& cplSiteName &

US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict

Ray Le Maistre
10/8/2012
50%
50%

5:00 AM -- The U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has decided that Chinese telecom equipment vendors Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. and ZTE Corp. (Shenzhen: 000063; Hong Kong: 0763) pose a security risk and that U.S. companies should not engage in business with them. (See More Chinese Whispers and Huawei, ZTE Probed by Intelligence Agency.)

That, reports Bloomberg, is the general conclusion of the Intelligence Committee following a probe that saw members of the investigating team visit China and representatives of both Huawei and ZTE give evidence to the Committee (testimony that included some ill-advised claims). (See Huawei, ZTE Get Grilled in US.)

The Committee's main concern, it would seem, is that it's not possible for Huawei and ZTE to operate without influence from the Chinese government, a claim that both vendors have always rejected and which ZTE has once again denied, reports Reuters.

The verdict should come as no surprise to anyone. The tone of the Committee's statements always suggested that the only thing in doubt was just how damning of the Chinese vendors the final conclusions would be.

That's not to say that the Committee's findings have no validity and, for sure, both Huawei and ZTE have been guilty over the years of having indulged in less than creditable business practices, including industrial espionage and bribery. To what extent those two companies engage in those practices any more than their counterparts is another issue altogether -- international business in any industry is far from squeaky clean.

Once the full report is released it'll be interesting to see the full details of the Committee's decision. What's immediately clear, though, is that this provides a greater opportunity for the Chinese vendors' rivals to win business in the critical U.S. market and that any engagement with Huawei and ZTE by U.S. companies hereon in is likely to be public relations suicide.

Of course, the fallout from the Committee's verdict could be far more wide-ranging. China's foreign ministry has already issued a statement about the verdict, urging the U.S. to set aside any prejudices when dealing with Huawei and ZTE, reports Reuters. It's hard to imagine that the Chinese government's reaction will begin and end with a statement.

— Ray Le Maistre, International Managing Editor, Light Reading

(19)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Rupert_Baines
50%
50%
Rupert_Baines,
User Rank: Blogger
12/5/2012 | 5:19:37 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


The Economist had a very intersting piece on this over the summer.


 


They discuss a lot of the issues: Huawei's success, the very genuine concerns about security in general, how other countries are facing these issues.


They contrast the US approachj (a panel of politicians) with how UK Govt has invested & involved GCHQ in audits and diligence. 


They also made the point about complacency: merely because a product is US owned is no particular reason to trust it is secure (after all, how much of the technology used in Western Company X's product was developed in China anyway...?)


http://www.economist.com/node/...


That said, there are things Huawei & ZTE could and should do to improve clarity.


Maybe this move will help that - but I suspect the reality may make little difference to US Trade Policy.

paolo.franzoi
50%
50%
paolo.franzoi,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:19:36 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


The bigger issue for Huawei is 60 minutes which did a piece on them last night (but not including ZTE).  I would say the chances of the American Public not being highly suspicious of Huawei after that report are slim and none (and slim just left).  


One of the very interesting bits came to the end when 60 minutes told folks that basically all the comm gear we buy (outside of Cisco) is foreign owned.  Of course that is not true, but Cisco is the only major American supplier out there.  


seven


 

paolo.franzoi
50%
50%
paolo.franzoi,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:19:35 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


Rgru,


None of those companies are $20B+ like Cisco, Alcatel, Erriccson, NSN, Huawei and ZTE.  The whole point is that the US companies that you listed there are Tier 2 and Tier 3 players.  There are no Tier 1 Telco Equipment Manufacturers left in the US, as Cisco in many ways is more of an Enterprise company.  The only one that the US really had was Lucent but that died long ago.


seven


 

non_linear
50%
50%
non_linear,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:19:35 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


What about HP's H3C unit? They operate as a completely independent company in China, where HP essentially acts as a reseller (with limited influence on features and roadmap) of H3C gear Rest of World?  Seems to me that this sort of "ruling" should apply to them too, no?

Chhilar
50%
50%
Chhilar,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:19:35 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


That is extremely inaccurate regarding the origin of telecomm equipment.  Ciena, Infinera, Tellabs, Adtran, JDSU, Oclaro and others...  There are many American telecomm equipment and component companies.

Soupafly
50%
50%
Soupafly,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 5:19:34 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


The leading headline is questionable journalism...imho. Its fair to say that LR & its parent company have commercial revenues and concerns to consider, so I understand that.


However, certain lines & journalistic integrity will always remain important.


This topic is going to rumble on.


The article alludes that the UK approach is better than the US. Am not sure I agree. Whilst its true that the UK process is arguably more transparent, I don't assume that the US process is wrong and baseless, just because they have not published their sources & rationale. There may be reasons that we are not aware of, as to why they have done that.


I do think that Huawei's top team including Ren got complacent & arrogant in regards to the US and breaking into the NA marketplace. They have fallen for too many fast talking texans and hustlers instead of paying careful attention to the environment & basics. ZTE are relatively inconsequential outside handsets and have immature tech, so not really worth commenting on - in detail. The alliance with Cisco in china is a counter-tactical play against Huawei, based on the frenemy principle, amongst others.


NA is strategically important on multiple levels, so whilst this will lead to another rounds of strategic reviews, the NA market is a no retreat, no surrender territory. AL, Ericsson, Cisco, Ciena, HP, Apple, IBM - all the big global players are there and that is something that cannot be understated.


Will they break through? No question. Yes.


Only 1 US carrier needs to break & be seduced by free or very cheap tech that is world class (and there R&D has done an amazing job on the tech!) and the floodgates will open. If 1 major operator gains a strategic cost advantage that will cross contaminate the balance sheet for all & lead to price war.


Thats what has happened in the EU market place and numerous others. The NA market is in no way special, in that regard.

sam masud
50%
50%
sam masud,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 5:19:34 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


Saw the 60 Minutes "report" last evening--it was hilarious, but not in a light, funny way. 

exon
50%
50%
exon,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:19:33 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


no doubt the verdict is highly political and way too influenced from lobbyists. Nevertheless is good for US interests. I wish the europeans could have the courage to do something similar rather than watching Huawei (mainly) and ZTE reaping one after the other the deals through price damping & other obviously illegal practices. They could have possibly saved some major tech firms (and many thousand jobs) from going under.

Rupert_Baines
50%
50%
Rupert_Baines,
User Rank: Blogger
12/5/2012 | 5:19:32 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


I'm not sure that protectionism is ever a good way to save jobs. Trying to use laws to keep out technology, to try to protect uncompetetive domestic amnufacturers is not usually recommended...


Indeed, in contradiction to your point, it is Europe that has accepted the challenge from Huawei & ZTE, with European operators buying from them.


But looking at the Tier 1 OEMs (Ericsson, Huawei, NSN, ALU, ZTE - and sort of Cisco) it does not seem to have hurt European business.


So what exactly is it that Europe should listen too?

lightmonkey
50%
50%
lightmonkey,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:19:30 PM
re: US vs Huawei/ZTE: The Verdict


I agree seven.


 


I think the US Govt. is finally waking up to the fact that there is no big US supplier in a key strategic industry.  It's clearly a problem. 


People here talk about protectionism, it's not about that so much.  It's really about the ability of a foreign government to essentially turn off or disrupt the communications infrastructure of the United States.  In any war, the very first thing that's targeted is the communications infrastructure. 


And BTW, the US is not alone here, the Germans came to the same conclusion.


http://www.lightreading.com/bl...


 


 


 

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
More Blogs from AsiaBlog
Staff humiliation strategy goes viral in China
Are you watching, Europe?
Security concerns scupper China Mobile investment in Taiwanese operator
Major carrier plans a near 50% hike in annual spending, with LTE TDD getting a healthy chunk
The Chinese vendors hike their intellectual property investments and ask everyone to play nice with patents
Light Reading’s Upskill U is a FREE, interactive, online educational resource that delivers must-have education on themes that relate to the overall business transformation taking place in the communications industry.
NEXT COURSE
Wednesday, September 28, 1:00PM EDT
Gigabit 101
Will Barkis, Senior Technology Analyst, Orange
UPCOMING COURSE SCHEDULE
Friday, September 30, 1:00PM EDT
Gigabit & the Great Migration
Robert Howald, Vice President, Network Architecture, Comcast
Wednesday, October 5, 1:00PM EDT
Gigabit & Smart Cities
Joe Kochan, COO & Co-Founder, US Ignite
Friday, October 7, 1:00PM EDT
Gigabit & DOCSIS 3.1
Ty Pearman, Director, Access Architecture, Comcast
in association with:
From The Founder
Light Reading today starts a new voyage as part of a larger Enterprise.
Flash Poll
Live Streaming Video
Charting the CSP's Future
Six different communications service providers join to debate their visions of the future CSP, following a landmark presentation from AT&T on its massive virtualization efforts and a look back on where the telecom industry has been and where it's going from two industry veterans.
LRTV Documentaries
MEC Congress: The Key Takeaways

9|22|16   |   03:25   |   (3) comments


Three key takeaways from the Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) Congress in Munich, Germany.
Wagner’s Ring
Time to Shut Up About 'Dumb Pipes'

9|22|16   |     |   (12) comments


Service providers can't compete with OTT players. It just isn't in their DNA. Instead, service providers need to embrace what they're good at -- providing reliable, secure connectivity.
Wagner’s Ring
Keeping Your Tech Career Going After 50

9|21|16   |     |   (13) comments


How do you keep your career moving forward when you're past the half-century mark?
LRTV Interviews
Peering Into the Digital Future

9|20|16   |   04:25   |   (0) comments


Nick Thomas, practice leader of digital media at Ovum, talks about how digital transformation in the technology, media and telecom sectors will enable the development of a new range of applications and services for enterprises and consumers and how the upcoming Digital Futures event in London will examine ...
LRTV Custom TV
Napatech Tackles NFV's Major Challenge

9|7|16   |   08:42   |   (0) comments


One of the main challenges for network operators introducing NFV is to combine performance and flexibility in a cost-effective way, but there is a solution, explains Napatech's Dan Joe Barry.
LRTV Custom TV
Huawei Optical Innovation 2016

9|6|16   |     |   (0) comments


Highlights of the 2016 Huawei Optical Innovation forum.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Are You Ready for Huawei Connect 2016?

8|31|16   |     |   (0) comments


Join us for an exclusive sneak peak of Huawei Connect, an integrated conference for the global ICT ecosystem taking place in Shanghai.
Between the CEOs
CEO Chat: UXP's Gemini Waghmare

8|26|16   |     |   (0) comments


Light Reading CEO Steve Saunders and UXP Systems CEO Gemini Waghmare discuss the strategic importance of digital identity for operators in the midst of transformation.
LRTV Custom TV
F5 Virtual Network Function Integrations With Partner Orchestration Platform

8|24|16   |   6:38   |   (0) comments


F5's Kishore Patnam, product manager for F5's service provider solutions, discusses why service providers are moving towards virtualization and how his clients are utilizing F5's solutions.
Between the CEOs
CEO Chat: Intel's Alexis Black Bjorlin

8|17|16   |   06:23   |   (0) comments


Join us for an in-depth interview between Steve Saunders of Light Reading and Alexis Black Bjorlin of Intel as they discuss the release of the company's Silicon Photonics platform, its performance, long-term prospects, customer expectations and much more.
Telecom Innovators Video Showcase
Accelerating Telecom Digital Transformation With Nominum DNS

8|1|16   |   12:04   |   (0) comments


Light Reading's Steve Saunders gets an update from Nominum CEO Gary Messiana on how his company is helping carriers on the digital transformation journey.
LRTV Custom TV
Reinventing Operations for a Virtual, Software-Defined World

7|28|16   |   5:23   |   (0) comments


Heavy Reading Senior Analyst Jim Hodges speaks with Accenture's Larry Socher and Matt Anderson about what service providers must do to transform their business to get the benefits of SDN and NFV including: leveraging DevOps, introducing real-time OSS and implementing analytics.
Upcoming Live Events
November 3, 2016, The Montcalm Marble Arch, London
November 30, 2016, The Westin Times Square, New York City
December 1, 2016, The Westin Times Square, New York, NY
December 6-8, 2016, The Westin Excelsior, Rome
May 16-17, 2017, Austin Convention Center, Austin, TX
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
Hot Topics
Keeping Your Tech Career Going After 50
Mitch Wagner, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading, 9/21/2016
Time to Shut Up About 'Dumb Pipes'
Mitch Wagner, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading, 9/22/2016
Comcast Will Go Wireless in 2017
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 9/20/2016
Sprint CEO: We'll Lease Spectrum as Soon as Possible
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 9/20/2016
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
Light Reading CEO Steve Saunders and UXP Systems CEO Gemini Waghmare discuss the strategic importance of digital identity for operators in the midst of transformation.
Join us for an in-depth interview between Steve Saunders of Light Reading and Alexis Black Bjorlin of Intel as they discuss the release of the company's Silicon Photonics platform, its performance, long-term prospects, customer expectations and much more.
Animals with Phones
You Thought Your Customer Service Was Unreliable... Click Here
Live Digital Audio

A vital part of increasing the number of women in comms is transforming the ways companies can support and empower women. While progressive company policies that support both men and women in achieving work-life balance are a step in the right direction, creating a company culture that supports those policies can at times be more challenging.

During this show, we'll talk to Lynn Comp, Senior Director of Industry and Sales Enabling (ISE) in the Network Platforms Group at Intel, about why those challenges exist and how companies can overcome them. She'll provide insight into how Intel has worked to create a culture that supports work-life balance, and provide steps and guidance for other companies wishing to do the same. We will also leave plenty of time to get your questions answered live on the air.