& cplSiteName &

Cable Walks Line on Net Neutrality

Mari Silbey
1/15/2014
50%
50%

The ink had barely dried on the federal appeals court decision to strike down the Federal Communication Commission's Net Neutrality rules Tuesday before the cable industry began issuing carefully worded responses backing an Open Internet, if not the FCC's rules to enforce it. (See Net Neutrality Fight Not Over.)

In a prepared statement, the National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA) mostly shrugged off the court decision itself. Instead, the group expressed its firm commitment to the Open Internet and support for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 's hands-off approach to web regulation so far.

“The cable industry has always embraced the principles of an open Internet and the Court decision will not change that," NCTA President & CEO Michael Powell said. "While we fully expect some to rush to judgment about the fate of the open Internet, we should remember neither the adoption of the Open Internet Order, nor its partial repeal, has led or will lead to significant changes in how ISPs manage their networks.”

Further, Powell said, “the cable industry has always made it clear that it does not -- and will not -- block our customer’s ability to access lawful Internet content, applications or services. We look forward to working with Chairman Wheeler and the FCC on ensuring that American consumers will continue to enjoy a fast, robust and open Internet experience.”

Similarly, Time Warner Cable Inc. (NYSE: TWC) re-affirmed its commitment to the Open Internet and support for the FCC's laissez-faire approach up till now. “Since pioneering the development of high-speed broadband service in the late 1990s, Time Warner Cable has been committed to providing its customers the best service possible, including unfettered access to the web content and services of their choice," the company said in its own prepared statement. "This commitment, which long precedes the FCC rules, will not be affected by today’s court decision.”

Likewise, American Cable Association (ACA) chimed in with its support for the Open Internet despite its opposition to the now-struck down Net Neutrality rules.

“ACA members believe that customers should be able to access the lawful content they wish on the Internet irrespective of who provides their Internet access service," ACA President & CEO Matthew Polka said in another prepared statement. "ACA has long held that adopting Open Internet rules was unnecessary because its members had been operating and would continue to operate in conformity with the FCC’s 2005 Open Internet principles. That remains true today regardless of the court’s decision.”

Although the appeals court unanimously decided that the FCC does not have the authority to ban broadband providers from blocking or discriminating against certain types of Internet traffic, it said the FCC could regulate such behavior if broadband providers were re-classified as common carriers. Up to now, the Commission has determined that ISPs are not common carriers and therefore not subject to such rules.

On the face of it, the appeals court ruling is a good one for cable companies. It means that the FCC cannot stop them from blocking or discriminating against popular web content providers like Netflix Inc. (Nasdaq: NFLX) that flood their networks with video traffic. However, the reality is far more complicated.

For one thing, the battle is far from over. The FCC still has room to create Internet protections outside of the specific parameters on which the court ruled.

For another, service providers have to be very careful about the arguments they make, given the potential anti-trust issues associated with prioritizing their own IP video content over a competitor's. Cable companies must show that they are fighting for an open Internet – as indeed their public statements so far indicate – because they have control over both broadband delivery pipes and the content that gets delivered over those pipes.

If the appeals court has walked a fine line with its decision, it's not the only one trying not to stray too far to one side or the other of the net neutrality debate. The cable industry also has a delicate balance to strike.

— Mari Silbey, special to Light Reading.

(20)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
sam masud
50%
50%
sam masud,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/16/2014 | 1:45:40 PM
Re: When lawyers are editors...
I really should have clarified my comment--fault of my mind thinking one thing and fingers doing something else--because in my head I was thinking about the telcos, VZ in particular, in light of the open Net ruling by the appellate court. My bad, as they say :-(
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/16/2014 | 1:27:02 PM
Re: When lawyers are editors...
Sam,

Let me use an ad absurdum argument to help clarify your last comment.

Since we are talking about Cable, their last mile is broken up into QAM groups allocated for different channels and for DOCSIS cable modems.  I could argue that the use of bandwidth for carrying broadcast channels is discriminating against OTT versions of that service already.

In fact, I could argue that the fact that any bandwidth in the local loop not dedicated to Internet Service is in fact discriminatory.

I don't believe those things but can argue them.  The challenge is a slippery slope definition wise.  Is applying QoS discriminatory?  Yes but it might be required to offer some services.

seven

 
sam masud
50%
50%
sam masud,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/16/2014 | 10:51:47 AM
Re: When lawyers are editors...
You're right about CDNs and peering agreements, even so that's something content companies do on their own--no one is putting a gun to their head and saying, "If you don't pay us more, then you're not going to get the same treatment as that other company." The point is that those who control the last mile should not descriminate when it comes to Net access.
TomNolle
50%
50%
TomNolle,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/16/2014 | 10:43:45 AM
Re: A Very Fine Line
I've been involved in regulatory politics for literally decades.  Back in the time of the Telecom Acti (of 1996) I had a conversation with a congressional aid on the topic of how the legislation was framed and passed.  He said "We brought in one side and gave them everything they wanted, then we brought in the other side and gave them everything they wanted."  This isn't a picture of an honest process, however you think that public policy should go in the matter.  Politics is universally corrupt, and regulatory policy is politics.
KBode
50%
50%
KBode,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/16/2014 | 9:58:02 AM
Re: A Very Fine Line
I agree with Carol.

In Congress, it's politically toxic and there's too many other battles being waged. It has been framed as trying to "regulate the Internet" after years of misleading debate. Dems won't touch it.

A the FCC, what's the over/under on a former cable lobbyist reclassifying ISPs under Title II? I just don't think it's likely. Maybe he'll surprise me.

I think we get to see first hand the kind of "innovation" carriers have long stated they wanted to experiment with in terms of consumer pricing. I'm sure it will start with baby steps (like AT&T's sponsored data) and gradually get worse from there.

Caps, unreliable meters, certain content made exempt provided the company pays up, etc. Brave new world ahoy.
brookseven
50%
50%
brookseven,
User Rank: Light Sabre
1/15/2014 | 4:10:00 PM
Re: When lawyers are editors...
Mari,

The other major sports networks are NBC/Comcast, Fox and CBS.  None of them (especially NBC) will struggle with data cap overrides.  I think you are more concerned about new players.  There I think they need to be niche players.  There is a network that focuses on a Video Gaming League.  That seems to be more likely and I don't see ESPN competing in that business.

seven

 
msilbey
50%
50%
msilbey,
User Rank: Blogger
1/15/2014 | 12:18:38 PM
Re: When lawyers are editors...
seven- By new players I mean content companies. Let's say ESPN bundles its IP video with transport costs so that any ESPN streaming doesn't count towards your data cap. In that case, ESPN is paying the cable companies for delivery and handing the cost back to consumers in the price of the service. Fine. But how does any other sports content company compete without also paying transport costs up front? Answer: by offering a cheaper, lower-quality service that eats into your data cap. Possible, but it won't be easy to create something compelling within those parameters. 

I do recognize that there are a lot of factors at play here. And arguably ESPN is impossible to compete with anyway. But I also believe we still need to keep tabs on how much we blur the lines between content and transport. It's only going to favor the companies - from ISPs to programmers - who already have power. 
albreznick
50%
50%
albreznick,
User Rank: Blogger
1/15/2014 | 12:13:43 PM
Re: A Very Fine Line
Agreed, Seven. The Dems have been bought and sold just like the Reps on issues like telecom. 
Carol Wilson
50%
50%
Carol Wilson,
User Rank: Blogger
1/15/2014 | 12:13:17 PM
Re: A Very Fine Line
I agree that the big carriers have spread their lobbying dollars around liberally and own, that is, influence, a fair number of folks on both sides of the aisle. 
albreznick
50%
50%
albreznick,
User Rank: Blogger
1/15/2014 | 12:11:29 PM
Re: A Very Fine Line
Yep, i agree with you there, Carol. I don't think the Dems have the stomach for this battle, at least not this time around. They have bigger, or at least other, fish to fry right now.  
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
From The Founder
Following a recent board meeting, the New IP Agency (NIA) has a new strategy to help accelerate the adoption of NFV capabilities, explains the Agency's Founder and Secretary, Steve Saunders.
Flash Poll
Live Streaming Video
Charting the CSP's Future
Six different communications service providers join to debate their visions of the future CSP, following a landmark presentation from AT&T on its massive virtualization efforts and a look back on where the telecom industry has been and where it's going from two industry veterans.
LRTV Documentaries
Verizon's Ed Chan on the New World for Networks

5|29|17   |   19:08   |   (0) comments


In this 2017 Big Communications Event keynote, Ed Chan Senior Vice President, Technology, Strategy and Planning, Corporate Networking and Technology, Verizon, discusses the coming world of sensors and the smart edge, powered by new spectrum and faster fiber uploads. For more BCE coverage and videos,
LRTV Interviews
Zayo's CTO: Respect the Infrastructure!

5|29|17   |   3:04   |   (0) comments


At Light Reading's Big Communications Event in Austin, Texas, Zayo's CTO Jack Waters talked about infrastructure and the changing customer landscape for network providers. While everyone else is chatting up applications and services, Waters urges the industry not to downplay the role that ...
LRTV Interviews
AT&T: Creating Dynamic Networks to Meet Business Needs

5|26|17   |   4:24   |   (0) comments


As enterprises need more dynamic networks, service providers need to deliver on-demand, virtual services to meet those needs. AT&T is creating a networking fabric to mix-and-match SDN technologies for enterprise customers, says Roman Pacewicz, AT&T senior vice president for offer management and service integration, in an interview at Light Reading's
LRTV Interviews
EdgeConneX on Industry Headwinds & Tailwinds

5|26|17   |   2:41   |   (0) comments


At Light Reading's Big Communications Event 2017, EdgeConneX CTO Don MacNeil discussed the value of partnerships in the digital world.
LRTV Documentaries
4 Steps Toward a Higher Network IQ

5|26|17   |     |   (0) comments


At the Big Communications Event in Austin, Texas, EXFO CEO Philippe Morin explains how sensors and analytics can boost a network's intelligence and enable on-demand customer experiences. Find more BCE 2017 coverage here.
LRTV Interviews
BT's McRae Sheds Light on 4K Strategy

5|25|17   |   4:45   |   (0) comments


At Light Reading's Big Communications Event 2017 in Austin, Texas, BT Group's Chief Network Architect Neil McRae talks about what it took for BT to broadcast live sports in 4K. Catch up with all our BCE coverage at http://www.lightreading.com/bce.asp.
From the Founder
How the NIA Aims to Advance NFV

5|25|17   |   08:07   |   (1) comment


Following a recent board meeting, the New IP Agency (NIA) has a new strategy to help accelerate the adoption of NFV capabilities, explains the Agency's Founder and Secretary, Steve Saunders.
LRTV Custom TV
Better Solutions That Address Growing Scale

5|25|17   |     |   (0) comments


For Comcast, the X1 rollout and 17-fold increases in broadband speeds in the past 16 years are among factors driving the need for Energy 2020 solutions that reduce cost and consumption, says Mark Hess.
LRTV Custom TV
Ethernity Network Delivers Instant Offloading of Network Functions With All-Programmable Intelligent NIC

5|25|17   |     |   (0) comments


David Levi, CEO of Ethernity Networks, explains that programmability of the hardware makes the company's All-Programmable Intelligent NIC uniquely beneficial for communications service providers that need advanced data appliances with agile support of virtualization. Utilizing the company's patented network processing technology, Ethernity offers data path ...
LRTV Documentaries
BCE 2017: Vodafone Gets Obsessed With Cloud-Native

5|25|17   |     |   (0) comments


Vodafone's Matt Beal updates us on Project Ocean and explains why simple virtualization isn't enough of a goal for network transformation. Catch up with other BCE 2017 keynotes and news at http://www.lightreading.com/bce.asp.
LRTV Documentaries
BCE 2017: Intel's Take on Network Transformation

5|24|17   |     |   (0) comments


In this BCE 2017 keynote, Lynn Comp discusses Intel's vision for areas such as analytics, automation and service assurance. For more videos and BCE coverage, see http://www.lightreading.com/bce.asp.
LRTV Documentaries
Order From Chaos: The Steve Saunders BCE Keynote

5|24|17   |   17:27   |   (0) comments


Kicking off BCE 2017, Light Reading founder Steve Saunders lays blame for NFV's slow ramp-up and urges telecom to return to old-fashioned standards building and interoperability testing.
Think of this as the video sequel to the recent columns he's written about NFV and the prospect of a telecom app store. (See

Infographics
With the mobile ecosystem becoming increasingly vulnerable to security threats, AdaptiveMobile has laid out some of the key considerations for the wireless community.
Hot Topics
Cities Clamor for More Clout at FCC
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 5/23/2017
What's Blocking 4K TV Today
Alan Breznick, Cable/Video Practice Leader, Light Reading, 5/22/2017
Sonus & Genband Finally Combine to Form $745M Company
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 5/23/2017
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
One of the nice bits of my job (other than the teeny tiny salary, obviously) is that I get to pick and choose who I interview for this slot on the Light Reading home ...
TEOCO Founder and CEO Atul Jain talks to Light Reading Founder and CEO Steve Saunders about the challenges around cost control and service monetization in the mobile and IoT sectors.
Animals with Phones
What Brogrammers Look Like to the Rest of Us Click Here
Live Digital Audio

Playing it safe can only get you so far. Sometimes the biggest bets have the biggest payouts, and that is true in your career as well. For this radio show, Caroline Chan, general manager of the 5G Infrastructure Division of the Network Platform Group at Intel, will share her own personal story of how she successfully took big bets to build a successful career, as well as offer advice on how you can do the same. We’ll cover everything from how to overcome fear and manage risk, how to be prepared for where technology is going in the future and how to structure your career in a way to ensure you keep progressing. Chan, a seasoned telecom veteran and effective risk taker herself, will also leave plenty of time to answer all your questions live on the air.