& cplSiteName &

Introducing 'The New IP'

Steve Saunders
9/11/2014
100%
0%

As anyone who's met me knows, it's not often that I'm stuck for words, but the huge changes that are currently sweeping the telecom industry this year have had even me struggling for the appropriate vocabulary to describe what's going on.

Fortunately, on a recent trip to Silicon Valley I heard a new industry term doing the rounds -- one that I think encompasses the current telecom zeitgeist perfectly.

The term is "The New IP" (and yes, it implies that there is also an "Old IP," of which we shall speak more shortly).

So what is The New IP? In simple technology terms, it's a state-of-the-art, virtualized IP network. But the reason why service providers and large enterprises need to sit up and take notice of The New IP doesn't have to do with technology nearly as much as it has to do with money.

It's about the money, dummy!
Specifically, networks built on The New IP technology help service providers to both save money on capex (capital expenditure) and opex (operational expenditure), and make money by selling new content-driven services.

This sets them apart from networks built on The Old IP, which typically don't do either of those things, consisting, for the most part, of utilitarian pipes designed to reliably deliver mucho traffic from hither to whence (and whose most important characteristic as far as service providers go is that they cost money).

Ok, so I'm simplifying things here -- but the telecom industry is actually well overdue for a dose of simplification, isn't it? The reason service providers today are anxious about having to plan their future network strategies is that the tech media (with the exception of Light Reading, obviously) has done an absolutely splendid job of obscuring the importance of virtualization by smearing it in a thick and bewildering layer of technical jargon, acronyms, buzzwords, and hype.

Sure, everyone has heard about SDN and NFV (boy, haven't we?!), but those specifications aren't what matters here; it's how they revolutionize service providers' businesses that counts (note to telcos everywhere -- "follow the money," in other words). These acronyms are actually symptoms of an absolutely huge upheaval that's about to turn the telecom ecosystem (and its economics) on its head.

Old, new, or somewhere in between
I'll dig into how The New IP changes everything in a minute. But first, gentle Light Reader, let's work out if YOUR telecom network is part of The Old IP world, or part of The New IP nirvana.

To do that, Light Reading has devised the following simple quiz to show how far you've come in moving from old to new, and how that progress could affect your company's bottom line.

The rules are simple: give yourself one point (1 pt) for each New IP box that your network checks, subtract one point (-1 pt) from the total for each box you check in the Old IP column, and then compare your score to our handy "What Your Score Means" key.

Table 1: Are You More New IP Than Old IP?

The Old IP The New IP
Designed to scale clients (devices/nodes) Capable of scaling clients and resources on-demand (cloud-like)
Rigid topology and architecture Fluid in topology and architecture
Hardware-centric Software-centric
IT-centric User-centric
Integrated control and data planes Disaggregated control and data planes
Decentralized intelligence and management Centralized intelligence and management
Proprietary but standards-driven innovation Open platform and open-sourced innovation
Time-bound provisioning and change management On-demand provisioning and programmability
Key success metric: performance (speeds and feeds) Key success metric: agility (usability)
Killer apps: data networking communications (email), ecommerce, voice/video/data integration (VoIP, unified comms) Killer apps: Cloud everything, mobile data centers, big data analytics, virtualization everywhere
Management considers your network as an essential budget line item Management considers your network to be a strategic asset that serves both the bottom and the top line by saving/making money
Source: Light Reading

What your score means

  • +10 points (max. possible)
    Whoa! Check out the big brain on [YOUR NAME HERE]. Are you sure you don't come from the future? Because, dude, your network like totally defines state of the art. Would you like a job at Light Reading? Scratch that -- can we all come and work for you?

  • +9 to +6 points
    All hail, IP visionary, we salute you! Where other service providers enervate, you innovate. Truly you are a trail blazer on the information superhighway, charting a course that the rest of the telecom industry must follow.

  • +5 points to +1 point
    Congratulations, slugger -- you've clearly done battle with the latest in comms technology and come out a winner. Your network isn't bleeding edge, but you've made real strides towards dragging it into the 21st Century.

  • 0 points to -9 points
    Humph. The good news is that your IP network is no worse than 90% of those currently installed by service providers. The bad? You are paying too much to buy and run a network which is actually making it harder for you to deploy new and profitable applications and services. Ouchy!

  • -10 points (worst possible score)
    It's pretty dark where you are, isn't it, old timer?

The shock of the new
As mentioned, one reason service providers are getting pumped up about virtualization is that it has the potential to deliver a double whammy of benefits: saving money on capex and opex AND making money on new services.

On the capex side, virtualization reduces the number of router ports that service providers have to buy -- especially out at the edge of the network. Conversely, core routers aren't much affected, and optical gear not at all -- or, as Michael Capuano, VP of marketing at Infinera Corp. (Nasdaq: INFN), told me the other day, "as far as I'm aware, no one has yet invented a way to create photons in software."

Note: It's a clear indicator of the robust health of the telecom market that Tier 1 service providers such as AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) and Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) aren't planning to use those edge router savings to reduce their net capex spend (which, when combined, added up to an astonishing $21 billion in 2012). Instead, they're expected to continue spending at record levels for at least the next year or so. What virtualization means is that this spend will purchase a lot more infrastructure for service providers' money -- good for them and their customers (and the rest of the telecom supply chain, of course).

The capex savings are nice, but the opex benefits delivered by The New IP are potentially even more significant than the capex savings.

Those opex savings come in different varieties. Use of automation to enable on-demand services reduces the need for humans to be involved in service provisioning, thus decreasing the inevitable incidence of human error on telecom networks. At the network level, service providers can reduce the number of truck rolls required to provision new services by doing it with a mouse instead.

But this new opex model isn't just about saving, it's also about enabling. In fact, what The New IP enables is probably even more important than any cost savings. At the business development level, The New IP gives the telcos the ability to start acting much more like their new OTT competitors (Netflix, Amazon, Facebook and so on) by using their live networks as a venue to design, spec, test and deploy new and profitable content-driven digital services. By building on open-sourced standards, network operators should also be able to act as better partners to innovators and developers, and more quickly incorporate outside innovation into their service mix.

And there's more. A New IP environment hands greater control and flexibility to a service provider's customers, who will be able (policies and rules permitting, of course) to add/drop and flex the services and applications they're using without having to reach out to their service provider and wait for a response/action. All of that adds up to an improved customer experience and an environment that encourages experimentation with, and use of, a greater number of services.

All this represents a meta-shift from where service providers are today: The switch from Old IP to New IP is as big, in fact, as the change from circuit-based to packet-switched networks.

Having written about tech for 25 years I've seen more than my share of technology hype, but having spent this year talking to service providers and their equipment suppliers I'm convinced that The New IP is the real deal.

In fact, the only thing likely to prevent service providers from taking New IP technology and running with it is the service providers themselves. Culturally, while the telcos want to compete with the new wave of OTT competitors such as Amazon, and recognize that in order to do so they must act more like the OTT players, in day-to-day reality most of them are miles away from being able to do so. Proprietary attitudes and "worst practice" for customer relations that go back literally decades will have to be overcome before real change can take place.

In other words: the ability of the telcos to make full use of The New IP will have as much to do with their own business philosophies as it does with technology.

Next page: All change?

(32)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Light Sabre
9/23/2014 | 2:48:54 AM
Re: Won't get fooled again
@Mitch: Cisco isn't alone in this vision.  I recently attended the Connected Cloud Summit here in Boston -- where IoT was the word of the day.  Many companies outside the Valley are understanding the importance of IoT not simply as a new fad, but as an important step in the evolution of networking IT.
lgradina
100%
0%
lgradina,
User Rank: Lightning
9/18/2014 | 7:17:45 PM
Re: There's no going back
Interesting ... GSMA's Network 2020 is building "All-IP" first, then security and and by the end (2020), SDN/NFV. Similar if not same ecosystem.

http://www.gsma.com/network2020/

Why so much talk around  IP this year?

- Maybe it is hard to accept that Old IP, New IP, All-IP - is still IP!

- Maybe it is hard to change IP (Internetwork Protocol) altogether?

Think in reverse: if a strog player or a disruptor proves something better than IP today, what would you hold on to: Old IP, New IP or just IP?  

 
Mitch Wagner
50%
50%
Mitch Wagner,
User Rank: Lightning
9/17/2014 | 1:32:13 AM
Re: Won't get fooled again
Here's an example:

Cisco Pitches Vision for 'Internet of Everything'

Also touched on here: 

Cisco's Chambers Predicts 'Brutal' Tech Consolidation

Cisco sees the Internet of Things (which it calls the Internet of Everything) as being vastly bigger than the networking market today, leaving plenty of room for Cisco to continue high-margin growth. 
Steve Saunders
50%
50%
Steve Saunders,
User Rank: Blogger
9/16/2014 | 9:39:34 PM
Re: bus model
that's right, Ray. And it forces netwrok operators to categorize themsleves in on or the other. It's not about "supporting" something (like a standard). It goes to the actual business function of the network. 
Ray@LR
100%
0%
Ray@LR,
User Rank: Blogger
9/16/2014 | 1:40:27 AM
Re: bus model
If this industry didn't have new terms that would be a sign that it had ground to a halt....

It's also important to note that this is not a technical term and is not related to a specific technology/standard/protocol, so using it in the same sentence as IPv6 is not, in my view,very relevant.

This is a term that relates to a concept -- that we are now in a new era of IP networking, and it's a term that neatly encapsulates that there is a very distincy difference between what has been the norm up to now and what that norm will be in the near future.

 
Steve Saunders
50%
50%
Steve Saunders,
User Rank: Blogger
9/15/2014 | 8:35:57 PM
Re: Won't get fooled again
articulate where? In briefings? I haven't briefed but have looked around and didn't see much... 

I mean, i cd use a briefing, obviously, but then again, service providers may not be briefed either!

 
Mitch Wagner
50%
50%
Mitch Wagner,
User Rank: Lightning
9/15/2014 | 8:20:58 PM
Re: Won't get fooled again
Cisco has been quite articulate about its Application Centric Infrastructure and how that achieves network programmibility. I can't see anything missing in Cisco's marketing. 

Whether reality lives up to that marketing will be an existential issue for Cisco. 

 
Steve Saunders
50%
50%
Steve Saunders,
User Rank: Blogger
9/14/2014 | 10:43:09 PM
Re: bus model
I think there's a bit more to it than marketing... though i agree that there's too much hype and hooplah right now. 

The thing that i personally like about this term The New IP is that it isn't a buzzword, or part of the jargon - it's just a really simple way of dividing the comms world into two - before and after.

And within that categorization you can fit just about anything that is IP comms related. So this is actually about simplifying and making it comprehensible to the c-level folk that coulnd't care less about IPV6, to use your example.

I'm sure not everyone will get on board but it works for me!

 

Steve   

 
danielcawrey
50%
50%
danielcawrey,
User Rank: Light Sabre
9/14/2014 | 2:29:03 PM
Re: bus model
Another buzzword for the lexicon. I don't think it's necessary – it acutally seems a bit confusing to be in all honesty.

With have IPv6 coming, and now the New IP – this is all part of the constant rate of change in technology, and I feel as though this is more an exercise of Silicon Valley marketing departments than anything else. 
DanJones
50%
50%
DanJones,
User Rank: Blogger
9/12/2014 | 3:28:09 PM
Re: I coulda done better
As the RAN elements of mobile networks and mobile devices get pulled more into this virtual world as well we'll have to get smarter about how we classify, store and manage data too.

 

There will be so much contextual data being produced on and about mobile devices and users that some will have to be stored locally and then dumped. As well as big data, we'll have small data (say, for instance, information about what parking spaces are nearest to the user's car), which will serve a useful purpose for the user in the moment but is probably not worth retaining after that.
Page 1 / 4   >   >>
More Blogs from Column
The definition of voice services is widening beyond phone calls, even into IoT. That calls for a more open approach to product development, Ian Maclean of Metaswitch argues.
The shift to cloud is turning unified communications into the next hot service for enterprises as the UCaaS market continues to expand.
Pay-TV providers should focus on four key areas to bring employees and customers along for the ride.
The shift to cloud computing is changing the way business is done. Now, the CFOs and their finance teams are seeing a benefit in cloud as well.
As enterprises spread applications across multiple clouds, they need ways to maintain visibility and control, Ixia's Jeff Harris argues.
Featured Video
From The Founder
Light Reading is spending much of this year digging into the details of how automation technology will impact the comms market, but let's take a moment to also look at how automation is set to overturn the current world order by the middle of the century.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
November 1, 2017, The Royal Garden Hotel
November 1, 2017, The Montcalm Marble Arch
November 2, 2017, 8 Northumberland Avenue, London, UK
November 2, 2017, 8 Northumberland Avenue – London
November 10, 2017, The Westin Times Square, New York, NY
November 16, 2017, ExCel Centre, London
November 30, 2017, The Westin Times Square
May 14-17, 2018, Austin Convention Center
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
With the mobile ecosystem becoming increasingly vulnerable to security threats, AdaptiveMobile has laid out some of the key considerations for the wireless community.
Hot Topics
Is US Lurching Back to Monopoly Status?
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 10/16/2017
Muni Policies Stymie Edge Computing
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 10/17/2017
'Brutal' Automation & the Looming Workforce Cull
Iain Morris, News Editor, 10/18/2017
Pai's FCC Raises Alarms at Competitive Carriers
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 10/16/2017
Worried About Bandwidth for 4K? Here Comes 8K!
Aditya Kishore, Practice Leader, Video Transformation, Telco Transformation, 10/17/2017
Animals with Phones
Selfie Game Strong Click Here
Latest Comment
Live Digital Audio

Understanding the full experience of women in technology requires starting at the collegiate level (or sooner) and studying the technologies women are involved with, company cultures they're part of and personal experiences of individuals.

During this WiC radio show, we will talk with Nicole Engelbert, the director of Research & Analysis for Ovum Technology and a 23-year telecom industry veteran, about her experiences and perspectives on women in tech. Engelbert covers infrastructure, applications and industries for Ovum, but she is also involved in the research firm's higher education team and has helped colleges and universities globally leverage technology as a strategy for improving recruitment, retention and graduation performance.

She will share her unique insight into the collegiate level, where women pursuing engineering and STEM-related degrees is dwindling. Engelbert will also reveal new, original Ovum research on the topics of artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, security and augmented reality, as well as discuss what each of those technologies might mean for women in our field. As always, we'll also leave plenty of time to answer all your questions live on the air and chat board.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed
Partner Perspectives - content from our sponsors
The Mobile Broadband Road Ahead
By Kevin Taylor, for Huawei
All Partner Perspectives