& cplSiteName &

Video Profits on Pause?

Light Reading
Supercomm News Analysis
Light Reading
6/22/2004
50%
50%

CHICAGO – Light Reading Live – Service providers gathered in Chicago yesterday to get the lowdown on the Triple Play scene, only to be faced with a stark message: You can't afford not to do it, but once you have, don't expect to make much money from your new video service capabilities.

For the more than 160 attendees who had just been hearing about the potential offered by video in the voice/data/video combo, that message from Harmonic Inc. (Nasdaq: HLIT) broadband access networks division VP David Piehler, who has worked with telcos and cable operators, put into context the size of the challenge faced by operators sizing up the triple-play opportunities.

"You've no idea how much the MSOs have to pay content owners such as ESPN for their feeds," warned Piehler, who said that while the cable operators might drive a lot of revenue from their video and broadcast capabilities, most of that goes back out the door to the major content suppliers in license fees. "The MSOs look at VOIP as a better profit opportunity," he added.

Event moderator and chief analyst at Heavy Reading, Scott Clavenna, was stunned by Piehler's insight into the economics of the video services. Yet his message remains that carriers cannot afford not to make the leap into the video services sector, a sentiment backed by event speakers Mark Marinkovich from Allied Telesyn Inc., Geoff Burke from Calix Networks Inc., and Ralph Biesemeyer from Intel Corp. (Nasdaq: INTC).

"There is no upside to doing nothing about video," said Clavenna. "Sitting back and not moving will lead to a drop in average revenues per customer and a loss of market share. The cable companies will just come and take your customers away."

"As a service provider, you have to be offering the full range of services to the consumer market to be competitive," agreed Allied Telesyn's Marinkovich.

That message has clearly hit home with even the biggest players. As the Light Reading Live event was taking place, BellSouth Corp. (NYSE: BLS) was telling Reuters that it will begin video service trials over its DSL lines within the next year. And at the same time, a major MSO, Cablevision Systems Corp. (NYSE: CVC), was piling the pressure on Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) by cutting the price of its triple-play package to $90, the same price that Verizon charges for a voice/Internet access combo.

But while there's major pressure on carriers to develop a triple-play strategy, there are a number of hurdles to overcome in putting that package on the table, noted Clavenna. Jumping into the video services sector comes replete with business, technology, deployment, and support risks. Clavenna noted that, for some operators, the potential downsides of trying to compete in the triple-play arena were making them think about exiting the fixed-line market altogether.

"I talked to one operator that said video was too scary. They were considering dropping their fixed-line business altogether and concentrating on wireless."

Such operators need help from vendors and integrators to get their strategy right. "There are a lot of hardware and software elements that need to be certified and integrated," noted Marinkovich, "and the carriers must get help from third parties as they get into video."

But it's not all doom and gloom for the video hopefuls. Marinkovich observed that the cost barriers for entry have fallen dramatically in the past few years, and that "there are a lot of entertainment dollars on the table" for the operators that can nail down a solid business plan.

And the potential to capture those revenues and win (and retain) customers has the world's operators excited about triple play, according to the results of research carried out by Heavy Reading. Clavenna noted that of more than 400 service providers surveyed about the importance of certain new services in 2004, only VOIP, cited by more than 30 percent of respondents, came out ahead of triple play, which was chosen by just fewer than 30 percent of the carriers.

Those figures varied in different regions, noted the analyst. Asian operators, which have a more mature broadband sector, cited triple play as the most important, while European operators are still mostly focused on driving further revenues from vanilla broadband access services. VOIP was considered the most important new service by nearly 40 percent of North American carriers.

— Ray Le Maistre, International Editor, Boardwatch

(7)  | 
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View        ADD A COMMENT
Abby
50%
50%
Abby,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 1:31:33 AM
re: Video Profits on Pause?
I liked to see a joint venture between a service provider and content owner take a run at this. Maybe then weGÇÖll see a business model that makes sense, since both will have a vested interest in the alliance succeed.
lr_fanny
50%
50%
lr_fanny,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 1:31:17 AM
re: Video Profits on Pause?
No not really. Time Warner already had the content. They own HBO and numerous other channels. ESPN is owned by Disney and is by far the worst. They charge an exorbitant amount to cable operators as well as forcing the operators to air losers like ESPN classic, ESPN2, etc.

This is why Comcast wanted to buy Disney.

AOL is a portal like Yahoo and a dial-up service like Earthlink. Not a supplier of video content.
eieio
50%
50%
eieio,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 1:31:17 AM
re: Video Profits on Pause?
I liked to see a joint venture between a service provider and content owner take a run at this. Maybe then weGÇÖll see a business model that makes sense, since both will have a vested interest in the alliance succeed.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Isn't that what AOL-TimeWarner is all about?
eieio
50%
50%
eieio,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 1:31:16 AM
re: Video Profits on Pause?
No not really. Time Warner already had the content. They own HBO and numerous other channels. ESPN is owned by Disney and is by far the worst. They charge an exorbitant amount to cable operators as well as forcing the operators to air losers like ESPN classic, ESPN2, etc.

This is why Comcast wanted to buy Disney.

AOL is a portal like Yahoo and a dial-up service like Earthlink. Not a supplier of video content.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Understood, the point I was trying to make is that I thought one of the reasons for the merger was because AOL thought it could supply video content to it's customers via it's marriage with Time Warner - no?
lr_fanny
50%
50%
lr_fanny,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 1:31:15 AM
re: Video Profits on Pause?
No. What AOL wanted was a stable company and they won in the long run because AOL would be dead if they had not merged with TW. AOL's pipes you must remember were 50k. Quality video that the cable pipe delivers is 4M. TWC already has the video content and the pipe.

AOL, I think, sold TW a bill of goods. The premise was more about AOL Internet access customers migrating to cable modems etc.
Abby
50%
50%
Abby,
User Rank: Light Beer
12/5/2012 | 1:31:11 AM
re: Video Profits on Pause?
>>Isn't that what AOL-TimeWarner is all about?

AOL-TimeWarner was an acquisition, not a joint venture. In a joint venture, two or more companies form a separate company to achieve business goals. The firms typically must invest significant resources, but receive equity in return. The parent firm determines the ownership, personnel, and organizational structure of the new company.

Black's Law Dictionary defines joint venture as "a business undertaking by two or more persons engaged in a single defined project. The necessary elements are: (1) an express or implied agreement; (2) a common purpose that the group intends to carry out; (3) shared profits and losses; and (4) each member's equal voice in controlling the project."

jayja
50%
50%
jayja,
User Rank: Light Sabre
12/5/2012 | 1:30:51 AM
re: Video Profits on Pause?
The telcos are only beginning to understand the highly competitive nature of video delivery.

As well as the high rights fees charged by ESPN and the forced bundling of unwanted products like ESPN Classic and ESPN News channel, is not DirectTV unable to obtain rights to show Philadelphia's professinal sports teams' games because they are owned by Comcast?

On the other hand, forced bundling of unwanted products and services, holding desired product back from the market, monopoly pricing tactics and forcing vendors to carry unprofitable product lines in order to sell other products should be familiar territory to the telcos.
Featured Video
From The Founder
The 'gleaming city on a hill,' Steve Saunders calls it. But who is going to take us from today's NFV componentry to the grand future of a self-driving network? Here's a look at the vendors hoping to make it happen.
Flash Poll
Upcoming Live Events
September 28, 2017, Denver, CO
October 18, 2017, Colorado Convention Center - Denver, CO
November 1, 2017, The Royal Garden Hotel
November 1, 2017, The Montcalm Marble Arch
November 2, 2017, 8 Northumberland Avenue, London, UK
November 2, 2017, 8 Northumberland Avenue – London
November 10, 2017, The Westin Times Square, New York, NY
November 30, 2017, The Westin Times Square
All Upcoming Live Events
Infographics
With the mobile ecosystem becoming increasingly vulnerable to security threats, AdaptiveMobile has laid out some of the key considerations for the wireless community.
Hot Topics
Could 5G Have Found Its Glass Ceiling?
Dan Jones, Mobile Editor, 9/20/2017
Why Amazon May Be Cable's Biggest Threat
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 9/22/2017
1 Million Pirate Set-Top Boxes Sold in the UK
Aditya Kishore, Practice Leader, Video Transformation, Telco Transformation, 9/20/2017
Can Fixed Wireless Fix Rural Broadband?
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 9/25/2017
Comcast Shuts Down OTT Again
Mari Silbey, Senior Editor, Cable/Video, 9/19/2017
Animals with Phones
Live Digital Audio

Understanding the full experience of women in technology requires starting at the collegiate level (or sooner) and studying the technologies women are involved with, company cultures they're part of and personal experiences of individuals.

During this WiC radio show, we will talk with Nicole Engelbert, the director of Research & Analysis for Ovum Technology and a 23-year telecom industry veteran, about her experiences and perspectives on women in tech. Engelbert covers infrastructure, applications and industries for Ovum, but she is also involved in the research firm's higher education team and has helped colleges and universities globally leverage technology as a strategy for improving recruitment, retention and graduation performance.

She will share her unique insight into the collegiate level, where women pursuing engineering and STEM-related degrees is dwindling. Engelbert will also reveal new, original Ovum research on the topics of artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, security and augmented reality, as well as discuss what each of those technologies might mean for women in our field. As always, we'll also leave plenty of time to answer all your questions live on the air and chat board.

Like Us on Facebook
Twitter Feed