Light Reading
The eventual success of LTE-U will depend on mobile operators' willingness to take on it rather than carrier WiFi -- an open question.

Jury Still Out on LTE-Unlicensed

Richard Thanki
3/12/2014
50%
50%

In less than 20 years of widespread availability, broadband radio technologies in the unlicensed spectrum, such as Bluetooth, WiFi, and ZigBee, have achieved a number of milestones. (See Playing by the Rules: The Success of Unlicensed Spectrum.)

The current successes of unlicensed technologies have been achieved primarily in the ISM band at 2.4 GHz -- a band spanning only 80 MHz. However, over the coming years, we will increasingly see these technologies expand their operation to new spectrum bands, whose characteristics will enable entirely new types of application.

  • The TV White Spaces are the unused sub-1 GHz bands in the broadcast TV bands providing anywhere from 30 to 200 MHz on average per person across the US. Their use permits long-distance non-line-of-sight communication and is already being tested in rural and urban broadband projects around the world, as well as new generations of long-range sensor networks.
  • The 60 GHz band provides an extremely capacious 7 GHz of unlicensed spectrum. Due to its extremely high frequency, it will be used for short-range, ultra-fast communication to mobile devices and somewhat longer-range fixed uses such as line-of-sight backhaul from small cells and point-to-point uses.
  • The 5 GHz band provides propagation possibilities most similar to the 2.4 GHz band. However, it also contains an order of magnitude more spectrum -- 775 MHz in the US. The 5 GHz technologies will be used to build superfast multi-gigabit LANs and longer-range, point-to-point gigabit links, which will be particularly important for rural WISPs in the developed world and for building the high-capacity distribution systems that will extend the Internet across developing nations.

These developments will likely increase the already impressive economic value delivered by unlicensed technologies. However, WiFi will not be the sole technology seeking widespread deployment in the 5 GHz band.

LTE Advanced in unlicensed spectrum (LTE-U) is an innovative proposal from Qualcomm Inc. (Nasdaq: QCOM) to deliver LTE with small cells using unlicensed 5 GHz spectrum. Previously, Qualcomm has argued that only licensed spectrum can support the quality of communications that consumers expect. "Quality of service predictability is linked to the exclusivity and the binary access to a given spectrum resource, at a given location and a given time," the company said in November.

LTE-U is an abrupt change of direction. However, it does not mean that LTE networks can be deployed completely in unlicensed spectrum. The specification will require that a control channel is implemented in a licensed band. Whether or not this is necessary to ensure that, as Qualcomm says, "the crucial signaling information is always communicated properly," a side effect is that the only deployers of LTE-U will be licensed mobile operators.

The eventual success of LTE-U will depend on mobile operators and their willingness to take on large-scale deployments of the technology alongside or instead of carrier WiFi. This remains an open question.

In its favor, LTE-U could allow mobile operators to offer very high speeds by tapping into the immense spectrum resources of the 5 GHz band -- especially attractive to weaker operators and new entrants with limited spectrum resources. Due to its deep integration with operators' current networks, fast handover between LTE-U cells and traditional macrocells should be possible.

However, LTE-U adoption will also face substantial obstacles. It is unlikely that LTE-U can be as cost effective as WiFi. Base stations are likely to cost substantially more, and the operators will always need to bear the backhaul costs. The premium features provided by LTE-U (seamless voice and data roaming) may not prove sufficiently more valuable than those offered by WiFi technologies such as Hotspot 2.0.

Perhaps the greatest drawback of LTE-U is that it will, of course, work only with LTE-capable devices. The future will contain many more devices that feature WiFi connectivity than LTE, including the majority of tablets, laptop computers, cameras, and nearly every other connected device. Will operators choose a standard (LTE-U) that locks them out of addressing the greatest possible market of connected devices?

Should LTE-U prove a success, then the technology will be a prominent addition to the rule-based spectrum bands. As the history of Bluetooth and WiFi shows, conflicts between technologies can arise in unlicensed spectrum. Nonetheless, these conflicts have been resolved, largely through the creation of mutually non-exclusionary rules of operation embedded in each technology -- the protocol standards themselves.

If LTE-U takes this conciliatory approach, then it can become an important part of the immense patchwork of unlicensed technology and usage. However, should the operation of LTE-U seriously degrade the possibility for other users to take advantage of the 5 GHz band, then this could precipitate the first true crisis of governance of the spectrum commons. This would pitch Qualcomm and some licensed stakeholders against an immensely broad coalition of unlicensed wireless users, including private citizens, retailers, governments at every level, healthcare providers, universities, and nearly every single business that uses networking technology.

By allowing rule-based access, the unlicensed spectrum bands have enabled innovation and business deployment by entities ranging from the world's largest companies to the smallest of startups. The rules of this commons have been sufficient to generate the most varied, the most efficient, and potentially the most economically valuable bands in wireless communication.

If LTE-U operation substantially disrupts the ability of other technologies to operate, the regulatory authorities must leave no doubt that they will intervene to help strengthen the rules governing the great spectrum commons.

— Richard Thanki, telecommunications economist and PhD candidate, University of Southampton

(10)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
DHagar
50%
50%
DHagar,
User Rank: Light Sabre
3/17/2014 | 12:32:50 PM
Jury Still Out on LTE-Unlicensed
@Richard, it appears that the key will be the packaging and pricing that will best determine the market positioning.  If so, establishing a continuum of services that offers choices along the way may be the best position.

 
zyj_1410
50%
50%
zyj_1410,
User Rank: Light Beer
3/17/2014 | 9:38:16 AM
Re: LTE-U vs. WiFI
Compared with WiFi, I think LTE-U is more suitable for operator. 1) easy to manage and control. 2) easy to operate 3) approximate cost if to reduce LTE-U small cell complexity, ect.
Richard Thanki
50%
50%
Richard Thanki,
User Rank: Light Beer
3/17/2014 | 8:16:31 AM
Re: We interrupt this broadcast ...
Very likely correct, however, if TV White Space unlicensed technology prooves a real success over the same timeframe then there will be a strong argument to make ~100MHz or so of the band dedicated unlicensed specrtum.
Richard Thanki
50%
50%
Richard Thanki,
User Rank: Light Beer
3/17/2014 | 8:13:26 AM
Re: Jury Still Out on LTE-Unlicensed
The return for the deployers of LTE-U will come from deferring the need for building new macro, micro and pico cells and reducing the need to spend vast sums in spectrum auctions.

However, that's the crux. If operators see that Wi-Fi + Passpoint (which allows seamless connection and roaming) provides comparable benefits to LTE-U for a fraction of the cost then LTE-U's future doesn't look too rosy!
Richard Thanki
50%
50%
Richard Thanki,
User Rank: Light Beer
3/17/2014 | 8:01:53 AM
Re: LTE-U vs. WiFI
It'd certainly be much easier for an operator that had an extensive Wi-Fi network to roll out LTE-U as they would already have acces to the small cell locations that the latter will need. However, an operator without extensive Wi-Fi could choose to deploy LTE-U + backhaul in a small cell formation. However, it is exceedingly unlikely that the equipment chosen by such an operator would be combined LTE-U and Wi-Fi - Wi-Fi is low cost and allows an operator to address devices that aren't LTE-U compatible.
SarahReedy
50%
50%
SarahReedy,
User Rank: Blogger
3/13/2014 | 12:43:45 PM
Re: LTE-U vs. WiFI
I think I'm confused -- wouldn't they have to have a WiFi fotprint to take advantage of LTE-U? 
WilliamofOccam
50%
50%
WilliamofOccam,
User Rank: Light Beer
3/13/2014 | 12:42:59 AM
LTE-U vs. WiFI
Operators with substantial investment in WiFi are unlikley to support LTE-U while exactly the reverse is true for those operators who have not depoloyed ot tied up with a WLAN network. It will be interesting to see who emerges as the winner in the standards war that seems bound to happe in 3GPP.
SarahReedy
50%
50%
SarahReedy,
User Rank: Blogger
3/12/2014 | 7:32:45 PM
LTE-U: friend or foe?
Interesting post, Richard. Thank you. I get the impression that LTE-U is still very much in the R&D phase, but that operators don't yet know what to think of it. If the app is making the decision which network to use, it takes that control away from them. But, wouldn't it only be used in worst-case scenarios when the network can't handle the load? In that case, it's not necessarily an alternative to WiFi, but just a way to augment it where it's not enough. Or, am I misreading it?
DHagar
50%
50%
DHagar,
User Rank: Light Sabre
3/12/2014 | 4:25:24 PM
Jury Still Out on LTE-Unlicensed
@mendyk - good question - I think you have a good estimate - especially if the market is driven by Qualcomm and others.

I have another question for Richard, as it appears then that the best market players are those who use LTE-U along with other services and packages, what is the best model of ROI for them?  (Since you are an economist)  And what is the best economic model for the customer?

Great blog.

 
mendyk
50%
50%
mendyk,
User Rank: Light Sabre
3/12/2014 | 11:06:53 AM
We interrupt this broadcast ...
At what point will over-the-air video broadcast spectrum be repurposed for mobile service? I'm guessing it will start in 10 to 15 years.
More Blogs from Column
Defining SDN realistically will help carriers cut through the hype, says Sunil Khandekar, CEO of Alcatel-Lucent's Nuage Networks.
They can go from also-rans to leaders -- if they don't mess up.
The benefits of SDN are hard to grasp because they're so big. But NFV provides a nice, finite-value proposition.
Intensive end-to-end test and measurement is essential to ensure the smooth rollout of new services like VoLTE.
European Union roaming regulations are opening the doorway to an enhanced consumer experience and higher market growth.
Flash Poll
LRTV Custom TV
A New Security Paradigm in SDN/NFV

7|28|14   |   02:54   |   (0) comments


Paul Shaneck, Global Director Network Solutions for Symantec, discusses the evolving virtualized network, explaining how Symantec is leading the security discussion as it relates to SDN and NFV, and helping to ensure the network is protected and compliant.
LRTV Documentaries
Sprint's Network Evolution

7|24|14   |   14:59   |   (0) comments


Sprint's Jay Bluhm gives a keynote speech at the Big Telecom Event (BTE) about Sprint's network and services evolution strategy, including Spark.
LRTV Documentaries
BTE Keynote: The Software-Defined Operator

7|24|14   |   18:43   |   (1) comment


Deutsche Telekom's Axel Clauberg explains the concept of the software-defined operator to the Big Telecom Event (BTE) crowd.
Light Reedy
Numbers Are In: LR's 2014 Salary Survey

7|24|14   |   1:25   |   (7) comments


Our fourth annual Salary Survey paints a picture of who's hiring, firing, earning, and yearning for a change in the telecom industry.
LRTV Custom TV
Driving the Network Transformation

7|23|14   |   4:29   |   (0) comments


Intel's Sandra Rivera discusses network transformation and how Intel technologies, programs, and standards body efforts have helped the industry migration to SDN and NFV.
LRTV Custom TV
Distributed NFV-Based Business Services by RAD

7|18|14   |   5:38   |   (0) comments


With the ETSI-approved Distributed NFV PoC running in the background, RAD's CEO, Dror Bin, talks about why D-NFV makes compelling sense for service providers, and about the dollars and cents RAD is putting behind D-NFV.
LRTV Custom TV
MRV – Accelerating Packet Optical Convergence

7|15|14   |   6:06   |   (0) comments


Giving you network insight to make your network smarter.
LRTV Custom TV
NFV-Enabled Ethernet for Generating New Revenues

7|15|14   |   5:49   |   (0) comments


Cyan's Planet Orchestrate allows service providers and their end-customers to activate software-based capabilities such as firewalls and encryption on top of existing Ethernet services in just minutes.
LRTV Custom TV
Symkloud NVF-Ready Video Transcoding, Big Data

7|9|14   |   3:41   |   (0) comments


Kontron and ISV partner Vantrix demonstrate high-performance video transcoding and data analytic solutions on same 2U standard platform that is ready for SDN and NFV deployments made by mobile, cable and cloud operators.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
The Evolving Role of Hybrid Video for Competitive Success

7|4|14   |   4:09   |   (0) comments


At Huawei's Global Analysts Summit in Shenzhen, China, Steven C. Hawley from TV Strategies speaks to us about the evolving role of hybrid video for competitive success.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
How CSPs Leverage Big Data in the Digital Economy

7|4|14   |   4:48   |   (2) comments


Justin van der Lande from Analysys Mason shares with us his views on how telecom operators can leverage customer asset monetization with big data. His discusses the current status of big data applications and the challenges and opportunities for telecom operators in the digital economy era.
LRTV Huawei Video Resource Center
Accelerator for Digital Business – Future Oriented BSS

7|4|14   |   3:08   |   (0) comments


Mobile and internet are becoming intertwined; IT and CT are integrating; and leading CSPs have begun to transform to information service and entertainment providers. How should the BSS system evolve to enable this transformation? Karl Whitelock, an analyst at Frost & Sullivan, shares his views.
Upcoming Live Events!!
September 16, 2014, Santa Clara, CA
September 16, 2014, Santa Clara, CA
October 29, 2014, New York City
November 6, 2014, Santa Clara
November 11, 2014, Atlanta, GA
December 9-10, 2014, Reykjavik, Iceland
Infographics
Packet Design asks network professionals how they handle the cloud, SDN, and network management.
Today's Cartoon
Vacation Special Caption Competition Click Here
Latest Comment
Hot Topics
Is Windstream Boldly Setting a New Trend?
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 7/29/2014
Facebook: 30% of Users Are Mobile-Only
Mitch Wagner, West Coast Bureau Chief, Light Reading, 7/24/2014
U-verse Growth Slips But Still Strong
Alan Breznick, Cable/Video Practice Leader, 7/24/2014
Nokia Holds Steady in Q2, Raises Outlook
Ray Le Maistre, Editor-in-chief, 7/24/2014
Verizon Applies 3G Throttling Policy to LTE
Sarah Reedy, Senior Editor, 7/25/2014
Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed