Light Reading - Telecom News, Analysis, Events, and Research
Sign up for our Free Telecom Weekly Newsletter
Connect with us
Comments
Current display:       Newest Comments First       Display in Chronological Order
jayja
User Ranking
Thursday December 13, 2012 9:06:21 PM
no ratings

If it quacks like a duck.....

Craig Matsumoto
User Ranking
Wednesday December 12, 2012 12:54:06 PM
no ratings

Yeah, I suppose you've got a point. It's like an indirect vendor financing.  It doesn't feel as uncomfortable, though.

Ray Le Maistre
User Ranking
Wednesday December 12, 2012 12:50:27 PM

David Byrne always wanted us all to 'stop making sense' - maybe he was suggesting that there are always pitfalls in every good idea.

There's no doubt that, under certain circumstances, this model is going to favor all parties. 

But I wonder what the SLA terms and conditions will be and how much they will alter from customer to customer. And revenue targets?

I can't help thinking that this is a model that, for the time being at least, looks greta on paper but that, in many cases, will hit the barrier that gets in the way of som many good ideas - people....

BigBro
User Ranking
Wednesday December 12, 2012 12:47:30 PM

I guess technically, it's slightly different, because the manufacturer remains the owner of the equipment, but isn't this really just the same thing as vendor financing?  Works great for high-margin products, I guess.

Northern Lights
User Ranking
Wednesday December 12, 2012 12:32:01 PM

The equipment maker gives up its one-time upfront revenue in favor of recurring revenues over the time that its gear gets used. In the you-name-it as a Service world, this model makes strong business sense.

As mentioned, there's risk and reward sharing with the downstream ecosystem, and that brings about interests alignment toward efficiency: the gear maker gets motivated about increasing the ratio of service revenue per equipment life time cost. With conventional model of selling plain hardware for one-time revenue and ongoing support service (+charges for security patches), the equipment vendor was rather rewarded from poor capacity utilization efficiency and operational complexity.

Perhaps "GaaS" model should specifically target providing hardware(-as-a-service) manageable using non-vendor-specific open-standard management interface ala SDN, however with critical hardware level features that are not available from traditional equipment vendors, to provide a superior performance and features in addition to partner/customer friendly business model.

Phil Harvey
User Ranking
Wednesday December 12, 2012 11:43:20 AM
no ratings

Gear as a Service. Or GaaS, if you will.

And also if you won't.

You're welcome.



The blogs and comments are the opinions only of the writers and do not reflect the views of Light Reading. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.