& cplSiteName &
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Curiousfellow
100%
0%
Curiousfellow,
User Rank: Lightning
12/23/2015 | 10:42:30 AM
How did we get here?
Thanks for asking the question.

Some questions are easy to ask, but hard if not impossible to get answered.

I think the larger question is: what is the basis for the selection of the existing management team, not just the new CEO.

Each of these companies, made a long string of decisions that led them to be the also-rans in the industry. One has to assume that the new owners believe they can bring some fresh management and efficiencies to the new combination to make things profitable. Later doing an IPO or liquidation to earn a return on investment.

Each of the companies in the new entity, for whatever the reasons are, failed to demonstrate viability as stand alone entities in their business sector, which begs the question.......what's different this time?

In the case of Tellabs, the company made a decision to narrow their product lines and business model from addressing the needs of a broad swath of Telecom and DataCom customers, (public, private and government), by offering hundreds of different products and competing in many product categories, and many channels of distribution to focusing exclusively on offering Synchronous Optical Network SONET products to the Bell Operating Companies (the big 5 or 6) and the long haul carriers who had already begun the move to DWDM. In pursuit of this goal, the management at all levels marched in lock step.

The consistent string of acquisitions succeeded mainly in vaporizing hundreds of millions of dollars of cash, the notable exception was a Finish Company; the author and manager of the acquisition was displaced by a new hire with zero product knowledge, after the deal was wildly successful. This was no blip.

Tellabs succeeded in their single minded goal of focusing on SONET, Cross Connects, and just Telcos leading to the crash and burn of the company. One has to wonder, how many of the managers are still manning the key decision making positions?

Reading the 1998 NYT article on the failed Ciena Merger, it may be interesting to do a retrospective article on where are they now. Ciena looks like they will finish 2015 at $2.5B in revenue with greatly expanded product lines from their 1998 business model.

 

Ray@LR
100%
0%
Ray@LR,
User Rank: Blogger
10/5/2015 | 10:50:32 AM
People, money and technology
There are three main things that influence what goes on in this industry -- people, money and technology -- and the people part of it is sometimes underplayed.



I'm not sure that Kheradpir had the optimum team supporting him during his time at Juniper and he did, in fairness, walk straight into an activist investor maelstrom. 

But... he now carries a reputation in the communications networking industry as the guy who crashed and burned at Juniper. Let's see if eh can tuirn that reputation around.


Featured Video
From The Founder
Light Reading founder Steve Saunders grills Cisco's Roland Acra on how he's bringing automation to life inside the data center.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
March 20-22, 2018, Denver Marriott Tech Center
April 4, 2018, The Westin Dallas Downtown, Dallas
May 14-17, 2018, Austin Convention Center
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
SmartNICs aren't just about achieving scale. They also have a major impact in reducing CAPEX and OPEX requirements.
Hot Topics
Here's Pai in Your Eye
Alan Breznick, Cable/Video Practice Leader, Light Reading, 12/11/2017
Ericsson & Samsung to Supply Verizon With Fixed 5G Gear
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 12/11/2017
The Anatomy of Automation: Q&A With Cisco's Roland Acra
Steve Saunders, Founder, Light Reading, 12/7/2017
You Can't Fix OTT Streaming Problems If You Can't See Them
Mike Hollyman, Head of Consulting Engineering, Nokia Deepfield, 12/8/2017
Eurobites: Ericsson Restates Its Financials, Warns of Impairment Charges
Paul Rainford, Assistant Editor, Europe, 12/8/2017
Animals with Phones
Don't Fall Asleep on the Job! Click Here
Live Digital Audio

Understanding the full experience of women in technology requires starting at the collegiate level (or sooner) and studying the technologies women are involved with, company cultures they're part of and personal experiences of individuals.

During this WiC radio show, we will talk with Nicole Engelbert, the director of Research & Analysis for Ovum Technology and a 23-year telecom industry veteran, about her experiences and perspectives on women in tech. Engelbert covers infrastructure, applications and industries for Ovum, but she is also involved in the research firm's higher education team and has helped colleges and universities globally leverage technology as a strategy for improving recruitment, retention and graduation performance.

She will share her unique insight into the collegiate level, where women pursuing engineering and STEM-related degrees is dwindling. Engelbert will also reveal new, original Ovum research on the topics of artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, security and augmented reality, as well as discuss what each of those technologies might mean for women in our field. As always, we'll also leave plenty of time to answer all your questions live on the air and chat board.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed