Light Reading Mobile – Telecom News, Analysis, Events, and Research

News Analysis  

Heavyweights Form CloudEthernet Forum

May 24, 2013 | Ray Le Maistre |
A collective of major industry operators and vendors, including Alcatel-Lucent, Juniper Networks Inc. and Verizon Communications Inc., has formed a new industry organization, the CloudEthernet Forum.

The Forum, a new part of the Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) that will "operate independently," has been formed to address "the specific issues of scaling and applying suitable Ethernet services to meet the stringent demands of delivering cloud services."

The Forum says it will "work to develop Ethernet to enable collections of millions of virtual servers and storage devices to perform reliably and efficiently across both regional and global networks."

In addition to Alcatel-Lucent, Juniper and Verizon, the other founding members are: Avaya, Equinix, HP, PCCW Global, Spirent Communications and Tata Communications. Other service providers, vendors and systems integrators are being invited to join. For more background on why the Forum has been formed and the views of various stakeholders, check out the CloudEthernet Forum official website.

Why this matters
There's no doubt that the issues surrounding the planning, construction and management of networks that will support cloud services and emerging capabilities such as network functions virtualization (NFV) and software-defined networking (SDN) demand close attention from all parties.

But does it need its own Forum? Don't we have enough industry organizations? And to what extent will this be independent of the MEF? (Does it need to be independent of the MEF, even? That will certainly be a question asked by MEF members if they're asked to stump up another membership fee…)

No one will argue that this isn't a development worthy of close, ongoing attention from a collective and representative group, but this industry may be reaching forum saturation point.

— Ray Le Maistre, Editor-in-Chief, Light Reading



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
 
White Papers SPONSORED CONTENT
Featured