& cplSiteName &

Towerstream Proposes a Small-Cell Alternative

Sarah Thomas
3/19/2014
50%
50%

Will wireless operators be content trading ease of deployment for revenues when it comes to public-access small cells?

Many of the cable operators that already have backhaul in major cities are banking on it, but -- as brought up in a recent Light Reading blog -- the question is, are the operators willing to cede control over owning and running the small cells to the cable providers? (See Small Cells as a Service? Not So Fast, MSOs... and MSOs Poised to Profit from Small Cell Rollouts – Research.)

Those might not be the only two options, according to tower company and broadband provider Towerstream Corp. (Nasdaq: TWER). It has an alternative to offer the wireless operators, and it even spun out a subsidiary, HetNets Tower Corp., last year to market the concept.

Here's the deal: Towerstream already has spent years acquiring real estate in prime locations like New York's Empire State building and MetLife center, a formidable challenge now for network operators. It also already has a high-capacity backhaul network -- with a fixed broadband network to back it up -- in Manhattan and its boroughs and is soon to be in San Francisco, Chicago, Miami, and other urban markets as well. (See Small Cells: The Battle for the Lamp Post, Poll: Backhaul Holds Up City Small Cells, and Towerstream Buys Small Cell & 4G Operator in Houston.)

To leverage this, Arthur Giftakis, VP of engineering and network operations, says the company is ramping up its small-cell play and offering carriers a way to connect on their own terms, leveraging its existing assets and the ability to more easily acquire facilities appropriate for mounting small cells. (See WiFi: Small Cells' Trojan Horse? and Know Your Small Cell: Home, Enterprise, or Public Access?)

"We're not held hostage by facilities, fiber rights of way, and things that give carriers problems and add months or years to build-outs," he says. "We don’t have to play by the same rules, which is a unique angle for us."

It's an angle the company is leveraging to lease space to the carriers. Giftakis says HetNets looks like a tower company and controls all the real estate assets Towerstream has access to for small cell activity. If the operator doesn't want to give up control of the small-cell service offering, that's fine, he says. It can structure a deal with HetNets however it wants. (See Public Access Small Cells: Off to a Slow Start.)

All of HetNet's sites have high-capacity, point-to-point backhaul with 200 to 800 megs of backhaul as needed, Giftakis says. "You can use our access points and just use our backhaul, or just our mounting space, or our power, or not."

Giftakis notes that in his discussions with vendors and carriers, the type of small cell they want to deploy varies by month. "One month they want a God-like device with LTE and WiFi, then they start to realize the limitations," he says, adding that one device that does everything doesn't do anything well. His opinion is: More singlemode LTE small cells will start to come out, as well as those with 3G/4G card slots, rather than the oft-discussed multimode devices. (See AT&T Readies LTE-Only Small Cells, Eyes Multimode by 2015 and MWC 2014: Single-Mode 4G Small Cells Ahoy?)

So when that day comes, will HetNets Tower Corp. be a more appealing model to wireless operators looking to crack the public-access small-cell market? The challenges might be enough to convince the operators to give it a try, even if it means giving up some control -- or cash -- especially in major urban markets like NYC.

The HetNets subsidiary has fared well in its first year in business. Giftakis says it has already signed up as customers two "top-tier wireless carriers" and saw its revenues grow 21% to $0.7 million in the most recent fourth quarter, its first full quarter with a cable MSO paying rent to use its WiFi network. While the bulk of its business is with the cable companies, Towerstream says HetNets is also the answer to carrier small-cell deployments in the second half of the year.

"Backhaul, at the end of the day, has been a problem for carriers anyway," Giftakis says. "They spent a lot of money bringing fiber to towers, and there's only 'x' amount of towers. You can't afford to bring fiber to all those types of sites. When you start looking at these small-cell deployments, it gives us a leg up."

— Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, Light Reading

(9)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
chrisdress
50%
50%
chrisdress,
User Rank: Light Beer
4/3/2014 | 10:18:00 AM
Re: Towerstream
Not sure.

 

A BIG Problem for small firms like Towerstream is that huge companies like telcos and cable providers want to do business with BIG companies, especially for any customer facing applications.  They do this because they believe that big companies will have the resources to support their needs.

This fact is death to the small companies who believe if they can land an elephant their success will be assured and as a result pump resources into supporting their sales efforts to the exclusion of chasing more profitable and higher % wins.

At this point I think Towerstream's best outcome is to be acquired by a larger firm so that they can be more attractive to these telcos/cable companies. 
Sarah Thomas
50%
50%
Sarah Thomas,
User Rank: Blogger
4/2/2014 | 2:32:03 PM
Re: Towerstream
What company do you see as filling that partner role?
chrisdress
50%
50%
chrisdress,
User Rank: Light Beer
3/29/2014 | 1:34:30 PM
Re: Towerstream
TWER has been a serial "disappointer".  Their CEO, Mr Thompson, has been promoting this concept with great fanfare for over 2 years and there is very little revenue to show for it; with the large investment, this has hurt the financials.

So far TWER has demonstarted that they have very little experience in understanding how these big companies make decisions and implement solutions.

TWER has been busy with the technology, which of course is critical, but these large elephants have a great ability to lead little companies like TWER around by the nose prior to doing it themselves in house.

I continue to stay in the name as I do think they have a good market position; however I think in order to maximize the return, the company needs a "strategic partner" with a track record in successfully dealing with the "big boys".

Best of luck to longs!

 
Sarah Thomas
50%
50%
Sarah Thomas,
User Rank: Blogger
3/23/2014 | 11:15:48 AM
Re: Towerstream
That's true, Mark, and Towerstream wants to lease to as many operators as they can, so they will be on the same spots. But, that's inevitable anyway. ANywhere one operator improves, its competitors will want to as well.
MarkC73
50%
50%
MarkC73,
User Rank: Light Sabre
3/22/2014 | 11:56:55 PM
Re: Towerstream
I'm keeping an eye on this model, if a trust model can be worked out that the wireless carriers accept, it may also aid in the construction of the host carrier's wifi/wireless offering.  Not sure if that will be an aiding competition concern for the wireless folks since it's already competitive, I feel the main concerns will be enforceable SLAs, Security, and price.
Sarah Thomas
50%
50%
Sarah Thomas,
User Rank: Blogger
3/21/2014 | 8:20:02 AM
Re: Towerstream
That could be one reason why it decided to spin out HetNets Towers as a subsidiary, to distance itself from the parent company. It has had this network and real estate for so long, so that's why it's training to repurpose it for WIFi and now small cells, to keep up with the changing industry dynamics.
DOShea
50%
50%
DOShea,
User Rank: Blogger
3/19/2014 | 9:58:43 PM
Towerstream
This company has been around for a long time, and has had some interesting ideas over the year. But, they've had a tough time of it financially lately, and i have to think that will affect how ready (or not) carriers will be to work with them. If carriers are going to lease, they are going to need a high level of trust in whoever they're dealing with.
Mitch Wagner
50%
50%
Mitch Wagner,
User Rank: Lightning
3/19/2014 | 5:49:47 PM
Re: lease versus own
Giving up control can be attractive if carriers get flexibility or cost savings in return. That's just basic business. 
Sarah Thomas
50%
50%
Sarah Thomas,
User Rank: Blogger
3/19/2014 | 3:45:48 PM
lease versus own
It seems to me that leasing access like this will have to be at least part of operators' small cell mix. They can't do it all in all locations, and they will need the coverage help in dense urban areas like NYC where Towerstream is up and running. It may not be the most lucrative path, but it's the path of least resistance.
Educational Resources
sponsor supplied content
Educational Resources Archive
Featured Video
From The Founder
Light Reading founder Steve Saunders grills Cisco's Roland Acra on how he's bringing automation to life inside the data center.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
March 20-22, 2018, Denver Marriott Tech Center
March 22, 2018, Denver, Colorado | Denver Marriott Tech Center
March 28, 2018, Kansas City Convention Center
April 4, 2018, The Westin Dallas Downtown, Dallas
April 9, 2018, Las Vegas Convention Center
May 14-16, 2018, Austin Convention Center
May 14, 2018, Brazos Hall, Austin, Texas
September 24-26, 2018, Westin Westminster, Denver
October 9, 2018, The Westin Times Square, New York
October 23, 2018, Georgia World Congress Centre, Atlanta, GA
November 8, 2018, The Montcalm by Marble Arch, London
November 15, 2018, The Westin Times Square, New York
December 4-6, 2018, Lisbon, Portugal
All Upcoming Live Events
Hot Topics
Federal Funds for Broadband? Unlikely
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 2/12/2018
Has Europe Switched to a Fiber Diet? Not Yet...
Ray Le Maistre, Editor-in-Chief, 2/15/2018
Net Neutrality: States' Rights vs. the FCC
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 2/13/2018
Will China React to Latest US Huawei, ZTE Slapdown?
Ray Le Maistre, Editor-in-Chief, 2/16/2018
IBM, Microsoft Duke It Out Over Chief Diversity Hire
Sarah Thomas, Director, Women in Comms, 2/15/2018
Animals with Phones
Live Digital Audio

A CSP's digital transformation involves so much more than technology. Crucial – and often most challenging – is the cultural transformation that goes along with it. As Sigma's Chief Technology Officer, Catherine Michel has extensive experience with technology as she leads the company's entire product portfolio and strategy. But she's also no stranger to merging technology and culture, having taken a company — Tribold — from inception to acquisition (by Sigma in 2013), and she continues to advise service providers on how to drive their own transformations. This impressive female leader and vocal advocate for other women in the industry will join Women in Comms for a live radio show to discuss all things digital transformation, including the cultural transformation that goes along with it.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed