& cplSiteName &

It's Time to Focus on One-Way Network Delays

Alan Breznick
5/15/2017
50%
50%

In a world where most video traffic only flows downstream, it's high time for wireline and wireless service providers to reconsider how they tackle the critical problem of excessive network delays.

Why? Because high latency, or lengthy network delays, is an issue bedeviling video content and service providers of all stripes and sizes. Buffering delays of even just a few milliseconds can lead to a poorer customer quality-of-experience (QoE) and much higher rates of video abandonment by subscribers, according to research conducted by Akamai Technologies Inc. (Nasdaq: AKAM) and others. In turn, these higher rates of abandonment can lead to substantial amounts of lost revenue.

How substantial? Well, Amazon.com Inc. (Nasdaq: AMZN) figures that a page load slowdown of a just a single second could cost it $1.6 billion in sales each year. Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) has calculated that slowing its search results by merely four-tenths of a second could wipe out 8 million searches per day, costing it countless millions in ad revenues. And a research paper published last year concluded that a millisecond delay at a data center could cause $100 million in lost revenues.

Such latency issues will only become more paramount as video increasingly rules both the world and the Internet. In the latest edition of its Visual Networking Index (VNI), Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO) projects that IP video will account for a whopping 82% of all global IP traffic by 2020, up from 70% in 2015. Similarly, the Cisco VNI forecast predicts that consumer Internet video will make up 82% of all consumer Internet traffic by the decade's end, up from 68% in 2015. Plus, the VNI report projects that mobile video will account for 78% of the world's mobile data traffic by 2021, up from 60% last year.

With more and more video traffic pulsing over their lines, service providers know they need to find ways to target latency issues and cut down on network delays or risk losing customers in droves. But what they may not know, and need to know, is that viewer QoE will likely become more and more of a crucial differentiator when consumers are choosing between video providers in the future, as the research is beginning to indicate.

Many service providers are trying to address the latency issue by measuring and monitoring video traffic delays in both directions on their networks, using such legacy methods as packet timing and Global Positioning System (GPS). They then take the two-way latency results and simply divide them in two to calculate the estimated delay in each direction. But this approach is faulty and can lead to big problems for network operators.

The obvious shortcoming with these rough estimates is that they don't offer any visibility into what might actually be happening on either network path. As a result, the estimates for one-way delays could be way off because of the asymmetrical nature of most video traffic. Worse yet, these estimates could wind up producing "false positives," incorrectly indicating no latency problems overall when in fact there may be huge traffic delays occurring in one direction or the other.

It seems clear, then, that service providers must measure and monitor one-way network latency directly and accurately. Unfortunately, though, the traditional methods to track one-way delays accurately are complex and expensive.

Take GPS, for instance. While this type of approach usually delivers the most accurate delay measurements, it's quite costly because it requires investment at all measurement sites. It can also be challenging to carry out in urban settings due to intermittent signals, as well as in indoor settings where GPS deployment is tricky. Plus, there's the extra opex cost of rolling a truck to repair or replace faulty equipment.

So, a better type of one-way latency testing is sorely needed. Without a better approach, video providers will not be able to do much better than guess about the scale of the latency issues they are struggling to master. Consider this question: How much is your inability to measure one-way latency costing your company?

This blog is sponsored by EXFO.

— Alan Breznick, Cable/Video Practice Leader, Light Reading

(5)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Sr.Embed22197
50%
50%
Sr.Embed22197,
User Rank: Light Beer
5/15/2017 | 2:18:37 PM
Re: Ummm
It's actually a bit of both, yes.

I guess my original point is that One Way measurments have some clock sync requirements that are far more strict than Two Way.  Y.1731 DMM, TWAMP, the test can compensate to a certain degree because you can factor out the time differences at each end.  One Way testing, the clocks have to be sync'd a lot tighter.

It's a price upgrade for hardware and infrastructure to do that and customers hate spending the extra money.  Most switches currently installed that I have to support, still rely on NTP.

The point of the article is that One Way testing is needed, and I'm seeing requests to add it, as well as defects reports about it's accuracy on older devices.  I agree that it's useful, but making it report valid numbers isn't just a slight tweak of the software. :)
brooks7
50%
50%
brooks7,
User Rank: Light Sabre
5/15/2017 | 1:33:46 PM
Ummm
I think about 1/2 your commentary is actually about Jitter and not latency.  Absolute Latency is important at the start of a stream (which includes channel switching).  But once a stream has started it is packet jitter that is the problem (i.e. the variance in delay between receipt of packets).

seven

 
Sr.Embed22197
50%
50%
Sr.Embed22197,
User Rank: Light Beer
5/15/2017 | 12:50:48 PM
Re: When the devices clocks are accurate enough ...
I'm working with 100G Ethernet. :)  PtP is the protocol they should be using, to have a chance of being accurate, so I agree with you there.  It's not available on low end switches though and customers want cheap switches.

Over multiple hops, from the customers testing center to the NTE, the end to end clocks have be be in sync if you're going to use something like Y.1731 1DM.  Sure, there are games you can play, run 100 frame tests, throw out the outliers, take the average.  You're still going to get odd results at times because someplace in the middle of the test, NTP updated the clock and slewed it someplace.

Customers hate running repeating tests and noticing occasional results that wandered out into the weeds because of a clock update.  Everytime a leap second hits, we get a couple of calls and we explain it all over again.
Duh!
50%
50%
Duh!,
User Rank: Light Sabre
5/15/2017 | 12:29:14 PM
Re: When the devices clocks are accurate enough ...
Off by a couple of orders of magnitude. Prop delay through fiber is 4.9 microseconds (μs) per kilometer. Serialization delay at 1 Gbps for an MTU-sized packet is 12.3 μs.

IEEE 1588 - Precision Time Protocol can provide commensurate accuracy.
Sr.Embed22197
50%
50%
Sr.Embed22197,
User Rank: Light Beer
5/15/2017 | 12:07:11 PM
When the devices clocks are accurate enough ...
When most vendors/customers use NTP to keep their clock accurate, I'd love to hear somebody explain how a clock that is +/- 128ms accuracy is going to get used to time the one way flight of a packet that takes nanoseconds to travel.

Yeah, there are better time protocols and sync Ethernet, but nobody wants to pay for it.

 
More Blogs from Heavy Lifting Analyst Notes
Cable is well on the path to meeting 5G backhaul and small cell requirements; however, cable may face competition from mobile network operators (MNOs) and find challenges in technology and regulation limitations.
Taking the pulse of NFV and SDN deployments.
Although many service providers have already deployed software-defined wide area network (SD-WAN) technology and believe it is an integral part of their business, a clear path to vendor success and long-term revenue isn't yet visible.
The Internet of Things (IoT) is growing rapidly, but the lack of standards – as well as uncertainty about its revenue potential – is a major source of frustration for communications service providers (CSPs).
Whatever strategy CSPs adopt in the emerging IoT landscape, a critical enabler of their IoT business will be the monetization engine.
Featured Video
From The Founder
Light Reading is spending much of this year digging into the details of how automation technology will impact the comms market, but let's take a moment to also look at how automation is set to overturn the current world order by the middle of the century.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
November 1, 2017, The Royal Garden Hotel
November 1, 2017, The Montcalm Marble Arch
November 2, 2017, 8 Northumberland Avenue, London, UK
November 2, 2017, 8 Northumberland Avenue – London
November 10, 2017, The Westin Times Square, New York, NY
November 16, 2017, ExCel Centre, London
November 30, 2017, The Westin Times Square
May 14-17, 2018, Austin Convention Center
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
With the mobile ecosystem becoming increasingly vulnerable to security threats, AdaptiveMobile has laid out some of the key considerations for the wireless community.
Hot Topics
Muni Policies Stymie Edge Computing
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 10/17/2017
'Brutal' Automation & the Looming Workforce Cull
Iain Morris, News Editor, 10/18/2017
Is US Lurching Back to Monopoly Status?
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 10/16/2017
Pai's FCC Raises Alarms at Competitive Carriers
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 10/16/2017
Worried About Bandwidth for 4K? Here Comes 8K!
Aditya Kishore, Practice Leader, Video Transformation, Telco Transformation, 10/17/2017
Animals with Phones
Selfie Game Strong Click Here
Latest Comment
Live Digital Audio

Understanding the full experience of women in technology requires starting at the collegiate level (or sooner) and studying the technologies women are involved with, company cultures they're part of and personal experiences of individuals.

During this WiC radio show, we will talk with Nicole Engelbert, the director of Research & Analysis for Ovum Technology and a 23-year telecom industry veteran, about her experiences and perspectives on women in tech. Engelbert covers infrastructure, applications and industries for Ovum, but she is also involved in the research firm's higher education team and has helped colleges and universities globally leverage technology as a strategy for improving recruitment, retention and graduation performance.

She will share her unique insight into the collegiate level, where women pursuing engineering and STEM-related degrees is dwindling. Engelbert will also reveal new, original Ovum research on the topics of artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, security and augmented reality, as well as discuss what each of those technologies might mean for women in our field. As always, we'll also leave plenty of time to answer all your questions live on the air and chat board.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
Partner Perspectives - content from our sponsors
The Mobile Broadband Road Ahead
By Kevin Taylor, for Huawei
All Partner Perspectives