& cplSiteName &

LightSquared CEO Calls FCC 'Irresponsible'

Dan Jones
LR Mobile News Analysis
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor
2/16/2012
50%
50%

LightSquared 's CEO struck back at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 's decision this week to block the company's Long Term Evolution (LTE) network plan. (See FCC Moves to Block LightSquared .)

CEO Sanjiv Ahuja released a statement Thursday saying that leaving the GPS interference issue unresolved is "the height of bureaucratic irresponsibility," while stressing that the venture remains committed to finding a solution to the problem:

    After years of receiving regulatory approvals, the FCC approved LightSquared to build its ground network in 2005. In 2010, the FCC amended that plan, requiring LightSquared to build a national broadband network that reached 260 million Americans. At the government’s mandate, LightSquared began investing billions of dollars in America’s infrastructure -- without asking for any money from the American taxpayer. Yesterday, after LightSquared had already spent nearly $4 billion, the FCC changed its mind. There can be no more devastating blow to private industry and confidence in the consistency of the FCC’s decision-making process.


Philip Falcone, head of the Harbinger Capital Partners LP fund that backs LightSquared, meanwhile, is reportedly seeking a spectrum swap so that the operator can try to push its plans forward. Bloomberg is quoting sources that the billionaire is seeking a swap with the defense department.

Why this matters
Despite a seemingly fatal blow to its plans from the FCC, it is becoming clear that LightSquared is not ready to give up on its plans just yet.

For more
Light Reading Mobile has followed LightSquared's regulatory roller coaster through its many ups and downs:



— Dan Jones, Site Editor, Light Reading Mobile

(9)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
joset01
50%
50%
joset01,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:42:26 PM
re: LightSquared CEO Calls FCC 'Irresponsible'


Always a good move to call out the only agency that holds any possibility (however remote) of saving your company's bacon.

kaps
50%
50%
kaps,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:42:26 PM
re: LightSquared CEO Calls FCC 'Irresponsible'


This follows the brilliant strategy of accusing AT&T and Verizon for conspiring to get the gubmint to work against LightSquared. Whether it's true or not, by doing so you indirectly accuse Congress of being on the take. Again, not a recipe for success. But it does keep the LightSquared self-immolation streak alive.

kaps
50%
50%
kaps,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:42:26 PM
re: LightSquared CEO Calls FCC 'Irresponsible'


This follows the brilliant strategy of accusing AT&T and Verizon for conspiring to get the gubmint to work against LightSquared. Whether it's true or not, by doing so you indirectly accuse Congress of being on the take. Again, not a recipe for success. But it does keep the LightSquared self-immolation streak alive.

joset01
50%
50%
joset01,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:42:25 PM
re: LightSquared CEO Calls FCC 'Irresponsible'


Yep, this whole thing might be an economics/politics/technology 101 lesson in years to come.

Flook
50%
50%
Flook,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:42:24 PM
re: LightSquared CEO Calls FCC 'Irresponsible'


I am not sure LightSquared is entirely to blame if, in fact, the FCC sent out the wrong signals, in effect stringing the company along--inadvertantly, of course. And there is this from the Washington Post: "...the company will soon have to cough up interest payments on $1.6 billion in secured loans and hundreds of millions in debt."


Still, given the compay's plan was to wholesale it services to operators that don't have the resources or do not want to take the risk of building out a national LTE network, I hope there is middle ground to work things out because, in the end, consumers will be the losers by this decision.


 


 


 

kaps
50%
50%
kaps,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:42:23 PM
re: LightSquared CEO Calls FCC 'Irresponsible'


I don't know how much consumers are really losing out. We never, ever heard a compelling business plan from anyone involved... wholesale sounds great, but in a business where profit margins are tightening and the easy cash from voice/text is going away, a wholesale customer would have to:


1) Strike some sort of device deal to offer competitive handsets


2) Spend lots of dough on consumer marketing to explain the service


3) Figure out how to make money when it has to do the above, then figure out a payment/billing/support system AND pay LightSquared


4) and then compete against AT&T and Verizon, who could cut prices for a year or more and eat the loss in order to stave off anything truly competitive.


What wholesale brand could pull this off? I believe there are possible interesting plays out there like Wireless Republic but... hard to say anyone was harmed because this grab at spectrum didn't work out. 

kaps
50%
50%
kaps,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:42:23 PM
re: LightSquared CEO Calls FCC 'Irresponsible'


I don't know how much consumers are really losing out. We never, ever heard a compelling business plan from anyone involved... wholesale sounds great, but in a business where profit margins are tightening and the easy cash from voice/text is going away, a wholesale customer would have to:


1) Strike some sort of device deal to offer competitive handsets


2) Spend lots of dough on consumer marketing to explain the service


3) Figure out how to make money when it has to do the above, then figure out a payment/billing/support system AND pay LightSquared


4) and then compete against AT&T and Verizon, who could cut prices for a year or more and eat the loss in order to stave off anything truly competitive.


What wholesale brand could pull this off? I believe there are possible interesting plays out there like Wireless Republic but... hard to say anyone was harmed because this grab at spectrum didn't work out. 

3screenplanet
50%
50%
3screenplanet,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:42:19 PM
re: LightSquared CEO Calls FCC 'Irresponsible'


Sorry Kaps, the harm to consumers is that the hosejob the FCC just pulled on LightSquared discourages future private investment.  Yeah, yeah.  You think that entrepreneurs will always take a shot.  And you're right.  But the shot they'll take isn't investing in a consumer-friendly business but focusing on which FCC member or Congressman to buy off (e.g. Tom Petri - head of the Aviation Subcommittee that also shafted LightSquared).  In that case, consumer good isn't just beside the point, it's non-existent. 


Whether LightSquared had any shot at success is irrelevant.  They invested billions in private capital and got hosed by the gubmint.  If only they were bankrolled on the taxpayer dime a la Solyndra.  Then LightSquared would've had a chance.

krishanguru143
50%
50%
krishanguru143,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:42:15 PM
re: LightSquared CEO Calls FCC 'Irresponsible'




How did the FCC string them along?  Did you actually read the CONDITIONAL waiver?  The word CONDITIONAL is a very clear sign that it is in no way the go ahead.  If you read the waiver, it laid the groundwork for what LightSquared was REQUIRED to accomplish to get approval to offer commercial services.

 

Here is part of the waiver:

"41. We agree on the need to address the potential interference concerns regarding GPS as

LightSquared moves forward with plans to deploy and commence commercial operations on its

network. 144 Further, we believe that establishing a working group that brings LightSquared and the GPS community together to address these interference issues expeditiously would serve the public interest.

 

We envision a working group in which cooperative and candid discussions can ensue, and where information, including proprietary information, can be shared among the participants with appropriate measures in place to protect the confidentiality of that information. Commission staff will work with NTIA, LightSquared, and the GPS community, including appropriate Federal agencies, to establish a working group to fully study the potential for overload interference to GPS devices and to identify any measures necessary to prevent harmful interference to GPS. As a condition of granting this waiver, the process described below addressing the interference concerns regarding GPS must be completed to the Commission’s satisfaction before LightSquared commences offering commercial service pursuant to this waiver on its L-band MSS frequencies."

 

The key part, the very last sentence.  LightSquared NEVER had approval, the FCC NEVER changed their mind.  It was LightSquared who failed to address the interference issues.  Is it the fault of the FCC that LightSquared was making these huge plans, launching a satellite, etc. in the anticipation of approval?  No, it was the fault of LightSquared.  The sole discretion was at the hands of the commission and clearly to get their approval, there could be no interference at all.  All LightSquared kept talking about was this waiver and not once did they even call it a conditional waiver.  This waiver was called a conditional waiver in it as well as by the FCC.  If LightSquared wants someone to blame, they need to look no further than themselves.




Flook
50%
50%
Flook,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 5:42:12 PM
re: LightSquared CEO Calls FCC 'Irresponsible'


In which case my question is how could LightSquared have been so dumb--that includes the hedge fund that provided the company $3 billion? And was Sprint that dumb too? Some of the stuff I've been reading, e.g. Forbes, indicates that old fashioned DC politics had a lot to do with this.

Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Featured Video
From The Founder
Light Reading is spending much of this year digging into the details of how automation technology will impact the comms market, but let's take a moment to also look at how automation is set to overturn the current world order by the middle of the century.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
October 18, 2017, Colorado Convention Center - Denver, CO
November 1, 2017, The Royal Garden Hotel
November 1, 2017, The Montcalm Marble Arch
November 2, 2017, 8 Northumberland Avenue, London, UK
November 2, 2017, 8 Northumberland Avenue – London
November 10, 2017, The Westin Times Square, New York, NY
November 16, 2017, ExCel Centre, London
November 30, 2017, The Westin Times Square
May 14-17, 2018, Austin Convention Center
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
With the mobile ecosystem becoming increasingly vulnerable to security threats, AdaptiveMobile has laid out some of the key considerations for the wireless community.
Hot Topics
Is US Lurching Back to Monopoly Status?
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 10/16/2017
Pai's FCC Raises Alarms at Competitive Carriers
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 10/16/2017
Muni Policies Stymie Edge Computing
Carol Wilson, Editor-at-large, 10/17/2017
The Big Cable DAA Update
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 10/11/2017
Telecom Italia Covers 73% of Italy With NB-IoT
Iain Morris, News Editor, 10/13/2017
Animals with Phones
Live Digital Audio

Understanding the full experience of women in technology requires starting at the collegiate level (or sooner) and studying the technologies women are involved with, company cultures they're part of and personal experiences of individuals.

During this WiC radio show, we will talk with Nicole Engelbert, the director of Research & Analysis for Ovum Technology and a 23-year telecom industry veteran, about her experiences and perspectives on women in tech. Engelbert covers infrastructure, applications and industries for Ovum, but she is also involved in the research firm's higher education team and has helped colleges and universities globally leverage technology as a strategy for improving recruitment, retention and graduation performance.

She will share her unique insight into the collegiate level, where women pursuing engineering and STEM-related degrees is dwindling. Engelbert will also reveal new, original Ovum research on the topics of artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, security and augmented reality, as well as discuss what each of those technologies might mean for women in our field. As always, we'll also leave plenty of time to answer all your questions live on the air and chat board.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed