You are missing the subtlety. The idea is that a plan is put in place before it can be used so that Chambers does not theoretically have material non-public information today about Q2 next year. He DOES have material non-public information about this quarter. So, the idea is that the delay in the start of the plan makes the current set of information public by the time the plan goes into execution.
So, again the whole idea of the plan is file now - delay - execute plan. The delay is supposed to either make public or non-material the information held today. But both now and 2 quarters from now Chambers has material non-public information. He just (theoretically) does not have material non public information that far in the future.
So true, Seven. Thanks. The part about "material non-public information" is the SEC's wording, not mine, so maybe I should have put quote marks around it. Whether such a thing is practical or not, well... talk to the SEC... :)
You have one mistake. A CEO is ALWAYS in possession of Material Non-Public Information. Plans are set to start usually a quarter in the future and must be followed or stopped with a delay then to start another plan. The idea of a selling plan is that it is mechanical. It can be simple or complex (the formula for selling shares) but it can not be a choice. So, most of the time a 1q delay before the start represents being out of touch with the material non-public information for 90 days in the future.
These plans are basically for all C level and other registered executives, who I said are ALWAYS in possession of material non-public information.
The blogs and comments are the opinions only of the writers and do not reflect the views of Light Reading. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
To save this item to your list of favorite Light Reading content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
