8:40 AM For some M2M apps, using the 4G network could be a matter of life or death

Sarah Thomas, Director, Women in Comms

July 9, 2010

2 Min Read
Mission-Critical M2M

8:40 AM -- Most machine-to-machine (M2M) apps in use today only require a 2G or 2.5G network, but the move to 4G is not without merit. It is video, the same culprit taxing 3G networks, that is driving the need for M2M that actually requires 4G speeds. (See WiMax Finds Short-Term Niche in 4G M2M, M2M: Where WiMax Meets Lindsay Lohan, and Does 4G Have a Role in M2M?)

According to Angela Singhal-Whiteford, solutions manager, service provider mobility, at Cisco Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: CSCO), if an app requires prioritization, it requires 4G. For example, first responders need to ensure that their often life-or-death messages are given precedence over other network traffic.

Other situations that require heavy bandwidth and low latency, such as video surveillance in a police cruiser, real-time video monitoring, and secure banking where an upsell might occur at the point-of-sale, are well suited for 4G, she says.

“If it’s a pretty dumb cheap device like a smart meter, it’s all about cost. There’s no way they’re looking at a 4G link. It depends on the device and the criticalness [sic] of information.”

Certain apps, like surveillance, might also include the option to upgrade the video stream to HD, adds Cisco solutions manager Brian Walsh. HD may be required by law in order for evidence to be admissible in court, for example, or the technology may be combined with face-recognition software. In this case, 4G -- or multiple network access -- would be in order.

Another interesting example of a 2.5G app that may need 3G or 4G capabilities is digital signage. For feeding video downstream, 2G is sufficient, but if a user shows interest, companies are interested in switching to a video conferencing link to connect the user with a sales person. The upstream speeds here can’t be supported over 2G.

In this case, chipsets that support 2.5G and 3G or 4G might make sense, but Heavy Reading research analyst Tim Kridel says they are significantly more expensive and complex.

“You could build whatever you needed into a wireless chipset,” Kridel says. “If you needed everything from GSM to LTE with some WiMax thrown in, and you’re willing to pay for someone to build it if it’s not available off the shelf, you can have that. It will be a significant cost for the chip and the airtime.”

— Sarah Reedy, Senior Reporter, Light Reading Mobile

About the Author(s)

Sarah Thomas

Director, Women in Comms

Sarah Thomas's love affair with communications began in 2003 when she bought her first cellphone, a pink RAZR, which she duly "bedazzled" with the help of superglue and her dad.

She joined the editorial staff at Light Reading in 2010 and has been covering mobile technologies ever since. Sarah got her start covering telecom in 2007 at Telephony, later Connected Planet, may it rest in peace. Her non-telecom work experience includes a brief foray into public relations at Fleishman-Hillard (her cussin' upset the clients) and a hodge-podge of internships, including spells at Ingram's (Kansas City's business magazine), American Spa magazine (where she was Chief Hot-Tub Correspondent), and the tweens' quiz bible, QuizFest, in NYC.

As Editorial Operations Director, a role she took on in January 2015, Sarah is responsible for the day-to-day management of the non-news content elements on Light Reading.

Sarah received her Bachelor's in Journalism from the University of Missouri-Columbia. She lives in Chicago with her 3DTV, her iPad and a drawer full of smartphone cords.

Away from the world of telecom journalism, Sarah likes to dabble in monster truck racing, becoming part of Team Bigfoot in 2009.

Subscribe and receive the latest news from the industry.
Join 62,000+ members. Yes it's completely free.

You May Also Like