading VoIP providers have actually surpassed PSTN (traditional phone service) in overall audio quality, but still lag behind PSTN in audio delay.

Twelve leading VoIP providers are part of the benchmark study that includes AT&T (NYSE: T - News), Comcast (Nasdaq: CMCSA - News), Lingo, Packet8, Skype (Nasdaq: EBAY - News), SunRocket, TimeWarner Cable (NYSE: TWX - News), TrueVoice, Verizon (NYSE: VZ - News), Vonage (NYSE: VG - News), Vonics and Windows Live Messenger (Nasdaq: MSFT - News). The complete Keynote VoIP competitive intelligence study, including detailed rankings, is available for purchase.

In order to benchmark and rank the quality of consumer VoIP services, Keynote measured the relative performance of the leading VoIP providers in the New York and San Francisco markets, including digital cable, adapter-based VoIP (hard phone) and PC-based software (soft phone) services, as well as the performance of leading VoIP providers against PSTN service in those cities. Keynote then rated the leading VoIP service providers on critical performance factors that influence the end-user experience using Keynote Voice Perspective®, which is Keynote's VoIP quality test and measurement product.

Survey Results Reveal Overall Improvement in VoIP Quality, Variations Between Cable and DSL

Based on the results of the survey, which was conducted over a one month period from Aug. 1-Aug. 31, 2006, Keynote found that overall reliability among the various competing VoIP providers had improved across the board and that the leading digital cable providers had in fact outperformed PSTN in overall reliability. Overall reliability is a computed index score based on performance measurements in three performance factors: service availability, average number of dial attempts and dropped calls.

Leading digital cable VoIP providers were also found to deliver better audio quality than the competition, with the leading cable providers achieving excellent audio responsiveness (a measure of audio delay) and audio clarity (measured by Mean Opinion Score, or MOS), two key contributors to overall audio quality. However, there was still room for improvement among the rest of the pack, with 10 of 12 VoIP service providers studied achieving less than a 4.0 MOS, which is considered to be "toll quality," that is, comparable to the audio quality of a toll call over PSTN.

Despite the shortcomings of the lower-ranked service providers, the overall average MOS of the VoIP providers studied continues to improve over time, with the overall average MOS of 3.58 reaching levels comparable with GSM mobile phone quality. In Keynote's December 2005 study the overall average MOS among VoIP providers was 3.55.

The study also examined the relative performance variations of the various VoIP service providers (as well as against the PSTN benchmark) during peak versus non-peak hours in terms of audio delay and Mean Opinion Score. It had been thought that cable modem subscribers would suffer overall service degradation during peak hours (8:00 PM-1:00 AM EDT), however the study revealed that while cable modem subscribers did experience greater instances of audio delay during peak hours, audio clarity (as measured by Mean Opinion Score) was not affected by the increased traffic associated with peak hours. DSL connections, on the other hand, were found to deliver more consistent peak versus non-peak audio delay performance, but were less consistent as measured by MOS.

Although the top performers in the consumer VoIP services market have improved the quality of call audio, calls placed on VoIP phones continue to exhibit considerably more audio delay than calls placed on traditional PSTN phones. This audio delay can cause callers to talk over each other, leading to conversational disruption and missed information, which can create frustration among users, especially in a business setting.

Keynote Systems Inc.



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
 
Related Content
White Papers SPONSORED CONTENT
Featured