& cplSiteName &

Why Isn't Virtualization Working?

Scott Sumner
4/14/2017
50%
50%

"No one can actually implement a virtualized heterogeneous network at commercial scale." True or false? (See Just Dirty.)

This is a good time for four-valued logic, because the answer is… both. In other words, it depends.

True: No one has implemented a commercial-scale, virtualized network using off-the-shelf, open source code, or even vendor-supplied software. Likely, no one ever will.

False: Despite that, many service providers that took the burden of this task on themselves have actually succeeded.

There have been numerous examples of virtualized heterogeneous networks at commercial scale: SK Telecom (Nasdaq: SKM), China Mobile Ltd. (NYSE: CHL), NTT DoCoMo Inc. (NYSE: DCM), AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) and Telefónica have all implemented virtualization over multivendor networks. They simply had to create their own management and network orchestration (MANO) and software-defined networking (SDN) platforms. Piece of cake, right?

The point is that these operators weren't prepared to wait. They cobbled together components, code and concepts to create control and orchestration platforms that talked to legacy and virtualized infrastructure. For sure, creating your own network control and management systems is a lot of hard work. But service providers are used to that. They've been stitching together operations systems for decades.

This wasn't quite the same, though, because virtualized networks don't behave like the networks they will (eventually) render obsolete. In a way, virtualized networks behave like cats. They are little angels while you are in the room, but then shred your sofa when you turn your back. They purr nicely at first before tearing apart all your carefully laid plans when they start to grow.

In a virtualized network, the equivalent of turning your back is losing visibility. And this has been one of the key challenges for service providers: finding a way to monitor performance and user experience in these new networks. That has definitely not come easily. Operators discovered, often late in the process, that their tried and true methods simply didn't "measure up" in this new context.

That's because these networks are highly dynamic, compared with our static networks of old. Virtual network functions (VNFs) interact in ways that traditional hardware components don't. They make decisions together, often outside the view of orchestrators. The network becomes a living, breathing ecosystem, where minute changes or impairments can cascade across the network, making problems hard to find.


For more NFV-related coverage and insights, check out our dedicated NFV content channel here on Light Reading.


The service providers that succeeded at building virtualized networks stood out from their peers by understanding that they were entering an unknown space, and being prepared to see and do things differently, early on. And they recognized that standards bodies, open source initiatives and vendor ecosystems weren't going to help. A completely new approach to monitoring had to be conceived. It was the operators that made it happen.

The result was virtualized monitoring: a simple, scalable way to regain visibility. It tests the actual network from physical or virtual vantage points, without concern for the path the data will take along the way.

This is critical, as any form of tapping or localized testing can't follow the dynamic routing and network slices in a virtualized network. Instead, tests need to be conducted over every segment in the service chain, and then pieced together using analytics to form a complete picture.

Virtualized monitoring solutions were developed by vendors actually working in service provider DevOps war rooms. They were aided by operators' integration skills, insights and appetite to virtualize. It is exactly these kinds of collaboration that formed the foundation for the first virtualized heterogeneous networks.

Service providers going it alone take on the responsibility of making predictions about the future, shepherding vendors, standards committees and their own staff along the way. But they can also achieve transformative performance gains, and gain a critical advantage by delivering an exceptional user experience. Those waiting for an "easy button" to appear might just find customer churn is right around the corner.

Likewise, vendors will succeed by building relationships with innovative, fearless operators. They must be willing to move beyond simply "selling" to those companies and start to act like partners. That will further challenges the operators to innovate beyond their needs, and take additional risks of their own.

— Scott Sumner, Director, Business Analytics, Accedian

(4)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
afshin1.esmaeili@gmail.com
50%
50%
afshin1.esmaeili@gmail.com,
User Rank: Light Beer
4/24/2017 | 1:29:03 PM
Maturity Required
First, long live virtualization. That established, let's now not be religiously pro or against virtualization. Telecom industry is a five nine reliability industry and if you were to be really mean you could say the IT industry has emerged from a nine five reliability (not exactly true though). They are melting up to form the ICT industry (of course it will not be the kind of meltup that Andromeda and Milky way are to face!). The question is how many nines of reliability do we want /need in ICT.

IoT offers the greatest growth opportunities that the Service Providers have seen since the mobile telephony took off in the early 90s. Much of it calls for the kind of reliability required by mission critical operations, be it self-driving cars or that young surgeon in white uniform standing by the patient's side with his tools (dagger) in his hand and waiting to receive his instructions from the "clinic cloud". Besides the current over seven billion mobile users will not tolerate any less reliability then they experience right now, and frankly there is lots of room for improvement too.

Finally if we want something as fancy as network slicing, of outmost mportance in my view, to work reliably and smoothly, we need to adapt a realistic and experience based approach to network evolution. So the history and past experience from many of Telecom projects that introduced some new technologies, services or network upgrades have had substantial hiccups, some even disastrous. That happened despite the fact that the Telecom's well established processes were followed including well defined and standardized interfaces and multi-vendor verification, interoperability etc. It will take many years before ICT finds its new form and we need to patiently grow with it. Some growing pain is to be expected but we should avoid disastrous network outages or major service unavailability in the mean time.

 
JA1994
50%
50%
JA1994,
User Rank: Light Beer
4/14/2017 | 2:39:27 PM
Great
I absolutely agree with his point of view. It just can't work!
brooks7
100%
0%
brooks7,
User Rank: Light Sabre
4/14/2017 | 12:34:55 PM
Re: Early
Umm...I think there are several examples of the networks described:  Google, Facebook, Microsoft and Amazon all come to mind straight away.  So not only is virtualizaton working it has been completely solved for almost 10 years.  The basic problem is that traditional service providers have a Systems Integration challenge to operate the way that those companies do.  To date, they have not done so.  They are trying to run a traditional process in an area of complete disruption and that is not working.  And it won't work, because by the time it gets ready it will be completely obsolete.  So, if I were say AT&T I would buy some Vmware licenses, hire a bunch of coders/netops people and get started.  No need to wait.  No need to expect perfect interoperability.  No need to standardize on common APIs.  Pick your products and Go.  Make.  Do.  Stop waiting for the IT world to do things your way.

seven

 
danielcawrey
0%
100%
danielcawrey,
User Rank: Light Sabre
4/14/2017 | 11:32:49 AM
Early
Even if it is early days, I think we're going to see virtualization take over networks. The big difference on the networking side versus what has happened with servers is clear: There are a lot more moving parts that need migration. But I have confidence some vendors will put this all together. 
More Blogs from Column
It's clear that SD-WAN is now seen as the enterprise networking architecture of the future, which is why this market will reach billions of dollars.
There is nothing wrong with large amounts of debt if you methodically expand a business, but what are these guys doing?
Market forces are working well in the business data services (BDS) market in the US, argues Bruce Mehlman, co-chairman of the Internet Innovation Alliance.
Mobile operators moving to virtualized networking for 5G infrastructure need to carefully consider the motivations behind the move and make the right choices at every step along the way.
Cheenu Seshadri, the managing partner at Three Horizon Advisors, looks at the market concentration risks of letting T-Mobile and Sprint merge.
Featured Video
From The Founder
John Chambers is still as passionate about business and innovation as he ever was at Cisco, finds Steve Saunders.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
June 26, 2018, Nice, France
September 12, 2018, Los Angeles, CA
September 24-26, 2018, Westin Westminster, Denver
October 9, 2018, The Westin Times Square, New York
October 23, 2018, Georgia World Congress Centre, Atlanta, GA
November 7-8, 2018, London, United Kingdom
November 8, 2018, The Montcalm by Marble Arch, London
November 15, 2018, The Westin Times Square, New York
December 4-6, 2018, Lisbon, Portugal
All Upcoming Live Events
Hot Topics
The Telco Debt Binge May End Badly
Scott Raynovich, Founder and Principal Analyst, Futuriom, 6/15/2018
Mavenir's Billion-Dollar Blueprint
Ray Le Maistre, Editor-in-Chief, 6/18/2018
Larry Ellison Laughed at the Cloud, Now the Cloud Is Laughing Back
Mitch Wagner, Executive Editor, Light Reading, 6/20/2018
Telco Job Prospects Go From Bad to Worse
Iain Morris, News Editor, 6/22/2018
Animals with Phones
Backing Up Your Work Is Crucial Click Here
Live Digital Audio

A CSP's digital transformation involves so much more than technology. Crucial – and often most challenging – is the cultural transformation that goes along with it. As Sigma's Chief Technology Officer, Catherine Michel has extensive experience with technology as she leads the company's entire product portfolio and strategy. But she's also no stranger to merging technology and culture, having taken a company — Tribold — from inception to acquisition (by Sigma in 2013), and she continues to advise service providers on how to drive their own transformations. This impressive female leader and vocal advocate for other women in the industry will join Women in Comms for a live radio show to discuss all things digital transformation, including the cultural transformation that goes along with it.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed