9:05 AM News got less worse, but things still aren't great

Craig Matsumoto, Editor-in-Chief, Light Reading

May 7, 2009

2 Min Read
Why Cisco's Happy

9:05 AM -- I painted the Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO) fourth-quarter forecast, issued Wednesday, as a pleasant surprise. (See Cisco Offers Light in the Gloom.) I feel like I should stress that things are still bad, just with signs that the badness isn't worsening.

Cisco beat expectations with that forecast, and it's predicting growth compared with the third quarter -- but it's still likely to experience its biggest year-to-year revenue dip of the downturn so far.

Table 1: Cisco's Revenue Growth

Q1 (Oct)

Q2 (Jan)

Q3 (Apr)

Q4 (Jul)

2008 ($B)

9.554

9.831

9.791

10.364

2009 ($B)

10.331

9.089

8.072

8.447*

'Growth'

+8.13%

-7.55%

-17.56%

-18.50%

* Midpoint of Cisco's own forecast range
Source: Cisco





The real key is that business didn't worsen during the third quarter. Specifically, each month's "growth" in orders, compared with the previous year, was about the same, CEO John Chambers says.

Contrast that with the January quarter:

Table 2: Q2 Was Sinking

Month

Order Growth
vs. Previous Year

November 2008

-9%

December 2008

-11%

January 2008

-20%

Source: Cisco Q2 earnings call, February 2009





That the third quarter "followed normalcy" (as Chambers worded it), combined with the stabilization that companies like Juniper Networks Inc. (NYSE: JNPR) claim to be seeing, adds up to a good sign, relatively. Chambers is right in saying business has to flatten out before it recovers.

Here's an interesting side note: Chambers still says long-term revenue growth can be 12 to 17 percent per year. He stuck to that figure during Wednesday's earnings call, although he hinted that investors and fellow executives have told him to stop saying that.

It's still plausible; the 12 to 17 percent is a relative figure, so it stays achievable no matter how far down Cisco's revenues go. And while it seems a lifetime ago, Cisco did see revenues climb 13 percent during fiscal 2008. But you can't blame investors if they think the prediction is all leprechauns and unicorns right now.

— Craig Matsumoto, West Coast Editor, Light Reading

About the Author(s)

Craig Matsumoto

Editor-in-Chief, Light Reading

Yes, THAT Craig Matsumoto – who used to be at Light Reading from 2002 until 2013 and then went away and did other stuff and now HE'S BACK! As Editor-in-Chief. Go Craig!!

Subscribe and receive the latest news from the industry.
Join 62,000+ members. Yes it's completely free.

You May Also Like