Light Reading

US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict

Ray Le Maistre
10/8/2012
50%
50%

5:00 AM -- The U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has decided that Chinese telecom equipment vendors Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. and ZTE Corp. (Shenzhen: 000063; Hong Kong: 0763) pose a security risk and that U.S. companies should not engage in business with them. (See More Chinese Whispers and Huawei, ZTE Probed by Intelligence Agency.)

That, reports Bloomberg, is the general conclusion of the Intelligence Committee following a probe that saw members of the investigating team visit China and representatives of both Huawei and ZTE give evidence to the Committee (testimony that included some ill-advised claims). (See Huawei, ZTE Get Grilled in US.)

The Committee's main concern, it would seem, is that it's not possible for Huawei and ZTE to operate without influence from the Chinese government, a claim that both vendors have always rejected and which ZTE has once again denied, reports Reuters.

The verdict should come as no surprise to anyone. The tone of the Committee's statements always suggested that the only thing in doubt was just how damning of the Chinese vendors the final conclusions would be.

That's not to say that the Committee's findings have no validity and, for sure, both Huawei and ZTE have been guilty over the years of having indulged in less than creditable business practices, including industrial espionage and bribery. To what extent those two companies engage in those practices any more than their counterparts is another issue altogether -- international business in any industry is far from squeaky clean.

Once the full report is released it'll be interesting to see the full details of the Committee's decision. What's immediately clear, though, is that this provides a greater opportunity for the Chinese vendors' rivals to win business in the critical U.S. market and that any engagement with Huawei and ZTE by U.S. companies hereon in is likely to be public relations suicide.

Of course, the fallout from the Committee's verdict could be far more wide-ranging. China's foreign ministry has already issued a statement about the verdict, urging the U.S. to set aside any prejudices when dealing with Huawei and ZTE, reports Reuters. It's hard to imagine that the Chinese government's reaction will begin and end with a statement.

— Ray Le Maistre, International Managing Editor, Light Reading

(19)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Rupert_Baines
50%
50%
Rupert_Baines,
User Rank: Blogger
12/5/2012 | 5:19:37 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


The Economist had a very intersting piece on this over the summer.


 


They discuss a lot of the issues: Huawei's success, the very genuine concerns about security in general, how other countries are facing these issues.


They contrast the US approachj (a panel of politicians) with how UK Govt has invested & involved GCHQ in audits and diligence. 


They also made the point about complacency: merely because a product is US owned is no particular reason to trust it is secure (after all, how much of the technology used in Western Company X's product was developed in China anyway...?)


http://www.economist.com/node/...


That said, there are things Huawei & ZTE could and should do to improve clarity.


Maybe this move will help that - but I suspect the reality may make little difference to US Trade Policy.

paolo.franzoi
50%
50%
paolo.franzoi,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:19:36 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


The bigger issue for Huawei is 60 minutes which did a piece on them last night (but not including ZTE).  I would say the chances of the American Public not being highly suspicious of Huawei after that report are slim and none (and slim just left).  


One of the very interesting bits came to the end when 60 minutes told folks that basically all the comm gear we buy (outside of Cisco) is foreign owned.  Of course that is not true, but Cisco is the only major American supplier out there.  


seven


 

paolo.franzoi
50%
50%
paolo.franzoi,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:19:35 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


Rgru,


None of those companies are $20B+ like Cisco, Alcatel, Erriccson, NSN, Huawei and ZTE.  The whole point is that the US companies that you listed there are Tier 2 and Tier 3 players.  There are no Tier 1 Telco Equipment Manufacturers left in the US, as Cisco in many ways is more of an Enterprise company.  The only one that the US really had was Lucent but that died long ago.


seven


 

non_linear
50%
50%
non_linear,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:19:35 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


What about HP's H3C unit? They operate as a completely independent company in China, where HP essentially acts as a reseller (with limited influence on features and roadmap) of H3C gear Rest of World?  Seems to me that this sort of "ruling" should apply to them too, no?

Chhilar
50%
50%
Chhilar,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:19:35 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


That is extremely inaccurate regarding the origin of telecomm equipment.  Ciena, Infinera, Tellabs, Adtran, JDSU, Oclaro and others...  There are many American telecomm equipment and component companies.

Soupafly
50%
50%
Soupafly,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 5:19:34 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


The leading headline is questionable journalism...imho. Its fair to say that LR & its parent company have commercial revenues and concerns to consider, so I understand that.


However, certain lines & journalistic integrity will always remain important.


This topic is going to rumble on.


The article alludes that the UK approach is better than the US. Am not sure I agree. Whilst its true that the UK process is arguably more transparent, I don't assume that the US process is wrong and baseless, just because they have not published their sources & rationale. There may be reasons that we are not aware of, as to why they have done that.


I do think that Huawei's top team including Ren got complacent & arrogant in regards to the US and breaking into the NA marketplace. They have fallen for too many fast talking texans and hustlers instead of paying careful attention to the environment & basics. ZTE are relatively inconsequential outside handsets and have immature tech, so not really worth commenting on - in detail. The alliance with Cisco in china is a counter-tactical play against Huawei, based on the frenemy principle, amongst others.


NA is strategically important on multiple levels, so whilst this will lead to another rounds of strategic reviews, the NA market is a no retreat, no surrender territory. AL, Ericsson, Cisco, Ciena, HP, Apple, IBM - all the big global players are there and that is something that cannot be understated.


Will they break through? No question. Yes.


Only 1 US carrier needs to break & be seduced by free or very cheap tech that is world class (and there R&D has done an amazing job on the tech!) and the floodgates will open. If 1 major operator gains a strategic cost advantage that will cross contaminate the balance sheet for all & lead to price war.


Thats what has happened in the EU market place and numerous others. The NA market is in no way special, in that regard.

sam masud
50%
50%
sam masud,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 5:19:34 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


Saw the 60 Minutes "report" last evening--it was hilarious, but not in a light, funny way. 

exon
50%
50%
exon,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:19:33 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


no doubt the verdict is highly political and way too influenced from lobbyists. Nevertheless is good for US interests. I wish the europeans could have the courage to do something similar rather than watching Huawei (mainly) and ZTE reaping one after the other the deals through price damping & other obviously illegal practices. They could have possibly saved some major tech firms (and many thousand jobs) from going under.

Rupert_Baines
50%
50%
Rupert_Baines,
User Rank: Blogger
12/5/2012 | 5:19:32 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


I'm not sure that protectionism is ever a good way to save jobs. Trying to use laws to keep out technology, to try to protect uncompetetive domestic amnufacturers is not usually recommended...


Indeed, in contradiction to your point, it is Europe that has accepted the challenge from Huawei & ZTE, with European operators buying from them.


But looking at the Tier 1 OEMs (Ericsson, Huawei, NSN, ALU, ZTE - and sort of Cisco) it does not seem to have hurt European business.


So what exactly is it that Europe should listen too?

lightmonkey
50%
50%
lightmonkey,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:19:30 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


I agree seven.


 


I think the US Govt. is finally waking up to the fact that there is no big US supplier in a key strategic industry.  It's clearly a problem. 


People here talk about protectionism, it's not about that so much.  It's really about the ability of a foreign government to essentially turn off or disrupt the communications infrastructure of the United States.  In any war, the very first thing that's targeted is the communications infrastructure. 


And BTW, the US is not alone here, the Germans came to the same conclusion.


http://www.lightreading.com/bl...


 


 


 

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Educational Resources
sponsor supplied content
Educational Resources Archive
More Blogs from AsiaBlog
Staff humiliation strategy goes viral in China
Are you watching, Europe?
Security concerns scupper China Mobile investment in Taiwanese operator
Major carrier plans a near 50% hike in annual spending, with LTE TDD getting a healthy chunk
The Chinese vendors hike their intellectual property investments and ask everyone to play nice with patents
Flash Poll
From The Founder
Last week I dropped in on "Hotlanta," Georgia to moderate Light Reading's inaugural DroneComm conference – a unique colloquium investigating the potential for drone communications to disrupt the world's telecom ecosystem. As you will see, it was a day of exploration and epiphany...
LRTV Documentaries
Cable Eyeing SDN for Headend, Home Uses

5|26|15   |   05:57   |   (1) comment


CableLabs is looking at virtualizing CMTS and CCAP devices in the headend, as well as in-home devices, says CableLabs' Karthik Sundaresan.
LRTV Documentaries
Verizon's Emmons: SDN Key to Cost-Effective Scaling

5|22|15   |   03:53   |   (0) comments


For Verizon and other network operators to ramp up available bandwidth cost effectively, they need to move to SDN and agree on how to do that.
LRTV Documentaries
Lack of Universal SDN a Challenge

5|21|15   |   04:51   |   (3) comments


Heavy Reading Analyst Sterling Perrin talks about how uncertainty about SDN standards and approaches may be slowing deployment.
LRTV Custom TV
Steve Vogelsang Interview: Carrier SDN

5|20|15   |   05:02   |   (0) comments


Sterling Perrin speaks to Steve Vogelsang, Alcatel-Lucent CTO for IP Routing & Transport business, about the new Carrier SDN-enabling Network Services Platform and the operator challenges it solves.
LRTV Custom TV
Carrier SDN: On-Demand Networks for an On-Demand World

5|20|15   |   20:52   |   (0) comments


Steve Vogelsang, Alcatel-Lucent CTO for IP Routing & Transport business, talks about requirements and benefits of Carrier SDN during the keynote address at the Light Reading Carrier SDN event May 2015.
LRTV Documentaries
The Security Challenge of SDN

5|19|15   |   02:52   |   (0) comments


CenturyLink VP James Feger discusses concerns that virtualization could create new vulnerabilities unless network operators build in safeguards.
LRTV Custom TV
NFV Elasticity – Highly Available VNF Scale-Out Architectures for the Mobile Edge

5|18|15   |   5:50   |   (0) comments


Peter Marek and Paul Stevens from Advantech Networks and Communications Group talk about their NFV Elasticity initiative and the company's latest platforms for deploying virtual network functions at the edge of the network. Packetarium XL and the new Versatile Server Module: 'designed to reach parts of the network that other servers cannot reach.'
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Bay Area Spark Meetup 2015

5|14|15   |   3:54   |   (0) comments


Developed in 2009, Apache Spark is a powerful open source processing engine built around speed, ease of use and sophisticated analytics. This spring, Huawei hosted a meetup for Spark developers and data scientists in Santa Clara, California. Light Reading spoke with organizers and attendees about Huawei's code contributions and long-term commitment to Spark.
LRTV Custom TV
The Transport SDN Buzz

5|12|15   |   06:01   |   (1) comment


Sterling Perrin, senior analyst at Heavy Reading, speaks with Peter Ashwood-Smith of Huawei and Guru Parulkar of ON.Lab about the evolution of transport SDN and the integration of technologies.
LRTV Custom TV
Next-Generation CCAP: Cisco cBR-8 Evolved CCAP

5|5|15   |   04:49   |   (0) comments


John Chapman, Cisco's CTO of Cable Access Business Unit and Cisco Fellow, explained the innovation design of Cisco's cBR-8, the industry's first Evolved CCAP, including DOCSIS 3.1 design from ground-up, distributed CCAP with Remote PHY and path to virtualization. Cisco's cBR-8 Evolved CCAP is the platform that will last through the transitions.
LRTV Custom TV
Meeting the Demands of Bandwidth & Service Group Growth

5|1|15   |   5:35   |   (0) comments


Jorge Salinger, Comcast's Vice President of Access Architecture, explains how DOCSIS 3.1 and multi-service CCAP can meet the demands of the bandwidth and service group growth.
LRTV Custom TV
DOCSIS 3.1: Transforming Cable From Hardware-Defined Network to Software-Defined Network

4|29|15   |   03:48   |   (0) comments


John Chapman, Cisco's CTO of Cable Access Business Unit and Cisco Fellow, explains how DOCSIS 3.1 can transform cable HFC network to a more agile software-defined network.
Upcoming Live Events
June 8, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 9, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 9-10, 2015, Chicago, IL
June 10, 2015, Chicago, IL
September 29-30, 2015, The Westin Grand Müchen, Munich, Germany
October 6, 2015, The Westin Peachtree Plaza, Atlanta, GA
October 6, 2015, Westin Peachtree Plaza, Atlanta, GA
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
Procera has gathered facts, stats and customer experience feedback from a survey of 540 users from across the globe.
Hot Topics
10 Alternate Uses for Tablets
Eryn Leavens, Copy Desk Editor, 5/22/2015
Bidding War for TWC Looks Likelier
Alan Breznick, Cable/Video Practice Leader, 5/22/2015
Charter Seals Deals for TWC, Bright House
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 5/26/2015
Eurobites: Alcatel-Lucent Trials 400G in Czech Republic
Paul Rainford, Assistant Editor, Europe, 5/26/2015
Comcast Targets 6 New Gigabit Markets
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 5/21/2015
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
On May 29th 10 AM ET, Steve Saunders, founder and CEO of Light Reading, will be drilling into the "pains and gains" of NFV with Saar Gillai, SVP & GM for NFV at Hewlett-Packard Co. (NYSE: HPQ) (HP). He has defined a four-step NFV model describing a sequence of technology innovation. It's a must-read doc for any network architect looking to get to grips with their NFV migration strategy. Join us for the interview, and the chance to ask Saar your NFV questions directly!
With 200 customers in 60 countries, Stockholm-based Net Insight has carved out a solid leadership position in one of the hottest vertical markets going in comms right now: helping service providers and broadcasters deliver video and other multimedia traffic over IP networks. How has Net Insight managed to achieve this success in the face of immense competition from the industry giants?
My ongoing interview tour of the leading minds of the telecom industry recently took me to Richardson, Texas, where I met with Rod Naphan, CTO and SVP, Solutions, ...
Cats with Phones