& cplSiteName &

Dems Urge FCC Action to Protect Muni Nets

Carol Wilson
6/30/2014
50%
50%

Eight Democratic members of Congress are challenging the FCC to reverse the trend toward legal restrictions on municipal development and ownership of broadband networks.

The five senators and three representatives last Friday sent a letter to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Tom Wheeler, urging him to combat efforts to restrict community ownership of broadband networks, using the powers given to the agency in the 1996 Telecom Act.

According to The Baller-Herbst Law Group, a D.C. firm long associated with municipal broadband efforts, there are 21 states that currently have some restrictions on the rights of municipalities to own and operate their own broadband networks. These vary widely, however, ranging from outright bans to restrictions on how such networks can be financed or used to specific requirements on what services can be offered. (The full list can be found here.)

AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T), in particular, has actively worked at the state level to impede muni networks. It is far from alone in those efforts, however, as other major cable and telecom operators have worked hard to oppose specific network plans and what they see as a general threat of being forced to compete with tax-subsidized network efforts. AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson spoke out against municipal networks in addressing Congress just last week.

The Democrats, including Senators Ed Markey (D-MA), Al Franken (D-MN), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), and Cory Booker (D-NJ), argue in their letter that municipalities needing to promote their communities and attract jobs should not be restricted in their ability to fund and build their own networks.

The three members of the House of Representations signing the letter are Mike Doyle (D-NJ), Henry Waxman (D-CA), and Anna Ishoo (D-CA). The full text of the letter is here.)

— Carol Wilson, Editor-at-Large, Light Reading

(39)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
MikeP688
50%
50%
MikeP688,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/11/2014 | 5:20:52 AM
Re: Both sides now
One of the compelling rationale should be simply to attract business.     It seems to me to be simple and logical--and for the record, for my local community, I think it is almost 100% covered today (between all the city facilities, Starbucks, the schools, the restaurants..)--for all intent and purpose, it is here. :-)
Mitch Wagner
50%
50%
Mitch Wagner,
User Rank: Lightning
7/9/2014 | 7:35:29 PM
Re: Both sides now
TomNolle - "I understand that, Mitch.  The question is whether they can keep doing it.  Why would local citizens pay for something via tax if they're unwilling to pay for it through monthly service charges?  The underlying cost isn't impacted by the payment mechanism."

The idea is that the cost is borne by the whole community because the whole community benefits, not just the recipients of the service.

That's the rationale behind highways and mass transit -- they attract business, therefore the whole community benefits. 

Also, businesses aren't looking to provide a service for the benefit of customers. They're looking to make a profit. (I know that's stating the obvious, but sometimes the obvious needs stating.) It may well be that broadband can be provided at a cost-effective rate -- but not for a sufficient profit margin to attract for-profit Internet service providers.
Mitch Wagner
50%
50%
Mitch Wagner,
User Rank: Lightning
7/9/2014 | 7:32:42 PM
Re: Both sides now
I did an opinion piece years ago, for a publication that no longer exists, saying municipal Wi-Fi should be legal, but municipalities should not do it. I'm don't feel that way about the last part anymore.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/3/2014 | 7:35:15 PM
Re: Common FTTP Fiber Network
So, whatnowdog...go ahead. seven
whatnowdog
50%
50%
whatnowdog,
User Rank: Light Beer
7/3/2014 | 7:02:07 PM
Common FTTP Fiber Network
I would suggest a private company build a dark fiber network to every house and business and then let other content companies and ISPs sell their product to a customer. They would lease a fiber strand for the customer do the inside work and connect at a POP site. I would hope several content companies compete instead of just one. Even Dish and Directv might decide to use the fiber instead of a dish.  If all you want is internet you may have several local ISPs or even national ISPs compete.

The one thing I would like is for the fiber network to cover the entire county or be a regional network. If you have power you will get FTTH within a few years if you want it. I have a problem with Muni because they can have all the problems other utilities have if politics gets  involved. They also tend to stop at the city limit. I would suggest the power company build the network if the telco or cable company does not want to take it on. If the telco/cable builds it they can not favor their own customers over anyone else.

The big reason FTTH networks don't get built is the expense for each company to build their own network and hope the percent of passed customer is enough to pay for the network. If there is one shared network the take rate is much higher then IF two or three companies build separate networks. Hopefully you will get competition from more companies if the content companies does not have to build a network.
Duh!
50%
50%
Duh!,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/1/2014 | 6:11:57 PM
Re: Legal authority?
Seeing as Markey is the architect of the 1996 Telecommunications Act fiasco, maybe he can explain.
Carol Wilson
50%
50%
Carol Wilson,
User Rank: Blogger
7/1/2014 | 4:25:33 PM
Re: Both sides now
Don't be a sad panda, I was only kidding!

The issue you raise is the part that puzzled me as well. I keep looking back at the Telecom Act and trying to find what "tools" they are talking about. 

I have tried to get an answer and will keep trying.

 
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/1/2014 | 3:21:17 PM
Re: Both sides now
Carol!

I am so hurt....I am a sad panda.

Ah c'mon - you know you love me.  :)

I was completely buffaoloed by the whole why the Senators think that the FCC can overrule the States.  Seems like a grandstanding thing to me.  Duh! and I fume in our efforts in the ability to educate the public on the issues here.  We disagree on a number of topics as do you and I.  But I think we can all agree that the general public is relatively ignorant of what the choices are.  I am surprised that a group of Sentaors and Congresspersons are that uneducated.

seven

 

 
Carol Wilson
50%
50%
Carol Wilson,
User Rank: Blogger
7/1/2014 | 3:01:32 PM
Re: Both sides now
Sorry, you lost me at "I essentially agree with Carol..." 
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
7/1/2014 | 2:51:26 PM
Re: Both sides now
The one thing that I think should be noted here (and I essentially agree with Carol and Duh! here) is that we really need to differentiate here about who the incumbent telco is here and the services offered.

I have not seen a lot of muni networks where an Tier 1 incumbent installs a FTTH network.  But lots of places inside Verizon and AT&T are not going to get upgrades according to both companies.  So, essentially they are stranded to create competition.

The IOCs have been doing FTTH for 10+ years and there can be a reasonable local economic case.

seven

 

 
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
Featured Video
From The Founder
The 'gleaming city on a hill,' Steve Saunders calls it. But who is going to take us from today's NFV componentry to the grand future of a self-driving network? Here's a look at the vendors hoping to make it happen.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
September 28, 2017, Denver, CO
October 18, 2017, Colorado Convention Center - Denver, CO
November 1, 2017, The Royal Garden Hotel
November 1, 2017, The Montcalm Marble Arch
November 2, 2017, 8 Northumberland Avenue, London, UK
November 10, 2017, The Westin Times Square, New York, NY
November 30, 2017, The Westin Times Square
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
With the mobile ecosystem becoming increasingly vulnerable to security threats, AdaptiveMobile has laid out some of the key considerations for the wireless community.
Hot Topics
Could the Connected Car Help Prevent Terrorism?
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 9/15/2017
Cities Slam FCC on Broadband Proceedings
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 9/15/2017
Apple's New iPhones: No Gigabit LTE for You!
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 9/14/2017
1 Million Pirate Set-Top Boxes Sold in the UK
Aditya Kishore, Practice Leader, Video Transformation, Telco Transformation, 9/20/2017
Close the Loop to Automate Service Assurance
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 9/14/2017
Animals with Phones
Live Digital Audio

Understanding the full experience of women in technology requires starting at the collegiate level (or sooner) and studying the technologies women are involved with, company cultures they're part of and personal experiences of individuals.

During this WiC radio show, we will talk with Nicole Engelbert, the director of Research & Analysis for Ovum Technology and a 23-year telecom industry veteran, about her experiences and perspectives on women in tech. Engelbert covers infrastructure, applications and industries for Ovum, but she is also involved in the research firm's higher education team and has helped colleges and universities globally leverage technology as a strategy for improving recruitment, retention and graduation performance.

She will share her unique insight into the collegiate level, where women pursuing engineering and STEM-related degrees is dwindling. Engelbert will also reveal new, original Ovum research on the topics of artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, security and augmented reality, as well as discuss what each of those technologies might mean for women in our field. As always, we'll also leave plenty of time to answer all your questions live on the air and chat board.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed