& cplSiteName &

Nortel to Offload Data Gear to Radware

Ray Le Maistre
2/20/2009
50%
50%

Nortel Networks Ltd. may have struggled to find a buyer for its Metro Ethernet Networks (MEN) division, but the Canadian vendor, currently restructuring under bankruptcy protection rules, has found a taker for the bulk of its application switching and WAN optimization products. (See Nortel to Hold MEN and Nortel Files for Bankruptcy Protection.)

The proposed buyer is Radware Ltd. (Nasdaq: RDWR), a specialist in applications delivery and security systems that's looking to boost its data center virtualization portfolio. (See Radware Buying Nortel's L4-7.)

Financial terms have not been disclosed, but when word of Radware's interest in some of Nortel's portfolio was first reported in January, a sum of around $50 million was mentioned, but a deal of that magnitude isn't going to help Nortel's current situation unless it opens the asset sale floodgates. (See Nortel M&A Rumor Update, Should Nortel Be Sold for Parts?, and The Decline & Fall of Nortel Networks.)

Nortel bought its way into the application switching sector in 2000 when it paid more than $7 billion in stock for Alteon, a valuation described by one industry executive as "insane." (See Nortel Buys Alteon for Big Bucks .)

The specific products Radware's hoping to acquire -- the 510 and 610 Application Accelerators; the 3408E, 2424E, 2424 SSL E, 2216E, and 2208E Application Switches; and the Virtual Services Switch (VSS) 5000, all currently part of Nortel's Enterprise division -- fit neatly with its strategy. Find out more about Radware's plans in the data center and applications delivery markets in the following video.





Stalking horse
Because of Nortel's current credit protection status, the planned transaction process will follow the auction guidelines set out in Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

Radware, as the initial buyer, is referred to as the "Stalking Horse" in this process, under which other bidders can submit a higher offer. You can read more about this, and how it relates to the Nortel/Radware deal at this Nortel Buzzboard.

Radware's chief operating officer, Ilan Kinreich, tells Light Reading that neither the proposed acquisition price, nor the number of Nortel employees that would transfer to Radware as part of the deal, may be disclosed, because of the bankruptcy court auction process.

He did say, though, that the plan was to take on "a good number of staff who would augment our R&D [and] who have been intimately involved in the Alteon product line, along with support engineers and some sales people."

Kinreich says the deal is "primarily about acquiring the customer base and sales channels. Nortel has done a good job selling [its application delivery products] as part of a larger enterprise and carrier solution set." He adds that the deal would particularly strengthen Radware's position with telecom operators and complement the company's existing business in the Asia/Pacific and EMEA (Europe, Middle East, and Africa) regions in particular.

Although he couldn't go into any details about how many customer relationships Radware might gain should the deal close as planned during the second quarter of this year, Kinreich notes that "tens of thousands of Alteon units have been sold over the years, and many of them are still in use in enterprises and data centers. We can offer [Nortel's customers] a strong roadmap for their existing platforms" and future upgrades to high-bandwidth and high-capacity systems. The COO adds that, in the future, Radware would look to integrate its own product lines with the Nortel assets to create a "best-of-breed product offering."

If his company doesn't lose out to a rival bidder, Kinreich says, the combined market share of the Nortel and Radware application delivery businesses would put it on a par with that of the market's No. 3 player, Citrix Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CTXS), and better position Radware to compete with the market leaders, F5 Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: FFIV) and Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO). See where Radware currently sits in the application delivery controller (ADC) market, according to Gartner Inc. , by checking out this market overview.

— Ray Le Maistre, International News Editor, Light Reading

(8)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Pete Baldwin
50%
50%
Pete Baldwin,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:11:08 PM
re: Nortel to Offload Data Gear to Radware
Reported in the Ottawa Citizen (and brought to my attention via the All About Nortel blog) -- the price for Alteon was $17.65M.

Ottawa Citizen: http://tinyurl.com/bqslcq
All About Nortel: http://tinyurl.com/auukt5

Globes, you'll recall, was thinking more in the $30M-$50M range. That was pre-bankruptcy.

http://www.lightreading.com/bl...
heretoday
50%
50%
heretoday,
User Rank: Moderator
12/5/2012 | 4:10:59 PM
re: Nortel to Offload Data Gear to Radware
.23% is not really a fair valuation of the original investment, nor is $17m a good or bad price for the technology.

NT wanted in on the Entprise market badly back in 1999/2000. Bay and Alteon made up the bulk of that investment which was approximately a $11.5B stock swap. If memory serves NT only paid a marginal premium over the respective market caps. At the time though NT was sailing with a market cap of about $100M. If you take market caps as a representation of value.. and many people unfortunately do... the enterprise invest was expected to be about 10%-11% of NT's acctual $21B business...something around $2.1B. Bay was doing about $2B prior to the acquisition and Alteon was doing a few hundred million so it was not a stretch to expect that the new enterprise portfolio should have netted 10%-11% of NT's total reveune moving into 2001 - 2002. And I believe it did.

If NT had paid a lot of cash for those companies you would have exected to recover that cash through the margin of the products, but NT didn't..it was funny money.

Look at it this way, my single family house has fluctuated in market price up and down 50%, but it's relative value has remained the same...for the price I can still buy a smiliar house in the same market.... the tide rises and sinks all ships.

The price of stock is the same in nature.

Over the last 9 years NT has had a pretty decent run on enterprise technology that was the result of the acquistions of Bay and Alteon. In the end I think it was a good move....but some of the technology is now pretty long in the tooth.

The $17M for the left over technology is irrelevant. The products mentioned,excluding the VSS5000, have been around for 9-12 years. NT did not develop the technology and spent very little in the follow on feature development and sustaining engineering... this is old stuff. I didn't say bad stuff, just old. Much of it is ASIC based and has had just about all of the blood squeezed out that can be. I'd be surprised if NT even spent $18M on development in the last 5 years... so who cares. They served their purpose.

And I hate Nortel as much as the next guy that got screwed out of their severance, retirment and benefits, but I think you still need to put the proper perspective on the business.

Now Clarify.... that's a whole different can of worms..... Qtera...oops.
Brightspark
50%
50%
Brightspark,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:10:59 PM
re: Nortel to Offload Data Gear to Radware
The conditions - "Stalking Horse" play directly into a previous comment of mine in that Huawei may bid for the MEM [and maybe more] business, only to be out bid at the 11th hour by Cisco in a protectionisim chess move to keep Huawei out of its North American domain.
hyperunner
50%
50%
hyperunner,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:10:59 PM
re: Nortel to Offload Data Gear to Radware
0.23% of the original investment.

And the people who made this "visionary" decision are still millionaires? While thousands of their former employees are struggling for some way to feed their families, pay their medical bills, educate their kids and keep a roof over their heads.

Holy crap, it makes you wonder if Karl Marx had a point :-)

hR.
fiber_r_us
50%
50%
fiber_r_us,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:10:54 PM
re: Nortel to Offload Data Gear to Radware
The acquiring companies always underestimate the ability of the evil "status quo" forces within the acquiring company to squeeze the life out of anything that threatens existing product lines, business units, or organizational structure. The acquiring company's "culture" suffocates the hapless acquired company.

hyperunner
50%
50%
hyperunner,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:10:54 PM
re: Nortel to Offload Data Gear to Radware
@heretoday

Thanks for that explanation. I guess there will be folks who disagree with your analysis, but I for one found it pretty logical, and it made me think a different way about acquisition prices.

What I don't understand is this. It sounds like Nortel bought Bay and Alteon, and then basically abandoned all development on the products - despite the fact that they seemed to be bringing in a decent revenue stream. Yet some of these products must have been quite advanced in their time, given you say that they are still deployable today after virtually no development.

(I guess it's also a testiment to the engineers who have to squeeze the performance out of those ASICs without the funding to do a proper next gen box).

Why do acquiring companies do that? Nortel isn't alone in that respect - look at the billions that Lucent spent on acquired companies whose products were EoL after a couple of years? If the technology (and customer base) is worth paying billions of dollars for, then surely it's worth spending a few million dollars more to retain the technology position that generates that revenue.

What am I missing here?

hR.

hyperunner
50%
50%
hyperunner,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:10:50 PM
re: Nortel to Offload Data Gear to Radware
The acquiring companies always underestimate the ability of the evil "status quo" forces within the acquiring company to squeeze the life out of anything that threatens existing product lines, business units, or organizational structure. The acquiring company's "culture" suffocates the hapless acquired company.

Yes, I can understand that. But some companies seem to be able to make acquisitions work. Cisco is a classic example. At least they appear to be able to make them work - I get that impression as an outsider.

I know your comment was partly meant as a joke, but with a serious message. But can it really be that simple?

For example. Lucent paid, what...$20 billion for Ascend. But they never developed a next gen ATM switch.

Let's assume this was because of status quo elements in Lucent - "not invented at Bell Labs".

Can it really be the case that a company would spend so much money on an acquisition, yet then not have the management strength to make sure that the acquired company could flourish without "status quo" interference?

Wait a minute, who am I kidding? This is Lucent after all. There is no level of incompetence to which they cannot rise :-)

hR.


High-Tide
50%
50%
High-Tide,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:10:49 PM
re: Nortel to Offload Data Gear to Radware
I think the analysis is okay if not taken too literally. Nortel has indeed invested development funds on L2/L3 Ethernet switching, and L4-7 application switching products over the last 8 to 10 years. All the original Alteon products and Bay Products are EOL. On the switch side, several generations of successors have been produced, with decent success. On the Alteon side, less so. So to say we never did anything with them is not accurate. For examples, check out the new stackables and core switches - they are formidable products - all derivatives of the Bay aquisition. Nortel still has the best stacking in the industry - by far. The Alteon SSL technology will live on, post Radware, in the form of remote access products(SSL VPN) and the Accelerated Firewall, and these work very well.

All that said, more focus should have been placed on the Alteon gear. We would love to see a greater % of R&D spend in Enterprise data - but to say there was no development is simply and grossly inaccurate, at least on the switch side. The L4-L7 business was somewhat starved during a critical time 3 or 4 years back, allowing F5 to gain market share. The complexity of the product also limited sales opportunities - some sales reps and partners could not easily understand this technology - missing opportunity.

There are plenty of other aqusisitons that did not bear fruit that are more disturbing examples - specifically Clarify and Sonoma. These seem to have been the worst - Sonoma products were basically killed off a few months after the aquisition. Nobody knew what to do with Clarify - had nothing to do with communications.

For all the negative things being said about Nortel, some well deserved, the technology speaks for itself. It seems that the LTE products are stellar, as are the optical - both market leading from a performance perspective. In Enterprise, the switching, voice, and UC products are also rock solid, modern, and high-performing. I saw a post someplace that said if Nortel had the bankroll, it would be a different playing field. Interesting thought. If some decisions makers had taken a different path, we might be singing a much happier tune.

HT
Light Reading’s Upskill U is a FREE, interactive, online educational resource that delivers must-have education on themes that relate to the overall business transformation taking place in the communications industry.
NEXT COURSE
Wednesday, September 28, 1:00PM EDT
Gigabit 101
Will Barkis, Senior Technology Analyst, Orange
UPCOMING COURSE SCHEDULE
Friday, September 30, 1:00PM EDT
Gigabit & the Great Migration
Robert Howald, Vice President, Network Architecture, Comcast
Wednesday, October 5, 1:00PM EDT
Gigabit & Smart Cities
Joe Kochan, COO & Co-Founder, US Ignite
Friday, October 7, 1:00PM EDT
Gigabit & DOCSIS 3.1
Ty Pearman, Director, Access Architecture, Comcast
in association with:
From The Founder
Light Reading today starts a new voyage as part of a larger Enterprise.
Flash Poll
Live Streaming Video
Charting the CSP's Future
Six different communications service providers join to debate their visions of the future CSP, following a landmark presentation from AT&T on its massive virtualization efforts and a look back on where the telecom industry has been and where it's going from two industry veterans.
LRTV Interviews
Level 3: Overcoming Terror of Being Supplier, Integrator & Developer

9|28|16   |     |   (0) comments


At Light Reading's NFV & Carrier SDN event in Denver, Travis Ewert of Level 3 Communications said there is terror in becoming supplier, integrator and developer, but it can be overcome and be cost effective.
LRTV Custom TV
Introducing IoT World News

9|27|16   |   01:43   |   (0) comments


Self-driving cars, medical sensors, smart cities... and refrigerators. In order to address the huge scope of IoT, KNect365 has created a unique online community that will help businesses to understand and monetize the opportunities that live within the IoT market. We look forward to welcoming you to IoT World News -- your gateway to a better connected future.
LRTV Interviews
AT&T: Re-usable Functions Next NFV Key

9|27|16   |   06:03   |   (0) comments


The next generation of NFV has to break functions down into re-usable software chunks, making everything much more cloud-like.
LRTV Interviews
Masergy on Security: Attackers Gaining Upper Hand

9|27|16   |   5:10   |   (2) comments


At Light Reading's NFV & Carrier SDN event in Denver, Ray Watson, vice president of Global Technology at Masergy, says that because of the growth in virtualization, the threat landscape is shifting in favor of the attackers. As a result, service providers need to think beyond just defending the perimeter and take a more holistic approach to security.
LRTV Interviews
Verizon Takes Next Step on Biz Virtualization Journey

9|26|16   |   4:38   |   (2) comments


At September's NFV & Carrier SDN event in Denver, Light Reading sat down with Victoria Lonker, director of Product and New Business Innovation at Verizon, to chat about where the carrier is with delivering virtualized services to business customers.
LRTV Interviews
Global Services: The $40B Face-Off

9|26|16   |   05:53   |   (1) comment


More service providers than ever before are battling it out to win a slice of what is now a $40 billion global communications services pie, explains Ovum Principal Analyst David Molony.
LRTV Documentaries
MEC Congress: The Key Takeaways

9|22|16   |   03:25   |   (3) comments


Three key takeaways from the Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) Congress in Munich, Germany.
Wagner’s Ring
Time to Shut Up About 'Dumb Pipes'

9|22|16   |     |   (12) comments


Service providers can't compete with OTT players. It just isn't in their DNA. Instead, service providers need to embrace what they're good at -- providing reliable, secure connectivity.
Wagner’s Ring
Keeping Your Tech Career Going After 50

9|21|16   |     |   (13) comments


How do you keep your career moving forward when you're past the half-century mark?
LRTV Interviews
Peering Into the Digital Future

9|20|16   |   04:25   |   (0) comments


Nick Thomas, practice leader of digital media at Ovum, talks about how digital transformation in the technology, media and telecom sectors will enable the development of a new range of applications and services for enterprises and consumers and how the upcoming Digital Futures event in London will examine ...
LRTV Custom TV
Napatech Tackles NFV's Major Challenge

9|7|16   |   08:42   |   (0) comments


One of the main challenges for network operators introducing NFV is to combine performance and flexibility in a cost-effective way, but there is a solution, explains Napatech's Dan Joe Barry.
LRTV Custom TV
Huawei Optical Innovation 2016

9|6|16   |     |   (0) comments


Highlights of the 2016 Huawei Optical Innovation forum.
Upcoming Live Events
November 3, 2016, The Montcalm Marble Arch, London
November 30, 2016, The Westin Times Square, New York City
December 1, 2016, The Westin Times Square, New York, NY
December 6-8, 2016, The Westin Excelsior, Rome
May 16-17, 2017, Austin Convention Center, Austin, TX
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
Hot Topics
Time to Shut Up About 'Dumb Pipes'
Mitch Wagner, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading, 9/22/2016
Verizon CFO: Eat Our (Fixed) 5G Dust!
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 9/22/2016
Eurobites: Telefónica Taps Juniper for Network Security
Paul Rainford, Assistant Editor, Europe, 9/26/2016
WiCipedia: The Women Helping Women Edition
Eryn Leavens, Special Features & Copy Editor, 9/23/2016
Open Source Getting on My Nerves
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 9/26/2016
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
Light Reading CEO Steve Saunders and UXP Systems CEO Gemini Waghmare discuss the strategic importance of digital identity for operators in the midst of transformation.
Join us for an in-depth interview between Steve Saunders of Light Reading and Alexis Black Bjorlin of Intel as they discuss the release of the company's Silicon Photonics platform, its performance, long-term prospects, customer expectations and much more.
Animals with Phones
There's Nothing Like Missing a Full Minute of Pokémon Go Click Here
Live Digital Audio

A vital part of increasing the number of women in comms is transforming the ways companies can support and empower women. While progressive company policies that support both men and women in achieving work-life balance are a step in the right direction, creating a company culture that supports those policies can at times be more challenging.

During this show, we'll talk to Lynn Comp, Senior Director of Industry and Sales Enabling (ISE) in the Network Platforms Group at Intel, about why those challenges exist and how companies can overcome them. She'll provide insight into how Intel has worked to create a culture that supports work-life balance, and provide steps and guidance for other companies wishing to do the same. We will also leave plenty of time to get your questions answered live on the air.