& cplSiteName &

AT&T Toll-Free Data: Innovation or Rip-Off?

Sarah Thomas
1/9/2014
50%
50%

Since AT&T announced its plans for toll-free data, reactions across the web have been streaming out, some lauding the big carrier for its innovation, others condemning it for finding another way to rip off customers. (See AT&T Unveils Toll-Free, Sponsored Data.)

So, what is it, an innovation or a rip-off? Well, it could be both, but I'm leaning toward innovation. If you can accept that data caps are here to stay, then this is the kind of service plan experimentation we need to see to make them more palatable to consumers.

That said, consumer watchdog groups immediately took issue with the announcement. Free Press called it a lose/lose for consumers and app makers because it bills the brands for data usage without reducing the cost of the user's plan. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman Tom Wheeler has even pledged to look into it to see if it "interferes with the operation of the Internet."

It might not directly save you money on your plan (although it could help avoid overages), but when an app you use all the time -- say, Facebook or ESPN -- partners with AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T), it could free you up to move to a lower data cap. It makes them pay, instead of you.

Granted, this takes a lot of monitoring and the help of AT&T to figure out what cap suits you best, but it's now an option for bill-minded consumers. They might even find themselves engaging more with interesting, relevant content from the brands that are footing the bill, which makes it attractive for them to get on board as well.

On the flip side, not every brand or app can afford to get on board. It's been argued that AT&T's toll-free data creates an unequal playing field for apps developers. A giant like ESPN would have no problem paying for the right to be excluded from the cap, but startups and smaller names might not have that ability.

That may be true, but just because a brand is sponsored doesn't mean consumers have to use its app or go to its site. They may be more compelled to do so because it's free, but the choice is still up to them. I'm not sure anyone would suddenly stop using an app because it's not sponsored. Let's not forget WiFi is still the network that's most used. That un-level playing field already exists today, and innovative startups have managed to emerge from the noise just fine.

Like most things in life, it comes down to execution. Favoritism, even net neutrality, could muck it up, as could the interface for how sponsored data is presented or the ads we have to endure to get to these apps... But, in theory, AT&T's toll-free data is the kind of innovation we need to see from wireless operators.

This is a good step forward and a move I expect other operators will mimic. My hope is that AT&T doesn't take any steps back in its execution.

— Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, Light Reading

(24)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/12/2014 | 10:46:49 AM
Re: Win or fail?
Scotte,

1 - Verizon sold only some wireline customers to Frontier.  They had previously sold some lines to Fairpoint.  Verizon still has about 15M wirelne customers.

2 - I think you are asking if Wireline telcos are measured/judged by their investment in their local wireline networks.  Outside of FCC violations, in general the answer is no.  Rate of Return Carriers still want to keep up their Rate Base, but there is no incentive (outside of customer value) in investing in a network for a Rate Cap carrier.

I do not understand why you would think an Enterprise that had AT&T as one of its ISPs would sponsor data to AT&T wireless customers more than others.  The real question is if the vendor perceives any value in the toll free data.  

 

seven
ScottEStewart0101
50%
50%
ScottEStewart0101,
User Rank: Lightning
1/11/2014 | 9:28:41 AM
Re: Win or fail?
What will be the big kicker here, is businesses choosing to pay only one carrier and not others for sponsored data. Perhaps a provider that sits on ATT's Ethernet pipe would be more inclined to pay ATT for sponsored data, but not Verizon because VZ sold their wire lines to Frontier. perhaps ATT would begin giving discounts on wireline enterprise customers that help subsidize content. Wouldn't be illegal, because they are gauged by their overall spend in an individual MSA.
Sarah Thomas
50%
50%
Sarah Thomas,
User Rank: Blogger
1/10/2014 | 1:43:44 PM
Re: Good or Bad?
With Facebook, you can change your settings to have the videos auto-play only over WiFi.

When you put it like that, UH does sound interesting. I'm on AT&T, so I'll get to experience these soon enough.

Hope your last CES was a good one!
RitchBlasi
50%
50%
RitchBlasi,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/10/2014 | 1:28:44 PM
Good or Bad?
As I mentioned, laying the groundwork.  That said United Healthcare actually makes sense.  For example, if someone goes to its website and wants to watch or download a video presentation explaining how the Affordable Care Act impacts Americans (and we all know that presentation could take some time), UH would pay the cost for its subscriber instead of eating up their data plan.  Sounds like a pretty good customer service play for UH.  The advertising stuff - yeah, pretty lame.  

Also, think back to that Facebook announcement a few months back where it said that it would proactively send videos or whatever to its subscriber base - think you guys covered the announcement.  In that case, the unsolicited video message could be paid by FB...no?  I think that might be one of the reasons FB joined the GSMA - to get a better handle on how what they do impacts companies in the mobile ecosystem.

Sorry, I am geeking out -- too much CES!!!!  But thank God, it was my last.

 
Sarah Thomas
50%
50%
Sarah Thomas,
User Rank: Blogger
1/10/2014 | 1:16:33 PM
Re: Good or Bad???
Video companies would be the most logical to take advantage of this, and be the most helpful to customers. I was surprised there weren't any at launch, but maybe they are still to comes. The launch partners sound kind of lame -- UnitedHealth Group, Kony Solutions, and Aquto -- but I guess we'll have to see how they use their sponsorships.

 
RitchBlasi
50%
50%
RitchBlasi,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/10/2014 | 1:03:33 PM
Good or Bad???
My take on this is that it is more about laying the foundation for companies with bandwidth intensive services - like Netflix, Hulu, etc. - to offset the costs and data usage of streaming video services for customers as more folks transition use from wired to wireless environments.  Wi-Fi has served both those issues for now, but again, it is limited in scale and availability.  As someone growing up in a mobile world, do I really want to be required to find a free Wi-Fi hotspot or would I be glad that my video provider is taking some of the burden off my shoulder?  To me, it doesn't sound like AT&T is double-dipping...they are trying an innovative pricing solution to bandwidth management.  
Sarah Thomas
50%
50%
Sarah Thomas,
User Rank: Blogger
1/10/2014 | 10:45:25 AM
Re: Win or fail?
It's not being forced on users and doens't change how they access content and where. It really is a choice, even if AT&T is helping to make one choice much more attractive over the other.
Sarah Thomas
50%
50%
Sarah Thomas,
User Rank: Blogger
1/10/2014 | 10:30:30 AM
AT&T's response to net neutrality
Probably because it knows it's attracted the FCC's attention, AT&T put out a statement today, saying that toll-free data does not violate net neutrality.

AT&T senior executive vice president of External and Legislative Affairs Jim Cicconi says, "We are completely confident this offering complies with the FCC's Net neutrality rules, which our company supports. AT&T's sponsored data service is aimed solely at benefiting our customers. It allows any company who wishes to pay our customers' costs for accessing that company's content to do so. This is purely voluntary and non-exclusive. It is an offering by that company, not by AT&T."
^ip4g^
50%
50%
^ip4g^,
User Rank: Lightning
1/10/2014 | 12:09:46 AM
Re: Win or fail?
How different is this from Walled Garden ?
brookseven
0%
100%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/9/2014 | 7:00:58 PM
Re: Win or fail?
Yep - why do 4G when you can do free WiFi if you are a restaurant?

seven
Page 1 / 3   >   >>
More Blogs from Que Sera Sarah
Join Women in Comms on Nov. 1 in London for a luncheon geared towards men and how they can be important allies for women in the workplace.
The results of Women in Comms' first survey are in, and they show that the more things change, the more they stay the same (among many other things!).
Join WiC for its fourth networking breakfast in Denver on Thursday, Sept. 28, where we'll come together to discuss why the future is brighter than ever for women in tech.
Nicole Engelbert, the director of research and analsis for Ovum, will be joining Women in Comms on Wednesday, Aug. 2 at 11:00 a.m. EST to talk all things women in tech.
Consulting firm will build 'inclusion councils' with white men in the mix instead of employee resource groups for women and minorities alone.
Featured Video
From The Founder
Light Reading is spending much of this year digging into the details of how automation technology will impact the comms market, but let's take a moment to also look at how automation is set to overturn the current world order by the middle of the century.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
November 1, 2017, The Royal Garden Hotel
November 1, 2017, The Montcalm Marble Arch
November 2, 2017, 8 Northumberland Avenue, London, UK
November 2, 2017, 8 Northumberland Avenue London
November 10, 2017, The Westin Times Square, New York, NY
November 16, 2017, ExCel Centre, London
November 30, 2017, The Westin Times Square
May 14-17, 2018, Austin Convention Center
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
With the mobile ecosystem becoming increasingly vulnerable to security threats, AdaptiveMobile has laid out some of the key considerations for the wireless community.
Hot Topics
Muni Policies Stymie Edge Computing
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 10/17/2017
Is US Lurching Back to Monopoly Status?
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 10/16/2017
'Brutal' Automation & the Looming Workforce Cull
Iain Morris, News Editor, 10/18/2017
Pai's FCC Raises Alarms at Competitive Carriers
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 10/16/2017
Worried About Bandwidth for 4K? Here Comes 8K!
Aditya Kishore, Practice Leader, Video Transformation, Telco Transformation, 10/17/2017
Animals with Phones
Selfie Game Strong Click Here
Latest Comment
Live Digital Audio

Understanding the full experience of women in technology requires starting at the collegiate level (or sooner) and studying the technologies women are involved with, company cultures they're part of and personal experiences of individuals.

During this WiC radio show, we will talk with Nicole Engelbert, the director of Research & Analysis for Ovum Technology and a 23-year telecom industry veteran, about her experiences and perspectives on women in tech. Engelbert covers infrastructure, applications and industries for Ovum, but she is also involved in the research firm's higher education team and has helped colleges and universities globally leverage technology as a strategy for improving recruitment, retention and graduation performance.

She will share her unique insight into the collegiate level, where women pursuing engineering and STEM-related degrees is dwindling. Engelbert will also reveal new, original Ovum research on the topics of artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, security and augmented reality, as well as discuss what each of those technologies might mean for women in our field. As always, we'll also leave plenty of time to answer all your questions live on the air and chat board.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
Partner Perspectives - content from our sponsors
The Mobile Broadband Road Ahead
By Kevin Taylor, for Huawei
All Partner Perspectives