& cplSiteName &

US Gets Worried About Huawei

Jeff Baumgartner
LR Mobile News Analysis
Jeff Baumgartner
8/20/2010
50%
50%

Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. 's push into the US hit another rough patch this week when eight senators called on the Obama administration to investigate whether national security would be compromised if the China-based supplier sold gear to Sprint Corp. (NYSE: S), which has contracts with domestic military and government agencies.

The group, led by Sens. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) and Christopher Bond (R-MO), fired off a letter on Aug. 18 expressing concern "that Huawei's position as a supplier of Sprint Nextel could create substantial risk for U.S. companies and possibly undermine U.S. national security."

Their reaction comes about six weeks after the Financial Times reported that Huawei was bidding for a big wireless contract with Sprint.

The senators said they were alarmed about reports that the supplier sold gear to Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq and had previously supplied the Taliban. They also worried that Huawei has become a "leading presence in Iran, especially with military industries" and that, based on current US sanctions on Iran, "Huawei should be prohibited from doing business with the US government."

They labeled Huawei's purported relationship with China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) as "most troubling," noting Huawei founder and CEO Ren Zhengfei previously served as a PLA officer.

"At worst, Huawei's becoming a major supplier of Sprint Nextel could present a case of a company, acting at the direction of and funded by the Chinese military, talking a critical place in the supply chain of the US military, law enforcement, and private sector."

Concerns such as these are growing increasingly commonplace for Huawei and fellow China-based supplier ZTE Corp. (Shenzhen: 000063; Hong Kong: 0763) as they continue to push international growth strategies. Sales by those vendors to India had been blocked over similar concerns, but on Friday, the Indian government ended that temporary ban after the companies reportedly agreed on several conditions, including the handing over of certain network source codes. (We'll have more details on the situation in India soon.) (See Huawei Confident of Indian Import Resolution.)

In the US, the senators outlined a list of questions for the proposed investigation, including whether the government had any unclassified info regarding Huawei's affiliation, if any, with the PLA. They also want to know what contracts the Department of Defense (DoD) has with Sprint, and if it would present a national security threat if Huawei "gained a measure of control over a US contractor involved in sensitive US government contracts."

Huawei's image in the US has already taken some hits regarding allegations of intellectual property theft, most recently with Motorola Inc. (NYSE: MOT) and, before that, with Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO). (See Moto Accuses Huawei of Theft, The Trouble With Huawei..., Huawei in Spying Flap, and Cisco & Huawei Extend Stay.)



Huawei released a statement in response to the concerns spelled out by the senators, noting disappointment that "old mischaracterizations about the company still linger." Here's the full statement, supplied to Light Reading on Friday:

Huawei is disappointed to learn that old mischaracterizations about the company still linger and we want to reiterate some of the facts. The truth is Huawei is an employee-owned private company. Government or military organizations do not hold any shares, or control the company in any form.

As a leading global telecommunications solutions provider, Huawei abides by and respects third-party intellectual property rights (IPR) and strives for continuous innovation to maintain our leadership position. Huawei has not been found in violation of IPR infringement by any court in any country nor has Huawei been found to have acquired inappropriately any third-party proprietary information.

Huawei has a comprehensive trade compliance organization, policies and operation system, and strictly complies with all the laws, regulations, and related trade compliance regulations established by the UN and all the countries where we operate including the U.S. This also applies to Iran, where our business operation is similar to other western vendors in the market.

We are deeply committed to long-term investment in North America, and will continue to contribute to this market by providing innovative communications network solutions and services to address our customers’ challenges and needs. Huawei strives to be open, transparent and is committed to cooperate fully with all stakeholders to advance the U.S. telecommunications industry.



Although Huawei's position at Sprint is coming under fire, the vendor has had some success penetrating the US cable industry, mostly notably a confirmed wireless equipment agreement with Cox Communications Inc. and a purported one with Comcast Corp. (Nasdaq: CMCSA, CMCSK) related to IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) equipment. It's also been able to sell set-tops and optical gear into Suddenlink Communications . (See Cox, Huawei Make Wireless Connection , Huawei DTAs Break In at Suddenlink , and Huawei, Ericsson Get a Piece of Comcast's IMS Action .)

— Jeff Baumgartner, Site Editor, Light Reading Cable

(14)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
paolo.franzoi
50%
50%
paolo.franzoi,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:26:04 PM
re: US Gets Worried About Huawei


 


There is a big difference between Motorola with an R&D group in China and a company run by a former Senior Officer in the PLA.  Get it?


As to the Iran bit, that has nothing to do with the Senators who you complained about.  That is a different issue dealing with the capabilities of the platforms to monitor citizens.  Of course, all governments do it so I think that one is silly.  Plus Israel will be blowing up parts of Iran soon so that should for a great deal of equipment sales to replace bombed things.


seven


 

paolo.franzoi
50%
50%
paolo.franzoi,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:26:04 PM
re: US Gets Worried About Huawei


 


Okay, maybe you have not figured it out.  If you can inject some code into a communications system, you might be able to spy on others.  This is called Hacking...its been in the news.  So handing over a chunk of your communications infrastructure to a company that has ties with a unfriendly foreign government is a potential risk to National Security.  Yes reverse these things and say US equipment into China and the same thing is true.


There are some industries considered so critical that they do not outsource them to what are considered unfriendly major powers.  Main Battle Tank and Jet Fighters would be an example.


Production is also not design.  Yes, there is a risk for parts made in China.  It is less than parts designed in China by a company with ties to the PLA.


seven


 

Paladin
50%
50%
Paladin,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:26:04 PM
re: US Gets Worried About Huawei


Did you miss the recent lawsuit filed in US court just this week against Nokie-Siemens Networks by an Iranian dissident for providing technology to the Iranian government to monitor cell phone traffic?  Did you miss the fact that Ericsson and Alcatel-Lucent both do business with Iran?  Why yes they do!  The world is a small place and merely a little googlesearching shows that things are never quite as simple as they seem.


So what is motivating the recent (CDS) China Derangement Syndrome suffered by this suddenly wary group of Senators?  Surely the potential loss of business for those companies mentioned above in a clearly protectionism based market wouldn't be a factor?  And when are those election$ coming (again)?  Leverage? what leverage?


It needs to be noted that each of the vendors mentioned above have R&D and manufacturing in China along with multiple U.S. communications carriers who also do business with China.  So we provide communications infrastructure for China's own carriers like China Mobile, etc.  It also needs to be noted that the Iphone we all love and that little Blackberry hiding in the Presidents coat pocket were made in....China. 


Perhaps the esteemed Senators should have included each of those companies mentioned above doing business with Iran in the request they made or did they mysteriously and purposefully neglect to do a little reasearch into the matter?


Oh to be a fly on the wall in the room when that one (Senate letter rationale) was gemmed up....

Paladin
50%
50%
Paladin,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:26:04 PM
re: US Gets Worried About Huawei
Perhaps the subtle notice that the other vendors each have R&D along with manufacturing in China escaped notice? Also that they each do business with Iran also seems to go unnoticed. Why is that?
Stefan Sip
50%
50%
Stefan Sip,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:26:03 PM
re: US Gets Worried About Huawei


Politicians from both sides digust me.  They are no more qualified to run the country than civics teachers in high school.  If you (e.g. American public) have no confidence in your elected officials, then their statements on Huawei should have no more or less influence on your personal views of Huawei.


I contend that the operators who listen to the Huawei’s pitch have largely made up their minds on whether they are going to buy Huawei or not.  That is to say customers who have similar beliefs as “seven” would not buy Huawei regardless of what proof are out there to indicate otherwise.  There are also customers like “Paladin” who are more open and willing to take the good and bad of Huawei or new entrants. Luckily for Huawei, there are more Paladins than sevens out there.  Perhaps not, but the need for lower cost solutions to compete in the market place is so strong that despite Huawei’s issues, customers are willing to take the risk.  So far, the risk has paid off, since Huawei has largely delivered and have not caused embarrassment to its large customer base.


If you look at Huawei’s track record, it started in China and developing countries by fundamentally reducing the cost of telecommunications.  For most consumers, Huawei has been good to their lives.  Base stations that used to cost $200K are now $20K.  Huawei had a hand in this by disrupting the incumbent suppliers of telecom.  


Now comes Sprint.  Sprint is clearly struggling on multiple levels.  Huawei’s technology and willingness to break into a tier-1 in North America provides the perfect storm for Sprint to take a chance on.  Now it is up to the paper pushers and suits to lift their collective skirts and grow some balls to make the right decision.  Otherwise, just ask the government to fund their network transformation if they are not allowed to buy a more competitive solution.

Paladin
50%
50%
Paladin,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:26:02 PM
re: US Gets Worried About Huawei
If the President of Motorola happened to have served in the US military does that mean he still is beholden to them in his capacity in the private sector or does that collusion only apply if someone was formerly in a military service other than the US military? As to monitoring capability I guess I don't need to mention DOJ requirements for lawful intercept ala CALEA? Hmmm weird isn't it??
paolo.franzoi
50%
50%
paolo.franzoi,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:26:01 PM
re: US Gets Worried About Huawei


Paladin,


As I have said in other threads, I assume the NSA and CIA hack Cisco and Juniper equipment (Mot maybe as well) and use it to spy on China.  Heck, maybe that is how they know about the Iran thing.  That is why China wants its own companies in its infrastructure.


seven


 

Photon_Got_Mad
50%
50%
Photon_Got_Mad,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:25:59 PM
re: US Gets Worried About Huawei


Seven:


If you argue that US companies are spying on China and China should allow these CIA sponsored firms to do business inside China but the US govenment should block similar business activities of Chinese companies doing business in the US (assuming they are spying on US), where is the fair trade in your mind? If you believe the freedpom of business and trade, where is your fundation of such an argument?


Let's use another example, if every country is spying on each other, if your argument on Huawei makes sense, you are really saying US should expel all diplomats from China but China should not expel any US diplomats.


Your thoughts are ridiculous, to say the least!!!


 


 

paolo.franzoi
50%
50%
paolo.franzoi,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:25:59 PM
re: US Gets Worried About Huawei


 


Actually, China funded Huawei to the tune of $6B a year to block out Western companies.  There are also issues if you are a Western Supplier with the MITI that do not occur if you are a Chinese company.  So, yes actually China HAS done this.  They just were nicely subtle about it.


Before you all express surprise and shock, the product that I used to work on was copied and stolen by about a dozen companies inside China.  One day we were told that we no longer met the requirements of import to China and all the local theives took the business over.  It took about 18 months to work through the morass of beauracracy, and by then the customers had switched their business to the local vendors exclusively.


seven


 

boozon
50%
50%
boozon,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:25:59 PM
re: US Gets Worried About Huawei


It's good that China didn't reciprocate and let Nortel doing business when it was run by Bill Owens, previously admiral in the US Navy.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
From The Founder
Cisco's Conrad Clemson, recently promoted to head up the company's Service Provider Apps & Platforms developments, talks to Light Reading's Founder and CEO Steve Saunders about how he's bringing cloud video, mobile and virtualization together to empower network operators.
Flash Poll
Live Streaming Video
Charting the CSP's Future
Six different communications service providers join to debate their visions of the future CSP, following a landmark presentation from AT&T on its massive virtualization efforts and a look back on where the telecom industry has been and where it's going from two industry veterans.
LRTV Interviews
Masergy: Ability to Adapt Key for NFV

1|16|17   |   6:40   |   (0) comments


Speaking at Light Reading's 2020 Vision in Rome, Masergy's VP, Global Technology, Ray Watson, said agility is key to providing the mix and match NFV-based services that are driving business for the managed service provider today.
LRTV Interviews
Equinix: The Data Explosion

1|13|17   |   4:16   |   (0) comments


At Light Reading's 2020 Vision in Rome, Eric Schwartz, president of EMEA, Equinix, talked about how Equinix is helping its customers manage the influx of data today, and how it's preparing for a future filled with millions of connected IoT devices.
LRTV Interviews
Heavy Reading: The Changing Data Center Landscape

1|12|17   |   6:05   |   (1) comment


At Light Reading's 2020 Vision event in Rome, Heavy Reading's Senior Analyst Roz Roseboro talks about how virtualization is impacting data center evolution and how that evolution is affecting the relationship between service providers, data center operators and public cloud providers.
LRTV Interviews
Boingo: Prepping for Millions of Devices

1|12|17   |   5:07   |   (1) comment


At Light Reading's 2020 Vision in Rome, Boingo's CTO Derek Peterson discusses how wireless operators will address the needs of low-bandwidth and high-bandwidth apps at the same time, the need for more MHz, the impact of IoT and more.
LRTV Interviews
Comcast Shows Off Gig Gateway at CES

1|11|17   |     |   (1) comment


With its largest presence at CES in years, Comcast took the wraps off its long-awaited gigabit gateway and a new platform for managing the home WiFi network. Light Reading Senior Editor Mari Silbey sat down with EVP Chris Satchell to discuss the latest Comcast advance, and met with VP of Product Strategy and Development Andrea Peiro to walk through a demo of the ...
LRTV Interviews
Colt: End-to-End Key for 2017

1|10|17   |   6:21   |   (0) comments


At Light Reading's 2020 Vision Executive Summit in Rome, Nico Fischbach of Colt said having a multi-carrier, end-to-end service proposition is going to be key for 2017 -- and SD-WAN is instrumental in making it happen.
From the Founder
Cisco's Clemson on Mobile Cloud Video

1|9|17   |     |   (1) comment


Cisco's Conrad Clemson, recently promoted to head up the company's Service Provider Apps & Platforms developments, talks to Light Reading's Founder and CEO Steve Saunders about how he's bringing cloud video, mobile and virtualization together to empower network operators. "If you think about where we're going… whether it's a mobile application, or a video ...
LRTV Custom TV
VMware Telco NFV Solutions – Preparing for 5G & IOT

1|9|17   |     |   (0) comments


Shekar Ayyar, EVP & Corporate Strategy/General Manager of Telco for VMware, discusses VMware's Telco NFV solutions role and foundation for the Imminent Arrival of 5G & IOT.
LRTV Interviews
Heavy Reading: Big Video Set to Disrupt

1|6|17   |   4:39   |   (0) comments


At Light Reading's 2020 Vision Executive Summit in Rome, Heavy Reading's Adi Kishore talks about the challenges of managing and monetizing bandwidth-intensive video, and how service providers will need to transform their networks to cope with the big video explosion.
LRTV Interviews
Heavy Reading: IoT Set to Disrupt

1|5|17   |   7:07   |   (0) comments


Heavy Reading's Senior Analyst of IoT, Steve Bell, tells Light Reading how the Internet of Things (IoT) will transform service provider markets, business models and mindsets, and how virtualizing the network core and Fog networking is key to meeting the agility and flexibility demands of IoT in the future.
LRTV Custom TV
Ensemble SmartWAN Explained

1|5|17   |     |   (0) comments


Ray Le Maistre and Prayson Pate, CTO of the Ensemble division at ADVA Optical Networking, discuss the details around the recent Ensemble SmartWAN announcement from ADVA and its potential impact on the SD-WAN movement as it goes virtual.
LRTV Interviews
Telstra Shares Digital Dos & Don'ts

1|4|17   |   3:21   |   (0) comments


At Light Reading's 2020 Vision Executive Summit in Rome, Telstra's Managing Director of EMEA Tom Homer shares his insight into what makes a good partner in today's digital world.
Upcoming Live Events
May 15-17, 2017, Austin Convention Center, Austin, TX
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
Hot Topics
Ericsson: 5G Heralds 'New' New Economy
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 1/12/2017
5G: Another Next-Generation Disappointment?
Iain Morris, News Editor, 1/10/2017
CES 2017: WIC's Picks & What Made Us Sick
Sarah Thomas, Director, Women in Comms, 1/10/2017
IBM, FDA Look to Blockchain to Secure Health Records
Scott Ferguson, Editor, Enterprise Cloud, 1/12/2017
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
Light Reading founder and CEO Steve Saunders chats with Sportlogiq CEO Craig Buntin about sports data analysis.
Eyal Waldman, CEO of Mellanox Technologies, speaks to Steve Saunders, CEO of Light Reading, for an exclusive interview about the 100 GB cable challenge, cybersecurity and much more.
Animals with Phones
Live Digital Audio

Playing it safe can only get you so far. Sometimes the biggest bets have the biggest payouts, and that is true in your career as well. For this radio show, Caroline Chan, general manager of the 5G Infrastructure Division of the Network Platform Group at Intel, will share her own personal story of how she successfully took big bets to build a successful career, as well as offer advice on how you can do the same. We’ll cover everything from how to overcome fear and manage risk, how to be prepared for where technology is going in the future and how to structure your career in a way to ensure you keep progressing. Chan, a seasoned telecom veteran and effective risk taker herself, will also leave plenty of time to answer all your questions live on the air.