Light Reading
The breakup of Nortel starts with the proposed sale of its application delivery switches to 'Stalking Horse' Radware

Nortel to Offload Data Gear to Radware

Ray Le Maistre
2/20/2009
50%
50%

Nortel Networks Ltd. may have struggled to find a buyer for its Metro Ethernet Networks (MEN) division, but the Canadian vendor, currently restructuring under bankruptcy protection rules, has found a taker for the bulk of its application switching and WAN optimization products. (See Nortel to Hold MEN and Nortel Files for Bankruptcy Protection.)

The proposed buyer is Radware Ltd. (Nasdaq: RDWR), a specialist in applications delivery and security systems that's looking to boost its data center virtualization portfolio. (See Radware Buying Nortel's L4-7.)

Financial terms have not been disclosed, but when word of Radware's interest in some of Nortel's portfolio was first reported in January, a sum of around $50 million was mentioned, but a deal of that magnitude isn't going to help Nortel's current situation unless it opens the asset sale floodgates. (See Nortel M&A Rumor Update, Should Nortel Be Sold for Parts?, and The Decline & Fall of Nortel Networks.)

Nortel bought its way into the application switching sector in 2000 when it paid more than $7 billion in stock for Alteon, a valuation described by one industry executive as "insane." (See Nortel Buys Alteon for Big Bucks .)

The specific products Radware's hoping to acquire -- the 510 and 610 Application Accelerators; the 3408E, 2424E, 2424 SSL E, 2216E, and 2208E Application Switches; and the Virtual Services Switch (VSS) 5000, all currently part of Nortel's Enterprise division -- fit neatly with its strategy. Find out more about Radware's plans in the data center and applications delivery markets in the following video.





Stalking horse
Because of Nortel's current credit protection status, the planned transaction process will follow the auction guidelines set out in Section 363 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

Radware, as the initial buyer, is referred to as the "Stalking Horse" in this process, under which other bidders can submit a higher offer. You can read more about this, and how it relates to the Nortel/Radware deal at this Nortel Buzzboard.

Radware's chief operating officer, Ilan Kinreich, tells Light Reading that neither the proposed acquisition price, nor the number of Nortel employees that would transfer to Radware as part of the deal, may be disclosed, because of the bankruptcy court auction process.

He did say, though, that the plan was to take on "a good number of staff who would augment our R&D [and] who have been intimately involved in the Alteon product line, along with support engineers and some sales people."

Kinreich says the deal is "primarily about acquiring the customer base and sales channels. Nortel has done a good job selling [its application delivery products] as part of a larger enterprise and carrier solution set." He adds that the deal would particularly strengthen Radware's position with telecom operators and complement the company's existing business in the Asia/Pacific and EMEA (Europe, Middle East, and Africa) regions in particular.

Although he couldn't go into any details about how many customer relationships Radware might gain should the deal close as planned during the second quarter of this year, Kinreich notes that "tens of thousands of Alteon units have been sold over the years, and many of them are still in use in enterprises and data centers. We can offer [Nortel's customers] a strong roadmap for their existing platforms" and future upgrades to high-bandwidth and high-capacity systems. The COO adds that, in the future, Radware would look to integrate its own product lines with the Nortel assets to create a "best-of-breed product offering."

If his company doesn't lose out to a rival bidder, Kinreich says, the combined market share of the Nortel and Radware application delivery businesses would put it on a par with that of the market's No. 3 player, Citrix Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CTXS), and better position Radware to compete with the market leaders, F5 Networks Inc. (Nasdaq: FFIV) and Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO). See where Radware currently sits in the application delivery controller (ADC) market, according to Gartner Inc. , by checking out this market overview.

— Ray Le Maistre, International News Editor, Light Reading

(8)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Pete Baldwin
50%
50%
Pete Baldwin,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:11:08 PM
re: Nortel to Offload Data Gear to Radware
Reported in the Ottawa Citizen (and brought to my attention via the All About Nortel blog) -- the price for Alteon was $17.65M.

Ottawa Citizen: http://tinyurl.com/bqslcq
All About Nortel: http://tinyurl.com/auukt5

Globes, you'll recall, was thinking more in the $30M-$50M range. That was pre-bankruptcy.

http://www.lightreading.com/bl...
heretoday
50%
50%
heretoday,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:10:59 PM
re: Nortel to Offload Data Gear to Radware
.23% is not really a fair valuation of the original investment, nor is $17m a good or bad price for the technology.

NT wanted in on the Entprise market badly back in 1999/2000. Bay and Alteon made up the bulk of that investment which was approximately a $11.5B stock swap. If memory serves NT only paid a marginal premium over the respective market caps. At the time though NT was sailing with a market cap of about $100M. If you take market caps as a representation of value.. and many people unfortunately do... the enterprise invest was expected to be about 10%-11% of NT's acctual $21B business...something around $2.1B. Bay was doing about $2B prior to the acquisition and Alteon was doing a few hundred million so it was not a stretch to expect that the new enterprise portfolio should have netted 10%-11% of NT's total reveune moving into 2001 - 2002. And I believe it did.

If NT had paid a lot of cash for those companies you would have exected to recover that cash through the margin of the products, but NT didn't..it was funny money.

Look at it this way, my single family house has fluctuated in market price up and down 50%, but it's relative value has remained the same...for the price I can still buy a smiliar house in the same market.... the tide rises and sinks all ships.

The price of stock is the same in nature.

Over the last 9 years NT has had a pretty decent run on enterprise technology that was the result of the acquistions of Bay and Alteon. In the end I think it was a good move....but some of the technology is now pretty long in the tooth.

The $17M for the left over technology is irrelevant. The products mentioned,excluding the VSS5000, have been around for 9-12 years. NT did not develop the technology and spent very little in the follow on feature development and sustaining engineering... this is old stuff. I didn't say bad stuff, just old. Much of it is ASIC based and has had just about all of the blood squeezed out that can be. I'd be surprised if NT even spent $18M on development in the last 5 years... so who cares. They served their purpose.

And I hate Nortel as much as the next guy that got screwed out of their severance, retirment and benefits, but I think you still need to put the proper perspective on the business.

Now Clarify.... that's a whole different can of worms..... Qtera...oops.
Brightspark
50%
50%
Brightspark,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:10:59 PM
re: Nortel to Offload Data Gear to Radware
The conditions - "Stalking Horse" play directly into a previous comment of mine in that Huawei may bid for the MEM [and maybe more] business, only to be out bid at the 11th hour by Cisco in a protectionisim chess move to keep Huawei out of its North American domain.
hyperunner
50%
50%
hyperunner,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:10:59 PM
re: Nortel to Offload Data Gear to Radware
0.23% of the original investment.

And the people who made this "visionary" decision are still millionaires? While thousands of their former employees are struggling for some way to feed their families, pay their medical bills, educate their kids and keep a roof over their heads.

Holy crap, it makes you wonder if Karl Marx had a point :-)

hR.
fiber_r_us
50%
50%
fiber_r_us,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:10:54 PM
re: Nortel to Offload Data Gear to Radware
The acquiring companies always underestimate the ability of the evil "status quo" forces within the acquiring company to squeeze the life out of anything that threatens existing product lines, business units, or organizational structure. The acquiring company's "culture" suffocates the hapless acquired company.

hyperunner
50%
50%
hyperunner,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:10:54 PM
re: Nortel to Offload Data Gear to Radware
@heretoday

Thanks for that explanation. I guess there will be folks who disagree with your analysis, but I for one found it pretty logical, and it made me think a different way about acquisition prices.

What I don't understand is this. It sounds like Nortel bought Bay and Alteon, and then basically abandoned all development on the products - despite the fact that they seemed to be bringing in a decent revenue stream. Yet some of these products must have been quite advanced in their time, given you say that they are still deployable today after virtually no development.

(I guess it's also a testiment to the engineers who have to squeeze the performance out of those ASICs without the funding to do a proper next gen box).

Why do acquiring companies do that? Nortel isn't alone in that respect - look at the billions that Lucent spent on acquired companies whose products were EoL after a couple of years? If the technology (and customer base) is worth paying billions of dollars for, then surely it's worth spending a few million dollars more to retain the technology position that generates that revenue.

What am I missing here?

hR.

hyperunner
50%
50%
hyperunner,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:10:50 PM
re: Nortel to Offload Data Gear to Radware
The acquiring companies always underestimate the ability of the evil "status quo" forces within the acquiring company to squeeze the life out of anything that threatens existing product lines, business units, or organizational structure. The acquiring company's "culture" suffocates the hapless acquired company.

Yes, I can understand that. But some companies seem to be able to make acquisitions work. Cisco is a classic example. At least they appear to be able to make them work - I get that impression as an outsider.

I know your comment was partly meant as a joke, but with a serious message. But can it really be that simple?

For example. Lucent paid, what...$20 billion for Ascend. But they never developed a next gen ATM switch.

Let's assume this was because of status quo elements in Lucent - "not invented at Bell Labs".

Can it really be the case that a company would spend so much money on an acquisition, yet then not have the management strength to make sure that the acquired company could flourish without "status quo" interference?

Wait a minute, who am I kidding? This is Lucent after all. There is no level of incompetence to which they cannot rise :-)

hR.


High-Tide
50%
50%
High-Tide,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 4:10:49 PM
re: Nortel to Offload Data Gear to Radware
I think the analysis is okay if not taken too literally. Nortel has indeed invested development funds on L2/L3 Ethernet switching, and L4-7 application switching products over the last 8 to 10 years. All the original Alteon products and Bay Products are EOL. On the switch side, several generations of successors have been produced, with decent success. On the Alteon side, less so. So to say we never did anything with them is not accurate. For examples, check out the new stackables and core switches - they are formidable products - all derivatives of the Bay aquisition. Nortel still has the best stacking in the industry - by far. The Alteon SSL technology will live on, post Radware, in the form of remote access products(SSL VPN) and the Accelerated Firewall, and these work very well.

All that said, more focus should have been placed on the Alteon gear. We would love to see a greater % of R&D spend in Enterprise data - but to say there was no development is simply and grossly inaccurate, at least on the switch side. The L4-L7 business was somewhat starved during a critical time 3 or 4 years back, allowing F5 to gain market share. The complexity of the product also limited sales opportunities - some sales reps and partners could not easily understand this technology - missing opportunity.

There are plenty of other aqusisitons that did not bear fruit that are more disturbing examples - specifically Clarify and Sonoma. These seem to have been the worst - Sonoma products were basically killed off a few months after the aquisition. Nobody knew what to do with Clarify - had nothing to do with communications.

For all the negative things being said about Nortel, some well deserved, the technology speaks for itself. It seems that the LTE products are stellar, as are the optical - both market leading from a performance perspective. In Enterprise, the switching, voice, and UC products are also rock solid, modern, and high-performing. I saw a post someplace that said if Nortel had the bankroll, it would be a different playing field. Interesting thought. If some decisions makers had taken a different path, we might be singing a much happier tune.

HT
Flash Poll
LRTV Documentaries
Sprint's Network Evolution

7|24|14   |   14:59   |   (0) comments


Sprint's Jay Bluhm gives a keynote speech at the Big Telecom Event (BTE) about Sprint's network and services evolution strategy, including Spark.
LRTV Documentaries
BTE Keynote: The Software-Defined Operator

7|24|14   |   18:43   |   (1) comment


Deutsche Telekom's Axel Clauberg explains the concept of the software-defined operator to the Big Telecom Event (BTE) crowd.
Light Reedy
Numbers Are In: LR's 2014 Salary Survey

7|24|14   |   1:25   |   (6) comments


Our fourth annual Salary Survey paints a picture of who's hiring, firing, earning, and yearning for a change in the telecom industry.
LRTV Custom TV
Driving the Network Transformation

7|23|14   |   4:29   |   (0) comments


Intel's Sandra Rivera discusses network transformation and how Intel technologies, programs, and standards body efforts have helped the industry migration to SDN and NFV.
LRTV Custom TV
Distributed NFV-Based Business Services by RAD

7|18|14   |   5:38   |   (0) comments


With the ETSI-approved Distributed NFV PoC running in the background, RAD's CEO, Dror Bin, talks about why D-NFV makes compelling sense for service providers, and about the dollars and cents RAD is putting behind D-NFV.
LRTV Custom TV
MRV Accelerating Packet Optical Convergence

7|15|14   |   6:06   |   (0) comments


Giving you network insight to make your network smarter.
LRTV Custom TV
NFV-Enabled Ethernet for Generating New Revenues

7|15|14   |   5:49   |   (0) comments


Cyan's Planet Orchestrate allows service providers and their end-customers to activate software-based capabilities such as firewalls and encryption on top of existing Ethernet services in just minutes.
LRTV Custom TV
Symkloud NVF-Ready Video Transcoding, Big Data

7|9|14   |   3:41   |   (0) comments


Kontron and ISV partner Vantrix demonstrate high-performance video transcoding and data analytic solutions on same 2U standard platform that is ready for SDN and NFV deployments made by mobile, cable and cloud operators.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
The Evolving Role of Hybrid Video for Competitive Success

7|4|14   |   4:09   |   (0) comments


At Huawei's Global Analysts Summit in Shenzhen, China, Steven C. Hawley from TV Strategies speaks to us about the evolving role of hybrid video for competitive success.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
How CSPs Leverage Big Data in the Digital Economy

7|4|14   |   4:48   |   (2) comments


Justin van der Lande from Analysys Mason shares with us his views on how telecom operators can leverage customer asset monetization with big data. His discusses the current status of big data applications and the challenges and opportunities for telecom operators in the digital economy era.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Accelerator for Digital Business Future Oriented BSS

7|4|14   |   3:08   |   (0) comments


Mobile and internet are becoming intertwined; IT and CT are integrating; and leading CSPs have begun to transform to information service and entertainment providers. How should the BSS system evolve to enable this transformation? Karl Whitelock, an analyst at Frost & Sullivan, shares his views.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Orange Tunisia Discusses Multi-Band Antenna With EasyRET Solution

7|4|14   |   2:45   |   (0) comments


As new site acquisition becomes more difficult, Orange Tunisia has requested multi-band antenna to support UMTS and LTE innovation. Some things considered include reducing the cost of antenna maintenance and having high reliability antenna and EasyRET solution.
Upcoming Live Events!!
September 16, 2014, Santa Clara, CA
September 16, 2014, Santa Clara, CA
October 29, 2014, New York City
November 6, 2014, Santa Clara
November 11, 2014, Atlanta, GA
December 9-10, 2014, Reykjavik, Iceland
June 9-10, 2015, Chicago, IL
Infographics
Packet Design asks network professionals how they handle the cloud, SDN, and network management.
Today's Cartoon
Vacation Special Caption Competition Click Here
Latest Comment
Hot Topics
The Municipal Menace?
Jason Meyers, Senior Editor, Utility Communications/IoT, 7/22/2014
Cisco Puts a Fog Over IoT
Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, 7/23/2014
Apple Earnings: Strong iPhone Sales, iPad Sales Slump, $7.8B Profit
Mitch Wagner, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading, 7/22/2014
Salary Survey Report 2014
Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, 7/23/2014
Facebook: 30% of Users Are Mobile-Only
Mitch Wagner, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading, 7/24/2014
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed