& cplSiteName &

Video Profits on Pause?

Light Reading
Supercomm News Analysis
Light Reading
6/22/2004
50%
50%

CHICAGO – Light Reading Live – Service providers gathered in Chicago yesterday to get the lowdown on the Triple Play scene, only to be faced with a stark message: You can't afford not to do it, but once you have, don't expect to make much money from your new video service capabilities.

For the more than 160 attendees who had just been hearing about the potential offered by video in the voice/data/video combo, that message from Harmonic Inc. (Nasdaq: HLIT) broadband access networks division VP David Piehler, who has worked with telcos and cable operators, put into context the size of the challenge faced by operators sizing up the triple-play opportunities.

"You've no idea how much the MSOs have to pay content owners such as ESPN for their feeds," warned Piehler, who said that while the cable operators might drive a lot of revenue from their video and broadcast capabilities, most of that goes back out the door to the major content suppliers in license fees. "The MSOs look at VOIP as a better profit opportunity," he added.

Event moderator and chief analyst at Heavy Reading, Scott Clavenna, was stunned by Piehler's insight into the economics of the video services. Yet his message remains that carriers cannot afford not to make the leap into the video services sector, a sentiment backed by event speakers Mark Marinkovich from Allied Telesyn Inc., Geoff Burke from Calix Networks Inc., and Ralph Biesemeyer from Intel Corp. (Nasdaq: INTC).

"There is no upside to doing nothing about video," said Clavenna. "Sitting back and not moving will lead to a drop in average revenues per customer and a loss of market share. The cable companies will just come and take your customers away."

"As a service provider, you have to be offering the full range of services to the consumer market to be competitive," agreed Allied Telesyn's Marinkovich.

That message has clearly hit home with even the biggest players. As the Light Reading Live event was taking place, BellSouth Corp. (NYSE: BLS) was telling Reuters that it will begin video service trials over its DSL lines within the next year. And at the same time, a major MSO, Cablevision Systems Corp. (NYSE: CVC), was piling the pressure on Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) by cutting the price of its triple-play package to $90, the same price that Verizon charges for a voice/Internet access combo.

But while there's major pressure on carriers to develop a triple-play strategy, there are a number of hurdles to overcome in putting that package on the table, noted Clavenna. Jumping into the video services sector comes replete with business, technology, deployment, and support risks. Clavenna noted that, for some operators, the potential downsides of trying to compete in the triple-play arena were making them think about exiting the fixed-line market altogether.

"I talked to one operator that said video was too scary. They were considering dropping their fixed-line business altogether and concentrating on wireless."

Such operators need help from vendors and integrators to get their strategy right. "There are a lot of hardware and software elements that need to be certified and integrated," noted Marinkovich, "and the carriers must get help from third parties as they get into video."

But it's not all doom and gloom for the video hopefuls. Marinkovich observed that the cost barriers for entry have fallen dramatically in the past few years, and that "there are a lot of entertainment dollars on the table" for the operators that can nail down a solid business plan.

And the potential to capture those revenues and win (and retain) customers has the world's operators excited about triple play, according to the results of research carried out by Heavy Reading. Clavenna noted that of more than 400 service providers surveyed about the importance of certain new services in 2004, only VOIP, cited by more than 30 percent of respondents, came out ahead of triple play, which was chosen by just fewer than 30 percent of the carriers.

Those figures varied in different regions, noted the analyst. Asian operators, which have a more mature broadband sector, cited triple play as the most important, while European operators are still mostly focused on driving further revenues from vanilla broadband access services. VOIP was considered the most important new service by nearly 40 percent of North American carriers.

— Ray Le Maistre, International Editor, Boardwatch

(7)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Abby
50%
50%
Abby,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 1:31:33 AM
re: Video Profits on Pause?
I liked to see a joint venture between a service provider and content owner take a run at this. Maybe then weGÇÖll see a business model that makes sense, since both will have a vested interest in the alliance succeed.
lr_fanny
50%
50%
lr_fanny,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 1:31:17 AM
re: Video Profits on Pause?
No not really. Time Warner already had the content. They own HBO and numerous other channels. ESPN is owned by Disney and is by far the worst. They charge an exorbitant amount to cable operators as well as forcing the operators to air losers like ESPN classic, ESPN2, etc.

This is why Comcast wanted to buy Disney.

AOL is a portal like Yahoo and a dial-up service like Earthlink. Not a supplier of video content.
eieio
50%
50%
eieio,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 1:31:17 AM
re: Video Profits on Pause?
I liked to see a joint venture between a service provider and content owner take a run at this. Maybe then weGÇÖll see a business model that makes sense, since both will have a vested interest in the alliance succeed.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Isn't that what AOL-TimeWarner is all about?
eieio
50%
50%
eieio,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 1:31:16 AM
re: Video Profits on Pause?
No not really. Time Warner already had the content. They own HBO and numerous other channels. ESPN is owned by Disney and is by far the worst. They charge an exorbitant amount to cable operators as well as forcing the operators to air losers like ESPN classic, ESPN2, etc.

This is why Comcast wanted to buy Disney.

AOL is a portal like Yahoo and a dial-up service like Earthlink. Not a supplier of video content.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Understood, the point I was trying to make is that I thought one of the reasons for the merger was because AOL thought it could supply video content to it's customers via it's marriage with Time Warner - no?
lr_fanny
50%
50%
lr_fanny,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 1:31:15 AM
re: Video Profits on Pause?
No. What AOL wanted was a stable company and they won in the long run because AOL would be dead if they had not merged with TW. AOL's pipes you must remember were 50k. Quality video that the cable pipe delivers is 4M. TWC already has the video content and the pipe.

AOL, I think, sold TW a bill of goods. The premise was more about AOL Internet access customers migrating to cable modems etc.
Abby
50%
50%
Abby,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 1:31:11 AM
re: Video Profits on Pause?
>>Isn't that what AOL-TimeWarner is all about?

AOL-TimeWarner was an acquisition, not a joint venture. In a joint venture, two or more companies form a separate company to achieve business goals. The firms typically must invest significant resources, but receive equity in return. The parent firm determines the ownership, personnel, and organizational structure of the new company.

Black's Law Dictionary defines joint venture as "a business undertaking by two or more persons engaged in a single defined project. The necessary elements are: (1) an express or implied agreement; (2) a common purpose that the group intends to carry out; (3) shared profits and losses; and (4) each member's equal voice in controlling the project."

jayja
50%
50%
jayja,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 1:30:51 AM
re: Video Profits on Pause?
The telcos are only beginning to understand the highly competitive nature of video delivery.

As well as the high rights fees charged by ESPN and the forced bundling of unwanted products like ESPN Classic and ESPN News channel, is not DirectTV unable to obtain rights to show Philadelphia's professinal sports teams' games because they are owned by Comcast?

On the other hand, forced bundling of unwanted products and services, holding desired product back from the market, monopoly pricing tactics and forcing vendors to carry unprofitable product lines in order to sell other products should be familiar territory to the telcos.
Featured Video
From The Founder
John Chambers is still as passionate about business and innovation as he ever was at Cisco, finds Steve Saunders.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
June 26, 2018, Nice, France
September 12, 2018, Los Angeles, CA
September 24-26, 2018, Westin Westminster, Denver
October 9, 2018, The Westin Times Square, New York
October 23, 2018, Georgia World Congress Centre, Atlanta, GA
November 7-8, 2018, London, United Kingdom
November 8, 2018, The Montcalm by Marble Arch, London
November 15, 2018, The Westin Times Square, New York
December 4-6, 2018, Lisbon, Portugal
All Upcoming Live Events
Hot Topics
5G & Industrial Automation: Creating the Factory of the Future
Gabriel Brown, Principal Analyst, Heavy Reading, 6/11/2018
Big Telcos Have Slashed 107K Jobs Since 2015
Iain Morris, News Editor, 6/11/2018
Comcast's Bid for Content, Growth & Whatever Comes Next
Phil Harvey, US News Editor, 6/13/2018
Ciena CTO Says No to Skynet, Advocates Adaptive Networks
Kelsey Kusterer Ziser, Editor, 6/14/2018
Animals with Phones
Live Digital Audio

A CSP's digital transformation involves so much more than technology. Crucial – and often most challenging – is the cultural transformation that goes along with it. As Sigma's Chief Technology Officer, Catherine Michel has extensive experience with technology as she leads the company's entire product portfolio and strategy. But she's also no stranger to merging technology and culture, having taken a company — Tribold — from inception to acquisition (by Sigma in 2013), and she continues to advise service providers on how to drive their own transformations. This impressive female leader and vocal advocate for other women in the industry will join Women in Comms for a live radio show to discuss all things digital transformation, including the cultural transformation that goes along with it.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed