Light Reading
Riverbed faces a second-quarter revenue drop, and renewed pressure to find a buyer.

Riverbed Faces More Pressure to Sell

Dan O'Shea
7/14/2014
100%
0%

WAN optimization vendor Riverbed is facing a renewed pressure to sell after warning that second-quarter revenue came in lower than previous guidance. Activist investor Elliott Management, which tried to acquire Riverbed Technology Inc. (Nasdaq: RVBD) earlier this year with an offer for $19 per share, but was rebuffed, has reiterated its most recent offering of $21 per share. The hedge fund, which owns just less than 11% of Riverbed, is asking that the Riverbed board in any case retain an advisor to help it pursue a sale. (See Riverbed Spurns Takeover Offer.)

The renewed demand to sell came after Riverbed updated its second-quarter revenue numbers, saying that unexpectedly long sales cycles in North America will drop second-quarter revenue to $264 million to $265 million from the previously anticipated range of $274 million to $280 million. After the update, MKM Partners came out with a research note suggesting that the miss could prompt Riverbed to take the next step toward a sale. "We think the company missing its growth targets could potentially serve as a catalyst for management to begin a deeper engagement with interested buyers," wrote Michael Genovese, managing director at MKM Partners.

Since rejecting Elliott's earlier takeover bid, Riverbed has put out a couple of new product announcements, but also saw Juniper Networks Inc. (NYSE: JNPR) kill an application delivery controller product based on technology it licensed from Riverbed. Also, it has been facing intense competition from a crowded field of WAN optimization vendors, including upstart Aryaka , which has claimed it has been doing quite well at the expense of Riverbed and others. (See Aryaka Spikes Unpredictable Enterprise WAN Traffic), Riverbed Announces Networking Solution for Branch Offices, Riverbed Debuts Virtualized Monitoring Appliance, and Juniper Cuts Headcount by 6%, Axes ADC .)

— Dan O'Shea, Managing Editor, Light Reading

(18)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
mrcynic
50%
50%
mrcynic,
User Rank: Light Beer
8/6/2014 | 8:03:11 PM
Re: Aryaka?
You could do a press release like Nutanix. See

http://www.nutanix.com/2014/08/06/nutanix-closes-strong-fiscal-year-exceeds-200-million-bookings-run-rate/

Contracts dont say much unless the dollar per contract is high. Lots of POP locations means you are spending money. 3000 customer locations also means very little if you only get $200 average per location. But if you are getting $1000 average per location, that is $3M per month, which is beginning to look meaningful.
mrcynic
50%
50%
mrcynic,
User Rank: Light Beer
7/31/2014 | 8:49:04 PM
Re: Aryaka?
And the monthly revenue is what?
sonalpuri123
50%
50%
sonalpuri123,
User Rank: Light Weight
7/31/2014 | 6:41:56 PM
Re: Aryaka?
400+ customer contracts. 95% customer retention. Top-tier venture investors that carry billion dollar funds and continue to support us. 3000 customer locations in 50 countries across 280 cities.

Riverbed founded 2002. Silverpeak founded 2004. Aryaka founded 2009.

Claiming we're just a Riverbed killer would not do justice to who we are. Aryaka replaces vendors in multiple billion dollar markets- WAN optimization controllers, MPLS providers and CDNs and green fields. 

Sonal
mrcynic
50%
50%
mrcynic,
User Rank: Light Beer
7/31/2014 | 6:23:34 PM
Re: Aryaka?
Sonal, you seem very eager to learn the identity of richard and myself. Why do you care? 

I decided to do a little research on Aryaka and I am puzzled. You only list 50+ customers. Plus, it appears your last round was a tiny insider round when every major startup has raised large rounds. Plus, you recently raised a large debt round. This doesnt sound like a Riverbed killer. Silverpeak, which is a known competitor, has 1500 customers. Maybe, you earn a lot more per customer, maybe you dont want to list all your customers. We will never learn the truth here. These truths will probably remain a secret like my identity.
sonalpuri123
50%
50%
sonalpuri123,
User Rank: Light Weight
7/25/2014 | 1:44:28 AM
Re: Aryaka?
Richard, thanks! It helps to have people question what we do. Let me see if I can address your queries one at a time. 

Doesn't your customer quote contradict your statement that Aryaka is not a managed service? Your customer called it the Aryaka managed-service model.

>> Aryaka is a managed service 'model'. But we manage our own service built from the ground up at Aryaka, not third party appliances. Different from MSPs.

I do consulting and have a few customers that use your service. And guess what? They all have Aryaka appliances onsite. The only difference is that your company manages the appliances and in the cost structure. Capex vs Opex. 

>> I am not sure which customers you're referring to because you (and mrcynic) don't share your identity. Less than half our customer locations have our optional appliance- the ANAP. The key is that the intelligence in the Aryaka service sits in our POPs. The onsite appliance is optional but remains cloud provisioned and managed. 

The feedback about turn up has been hit and miss. One of my customers had an awful turn up experience and extended way past their maintenance window, but stayed with it because it's cheap- not better.

>> Specifics will help me respond better to random comments like this. Yes, certain customer experience for turnup is not ideal. It usually is because of either limited knowledge on the customers side, last mile devices with expired maintenance, non standard configurations, no ports available, firewall issues etc. More than 65% of our customer locations have a zero-touch turnup experience. 

Most people interpret cloud to be elastic and highly automated, but from what I've heard, everything you do is very manual during service turn up. I don't think that your bandwidth is elastic at the core, so in order for you to reach profitability, I'd imagine that it's very over subscribed there. If it isn't, then you don't have that many customers.

>> Less knowledge = wrong conclusions. Between the management team, we've built multiple world class global networks and know how to manage capacity while growing the business towards strong margins. No, its not oversubscribed and yes we are headed towards profitability. 

I could see a fit in some niche use cases where non-mission critical traffic could run through it, but anything mission critical should still stay on MPLS. I wouldn't bet my lunch money on it and definitely not bet my career on it.

>> Expand your horizons. 

I wish you good luck with the business and maybe there is a good market for WAN managed services, but I won't change my mind that the need for WAN-Op is going away slowly.

>> Everyone should have their opinions. Thats what makes us individuals. 

Riverbed just missed their number again, but it's because of the market- not Aryaka. 

>> No argument from me on this. Absolutely agree that its not just us. They have bigger problems. 

Thanks for playing. 

Sonal
richard888rocket
50%
50%
richard888rocket,
User Rank: Light Beer
7/25/2014 | 12:43:17 AM
Re: Aryaka?
Doesn't your customer quote contradict your statement that Aryaka is not a managed service? Your customer called it the Aryaka managed-service model.

I do consulting and have a few customers that use your service. And guess what? They all have Aryaka appliances onsite. The only difference is that your company manages the appliances and in the cost structure. Capex vs Opex. 

The feedback about turn up has been hit and miss. One of my customers had an awful turn up experience and extended way past their maintenance window, but stayed with it because it's cheap- not better.

Most people interpret cloud to be elastic and highly automated, but from what I've heard, everything you do is very manual during service turn up. I don't think that your bandwidth is elastic at the core, so in order for you to reach profitability, I'd imagine that it's very over subscribed there. If it isn't, then you don't have that many customers.

I could see a fit in some niche use cases where non-mission critical traffic could run through it, but anything mission critical should still stay on MPLS. I wouldn't bet my lunch money on it and definitely not bet my career on it.

I wish you good luck with the business and maybe there is a good market for WAN managed services, but I won't change my mind that the need for WAN-Op is going away slowly.

Riverbed just missed their number again, but it's because of the market- not Aryaka. 

 
sonalpuri123
0%
100%
sonalpuri123,
User Rank: Light Weight
7/24/2014 | 2:29:53 PM
Re: Aryaka?
All in good time- I promise:-) Stay tuned. Meanwhile, we have lots of momentum news including another announcement this week of a win against Riverbed and MPLS.

Customer says, and I quote:

"The high cost and poor reliability of our MPLS and Riverbed appliances based solution was a major concern for us. Sites took weeks, sometimes months to deploy and the quality of support was very poor. Aryaka's managed-service model perfectly synced with our requirements and their support is light years ahead of the competition. The overall cost of the Aryaka model is much lower and we no longer have the long term and complex contracts we had before. The results since we put our entire global network on Aryaka have been outstanding. Aryaka can bring up a new site within a couple of days, the application performance is much improved when compared to that of our older MPLS and Riverbed based solution, and Aryaka's managed service with a five minute SLA for support is world class."
mrcynic
50%
50%
mrcynic,
User Rank: Light Beer
7/24/2014 | 9:38:26 AM
Re: Aryaka?
sonalpuri123, you didnt answer my question. Will you publish verifiable Aryaka revenue numbers in a press release? Otherwise, everyone in this thread and outside will think Aryaka is just talk. Appears you have raised $70M+ over 5+ years in venture and debt, so you probably have very good revenues. 
sonalpuri123
50%
50%
sonalpuri123,
User Rank: Light Weight
7/24/2014 | 1:51:07 AM
Re: Aryaka?
@mrcynic- you're right on the money- we do compete with three markets for wan optimization, global network services and CDN/ADN. We also compete with the do-nothing philisophy- where prospects find all existing services either too complex or too expensive and don't do anything to solve their application performance issues. 

Broad observations- the three markets above are coming together. We're just leading the charge. Akamai and Riverbed are working together to address SaaS apps. Cisco and Akamai are partnered too. Most global network providers have some form of CDN offering and also provide managed wan optimization. And cloud providers are trying to forge network partnerships. 

Seeing all these alliances in existing markets, I don't believe the Aryaka model of bringing it all together on one platform needs further validation. 

Anyway, I have to get back to work. Customers need to be rescued from their appliances. 

 
mrcynic
50%
50%
mrcynic,
User Rank: Light Beer
7/23/2014 | 10:55:51 PM
Re: Aryaka?
Well, if it makes you feel good that I joined to respond to you, I am happy. But, the truth is I have followed this site for some time. Today, I saw the Velocloud announcements and saw Dan's Velocloud article and joined to ask a question on Velocloud and then saw your post. So, technically, reply to your post is my second post.

But, your response made me more curious. Aryaka appears to be competing in 3 markets -- WAN Optimization, CDN/ADN and MPLS replacement. If you are taking serious business away from Riverbed, Akamai and telcos, then, you should not be shy to do a press release with your verifiable revenues.

If you can show that you are making a serious dent ito Riverbed's revenue (and Akamai and telcos) with this press release, the activist might swoop up Aryaka -- he gets a company that could win in three markets.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Flash Poll
From The Founder
It's clear to me that the communications industry is divided into two types of people, and only one is living in the real world.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Interview With Rick Talbot, Principal Analyst, Current Analysis

10|31|14   |   2:12   |   (0) comments


At the NFV Open Cloud Forum 2014, Rick Talbot shared his positive feedback about the holistic and open approach that Huawei adopts for SDN and NFV. He also found the open sharing at the event valuable as it features different perspectives from Huawei experts, telecom operators, industry analysts as well as security experts.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Interview With David Snow, Principal Analyst, Current Analysis

10|31|14   |   2:24   |   (0) comments


David Snow talked about his understanding of Huawei and its SoftCOM strategy at the NFV Open Cloud Forum 2014, saying that Huawei's wide approach combining IT and CT expertise, introducing big data and analytics into solutions and contributing to the OpenStack community particularly resonate with him and make the company stand out in the industry.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Interview With Roz Roseboro, Senior Analyst, Heavy Reading

10|31|14   |   3:13   |   (0) comments


Roz Roseboro commented on Huawei's data center capabilities and NFV solutions at the NFV Open Cloud Forum 2014, saying that in addition to covering all three key domains of compute, storage and networking, the company also emphasizes the importance of management capabilities and professional services, which are essential in making NFV a reality.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Interview With Michael Howard, Co-founder & Principal Analyst, Infonetics Research

10|31|14   |   5:25   |   (0) comments


Michael Howard talked about SDN, NFV, and OpenStack adoption at Huawei's NFV Open Cloud Forum 2014. Particularly, he pointed out that Virtual Enterprise CPE is the top NFV use case that operators plan to invest in over 2014 and 2015 to deliver new enterprise services through virtualized functions.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Interview With Jerry Caron, Senior Vice President, Current Analysis

10|31|14   |   3:11   |   (0) comments


At Huawei's NFV Open Cloud Forum 2014, Jerry Caron from Current Analysis said that orchestration and management are key to realizing SDN and NFV for global carriers, and the approach that Huawei is taking, with its FusionSphere Cloud OS at the core, is in the right direction to address the challenges.
LRTV Documentaries
Broadband Battles

10|31|14   |   01:39   |   (0) comments


This year's Broadband World Forum featured a number of show floor battles focused on access gear, components and coffee.
Jonestown
Mobile Backhaul: Going to the Dark Side?

10|30|14   |   2:26   |   (1) comment


Heavy Reading's Patrick Donegan shares his view on a dark trend that bubbled up at Light Reading's annual backhaul conference in NYC.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
2014 Huawei Electric Power Industry Summit: Interview With CEO of SwitchCom

10|30|14   |   4:13   |   (0) comments


SwitchCom, an IT company based in Angola, recommends a variety of Huawei solutions and hardware to their customers in the energy industry.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
2014 Huawei Electric Power Industry Summit: Interview With Ethiopia's Ministry of Water Irrigation & Energy

10|30|14   |   4:08   |   (0) comments


Gosaye Mengistie of Ethiopia's Ministry of Water Irrigation & Energy discusses the collaboration with Huawei in that country.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
2014 Huawei Electric Power Industry Summit: Interview with Dongfang Electronics Corporation

10|30|14   |   5:46   |   (0) comments


Dongfang Electronics Corporation, headquartered in Chengdu, China, is one of China's largest manufacturers of power generators and contractors of power station projects.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
2014 Huawei Electric Power Industry Summit: Interview with Zimbabwe's Customers

10|30|14   |   3:31   |   (0) comments


Representatives of Zimbabwe's Ministry of Power and Development discuss the energy needs of their country as well as new areas of improvement due to enhanced ICT capabilities.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
2014 Huawei Electric Power Industry Summit: Interview With Colbún Chile

10|30|14   |   4:29   |   (0) comments


In Chile, an aging energy infrastructure was in dire need of a modern update. Claudio Valenzuela of Colbún discusses how Huawei's ICT solutions continue to provide crucial information to improve the grid and how an in-country engineer is a cricial asset.
Upcoming Live Events
November 6, 2014, Santa Clara
November 11, 2014, Atlanta, GA
December 2, 2014, New York City
December 3, 2014, New York City
December 9-10, 2014, Reykjavik, Iceland
February 10, 2015, Atlanta, GA
May 6, 2015, McCormick Convention Center, Chicago, IL
May 30, 2015, The Westin Peachtree, Atlanta, GA
June 9-10, 2015, Chicago, IL
Infographics
WhoIsHostingThis.com presents six of the world's most extreme WiFi hotspots, enabling the most epic selfies you can imagine.
Hot Topics
Microsoft's Skype Embraces WebRTC on IE
Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, 10/27/2014
FTC Slaps AT&T With Throttling Lawsuit
Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, 10/28/2014
Wheeler Gets Down With OTT
Mari Silbey, Independent Technology Editor, 10/29/2014
China's MVNOs Hit the Wall
Robert Clark, 10/27/2014
Let's Not Kill SDN & NFV With Silos
Francois Locoh-Donou, Senior VP, Global Products Group, Ciena, 10/28/2014
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed