& cplSiteName &

BT Threatens to Ditch OpenStack

Iain Morris
10/14/2015
0%
100%

DUSSELDORF -- SDN & Openflow World Congress -- BT is threatening to abandon OpenStack in favor of a proprietary technology during its rollout of virtual enterprise services unless vendors backing the standard can overcome six potential technology showstoppers.

Such a move by the UK fixed-line incumbent could be a major setback for OpenStack, an open standard that is being touted as one of the key technologies underpinning NFV.

BT Group plc (NYSE: BT; London: BTA)'s concern relates to the use of OpenStack with virtual enterprise CPEs, whereby servers are distributed around the edge of the network and on customer premises.

Peter Willis, BT's chief researcher for data networks, acknowledges that OpenStack has major attractions as set of open source tools, with backing from some of the world's biggest IT companies, but says the technology still holds a number of risks for an operator rolling out virtual enterprise CPEs.

Unless the OpenStack community can address a number of serious challenges, BT will look to use an alternative technology.

Those challenges relate to the connection of virtual network functions (VNFs), service chain modification, scalability, so-called "start-up storms," the security of OpenStack over the Internet and backwards compatibility.

"If these six issues are not addressed we will not use OpenStack for virtual enterprise," he told attendees here in Dusseldorf. "There are proprietary solutions out there we could use and we will use them in lieu of OpenStack being available."


For more NFV-related coverage and insights, check out our dedicated NFV content channel here on Light Reading.


Willis revealed that some of the most important OpenStack stakeholders -- including HP Inc. (NYSE: HPQ), Red Hat Inc. (NYSE: RHT), Canonical, Mirantis Inc. and Intel Corp. (Nasdaq: INTC) -- have agreed there are problems but have not yet reached a consensus on how to address them.

Although BT could opt for a proprietary technology in the short term and introduce OpenStack at a later stage, this will become more difficult as services are rolled out.

"It's a strategic migration issue," says Willis. "It's easy to start off greenfield because we've not deployed any large numbers of virtual enterprise CPEs but in two or three years there will be more legacy."

Next page: The six challenges

(14)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
kq4ym
50%
50%
kq4ym,
User Rank: Light Sabre
10/26/2015 | 9:48:02 PM
Re: Rather ridiculous
I'm sceptical that BT would follow through with the "threat." I'm just guessing they;re bluffing in an attempt to speed up the openstack standards solutions. Going to proprietery is much like moving backwards at this point.
ahmadarshad
100%
0%
ahmadarshad,
User Rank: Light Beer
10/16/2015 | 10:21:33 AM
Resistance is one form of acceptance
I take it a positve step. Risks pointed out in this articles shoud be taken positively. Openstack is still in its infancy and there are fears and uncertaintity everywhere on its use and deployment. Best thing is to contribute and be part of it as pointed by EtherealMind. I like see these type of comments/risks from other Service Providers and users so that openstack community starts lokking in these areas. We face these challenges in our professional life every day and either get them resolved or find a work around. I believe security of infrastructure will be a big challenge in coming years and will be a hot topic of discussion.
Director72287
50%
50%
Director72287,
User Rank: Light Beer
10/15/2015 | 7:11:31 PM
Srsly?

Overall this smells like a FUD piece designed to demonstrate that a major service provider is unlikely to adopt OpenStack at this point in time. For starters, the idea that OpenStack is suitable for a major telco service provider's  virtual enterprise CPE platform is implausible at best.

If (and that's a big IF) Peter Willis is actually considering it he's guilty of trying to bang a square peg into a round hole, he should know better. I don't believe he is, so I have to assume this piece is an indirect rebuttal to a number of vendors who are hammering on his door telling him he should be using OpenStack because it is the answer to a maidens prayer. OpenStack is not an SDN platform. OpenStack could be used to build a service platform alongside other components, but that's a different discussion.

 

To address the points directly...

 

VNF's. Virtual Network Functions, are not a core use-case that OpenStack was ever designed to address. It may evolve to do that, but right now you need a focussed SDN solution to address this one.

 

Service chaining, the connection of a number of VNF's in series. It's just an amplification of the previous point.

 

Lack of scalability with a single controller.  Spare me! No sane commercial, service provider, or enterprise grade implementation would try to run with a single controller, scaling OpenStack requires an understanding of how to scale distributed systems.

 

Start-up storms. Anyone who thinks they can load 100,000 virtual CPE's onto a single controller has either been at the pixie dust, or is lacking clue about scaling distributed systems, or both (see previous point). Solving the problem of high volume SSL session setup is a well trodden path, horizontal scaling is one possibility, doing it in hardware is another (see previous point, again)  

 

Security. Yes, there is work to be done in securing OpenStack. SSL gets us a long way down the path at the transport layer, but there are other aspects as well. To state that a hypervisor to controller connection requires "500 pinholes" in a firewall is naive demagoguery, you need about 8, and that could probably be reduced even further if you're really security conscious and prepared to tweak the control plane architecture.

 

Backwards compatability. This problem exists for every single piece of moderately complex software with lifetime of more than a few months. In the specific case of OpenStack it's more complex than most, OpenStack has a lot of moving parts, and is developed by a community of loosely coupled projects. Synchronising them all is a challenge. To adopt open source software into your platform and enterprise usefully you have to invest in understanding the community and contributing to it.

 

Disclosure: I'm a huge fan of OpenStack, I'm a director of an OpenStack platform operator. It's a great platform, but it's not the answer to every question.

Flames will be piped to /dev/null :-)

mendyk
100%
0%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
10/15/2015 | 11:06:46 AM
Re: Rather ridiculous
Heavy Reading's most recent research shows incredibly strong support for OpenStack among network operators, at least right now.
NeilMcRae
50%
50%
NeilMcRae,
User Rank: Lightning
10/15/2015 | 3:34:51 AM
Re: Rather ridiculous
I would say yes - it also, in many use cases, performs very well.
Steve Saunders
100%
0%
Steve Saunders,
User Rank: Blogger
10/14/2015 | 5:12:59 PM
Re: Rather ridiculous
Is VMware really carrier class code? I know they are now sniffing around the t4elecom market but i thought they had Enterprise pedigree. 
NeilMcRae
100%
0%
NeilMcRae,
User Rank: Lightning
10/14/2015 | 4:57:48 PM
Re: Is this a common view?
We always want more!  We want the best for our customers!

Openstack scalability is not a new issue and Peter is merely stating a fact and its not a threat its simply an ackowledgement of the current challenges operators face in rolling NFV (and other cloud services) out. Its not an issue of being competitive its an issue of having something that works for customers, at BT we only deploy things that work for customers!

There are alot of other gaps in Openstack and in time I am sure they will all be resolved, however with the current focus on these services customers are starting to want these services and the whole ecosystem is at varied levels of maturity; We are acknowledging an issue that we feel is not being as widely recognised as it needs to be and in many cases this is preventing large scale deployment. For vendors in the NFV/SDN space its going to be a barrier to sales for sure (I'd argue it already is).

Also its not the only issue in this space, lets not forget that this technology is still in its infancy, there are still significant OSS/BSS issues with SDN/NFV. The IT stack and capability to manage large scale SDN/NFV deployments and wide range of interacting services simply doesn't exist right now and how these technologies overlap with the existing telco and datacentre networks is still very "homebriew". For BT Cloud Connect we have created something to fill the gaps but its iimited in its capability, we want something more that truly brings abstracted service creation on any type of containerised/virtiualised/appliance based solution hence our significant contribution to OpenConfig and other Yang models across the network space. The end to end architecture in areas of service inventory, logical and physical inventory, workflow, activation and telemetry is still at a very early stage, with very little alignment or deployable solutions. Without these things, some of the promise these new technolgies bring won't materialise.

How does workflow work? how do atomic services interact with one another? how do we really drive the on demand opportunities between different methods of delivering services over different technologies and infrastructure - there is a long way to go.  If my customers fixed broadband Internet service goes down, how to I create a standby internet service using personal hotspot on my customers cellular service on demand whilst the fixed service is restored?

These are all maturity issues but we feel not enough focus is on this topic. We are all focused on interop and POCs, well frankly we've done that, infact we did it _years_ ago, now we want to move to proper deployment and for that we need a more complete ecosystem. But to be clear we aren't making any threats or otherwise we just want it to work for our customers and we will continue to collaborate to do this. And lightreadng if you want to come and have a chat about this, we are always open for coffee!

 

Regards,

Neil

 
brooks7
50%
50%
brooks7,
User Rank: Light Sabre
10/14/2015 | 4:50:55 PM
Re: Rather ridiculous
So, you can wait for OpenStack to fix their problems someday or implement today using VMware?  Is that the argument?

And by the way, all kinds of SaaS operators use VMware....and make money.  And I don't work for them, but I have been trying to raise this point for over a year.  Which is that SaaS operators have things pretty well solved already.

seven

 
Steve Saunders
50%
50%
Steve Saunders,
User Rank: Blogger
10/14/2015 | 3:39:20 PM
Re: Rather ridiculous
i need to dig in a bit more - thans for the insights. 
EtherealMind
100%
0%
EtherealMind,
User Rank: Lightning
10/14/2015 | 3:34:55 PM
Re: Rather ridiculous
The issues raised are well known, raised several times by others and OpenStack has been working on them for about a year and making progress. It might take a couple more years to get stable code and viable delivery. If BT got involved, comitted funding and developers then it could happen faster. Instead of gum flapping, they should participate. 

The only alternative that does have solutions for the issues raised is VMware and comes at a licending between £200-800 per physical server or ~£50-100 per VM (depending). 

There are OpenStack solutions from Cisco, HP, Mirantis and others that offer some answers but, again, cost per VM would make BT uncompetitive. 

Also I'm not raising the fact that OpenStack isn't specifically intended to handle lagacy applications that exist in private data centers. 

 
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Educational Resources
sponsor supplied content
Educational Resources Archive
From The Founder
Either we perform a complete 'factory reset' on the way the telecom industry creates and deploys virtualization, or we face the consequences.
Flash Poll
Live Streaming Video
Charting the CSP's Future
Six different communications service providers join to debate their visions of the future CSP, following a landmark presentation from AT&T on its massive virtualization efforts and a look back on where the telecom industry has been and where it's going from two industry veterans.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Mobile Operators & Video

4|25|17   |     |   (0) comments


Ovum's Ed Barton discusses the latest mobile operator strategies for mobile video.
LRTV Custom TV
Infinera Introduces Instant Network

4|20|17   |     |   (1) comment


Mike Capuano, vice president of marketing at Infinera, discusses the advancement from Instant Bandwidth to new Instant Network capabilities, which include Bandwidth License Pools, Moveable Licenses and Automated Capacity Engineering (ACE).
Women in Comms Introduction Videos
Vodafone's Eubank on Sponsors, Mentors & Moving On Up

4|19|17   |   4:25   |   (0) comments


Vodafone America's Head of Operations Kimberly Eubank breaks down the difference between a sponsor and a mentor and shares why both made a big difference in her career.
LRTV Custom TV
NYC Auto Show: Are We Smart Yet?

4|18|17   |     |   (0) comments


The auto industry is facing some big transformations as electric vehicles, autonomous technology and connected cars are seen as the future of the industry. During the much-anticipated NY international auto show, there was an emergence of new technology and mobility service on the show floor. Aside from performance, brands like Lincoln, Hyundai, Honda, Mercedes and ...
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
The Impact of Video

4|18|17   |     |   (0) comments


David Mercer from Strategy Analytics discusses the impact of video on current strategies.
LRTV Custom TV
Pardeep Kohli Discusses Network Transformation & the Market Opportunity for the 'New' Mavenir Systems

4|13|17   |     |   (0) comments


In a brief discussion at MWC 2017, Heavy Reading analyst Adi Kishore talks to Pardeep Kohli, CEO, Mavenir Systems about the creation of the 'new Mavenir' and some of the key challenges facing operators in today's market. A key theme of the discussion centers around operator need for software-only, virtualized solutions and how they will need to adapt to ...
Women in Comms Introduction Videos
Tech Maverick Shares Her Tips for Gender Inclusivity

4|12|17   |   7:28   |   (0) comments


Wendy Hall Bohling, a corporate escapee, author and gender exclusivity consultant, tells her story of sexism, bias and progress along the road to gender equality in the workforce.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Huawei at MWC 2017

4|11|17   |     |   (0) comments


At Mobile World Congress 2017, the biggest mobile industry gathering of the year, Huawei showcased its new innovations and solutions with the theme "Open Road," which focuses on cloud, 5G, operation transformation, videos and consumer-oriented products. Its campaign has been recognized by three awards given by GSMA.
LRTV Custom TV
China Telecom NFV Infrastructure on RSD

4|6|17   |     |   (0) comments


Lynn Comp, senior director of market development of Intel, is joined by Chong Zhang, storage engineer at Inspur and Ou Li Yan, architect for technology strategies of China Telecom, for a discussion of what NFV brings.
LRTV Custom TV
Nokia's IMPACT Software Demo

4|6|17   |     |   (0) comments


Khamis Abulgubein of IoT market development at Nokia demonstrates IMPACT (intelligent management platform for all connected things), a software solution with a horizontal approach to managing any device on any application.
LRTV Custom TV
Nokia Introduces Virtual Service Router for More Rapid Service

4|6|17   |     |   (0) comments


James Cumming, product line manager for virtualized service routers at Nokia, demonstrates how the virtual router based off the Nokia ecosystem changes the network function experience.
LRTV Custom TV
The Keys to SD-WAN Success

4|6|17   |     |   (0) comments


Versa Networks CEO Kelly Ahuja talks about the key requirements for service provider-managed SD-WANs.
Upcoming Live Events
May 15-17, 2017, Austin Convention Center, Austin, TX
May 15, 2017, Brazos Hall - Austin, TX
May 15, 2017, Austin Convention Center - Austin, TX
June 6, 2017, The Joule Hotel, Dallas, TX
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
With the mobile ecosystem becoming increasingly vulnerable to security threats, AdaptiveMobile has laid out some of the key considerations for the wireless community.
Hot Topics
Time for a Telecom Reboot
Steve Saunders, CEO and founder, Light Reading, 4/19/2017
Did Verizon Outbid AT&T for Straight Path?
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 4/25/2017
Surprise! AT&T Markets 4G Advances as '5G Evolution'
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 4/25/2017
First Year TIPs the Scale Toward Success
Denise Culver, 4/24/2017
Unlicensed: It's What's Next for US Mobile Operators
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 4/19/2017
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
BETWEEN THE CEOs - Executive Interviews
One of the nice bits of my job (other than the teeny tiny salary, obviously) is that I get to pick and choose who I interview for this slot on the Light Reading home ...
TEOCO Founder and CEO Atul Jain talks to Light Reading Founder and CEO Steve Saunders about the challenges around cost control and service monetization in the mobile and IoT sectors.
Live Digital Audio

Playing it safe can only get you so far. Sometimes the biggest bets have the biggest payouts, and that is true in your career as well. For this radio show, Caroline Chan, general manager of the 5G Infrastructure Division of the Network Platform Group at Intel, will share her own personal story of how she successfully took big bets to build a successful career, as well as offer advice on how you can do the same. We’ll cover everything from how to overcome fear and manage risk, how to be prepared for where technology is going in the future and how to structure your career in a way to ensure you keep progressing. Chan, a seasoned telecom veteran and effective risk taker herself, will also leave plenty of time to answer all your questions live on the air.