& cplSiteName &

Huawei Denied German Bid

Ray Le Maistre
5/10/2012
50%
50%

10:45 AM -- The list of countries where Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. has been denied the chance to compete for business has grown again, with Germany the latest market to give the vendor further cause for concern.

Having already experienced the political cold shoulder in Australia, India and the U.S., Huawei has now been excluded from bidding for business at a major German research network where it was an incumbent supplier. (See Huawei Ban Row Escalates, US Blocks Huawei LTE Bid , Global Vendors Face Tough New Rules in India and More Security Woes for Huawei.)

Deutsches Forschungsnetz (DFN), Germany's national research and education network that stretches about 10,000 kilometers to connect about 60 sites, is to upgrade its network from 10 Gbit/s to 100 Gbit/s using technology only from European suppliers, according to Wirtschafts Woche and several other German media outlets.

Alcatel-Lucent (NYSE: ALU), Nokia Networks and T-Systems International GmbH have been shortlisted for the upgrade.

Chinese vendors are not being considered, it seems, because of security concerns, even though the current DFN network has been using Huawei equipment since 2005.

Lewis Xu, the CEO of Huawei Germany, expressed incredulity at the decision in a statement issued to the German press, saying that to exclude Huawei from the process is incomprehensible.

What must be more worrying for Huawei is that concern about cyber security is increasing and that many companies and national agencies point the finger at China as a prime source of political and industrial espionage attacks. (See Nortel Got Super-Hacked and this Bloomberg report, for example.)

It's hard to imagine that Huawei and other Chinese vendors, no matter how many existing national deployments and words of support they have, are going to find anything other than increasing resistance and further restrictions when it comes to their involvement in the construction of important national networks in the near term.

— Ray Le Maistre, International Managing Editor, Light Reading

(33)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
digits
50%
50%
digits,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:33:30 PM
re: Huawei Denied German Bid


Looks like Huawei's biggest challenge now is not in the R&D labs but in the marketing and communications departments...

geekhole
50%
50%
geekhole,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:33:30 PM
re: Huawei Denied German Bid


Security concerns aside, until Huawei goes public and pays dividends, benefiting global shareholders, mutual funds, 401ks. retirement accounts, etc. they willl continue to get the cold sholder. They need to spread the wealth or the wealth will stay with those that do!

Flook
50%
50%
Flook,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:33:27 PM
re: Huawei Denied German Bid


Weird that the Germans have deployed Huawei's equipment and are now shutting the door on Huawei. Regarding security, don't domestic networks often connect to national and international networks? In which case traffic from an NSN network for a particular customer could very well be going across a network built with Huawei gear--and there goes security out the door...


 


It's a global, interconnected world, so risks will be involved.

Ktan8888
50%
50%
Ktan8888,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:33:25 PM
re: Huawei Denied German Bid


Obviously this is the protectionism in play..


 


 

Soupafly
50%
50%
Soupafly,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 5:33:24 PM
re: Huawei Denied German Bid


Branding it protectionism is just lazy.


The article provides no depth beyond obvious soundbites & trivial analysis.


To comment, you usually need to have a reasonable understanding. Based on the syndicated german content you have provided links to in the article, how anyone can arrive at any kind of understanding is beyond me!?


The fact that this network already used Huawei gear is what makes this unusual. The layer at which this exclusion has been imposed is also intriguing. The network deployment referenced would appear to be Layer 1 optical equipment in bias & focus.


What new "security concerns" have been identified?


Was it:


a) They found a "bird on the wire"?


b) Have seen a specific APT attack vector exploited or launched & traced the source?


c) Discovered a point of "Intellectual Property" compromise, directly connected to the network? (The most likely.)


d) Examined the layer 2 & 3 functionality/features on these platforms & decided that these represent a new risk that was not present in the original equipment? (An important trend in Packet Optical & pure optical is the convergence of traditional multi-layer functionality.)


e) None of the above & a new completely "concern"?


In the security community at the moment, the level of expertise & prowess been consistently demonstrated  by chinese hackers is worrying and has raised alarm bells. The speed & capability escalation has caught many by suprise. In 2005, the level of assessed risk & maturity was considered acceptable.


In 2012, that risk assessment barometer reading & the comfort zone around it, may have shifted. 


Couple that trend and its rapid acceleration with a strength in depth around science & mathematics (at the academic level) and you can see how original decision taken in 2005 may come under additional scrutiny and be re-evaluated.


The continued nonsensical statements from the party that "we are victims & know nothing of these attacks" is incredulous & laughed at by many within the community.


And before anyone crys prove it! Consider, the fact that the chinese networks are THE most overtly policed & monitored networks on earth, with inline & offline DPI, routine traffic mirroring, no privacy frameworks and complete compliance and oversight assumed by default. Then move that datapoint across all key intra-regional & national nodes and global IP Transit ingress/egress points & inter-connect and look at the ongoing, detailed traffic analytics.


Now I know the above statements are true because of actual conversations in this community. This is not spun, rumour-mill.


So with all of the above... what would you do if you were charged with making the call today? I am not taking a moral or ethical stand on this, just a pragmatic one and if I were in their shoes, I might make the same call. Note; Use of the word "might" not would. I dont have all the facts, just an insight into what they might be seeing.


 

macster
50%
50%
macster,
User Rank: Light Bulb
12/5/2012 | 5:33:24 PM
re: Huawei Denied German Bid


Ray,


As the article itself says, they've been using Huawei since 2005, but now a change of tone?


Marcomms? Come on! This is so obviously European bigotry and hypocrisy in play - no more, no less.

digits
50%
50%
digits,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:33:23 PM
re: Huawei Denied German Bid


SO what I am saying is that it's not a technology challenge -- Huawei's marketing and communications team have to figure out how best to overcome the (choose your favorite term) political/protectionist/bigoted/xenophobic challenges the company now faces.


And not marcomms directed solely (or even primarily) at the direct customers but at the broader political and industrial landscape.

digits
50%
50%
digits,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:33:22 PM
re: Huawei Denied German Bid


T-Systems is not an equipment vendor, but is an integrator, so it would be taking third party equipment into this if it is successful. (I would put mt bet on T-Systems or NSN winning this deal...)


I suspect that there is an lement of outsourced network management in this, where the winner(s) would not only provide the equipment but be involved in the rollout and maybe even ongoing management of the network. That's something that ALU, NSN and T-Systems could do, though, of course, Huawei could do that too. 

cross
50%
50%
cross,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:33:22 PM
re: Huawei Denied German Bid


Ray, is it correct that T-Systems International is bidding for DFN's new network?  T-Systems is a subsidiary of Deutsche Telekom and not a vendor.  Traditionally, T-Systems often offers Cisco-based solutions.  It is a question whether Cisco qualifies more as a European vendor than Huawei does.  Both vendors have offices, R&D centers etc. in Europe but are headquartered outside Europe.


Carsten

macster
50%
50%
macster,
User Rank: Light Bulb
12/5/2012 | 5:33:21 PM
re: Huawei Denied German Bid


Soupafly,


Having worked for Huawei, European vendors and operators, the consulting arm of DT, I do know what I am talking about (and definitely do not need a long comment to justify).


Like Phil says, this is not a technology issue. Not even marcomms!


What would you say if China bans Cisco, ALU, E\\\, citing 'security concerns'? You'll think of it as a joke, right? Yup, Huawei is a terrible and corrupted company. ALU, Siemens and others are righteous. Asian nations are corrupted. No corruption in EU/UK/US, merely Cash for Honours, Cash for PM Access, etc. Right?


Have the decency to call it what it really is. I know, I know..... the truth hurts!!!

Page 1 / 4   >   >>
More Blogs from EuroBlog
Having taken a breather from its acquisition spree in the US, Zayo could kick-start some infrastructure consolidation action in Europe
Some good news for its Finnish parent – Nokia Siemens Networks is on a margin roll
Telefónica to boost its broadband lines in LatAm with DSL management the from ASSIA
According to the value of Nokia's takeover deal, Nokia Siemens Networks is worth less than $5B
As APAC and North America forge ahead, Europe seems stuck in yesteryear
Featured Video
From The Founder
Light Reading founder Steve Saunders talks with VMware's Shekar Ayyar, who explains why cloud architectures are becoming more distributed, what that means for workloads, and why telcos can still be significant cloud services players.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
June 26, 2018, Nice, France
September 12, 2018, Los Angeles, CA
September 24-26, 2018, Westin Westminster, Denver
October 9, 2018, The Westin Times Square, New York
October 17, 2018, Chicago, Illinois
October 23, 2018, Georgia World Congress Centre, Atlanta, GA
November 7-8, 2018, London, United Kingdom
November 8, 2018, The Montcalm by Marble Arch, London
November 15, 2018, The Westin Times Square, New York
December 4-6, 2018, Lisbon, Portugal
All Upcoming Live Events
Hot Topics
Telus CTO: NFV Burden May Cripple Telcos
Iain Morris, News Editor, 5/14/2018
Verizon CEO Says LA Is Second 5G City
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 5/16/2018
TM Forum Sea-Change Overcomes That Sinking Feeling
Iain Morris, News Editor, 5/17/2018
Animals with Phones
Live Digital Audio

A CSP's digital transformation involves so much more than technology. Crucial – and often most challenging – is the cultural transformation that goes along with it. As Sigma's Chief Technology Officer, Catherine Michel has extensive experience with technology as she leads the company's entire product portfolio and strategy. But she's also no stranger to merging technology and culture, having taken a company — Tribold — from inception to acquisition (by Sigma in 2013), and she continues to advise service providers on how to drive their own transformations. This impressive female leader and vocal advocate for other women in the industry will join Women in Comms for a live radio show to discuss all things digital transformation, including the cultural transformation that goes along with it.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
Partner Perspectives - content from our sponsors
Swisscom: Quick off the Blocks With 5G
By Gary Maidment, for Huawei
SAIL the Atlantic With CAMTEL
By Gary Maidment, for Huawei
What's in the Box?
By Huawei
Beginning With the End In Mind
By Kevin Taylor, for Huawei
All Partner Perspectives