Light Reading
In twin moves, FCC bans broadcaster 'collusion' in retransmission-consent negotiations and weighs further changes to rules after spate of battles between broadcasters and pay-TV providers.

FCC Tackles Retrans Reforms

Alan Breznick
4/1/2014
50%
50%

Throwing its regulatory weight around, the FCC is moving to curb some of the power that broadcasters have in striking retransmission-consent deals with pay-TV providers.

In an order issued Monday, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) banned two large broadcast TV stations in the same local market from banding together to negotiate retransmission-consent deals with a pay-TV provider. The ban applies if the two stations rank among the top four broadcasters in market audience share and don't share the same owner.

At the same time, the FCC's adopted a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to consider possible changes to the overall retransmission-consent rules. Although the Commission's power to modify the Congressionally set rules is limited, the agency will weigh whether it should "provide more guidance" to broadcasters and pay-TV providers on "good-faith negotiation requirements," give better advance notice to consumers about "possible service disruptions caused by impasses in retransmission-consent negotiations," and eliminate its network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity rules.

The FCC's twin actions come after cable operators, satellite TV providers, and other pay-TV operators have complained strenuously to the Commission about broadcaster practices in retransmission-consent negotiations. Such negotiations have become tougher, louder, and uglier in some cases as retransmission-consent fees have soared in recent years, jumping from a mere $28 million in 2005 to $2.4 billion in 2012.

In particular, the American Cable Association (ACA) , which is holding its annual summit in Washington, D.C. this week, has lobbied hard for more restrictions on the broadcasters because of the impact on smaller and independent cable operators. But large cable companies, such as Time Warner Cable Inc. (NYSE: TWC), have called for regulatory reforms too after bruising battles with large broadcasters like CBS Corp. (NYSE: CBS). (See TWC, CBS End Their Feud.)

In a prepared statement, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said the Commission was imposing the ban on joint negotiations by the largest TV stations in a market to restore "fair and effective competition of retransmission-consent negotiations, to the ultimate benefit of consumers." Although Congress intended that the deals be negotiated on a one-to-one basis, he said, larger stations have increasingly banded together in the negotiations to gain higher carriage fees from pay-TV providers, leading to higher prices for consumers.

Wheeler, who signaled his position on the issue in a blog post early last month, cited one study indicating that joint negotiations by the largest stations increased carriage fees from cable systems by 20% to 40%. He argued that such carriage fee increases put "upward pressure on the prices" paid by cable subscribers, leading to higher monthly bills.

"The action we take to address joint negotiation by broadcasters will return retransmission-consent to one-on-one negotiations as Congress intended, rather than many against one," Wheeler said. "This should benefit the consumer by removing the leverage of collusion to inappropriately drive up retransmission-consent fees and with them consumer prices."

Not surprisingly, both the ACA and the National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) , which represents the big MSOs and cable programmers, hailed the FCC for instituting the ban on joint station negotiations, calling it long overdue. Just as predictably, the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) blasted the move, noting that the FCC has never found a local station to have negotiated in bad faith.

It's not clear just how much of an impact the FCC's moves will have on the retransmission-consent market. But the NPRM will undoubtedly generate plenty of fiery arguments on both sides of the issue as the broadcasting and pay-TV industries continue to jockey for position.

— Alan Breznick, Cable/Video Practice Leader, Light Reading

(7)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
4/2/2014 | 2:29:30 PM
Re: FCC Zebras
There used to be some solid cross-ownership rules in place but we got rid of most of them because, you know, businesses can always be trusted to do the right thing.
Phil_Britt
50%
50%
Phil_Britt,
User Rank: Light Sabre
4/2/2014 | 1:17:42 PM
Re: FCC Zebras
No doubt the cross-ownership issue is huge. It reminds me of the concerns in the rabbit ear antenna days about control of the airwaves. Concentration of distribution and content can make it harder for other major networks get the same treatment as NBC does from Comcast.
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
4/2/2014 | 1:03:42 PM
Re: FCC Zebras
In the bigger picture, the content conglomerates are extracting way more from video service providers than their products warrant (i.e., if you want our good channel, you have to take these dozen crappy ones also). Comcast to some extent is protecting its content assets by buying up more cable footprint. In fact, I'd argue that any review of the Time Warner Cable acquisition should focus more on cross-ownership (network and media) instead of just looking at the network side of things. Late entries to the video services business clearly are having second thoughts about the move (the margins are just too weak, and the service provider gets blamed for the unbridled greed of the media companies). OTT will happen because the video services business is turning out to be a loser for network operators.
Phil_Britt
50%
50%
Phil_Britt,
User Rank: Light Sabre
4/2/2014 | 12:00:01 PM
Re: FCC Zebras
Though these issues could accelerate some OTT movement, but before more people "cut the cord," they will want to get the same channels they can get on cable as well as the same Internet speeds. The additional I would need to pay for sports and questionable satellite transmission speeds keep me and several others from making the switch. 

Even with rising monthly fees, cable right now is still the best option for many (though the numbers are certainly dwindling). Luckily for me, I haven't missed anything yet due to the retransmission battles. But those are sure to accelerate. It reminds me of the days of all home NFL games being blacked out in the local market (yes, some of us are old enough to remember that).
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
4/1/2014 | 2:23:21 PM
Re: FCC Zebras
Yes, and this is why some of the newer entries in conventional video services are now much more skeptical of their prospects. Because the money is not working out so well for the middle entity, the migration to OTT is likely to accelerate. That is not good news for the content providers, who have gotten used to collecting money from video service providers for increasingly cheap and crappy content. Tacking more rules and regs onto a system that is fast becoming unworkable at best doesn't solve the problem and at worst only adds to it.
Carol Wilson
50%
50%
Carol Wilson,
User Rank: Blogger
4/1/2014 | 2:17:49 PM
Re: FCC Zebras
This seems to be to be a matter of trying to prevent broadcasters from killing the goose that lays their golden eggs. It may be hard to summon much sympathy for Comcast, TWC or AT&T, but there are dozens of smaller cable and telcoTV providers who are literally losing money providing video services because of the outrageous growth in re-transmission fees.

Those same broadcasters then make their content available on-line for viewing after it has aired. So the pay-TV providers aren't in a position, many times, to pass along the persistent fee increases to their customer base.

And that customer base blames the provider for any fee increases, when the cost of content is often responsible. 

I'm not saying the FCC's approach is the best one but some examination of the current state of affairs makes sense. 
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
4/1/2014 | 12:53:40 PM
FCC Zebras
Not to be outdone by the NFL, the FCC decides to address faulty rules by ... creating yet more faulty rules.
Flash Poll
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
The Inaugural Optical Innovation Forum in Nice

9|2|14   |     |   (0) comments


More than 170 attendees from network operators, service providers, analyst firms, and component companies from around the world convened in Nice in June for the inaugural Optical Innovation Forum, co-produced by Huawei and Light Reading.
Wagner’s Ring
Data Centers Drive Telcos Into the Future

8|28|14   |   2:20   |   (2) comments


Data centers are at the heart of key trends driving telecom -- network virtualization, the drive for increased agility, and the need to compete with OTT providers.
LRTV Custom TV
Why SPs Should Consider Cisco's EPN

8|27|14   |   5:40   |   (0) comments


Sultan Dawood from Cisco discusses Cisco's EPN, which enables SPs to build agile and programmable networks delivering new network virtualized services using Cisco's Evolved Services Platform (ESP).
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei’s Showcase @ Big Telecom Event 2014

8|26|14   |   2.56   |   (0) comments


SoftCOM is Huawei's framework for telecom business and network transformation. Haofei Liu, Solution Marketing Manager, Carrier Business Group, Huawei, showcases Huawei's SoftCOM architecture in this video.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei @ BTE 2014: Director of Integrated Solutions on SoftCOM & NFV Monetization

8|26|14   |   4.43   |   (0) comments


Libin Dai, Director of Integrated Solutions, Carrier Business Group, discusses Huawei's SoftCOM and NFV monetization. Huawei believes that NFV monetization should be service-driven rather than network-driven, and that operators should have network transformation, service transformation and a compatible and collaborative ecosystem in place in order to deploy NFV.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei @ BTE 2014: Director of US NFV Lab on CloudEdge & the Future of NFV

8|26|14   |   4.06   |   (0) comments


Sean Chen, Director of US NFV Lab at Huawei, discusses Huawei's new approach to NFV in open collaboration. Huawei believes that through Proof of Concept tests, it could help operators learn and communicate with the industry more effectively. Sean believes that successful implementation of NFV should have its values reaching to end users and discusses how Huawei's ...
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei's Highlights @ Big Telecom Event 2014

8|26|14   |   3.34   |   (0) comments


At the Big Telecom Event in Chicago Huawei showcases its high-level strategy, the SoftCOM architecture, which helps operators reduce the cost of ownership of their network infrastructure and generate additional revenue in the ICT service environment. Huawei showcases over 30 pilot programs from across the globe, focusing on the industry-leading commercial ...
LRTV Custom TV
VeEX – Live from the Show

8|21|14   |   5:58   |   (0) comments


An overview of VeEX Test and Measurement solutions including TX300S multi-service test set with VeExpress cloud-based management system, UX400 universal modular platform supporting 100G testing, and the redesigned RXT modular platform.
LRTV Custom TV
Transitioning CE 2.0 Networks Into the SDN & NFV Era With Telco Systems

8|19|14   |   5:19   |   (0) comments


Telco Systems' Ariel Efrati (CEO) and Moshe Shimon (VP of Product Management) discuss virtualization and how the company's new Open Metro Edge solution utilizes the SDN and NFV concepts to accelerate and orchestrate service delivery through its innovative product portfolio and software applications.
LRTV Custom TV
NFV Myths: Is NFV Still Several Years Away?

8|11|14   |   1:13   |   (0) comments


Some say that NFV (network functions virtualization) is still several years away from being implemented on mobile operator networks. This isn't the case. Operators can get started on their paths to NFV now, as this short video from Skyfire shows.
LRTV Custom TV
A New Security Paradigm in SDN/NFV

7|28|14   |   02:54   |   (0) comments


Paul Shaneck, Global Director Network Solutions for Symantec, discusses the evolving virtualized network, explaining how Symantec is leading the security discussion as it relates to SDN and NFV, and helping to ensure the network is protected and compliant.
LRTV Documentaries
Sprint's Network Evolution

7|24|14   |   14:59   |   (0) comments


Sprint's Jay Bluhm gives a keynote speech at the Big Telecom Event (BTE) about Sprint's network and services evolution strategy, including Spark.
Upcoming Live Events!!
September 16, 2014, Santa Clara, CA
September 16, 2014, Santa Clara, CA
September 23, 2014, Denver, CO
October 29, 2014, New York City
November 6, 2014, Santa Clara
November 11, 2014, Atlanta, GA
December 2, 2014, New York City
December 9-10, 2014, Reykjavik, Iceland
June 9-10, 2015, Chicago, IL
Infographics
A survey conducted by Vasona Networks suggests that 72% of mobile users expect good performance all the time, and they'll blame the network operator when it's not up to par.
Today's Cartoon
Hot Topics
Nokia's Maps Land on Samsung Devices
Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, 8/29/2014
Now Google Planning Drones-to-Go
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 8/29/2014
Music to My Mobile
Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, 8/28/2014
Be Open to the Freedom of Openness
Kelly Herrell, 8/29/2014
Netflix to FCC: Kill Comcast-TWC Deal
Alan Breznick, Cable/Video Practice Leader, 8/28/2014
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed