Light Reading Mobile – Telecom News, Analysis, Events, and Research

LR Mobile News Analysis  

LTE Voice Lag Leaves Operators Vulnerable

October 13, 2010 | Michelle Donegan |

The longer mobile operators delay offering their own voice services over Long Term Evolution (LTE), the more vulnerable they could be to over-the-top (OTT) voice over IP (VoIP) service providers, finds a recent Heavy Reading Insider report.

Operators are not in a hurry to deliver voice services over LTE networks, says Robert Poe, author of the Heavy Reading 4G/LTE Insider report, "Voice Over LTE: More Pitfalls Than Promise for Now." This is because they can use their 3G or 2G networks to deliver voice services, reserving the packet-based LTE network for data services, a technique called "circuit-switched fallback." (See LTE TDD: In Mobile, Size Matters.)

But if operators wait too long, they could face some negative consequences. (See Google Gives Telcos a Wakeup Call.)

"The main one is that over-the-top VoIP providers -- like Skype Ltd., fringland Ltd., and Nimbuzz Group -- could offer voice services over the speedy new LTE connections," says Poe, adding that such services represent a significant threat to operators' existing voice revenues because they would probably be cheaper and could even offer better quality with high-definition voice technology.

"So the period in which operators have deployed LTE networks but are not delivering voice services over them represents a window of vulnerability for them," says Poe.

One operator facing that window of vulnerability is TeliaSonera AB, with its commercial LTE networks in Norway and Sweden. The operator's CTO of mobility services, Lars Klasson, told Light Reading Mobile in a recent interview, "We're not in a rush to put voice onto the 4G networks."

But when the Swedish operator is ready to put voice over its LTE networks, it will use IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS)-based VoIP, Klasson said. (See TeliaSonera First to Go Live With LTE.)

However, over-the-top VoIP doesn't have to be a threat to mobile operators. It's possible for operators to use these services to their advantage, finds the Heavy Reading report, either by offering their own over-the-top VoIP services, or by partnering with VoIP service providers.

The IMS dilemma
The standards-based way to deliver voice services over LTE is to use an IMS architecture in the network, an option driven by the One Voice industry initiative and which became the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP)'s voice over LTE (VoLTE) specification.

But, according to the report, there is a disconnect between IMS and LTE deployments. Operators are deploying IMS and LTE independently, so the technologies may not be rolled out at the same time or in the same place. (See Operators Rally Round IMS for LTE Voice and Voice Over LTE & the 'IMS Gap'.)

This situation has had two results: First, there will be a need for alternatives to IMS-based LTE voice services; and second, there has been an acceleration of some operators' IMS plans specifically to enable LTE voice services.

The alternative approaches for LTE voice services include circuit-switched fallback, VoLGA (voice over LTE via generic access), Nokia Siemens Networks's fast-track VoLTE, and over-the-top VoIP. (See New Specs Deepen LTE Voice Dilemma, NSN Goes Solo for LTE Voice, and T-Mobile: Voice Discord Threatens LTE.)

— Michelle Donegan, European Editor, Light Reading Mobile



Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Network Computing encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Network Computing moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. Network Computing further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
 
Related Content
White Papers SPONSORED CONTENT
Featured
Trill
A Spanning Tree alternative in Ethernet networks