Light Reading Mobile – Telecom News, Analysis, Events, and Research

5:30 PM -- The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)'s move last week to open up 100MHz of 3.5GHz radar spectrum could open up interesting prospects for small cells but -- if the past is any guide -- could take more time than the agency expects.

The agency is proposing that carriers use the spectrum for high-capacity, short-range deployments using small cells. It says that deploying 10 small cells in place of a single macrocell could cause a tenfold increase in capacity. The plan for the 3.5GHz band is part of the FCC's plan to open up 275MHz of new spectrum by the end of 2015. (See FCC Shows Radar Love for Small Cells.)

The FCC's plan, however, allows for priority access for the military to use its radar in the band "when the need arises to prepare for or execute national defense missions" -- with wireless exclusion zones around radar deployments -- and more sharing with other federal users.

That's no surprise. If you remember, the U.S. military hasn't typically been particularly speedy about moving off spectrum it holds in the past.

For instance, T-Mobile USA won advanced wireless spectrum (AWS) at auction in September 2006. It didn't launch its first 3G market in NYC until May 2008 and then continued a slow rollout through 2009. (See T-Mobile: 95 Cities Will Have 3G for Android.)

Part of the delay was because T-Mobile had to wait for the U.S. military to vacate some of the AWS spectrum before it could get on the air. (See '4G' Delays Ahead?)

Using military airwaves for commercial use is often tricky. Way back in 2000, the French military wanted Bluetooth banned because it supposedly interfered with vital radio communications.

So, let's keep an eye on how this develops, but don't be surprised if moving small cells onto the 3.5GHz band takes a while.

— Dan Jones, Site Editor, Light Reading Mobile

5:30 PM The 3.5GHz radar band could be interesting for small-cell applications, but don't hold your breath for the military to move off that turf
December 17, 2012 | Dan Jones |


Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
 
Related Videos
White Papers SPONSORED CONTENT
Featured
Mach-Zender Modulator
A modulator that uses a phase shift to create 1s and 0s