& cplSiteName &

Overpriced & Underwhelming, Apple's New iPhone Lacks X Factor

Iain Morris
9/13/2017
50%
50%

Apple's desperately awaited new iPhone has finally arrived, and the big news -- which most of us learned through a drip feed of leaks over the past few days -- is that it's even more expensive than the last model. Oh, and it includes facial recognition software.

What that essentially means is that a consumer will be able to unlock this bit of digital bling by looking at it instead of touching the screen. It's far more secure than fingerprint recognition, says Apple. But on the wow-factor seismometer, it's not exactly a garbage-fueled flying car.

Analysts had been salivating in expectation of this iPhone launch like Pavlov's dogs after the ringing of the bell. But it's a measure of just how underwhelming the whole smartphone show has become that some of the most respected commentators chose to focus on the facial recognition stuff.

Carolina Milanesi, an analyst from market research firm Creative Strategies, said security-conscious consumers might initially be reluctant to use facial recognition as an alternative to fingerprint recognition, according to a BBC report.

Given that customers didn't have much hesitation about using fingerprint recognition when it recently appeared, we're not convinced they will be so wary. Unenthused, yes.

Unfortunately, if anyone is worried about the security implications of using a face instead of a fingerprint, they won't have recourse to the latter. That's because, in another mind-blowing innovation, Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL) has done away with the button on the screen.

That's right. Having taken its battle against the button to its logical conclusion, Apple has removed the one button that its customers had left at their disposal and produced a touchscreen-only device.

Just as the elimination of a 3.5mm socket from earlier models stopped customers from using traditional earphones, so the death of the button will prevent them from using familiar gestures to control the device.

The screen display is bigger, too, extending from one edge of the device to the other. If that sounds like something you can already get on other luxury smartphones, it's because -- well -- you can.

And get this. In a bit of marketing genius that would have had Steve Jobs ditching his trademark somber black turtleneck for a celebratory Hawaiian shirt, Apple has branded its new device the iPhone X.

Can you see what it's done there? Not only is X an extremely "sick" letter of the alphabet, as millennials would say, but it's also the Roman numeral for 10. That portends empire-building greatness. And because the previous device was the iPhone 7, and Apple introduced the iPhone 8 alongside the X, the nomenclature shows that Apple is "leapfrogging" the 9 to produce something really groundbreaking. Brilliant, eh?


For all the latest news from the wireless networking and services sector, check out our dedicated mobile content channel here on Light Reading.


What's really depressing about all this is the message it sends out. Device makers obviously want a range that caters to both ends of the consumer market. But at a time when incomes are being squeezed, and Thomas Piketty is writing about the widening wealth gap between rich and poor, Apple's most anticipated innovation in ages is a smartphone that, at $1,000, costs about as much as one of its state-of-the-art laptops did just a few years ago.

Maybe Apple is just more honest than Facebook , whose purported goal of "democratizing" technology and bringing the Internet within rich of disadvantaged communities has attracted equal cynicism.

But it's hard to shake the feeling that Apple's iPhone X is the hardware equivalent of that app that turned up in its store way back in 2008. Priced at a jaw-dropping $1,000, it did nothing more than display the image of a red ruby on the iPhone screen. "I Am Rich," it was called.

Media reports suggest that app had about eight buyers worldwide. Apple will obviously be hoping the iPhone X meets with a warmer reception. In 2016, it sold fewer iPhones than in the previous year for the first time ever, and its growth rate for units sold has been trending down since 2010, when it was at an all-time high of more than 90%.

Despite all the fanfare about the Internet of Things and the connected home, Apple has disappointingly failed to come up with any gadget since the iPhone that excites investors and consumers to the same degree. Unless this latest iPhone rekindles their enthusiasm, it will have some hard questions to answer about its strategic direction.

— Iain Morris, News Editor, Light Reading

(12)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
kq4ym
50%
50%
kq4ym,
User Rank: Light Sabre
9/22/2017 | 2:43:06 PM
Re: Annual Ritual
It does seem there's something at work to bring a bit more into Apple's pockets with the $1000 phone price catering to perhaps the folks who just have to have the latest and greatest or at least want to be know for being able to afford the luxury of such a gadget. And of course, service providers figure out ways to make that price "affordable" with monthly payments and come-on deals to switch and get newer phones.
brooks7
50%
50%
brooks7,
User Rank: Light Sabre
9/14/2017 | 11:55:41 AM
Re: Annual Ritual
 

I would say long ago (5 years or more maybe) new versions of various smartphones have added little to nothing new.  A bit better of a camera here or a bit more processor there.  But revolutionary changes left the building a long time ago.  I would argue the reason that user battery replacement was removed from phones was to keep up demand.  I still use a Galaxy S3 and it works perfectly well.   I have yet to see anything that would make me change.

seven

 
DanJones
50%
50%
DanJones,
User Rank: Blogger
9/13/2017 | 8:57:32 PM
Re: Annual Ritual
BTW, from what I hear, Apple is using both Intel and Qualcomm modems for the new phones. More on that later, hopefully....
DanJones
50%
50%
DanJones,
User Rank: Blogger
9/13/2017 | 8:55:09 PM
Re: Annual Ritual
Well that's where the industry is going, they need to understand it, even if they don't dive in headfirst.
bosco_pcs
50%
50%
bosco_pcs,
User Rank: Light Sabre
9/13/2017 | 8:49:11 PM
Re: Annual Ritual
So QCOM really has Apple over the barrel after all. Unless Intel somehow could pull a rabbit out of the hat... But why did Apple try to field test 5G a few months ago? Anyone has the inside scoop?
DanJones
50%
50%
DanJones,
User Rank: Blogger
9/13/2017 | 8:17:18 PM
Re: Annual Ritual
Well in this case there's another consideration here, the new iPhones don't support gigabit 

LTE, 10 android devices already do, many more will in 2018.
bosco_pcs
50%
50%
bosco_pcs,
User Rank: Light Sabre
9/13/2017 | 7:33:50 PM
Re: Annual Ritual
Dan, I'd like to answer your question differently but maybe with a straight response first. Since Apple claims iPhone X is the future of phone, probably it is the baseline going forward, i.e., 8 is the last of the Gen 1 and X is the base of Gen 2, including pricing. Mind you, it still covers the full range depending on the clienteles. Perhaps India at the low end and more affluent countries higher end.

In terms of being pricey, which is really my way of answering you, is it really. Case in point, I just upgrade mine from 4s to 7+ in April after the former 4 years of service. 3G is no longer up to the task either. While I lust after the new one, I am not planning to upgrade anytime soon because 7+ wasn't cheap either. If you factor in the higher storage, it is not far from the X. 

More importantly though, its usage and longevity are part of the cost-benefit analysis, yes? 

This is similar to the logic of choosing Windows or Mac. I am on 2013 Mac I bought in 2014. Not being a gamer, I am fine with it. Before that, my HP was on the fizz after 2 years of usage.

So I wonder if the usual refrain that Apple is overpriced is really relevant when your iPhone iOS outlive a variety of Androids which stop updating after a couple of years (except maybe Google's Pixel and Samsung's)
danielcawrey
50%
50%
danielcawrey,
User Rank: Light Sabre
9/13/2017 | 6:48:49 PM
Re: Annual Ritual
I think it is interesting Apple now has a device with which to test really pricey features.

The question is: Will that translate into Apple doing this with new iPhone X models every once in a while? Or is this a one-off?
bosco_pcs
50%
50%
bosco_pcs,
User Rank: Light Sabre
9/13/2017 | 2:14:54 PM
Annual Ritual
Hyping beforehand and dissing afterward seems to be annual Apple iPhone coming out party ritual every year.

And plenty of role playing too. Financial analysts become technical gurus become consumer connouseurs. 

There is facial recognition and there is facial recognition, time will tell if it is the Samsung's picture-can-fool-it or real emerging tech. Remember the fingerprint had the same criticism. One thing not stated is if you can disable it or relegate to the trusted keypad. My bet yes, if you don't like it. Interestingly, Jet Blue and TSA are also piloting facial recognition. 

People hype Nvidia and AMD because of the GPU design but they ignore A11 Bionic. Imagine if Apple decided to give QCOM's snapdragon a run for the money now that it has dispensed Imagination. The best innovations might not necessarily the flashy stuff but it the bowel of the device.

But we are human, the same logic that any cost centers are not P&L and therefore should be cut to the bones, like payroll systems and Y2K remediation. Alas, the price to pay is an existential crisis like Equifax when it skimmed on security. Why, there is no flash or even recognition when you can fence off cybercriminals. But that feature is exactly what consumers want
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
9/13/2017 | 10:44:11 AM
Re: Doppleganger delight
Launching your phone with your face -- seems fitting for the times. As far as "wow" factors go, I wonder what exactly could be crammed into the X to make it stand out.
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
More Blogs from Morris Lore
Trump's 5G plan is an 'outdated' piece of government theorizing, say reports. But might he have stumbled onto something?
What do Brexit, Trump's hair and net neutrality have in common?
Let's hope that cloudification, network slicing and core network transformation top the agenda at MWC 2018, and not the dreary issue of 5G new radio.
Altice hopes a just-announced US spin-off will help it double down on its underperforming core European operations.
It is time the industry faced up to the upheaval that automation will create.
Featured Video
From The Founder
The world of virtualization is struggling to wrench itself away from the claws of vendor lock-in, which runs counter to everything that NFV stands for.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
March 20-22, 2018, Denver Marriott Tech Center
March 22, 2018, Denver, Colorado | Denver Marriott Tech Center
March 28, 2018, Kansas City Convention Center
April 4, 2018, The Westin Dallas Downtown, Dallas
April 9, 2018, Las Vegas Convention Center
May 14-16, 2018, Austin Convention Center
May 14, 2018, Brazos Hall, Austin, Texas
September 24-26, 2018, Westin Westminster, Denver
October 9, 2018, The Westin Times Square, New York
October 23, 2018, Georgia World Congress Centre, Atlanta, GA
November 8, 2018, The Montcalm by Marble Arch, London
November 15, 2018, The Westin Times Square, New York
December 4-6, 2018, Lisbon, Portugal
All Upcoming Live Events
Hot Topics
Will China React to Latest US Huawei, ZTE Slapdown?
Ray Le Maistre, Editor-in-Chief, 2/16/2018
21st Century Networking? Welcome to the Lock-In
Steve Saunders, Founder, Light Reading, 2/20/2018
Stakes Run High for Tivo in Comcast Suit
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 2/20/2018
Liberty Global: Not So Fast on D3.1
Alan Breznick, Cable/Video Practice Leader, Light Reading, 2/20/2018
AT&T Reveals Initial 5G Cities
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 2/21/2018
Animals with Phones
Live Digital Audio

A CSP's digital transformation involves so much more than technology. Crucial – and often most challenging – is the cultural transformation that goes along with it. As Sigma's Chief Technology Officer, Catherine Michel has extensive experience with technology as she leads the company's entire product portfolio and strategy. But she's also no stranger to merging technology and culture, having taken a company — Tribold — from inception to acquisition (by Sigma in 2013), and she continues to advise service providers on how to drive their own transformations. This impressive female leader and vocal advocate for other women in the industry will join Women in Comms for a live radio show to discuss all things digital transformation, including the cultural transformation that goes along with it.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed