Another day, another OTT video rumor.

Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video

March 18, 2016

2 Min Read
Facebook, Twitter Join TV Hopefuls – Report

How many times have we heard this story?The New York Post is reporting that both Facebook and Twitter Inc. are talking to programmers about negotiating new TV distribution deals. According to the Post's sources, Facebook, which is already bidding for Thursday Night NFL Football, has been meeting with TV executives in recent weeks, and may even be considering creating its own skinny bundle of channels. Twitter, meanwhile, is reportedly boasting of its ability to connect younger audiences to TV networks with a single click.If the rumors sound familiar, it's no surprise. This is far from the first time a major technology company with a massive customer base has tested the TV industry waters. Microsoft Corp. (Nasdaq: MSFT) tried for years to enter the pay-TV business through both software and direct-to-consumer services. The first was a strike-out with cable operators; the second a strike-out with content companies. Google talked to programmers too, but no luck. Then there's Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL). Apple is always on the verge of bringing a killer TV bundle to market... except it never happens. (See Pay-TV: Too Costly to Replicate Online? and Google, Apple Pitch Pay-TV Services.)For more on TV technology trends, check out our dedicated video services content channel here on Light Reading.Unexpectedly, Amazon.com Inc. (Nasdaq: AMZN) is the one major tech company gaining traction in the TV business. Maybe that's because of the company's massive distribution network, or maybe it's because Amazon isn't trying to get gimmicky with TV, but rather just deliver it -- in an easily accessible way with some exclusive, original content to boot.Sony Corp. (NYSE: SNE) belongs in the wait-and-see category. The company just went national with its PlayStation Vue TV bundles, but it's only to make services available to consumers with Sony-connected devices.Facebook and Twitter could follow Amazon's path. They both have the distribution platform and the web-scale, New IP infrastructure to support a TV service, and they're certainly not dependent on a single hardware brand. But so far there's no evidence that either company has figured out the content side of the equation.And history is littered with tech companies that have tried and failed at TV in the past.— Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, Light Reading

About the Author(s)

Mari Silbey

Senior Editor, Cable/Video

Mari Silbey is a senior editor covering broadband infrastructure, video delivery, smart cities and all things cable. Previously, she worked independently for nearly a decade, contributing to trade publications, authoring custom research reports and consulting for a variety of corporate and association clients. Among her storied (and sometimes dubious) achievements, Mari launched the corporate blog for Motorola's Home division way back in 2007, ran a content development program for Limelight Networks and did her best to entertain the video nerd masses as a long-time columnist for the media blog Zatz Not Funny. She is based in Washington, D.C.

Subscribe and receive the latest news from the industry.
Join 62,000+ members. Yes it's completely free.

You May Also Like