& cplSiteName &

Facebook: Sync Content With TV Ads to Catch Wandering Eyeballs

Aditya Kishore

A study commissioned by Facebook IQ found that 94% of US TV viewers kept a smartphone close by while viewing television, making it nearly ubiquitous. This is important because it means that media multitasking, i.e., using both the TV and the smartphone to consume content, is happening nearly simultaneously.

The Facebook study was run in four US cities. A hundred participants were asked to wear eye-tracking glasses, and Facebook IQ analyzed the data from those that chose to view TV. The glasses tracked viewers' eye movements, and found that on average they were solely focused on the TV screen for about half the time (53%) they viewed the program.

The remaining 47% of their time was spent performing housekeeping tasks such as folding laundry and cooking dinner. These were followed by usage of smartphones, laptops and other devices. As you would imagine, commercial breaks were when disengagement from the TV content peaked. Facebook's research found that on average, those viewing a TV ad "disengaged during a third of the commercial breaks, usually about 2.5 seconds into the first ad. And three-quarters of the time, people who disengaged from the TV ad content turned to their smartphones."

In a prior study, Facebook analyzed data from 1 million Facebook users while they were viewing the premiere of a popular cable TV drama, and found that smartphone usage could ramp up as much as three times during ad breaks.

Facebook's research has found that millennials (18-34) spent more time using mobile devices last year than viewing TV. It also found that light TV viewers are likely to be younger (with an average age of 27) than heavy viewers (with an average age of 48).

Facebook argues that the best solution for advertisers now is to deliver targeted video advertising synchronized with the TV commercial on Facebook and Instagram. It also recommends focusing more on the audio component of the commercial as viewers will still be listening to the audio even if they are looking elsewhere.

The second argument makes sense, but I'm not so sure about the first. Viewers are more likely to be scanning their Facebook page because they are disengaged from the commercial. Putting it on Facebook is unlikely to suddenly engage them, even if there is a (not always successful) attempt to make it more targeted and relevant.

However, related text and graphics content on the Facebook page might work, because a quick scan is probably what fits better with the mindset of the viewer at that time. And if there is a connection with the TV audio, it might even drive viewers to look at the TV commercial, though that does sound a bit optimistic.

The logistics for this are complex -- being able to determine which ad is playing when, what kind of targeted message works and even how it will affect the channel's ability to sell in advertising. For example, if a viewer is engaged with the first commercial in the pod, then he/she is not going to pay attention to the next one. That advertiser will not be keen to pay the same amount as the first, or may not want to buy the slot at all.

Ultimately, I think we have all known for decades that viewers disengage during commercial breaks, but TV advertising continues to rack up billions of dollars. Upfront sales this year were estimated to bring in $9 billion for broadcasters, for example. And even Facebook's study found that viewers were more likely to be folding laundry and cooking dinner than using their smartphone while viewing TV -- tasks they have been performing long before smartphones and the Internet were even invented.

It's important to remember this because, from an advertiser's point of view, maybe this behavior isn't that disruptive. In a sense, smartphone usage is just replacing short errands or having a conversation with a family member -- and not necessarily affecting viewing of a TV commercial. That distraction has been factored in by advertisers, it's just seen as a limitation of a medium that they believe still delivers value for them regardless. (See Broadcast Still Pulls in Advertising Dollars.)

Broadcast advertising has been described as "spray and pray" -- just get your message on the air and hope for the best. And in aggregate, it appears to have worked because advertisers keep coming back to it despite a broad range of alternatives. Perhaps that can't be sustained for much longer, with newer behaviors and viewership shifts, but advertisers have proven to be stubbornly loyal to the 30-second TV commercial. Change will come slowly, and only when the benefits of alternatives are clear and substantial, and the business and technological requirements across an unwieldy value chain have been ironed out.

— Aditya Kishore, Practice Leader, Video Transformation, Telco Transformation

(2)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
User Rank: Moderator
7/17/2017 | 6:42:55 AM
Re: Background
danielcawrey - I wonder if we have also just become either better at multitasking or just used to a constant state of distraction, where we can't focus on anything for long periods. TV shows have stretches where not too much is happening, where the mind wanders and the smartphone is an easy option. But as the show picks up, we can get back to it because we're still tracking the narrative via audio. And with a high penetration of DVRs, we can just rewind if we miss something important. 

User Rank: Light Sabre
7/16/2017 | 3:23:09 PM
Television has truly become a background entertainment medium. 

Some of the problem is advertising. Many people lose attention as soon as there is a commercial break, leading them to laptops and smartphones. 
Featured Video
From The Founder
Light Reading is spending much of this year digging into the details of how automation technology will impact the comms market, but let's take a moment to also look at how automation is set to overturn the current world order by the middle of the century.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
November 30, 2017, The Westin Times Square
December 5-7, 2017, The Intercontinental Prague
March 20-22, 2018, Denver Marriott Tech Center
May 14-17, 2018, Austin Convention Center
All Upcoming Live Events
SmartNICs aren't just about achieving scale. They also have a major impact in reducing CAPEX and OPEX requirements.
Hot Topics
Juniper's New Contrail VP Hails From Google
Craig Matsumoto, Editor-in-Chief, Light Reading, 11/15/2017
Eurobites: Telefónica Reckons Plastic Is Fantastic for FTTH
Paul Rainford, Assistant Editor, Europe, 11/15/2017
AT&T's Lurie Leaps to Synchronoss as New CEO
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 11/17/2017
Animals with Phones
Live Digital Audio

Understanding the full experience of women in technology requires starting at the collegiate level (or sooner) and studying the technologies women are involved with, company cultures they're part of and personal experiences of individuals.

During this WiC radio show, we will talk with Nicole Engelbert, the director of Research & Analysis for Ovum Technology and a 23-year telecom industry veteran, about her experiences and perspectives on women in tech. Engelbert covers infrastructure, applications and industries for Ovum, but she is also involved in the research firm's higher education team and has helped colleges and universities globally leverage technology as a strategy for improving recruitment, retention and graduation performance.

She will share her unique insight into the collegiate level, where women pursuing engineering and STEM-related degrees is dwindling. Engelbert will also reveal new, original Ovum research on the topics of artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, security and augmented reality, as well as discuss what each of those technologies might mean for women in our field. As always, we'll also leave plenty of time to answer all your questions live on the air and chat board.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
Partner Perspectives - content from our sponsors
The Mobile Broadband Road Ahead
By Kevin Taylor, for Huawei
All Partner Perspectives