T-Mobile's "uncarrier" moves paid off in the first customer as it managed to add 2.4 million new customers, including 1.3 million postpaid subscribers. But the additions came at a cost.
T-Mobile US Inc. lost $151 million, or 19 cents a share in the first quarter, as it stepped up its promotional efforts, compared to a $106 million profit at 20 cents a share in the year-earlier quarter. Its shares, however, were up 7.5% to $31.50 in early market trading on Thursday.
The share climb was a reflection of the net additions, as well as the revenue bump T-Mobile received from closing its purchase of contract-free operator MetroPCS. Revenue in the first quarter grew 47% to $6.9 billion. Without MetroPCS's results in the mix, revenue would have risen 19%. T-Mobile also managed to add 465,000 prepaid customers with help from MetroPCS.
T-Mobile is now approaching 50 million customers, closing the gap on potential merger partner Sprint, which ended the first quarter with 54 million customers. T-Mobile says it plans to add 2.8 to 3.3 million branded contract customers by the end of the year. (See T-Mobile Pours Cold Water on Sprint's Spark.)
JCfti, User Rank: Light Beer 5/1/2014 | 1:49:05 PM
Re: Sprint merger? The network side is the crucial piece to me. With no-contract service plans, the customer can too easily switch if it isn't happy with the coverage. Just pay off any device contract and take that phone to AT&T or sell it and get a new one from VZ or Sprint. Their churn rate is down which speaks well to the work on that front (or customer confusion on device vs service contracts). They have little margin for error, but so far it appears to be working
Re: Sprint merger? Good points, JC. I think the spectrum acquisitions from Verizon and MetroPCS will really help it as it finishes out its LTE buildout and improves the network. Once it gets all its customers on LTE, that will improve their experience for them, helping with retention, and help with costs since it's more efficient.
JCfti, User Rank: Light Beer 5/1/2014 | 1:36:55 PM
Re: Sprint merger? If the short-term customer acquistion costs are more related to paying off ETFs and offering trade-in incentives versus discounting plans, the hope would seem to be that over time TMO recoups these costs and gains customers 'hearts and minds." So when a customer's new device contract runs outs or they want to buy a new phone or tablet they would choose TMO. That seems to be the gamble that they are making. On the network side, they are making strides in providing customers a good experience, and have plans to address its biggest hurdle, the ubiquity of its network coverage (see its plans for the 700 MHz A Block it just closed on and the 2G Edge to 4G LTE conversion plans, as well as expected participation in 600 MHz)
So, yes they have short-term hurt, but it seems with a longer-term plan in place. If it will work is still an open question. Also could be a ploy to be a more attractive take-over purchase. They appear to have a good game plan either way at this point.
Re: Sprint merger? But, might add, wouldn't exceptional growth like this suggest T-Mo doesn't really need to combine with Sprint? It's already encouraging competition in the market, something it is very proud of. I guess it goes back to what Carol and Phil have brought up, whether its pricing moves are sustainable or if this is just a short-term landgrab.
"This is the start of competition, and, again, don't confuse yourselves, the big are still the biggest. These are big huge people who are probably calculating ways they can protect their 55% in growing EBIDTA margins...
It's matter of when, not if. It's not just among the 4 you see, but multiple other tangential players sitting on the periphery of the industry looking in. we've been consistent on that with no clear statement on timing. Otherwise, there are multiple paths we need to look very hard at from the standpoint of capital and deployment. But when you are growing like we are, we think it's a good hand to play."
Phil_Britt, User Rank: Light Sabre 5/1/2014 | 11:16:10 AM
Re: Q1 call I have to agree with Carol. Businesses cannot win by continuing to discount prices -- look at the airlines. They would try to undercut each other to win additional customers, only to declare bankruptcy multiple times.
Now they only rarely cut prices -- and charge for things that used to be free -- and are profitable. Telecom is a different industry, but business is business.
Re: Q1 call That is certainly a valid concern and came up on the call, but T-Mobile CMO Mike Sievert says it's not so (of course):
"There are plenty of cynics including our competitors that will convince you we're buying growth in a non-economic way, but the opposite is true. Bringing in the highest quality customers in our history at a marginal cost that is a little higher as well. High quality customers with great returns."
Re: Q1 call Okay, showing my age here, but once upon a time, upstart long-distance competitors essentially "bought" customers and grew themselves almost into bankruptcy. Is there any clear strategy for how T-Mobile avoids that trap?
Light Reading’s Upskill U is a FREE, interactive, online educational resource that delivers must-have education on themes that relate to the overall business transformation taking place in the communications industry.
Wednesday, September 28, 1:00PM EDT Gigabit 101 Will Barkis, Senior Technology Analyst, Orange
Six different communications service providers join to debate their visions of the future CSP, following a landmark presentation from AT&T on its massive virtualization efforts and a look back on where the telecom industry has been and where it's going from two industry veterans.
At Light Reading's NFV & Carrier SDN event in Denver, Ray Watson, vice president of Global Technology at Masergy, says that because of the growth in virtualization, the threat landscape is shifting in favor of the attackers. As a result, service providers need to think beyond just defending the perimeter and take a more holistic approach to security.
At September's NFV & Carrier SDN event in Denver, Light Reading sat down with Victoria Lonker, director of Product and New Business Innovation at Verizon, to chat about where the carrier is with delivering virtualized services to business customers.
Nick Thomas, practice leader of digital media at Ovum, talks about how digital transformation in the technology, media and telecom sectors will enable the development of a new range of applications and services for enterprises and consumers and how the upcoming Digital Futures event in London will examine ...
Heavy Reading Senior Analyst Jim Hodges speaks with Accenture's Larry Socher and Matt Anderson about what service providers must do to transform their business to get the benefits of SDN and NFV including: leveraging DevOps, introducing real-time OSS and implementing analytics.
VeEX's Senior Director of Business Development, Perry Romano, explains how VeEX provides tools to help install, maintain, monitor and manage network infrastructure efficiently and effectively. The portfolio of products on display include the RXT-6000, MTTplus and TX300s.
Light Reading Editor Mitch Wagner talks to NetScout CMO Jim McNiel about maximizing the benefits of enterprise cloud and digital transformation while minimizing potential pitfalls with a proper monitoring and instrumentation strategy.
Many of the initial use case implementations are single-vendor and self-contained. The industry is still climbing the virtualization maturity curve, needing further clarity and stability in the NFV infrastructure (NFVi) and greater availability and choice of virtualized network functions (VNFs). Interoperability between NFVis and VNFs from different vendors ...
Join us for an in-depth interview between Steve Saunders of Light Reading and Alexis Black Bjorlin of Intel as they discuss the release of the company's Silicon Photonics platform, its performance, long-term prospects, customer expectations and much more.
A vital part of increasing the number of women in comms is transforming the ways companies can support and empower women. While progressive company policies that support both men and women in achieving work-life balance are a step in the right direction, creating a company culture that supports those policies can at times be more challenging.
During this show, we'll talk to Lynn Comp, Senior Director of Industry and Sales Enabling (ISE) in the Network Platforms Group at Intel, about why those challenges exist and how companies can overcome them. She'll provide insight into how Intel has worked to create a culture that supports work-life balance, and provide steps and guidance for other companies wishing to do the same. We will also leave plenty of time to get your questions answered live on the air.