Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. has officially given up on the U.S. telco market -- or, at least, that's what is implied by the literal wording of one executive's "exasperation."
"We are not interested in the U.S. market anymore. Generally speaking, it's not a market that we pay much attention to," said Eric Xu, a Huawei executive vice president, as quoted by Reuters.
Xu, speaking at Huawei's annual analyst event in Shenzhen, China, was responding to a question about last year's congressional report that pegged Huawei and ZTE as security risks for U.S. companies.
The Financial Times took the statement at face value, while Reuters left room for the possibility that Xu was just being a bit dramatic.
Xu's statement doesn't appear to apply to the handset market, where Huawei assumedly still has high hopes in the United States. Reuters reported that Xu didn't respond to a question about that.
Why this matters
The U.S. government has made it clear that Huawei's equipment won't be allowed in AT&T or Verizon networks -- which would relegate Huawei and ZTE bit players, at best, in U.S. telecom.
For Huawei to give up on the U.S. telecom market, then, would make a lot of sense. Saying so out loud seems a little unusual but is hardly surprising.
re: Huawei Gives Up on US Telecom As usual the big Corps screw the US backward cellular system, while keeping competition out and user costs high. Uncle Sam should be on trial for financial rape of it's own people.
re: Huawei Gives Up on US Telecom Hmmm ... Without politics and security concerns, I also see no reason why Northern Ireland can't be joined with Republic of Ireland, Palestine can't merge with Israel, and Taiwan can't be integrated with mainland China. -áC'mon Ray-á
re: Huawei Gives Up on US Telecom On the other hand.... Ericsson's Q1 results today show that it generated revenues of $2.4 billion from North America (mainly USA) in the first three monmths of this year, so that's a run rate of nearly $10 billion in a year. Huawei is challenging Ericsson globally, so under level playing field conditions there would be no reason why Huawei could not build a business worth billions of dollars per year in North AMerica (without handset sales) -- that's what Huawei has been chasing. Without the politics and security concerns I see no reason why Huawei would not have been a significant player in N American networks sector. It's no surprise it feels it can put its resources to better use elsewhere.
chuckj, User Rank: Light Sabre 4/24/2013 | 2:04:09 AM
re: Huawei Gives Up on US Telecom This has nothing to do with the U.S. Government posturings, it is just common sense. How much is the total annual telco capex? $60, $80 billion? -áhow much of that is actually for hardware? $20, $30 billion? -áHow many suppliers are there? -á6, 7, 8, 9? -áIs there a sense of urgency with any of the carriers to upgrade their network? -á Are the carriers the kind of customers who take hardware with no fuss without a long-áqualification-ácycle, without demands for-áfree $million hardware samples?
There are folks in the US who run rural operations and they will buy from huawei and they are far better customers than the Telco's, all the while the Telco suppliers are too busy fighting each other on being short listed on RFQs that take two years to come to fruition, most of which don't.
Technology industry veteran Martin Lund joins Metaswitch Networks this week as the company's new CEO. In this interview, Lund discusses his new role and the industry's progress with Light Reading CEO Steve Saunders. Lund believes that the industry disruption caused by SDN and NFV is creating opportunities for companies like Metaswitch – network software providers ...
Nominum CEO Gary Messiana talks about the challenges service providers face in competing for a much more sophisticated customer, a customer that has heightened expectations for more personalized and compelling digital experiences. Providers are focusing their efforts on delivering higher value subscriber services, retaining their existing customers and increasing ...
Equinix CTO Ihab Tarazi talks to Light Reading founder and CEO Steve Saunders about the dramatic changes in the data center, cloud and interconnect markets and discusses the impact of SDN and NFV in the coming years.
Andrew Coward discusses what the New IP means to end users or enterprise customers. He explains compelling reasons, including how every customer can get their own network, from the transformation to the New IP.
Mukund Srigopal provides an explanation of what network visibility is and how it is essential as service providers transition to the New IP. In addition, the importance of the network packet broker is discussed.
Ali Kafel from Stratus Technologies addresses high-availability concerns within the telco industry with a solution that enables telcos to provide high-availability and stateful fault-tolerance using a software-based approach.
Intel's Bev Crair and IBM's Eric Herzog discuss how IBM's V9000 Flash Storage System has helped customers around the world. Featuring real-time compression powered by Intel QuickAssist Technology, the V9000 is a next-gen flash storage solution.
Saran Phaloprakarn, Senior VP of Fixed Broadband Business Management of Thailand's AIS, was a keynote speaker at the first Asia-Pacific Ultra Broadband Summit in Bangkok. In this video, he talks to Heavy Reading about transforming into an FMC (FBB+MBB+Content) operator.
Technology industry veteran Martin Lund joins Metaswitch Networks this week as the company's new CEO. In this interview, Lund discusses his new role and the industry's progress with Light Reading CEO Steve Saunders. Lund believes that the industry disruption caused by SDN and NFV is creating opportunities for companies like Metaswitch – network software providers with the agility to embrace new technologies quickly and the ability to deliver on substantial projects for global network operators.