Ah, good point, ethertype. Although I'd note that enterprises are expected to generate a lot more video traffic (hence the need for CDNs). Some of AT&T's CDN customers might be small providers grappling with video, too (theoretically possible, anyway). But you are correct, I was taking a couple of turns my thinking there.
Craig, I think you're confusing CDNs. You say carriers need CDNs for "all the video content they're being asked to shunt around," which implies this is all about managing AT&T's own network costs. But the press release is all about forming "a strategic alliance to deliver a global suite of content delivery network (CDN) solutions to companies," i.e. selling solutions to enterprise customers.
The blogs and comments are the opinions only of the writers and do not reflect the views of Light Reading. They are no substitute for your own research and should not be relied upon for trading or any other purpose.
To save this item to your list of favorite Light Reading content so you can find it later in your Profile page, click the "Save It" button next to the item.
